Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  TONIOLO v. SAN MARINO AND ITALY

  Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. f, Art. 35 MRK
  Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention Procedure prescribed by law Article 5-1-f - Extradition) ...

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 26.06.2012 - 44853/10
• EGMR, 10.12.2014 - 44853/10

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Zitiert selbst (13)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 21.11.2000 - 53652/00

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.06.2012 - 44853/10

  The Court reiterates that extradition proceedings do not concern a dispute ("contestation") over an applicant's civil rights and obligations (see, inter alia, RAF v. Spain (partial dec.), no. 53652/00, ECHR 2000-XI; and A.B. v. Poland (dec.), no. 33878/96, 18 October 2001).
• EGMR, 29.06.2006 - 54934/00

  Menschenrechte: Verletzung der Privatsphäre und des Briefgeheimnisses durch das …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.06.2012 - 44853/10

  The Court reiterates that on the question whether detention is "lawful", including whether it complies with "a procedure prescribed by law" within the meaning of Article 5 § 1, the Convention refers back essentially to national law, including rules of public international law applicable in the State concerned (see, mutatis mutandis, Groppera Radio AG and Others v. Switzerland, 28 March 1990, Series A no. 173, § 68; Öcalan v. Turkey [GC], no. 46221/99, §§ 83, 90, ECHR 2005-IV; and Weber and Saravia v. Germany (dec.), no. 54934/00, § 87, 29 June 2006).
• EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94

  Einstufung des in französischer Haft zugefügten Übels als Folter - Verpflichtung …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.06.2012 - 44853/10

  The purpose of Article 35 § 1 is to afford the Contracting States the opportunity of preventing or putting right the violations alleged against them before those allegations are submitted to the Court (see, inter alia, Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 74, ECHR 1999-V).

• EGMR, 28.03.1990 - 10890/84

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.06.2012 - 44853/10

  The Court reiterates that on the question whether detention is "lawful", including whether it complies with "a procedure prescribed by law" within the meaning of Article 5 § 1, the Convention refers back essentially to national law, including rules of public international law applicable in the State concerned (see, mutatis mutandis, Groppera Radio AG and Others v. Switzerland, 28 March 1990, Series A no. 173, § 68; Öcalan v. Turkey [GC], no. 46221/99, §§ 83, 90, ECHR 2005-IV; and Weber and Saravia v. Germany (dec.), no. 54934/00, § 87, 29 June 2006).
• EGMR, 18.12.1986 - 9990/82

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.06.2012 - 44853/10

  However, since under Article 5 § 1 failure to comply with domestic law entails a breach of the Convention, it follows that the Court can and should exercise a certain power to review whether this law has been complied with (see Bozano v. France, 18 December 1986, Series A no. 111, § 58; and Öcalan, cited above, § 84).
• EGMR, 28.03.2000 - 28358/95

  BARANOWSKI v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.06.2012 - 44853/10

  "Quality of law" in this sense implies that where a national law authorises deprivation of liberty it must be sufficiently accessible, precise and foreseeable in its application, in order to avoid all risk of arbitrariness (see Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, § 125, ECHR 2005-X (extracts); Jecius v. Lithuania, no. 34578/97, § 56, ECHR 2000-IX; Baranowski v. Poland, no. 28358/95, §§ 50-52, ECHR 2000-III; and Amuur, cited above).
• EGMR, 31.07.2000 - 34578/97

  JECIUS v. LITHUANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.06.2012 - 44853/10

  "Quality of law" in this sense implies that where a national law authorises deprivation of liberty it must be sufficiently accessible, precise and foreseeable in its application, in order to avoid all risk of arbitrariness (see Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, § 125, ECHR 2005-X (extracts); Jecius v. Lithuania, no. 34578/97, § 56, ECHR 2000-IX; Baranowski v. Poland, no. 28358/95, §§ 50-52, ECHR 2000-III; and Amuur, cited above).
• EGMR, 06.03.2001 - 40907/98

  Griechenland, Ausweisung, Abschiebung, Abschiebungshaft, Haftbedingungen, …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.06.2012 - 44853/10

  The Court will consider whether this requirement was met, with particular reference to the safeguards provided by the national system (see Dougoz v. Greece, no. 40907/98, § 54, ECHR 2001-II).
• EGMR, 08.11.2005 - 6847/02

  KHOUDOÏOROV c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.06.2012 - 44853/10

  "Quality of law" in this sense implies that where a national law authorises deprivation of liberty it must be sufficiently accessible, precise and foreseeable in its application, in order to avoid all risk of arbitrariness (see Khudoyorov v. Russia, no. 6847/02, § 125, ECHR 2005-X (extracts); Jecius v. Lithuania, no. 34578/97, § 56, ECHR 2000-IX; Baranowski v. Poland, no. 28358/95, §§ 50-52, ECHR 2000-III; and Amuur, cited above).
• EGMR, 22.05.2012 - 19/11

  LANG v. THE UNITED KINGDOM AND HASTIE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 26.06.2012 - 44853/10

  19/11/2012.
• EGMR, 17.12.2002 - 21287/02

  PRYSTAVSKA contre l'UKRAINE
• EGMR, 04.05.1999 - 41974/98

  KUCHERENKO contre l'UKRAINE
• EGMR, 21.09.2010 - 38478/06

  BARC COMPANY LIMITED v. MALTA

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 06.07.2015 - C-237/15

  Lanigan - Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung - Eilvorabentscheidungsverfahren - …

  Vgl. insoweit EGMR, Soldatenko/Ukraine, 23. Oktober 2008, Nr. 2440/07, § 112, sowie Toniolo/San Marino und Italien, 26. Juni 2012, Nr. 44853/10, § 46.

  {FN:65} - EKMR, X./Vereinigtes Königreich, 21. Mai 1976, Nr. 6565/74, D. R. 5, S. 55 f., EGMR, Medvedyev u. a./Frankreich, Nr. 3394/03, EGMR 2010, § 79, sowie Toniolo/San Marino und Italien, 26. Juni 2012, Nr. 44853/10, § 44.

• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 27.10.2016 - C-640/15

  Vilkas - Europäischer Haftbefehl - Fristen für die Übergabe der gesuchten Person …

  {FN:23} - Urteil des EGMR vom 26. Juni 2012, Toniolo/San Marino und Italien (CE:ECHR:2012:0626JUD004485310, Rn. 44).

  {FN:27} - Urteile des EGMR vom 23. Oktober 2008, Soldatenko/Ukraine (…CE:ECHR:2008:1023JUD000244007, Rn. 112), und vom 26. Juni 2012, Toniolo/San Marino und Italien (CE:ECHR:2012:0626JUD004485310, Rn. 46 bis 50).