Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• HRR Strafrecht

  Art. 6 Abs. 2 EMRK; Art. 8 EMRK
  Unschuldsvermutung: Schutz vor (Kosten-)Entscheidungen, welche den Angeklagten formal oder materiell ohne vorherigen gesetzlichen Schuldbeweis und ohne die Möglichkeit zur Ausübung der Verteidigungsrechte für schuldig erklären (Abgrenzung von -missverständlicher / ...

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  BAARS v. NETHERLANDS

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 2, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-2 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses (domestic proceedings) - claim dismissed Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 26.11.2002 - 44320/98
• EGMR, 28.10.2003 - 44320/98

Wird zitiert von ... (7)Zitiert selbst (3)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 25.03.1983 - 8660/79

  Minelli ./. Schweiz

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.10.2003 - 44320/98

  Rn. 29 26. In the Minelli v. Switzerland judgment of 25 March 1983 (Series A no. 62, p. 18, § 37), the applicable principle was stated as follows:.
• EKMR, 18.05.1995 - 25513/94

  KANDEL v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.10.2003 - 44320/98

  They were in any case similar to those in other cases decided by the Convention organs, which had resulted in decisions of inadmissibility ( Kandel v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 25513/94, 18 May 1995, and Hibbert v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 38087/97, 26 January 1999).
• EGMR, 26.01.1999 - 38087/97

  HIBBERT v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.10.2003 - 44320/98

  They were in any case similar to those in other cases decided by the Convention organs, which had resulted in decisions of inadmissibility ( Kandel v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 25513/94, 18 May 1995, and Hibbert v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 38087/97, 26 January 1999).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 28.06.2018 - 1828/06

  [FRE]

  Moreover, guilt cannot be legally established where the proceedings have been closed by a court before the gathering of evidence or the conducting of hearings that would have allowed the court to determine the case on its merits (see Baars v. the Netherlands, no. 44320/98, §§ 25-32, 28 October 2003, and Paraponiaris, cited above, §§ 30-33).
• EGMR, 11.06.2024 - 32483/19

  NEALON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM and 1 other application

  (b) a former accused's request for compensation for detention on remand or other inconvenience caused by the criminal proceedings (see Englert, cited above, § 35; Nölkenbockhoff v. Germany, 25 August 1987, § 35, Series A no. 123; Sekanina, cited above, § 22; Rushiti, cited above, § 27; Mulaj and Sallahi v. Austria (dec.), no. 48886/99, 27 June 2002; O. v. Norway, no. 29327/95, §§ 33-38, ECHR 2003-II; Hammern, cited above, §§ 41-46; Baars v. the Netherlands, no. 44320/98, § 21, 28 October 2003; Capeau v. Belgium (dec.), no. 42914/98, 6 April 2004; Del Latte v. the Netherlands, no. 44760/98, § 30, 9 November 2004; A.L. v. Germany, no. 72758/01, §§ 31-33, 28 April 2005; Puig Panella, cited above, § 50; Tendam, cited above, §§ 31 and 36; Bok v. the Netherlands, no. 45482/06, §§ 37-48, 18 January 2011; and Lorenzetti v. Italy, no. 32075/09, § 43, 10 April 2012);.
• EGMR, 25.02.2025 - 34916/16

  GOMES COSTA v. PORTUGAL

  Il se réfère à cet égard aux arrêts de la Cour Sekanina c. Autriche (25 août 1993, série A no 266-A), Capeau c. Belgique (no 42914/98, CEDH 2005-I), Baars c. Pays-Bas (no 44320/98, 28 octobre 2003), et Puig Panella c. Espagne (no 1483/02, 25 avril 2006).

  La Cour estime, par ailleurs, que le langage employé par les juridictions internes ne reflète pas le sentiment que le requérant était coupable de l'infraction en cause et que l'issue de la procédure pénale aurait dû être différente (comparer avec Lorenzetti, précité, § 47, et Ilias Papageorgiou, précité, § 55 ; voir également, a contrario, Baars c. Pays-Bas, no 44320/98, §§ 29-31, 28 octobre 2003, Del Latte, précité, §§ 32-33, Farzaliyev c. Azerbaïdjan, no 29620/07, §§ 66-67, 28 mai 2020, et Pasquini c. Saint-Marin (no 2), no 23349/17, § 64, 20 octobre 2020).

• EGMR, 28.04.2005 - 72758/01

  Unschuldsvermutung (Entschädigungsansprüche; konkludente Schuldfeststellung bei …

  Er befand, dass nur die zweite Kategorie mit Artikel 6 Abs. 2 der Konvention unvereinbar ist (Individualbeschwerde Nr. 44320/98 vom 28. Oktober 2003, Nrn. 25-32 mit weiteren Verweisen, siehe auch Rechtssache Del Latte , a. a. O., Nr. 31).
• EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 33468/03

  Verletzung der Unschuldsvermutung eines Verstorbenen durch gerichtliche …

  The Court underlines that there can be no justification for a court of law to make a premature pronouncement of this kind (see the above-cited case-law, and also Ka?mierczak v. Poland, no. 4317/04, § 54, 10 March 2009; Wojciechowski v. Poland, no. 5422/04, § 54, 9 December 2008; Del Latte v. the Netherlands, no. 44760/98, § 31, 9 November 2004; and, as regards subsequent civil proceedings, Y. v. Norway, no. 56568/00, § 46, ECHR 2003"II (extracts), and Baars v. the Netherlands, no. 44320/98, § 63, 28 October 2003).
• EGMR, 18.01.2011 - 45482/06

  [ENG]

  However, the Court has been led to find violations of Article 6 § 2 in that the reasons given for refusing monetary compensation following the termination of criminal proceedings reflected an opinion that the accused was guilty of a crime, notwithstanding the absence of any actual conviction (see, as examples concerning the same respondent Party, Baars v. the Netherlands, no. 44320/98, § 31, 28 October 2003, and Del Latte v. the Netherlands, no. 44760/98, § 33, 9 November 2004; as examples of similar findings against a different respondent Party, see Hammern v. Norway, no. 30287/96, § 47, 11 February 2003, and O. v. Norway, no. 29327/95, § 39, ECHR 2003-II).
• EGMR, 15.05.2012 - 13043/05

  CAPETTI AND MAIMUT v. ROMANIA

  Ainsi, la Cour a déjà conclu qu'il ne peut être question d'un établissement légal de la culpabilité si la procédure a été clôturée par les tribunaux avant l'administration de preuves ou la tenue des débats qui leur aient permis de statuer sur le fond de l'affaire (voir Baars c. Pays-Bas, no 44320/98, §§ 25-32, 28 octobre 2003 ; Paraponiaris c. Grèce, no 42132/06, § 30-33, 25 septembre 2008).