Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KAR AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 10 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 Violation f Art. 10 (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (5)Zitiert selbst (9)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 31.01.2006 - 58709/00

  YAZAR v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2007 - 58756/00

  [1] The playwright also lodged an application with the Court (Mehmet Vahi Yazar v. Turkey, no. 58709/00, 31 January 2006), and this was joined to the present application.
• EGMR, 07.12.1976 - 5493/72

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2007 - 58756/00

  The Court reiterates the basic principles laid down in its judgments concerning Article 10 (see, in particular, Müller and Others v. Switzerland judgment of 24 May 1988, Series A no. 133, § 27; Handyside v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 7 December 1976, Series A no. 24, § 49; Baskaya and OkçuoÄŸlu v. Turkey, nos. 23536/94 and 24408/94, § 66, ECHR 1999-IV; Karatas v. Turkey [GC], no. 23168/94, §§ 49-50, ECHR 1999-IV, and Fressoz and Roire [GC], cited above,).
• EGMR, 24.05.1988 - 10737/84

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2007 - 58756/00

  The Court reiterates the basic principles laid down in its judgments concerning Article 10 (see, in particular, Müller and Others v. Switzerland judgment of 24 May 1988, Series A no. 133, § 27; Handyside v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 7 December 1976, Series A no. 24, § 49; Baskaya and OkçuoÄŸlu v. Turkey, nos. 23536/94 and 24408/94, § 66, ECHR 1999-IV; Karatas v. Turkey [GC], no. 23168/94, §§ 49-50, ECHR 1999-IV, and Fressoz and Roire [GC], cited above,).

• EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 29183/95

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2007 - 58756/00

  In the light of the above, the Court concludes that the applicants" complaint under Article 10 of the Convention was thus brought, at least in substance, to the attention of the domestic courts (see, mutatis mutandis, Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183/95, §§ 36-39, ECHR 1999-I).
• EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23536/94

  Strafrechtliche Verfolgung auf Grund der Veröffentlichung eines Buches mit …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2007 - 58756/00

  The Court reiterates the basic principles laid down in its judgments concerning Article 10 (see, in particular, Müller and Others v. Switzerland judgment of 24 May 1988, Series A no. 133, § 27; Handyside v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 7 December 1976, Series A no. 24, § 49; Baskaya and OkçuoÄŸlu v. Turkey, nos. 23536/94 and 24408/94, § 66, ECHR 1999-IV; Karatas v. Turkey [GC], no. 23168/94, §§ 49-50, ECHR 1999-IV, and Fressoz and Roire [GC], cited above,).
• EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23168/94

  KARATAS c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2007 - 58756/00

  The Court reiterates the basic principles laid down in its judgments concerning Article 10 (see, in particular, Müller and Others v. Switzerland judgment of 24 May 1988, Series A no. 133, § 27; Handyside v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 7 December 1976, Series A no. 24, § 49; Baskaya and OkçuoÄŸlu v. Turkey, nos. 23536/94 and 24408/94, § 66, ECHR 1999-IV; Karatas v. Turkey [GC], no. 23168/94, §§ 49-50, ECHR 1999-IV, and Fressoz and Roire [GC], cited above,).
• EGMR, 04.05.2006 - 34520/97

  ALINAK ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2007 - 58756/00

  Making its own estimate based on the information available, and having regard to the awards made in similar cases (see, in particular, Mehdi Zana v. Turkey (no. 2), no. 26982/95, § 54, 6 April 2004, and Alınak v. Turkey, no. 34520/97, § 51, 4 May 2006), the Court awards the applicants jointly the sum of EUR 4, 000, covering costs under all heads.
• EGMR, 16.01.2007 - 65897/01

  AKGÜL v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2007 - 58756/00

  The Court has examined a large number of cases raising issues similar to those arising in the present case and found a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see, in particular, Incal, cited above, §§ 61-73; see also, more recently, Akgül v. Turkey, no. 65897/01, § 25, 16 January 2007).
• EGMR, 06.04.2004 - 26982/95

  MEHDI ZANA c. TURQUIE (N° 2)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 03.05.2007 - 58756/00

  Making its own estimate based on the information available, and having regard to the awards made in similar cases (see, in particular, Mehdi Zana v. Turkey (no. 2), no. 26982/95, § 54, 6 April 2004, and Alınak v. Turkey, no. 34520/97, § 51, 4 May 2006), the Court awards the applicants jointly the sum of EUR 4, 000, covering costs under all heads.

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 31.01.2006 - 58709/00

  YAZAR v. TURKEY

  58709/00 and 58756/00 by Mehmet Vahi YAZAR and Nazmi KAR and Others against Turkey.

  As regards the applicants Nazmi Kar, Zekeriya Özen, Fuat Basarılı and Osman Yavuz (application no. 58756/00).

  Decides to adjourn the examination of the complaints introduced by Nazmi Kar, Zekeriya Özen, Fuat Basarılı and Osman Yavuz (application no. 58756/00) concerning their right to a fair hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal and the interference with their right to freedom of expression;.

• EGMR, 20.09.2018 - 22678/93

  INCAL CONTRE LA TURQUIE ET 1 AUTRE AFFAIRE

  - the lack of independence and impartiality of the State Security Courts (violations of Article 6) in the cases of Incal (22678/93), Aydın Abdullah (42435/98), Ayhan No. 1 (45585/99), Bakır (54916/00), Baran (48988/99), Birdal (53047/99), Birdal Akın (47520/99), Ceylan No. 2 (46454/99), Dicle (34685/97), Erbakan (59405/00), Ahmet Ergin No. 1 (48944/99), Ahmet Ergin No. 2 (49566/99), Ahmet Ergin No. 3 (50691/99), Ahmet Ergin No. 4 (63733/99), Ahmet Ergin No. 5 (63925/99), Ergin and Keskin No. 1 (50273/99), Ergin and Keskin No. 2 (63926/00), Ali Erol No. 2 (47796/99), Gümüş and Others (40303/98), Halis (30007/96), Haydar Yıldırım and Others (42920/98), Kalın (31236/96), Kar and Others (58756/00), Seher Karataş (33179/96), Karkın (43928/98), Haydar Kaya (48387/98), Korkmaz No. 1 (40987/98), Korkmaz No. 2 (42589/98), Korkmaz No. 3 (42590/98), Odabaşı (41618/98), Özkaya (42119/98), Pamak (39708/98), Şahin Fikret (42605/98), Sürek and Özdemir (23927/94), Sürek No. 2 (24122/94), Varlı and Others (57299/00), Yarar (57285/00), Yüksel (56362/00) (this issue was examined under the Gençel and Çıraklar groups of cases (see Final Resolutions CM/ResDH(2013)256 and ResDH(99)555));.

  58756/00.

• EGMR, 19.01.2016 - 17526/10

  GÜLCÜ v. TURKEY

  The Court further reiterates that the nature and severity of the penalties imposed are also factors to be taken into account when assessing the proportionality of the interference (see, mutatis mutandis, Başkaya and Okçuoğlu v. Turkey [GC], nos. 23536/94 and 24408/94, § 66, ECHR 1999-IV; Kar and Others v. Turkey, no. 58756/00, § 48, 3 May 2007; and Murat Vural v. Turkey, no. 9540/07, § 64, 21 October 2014).
• EGMR, 15.06.2021 - 2006/13

  EKSIOGLU v. TURKEY and 1 other application

  Having regard to its finding that the Arbitration Committee did not satisfy the requirements of independence and impartiality under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, it considers that the applicants' complaints about the fairness of the proceedings before the Arbitration Committee, including the right of access to a court, and their right to respect for presumption of innocence do not need to be examined separately (see, Ali Rıza and Others, cited above, § 226 and, mutatis mutandis, Kar and Others v. Turkey, no. 58756/00, §§ 27 and 32, 3 May 2007).
• EGMR, 02.10.2007 - 53047/99

  BIRDAL v. TURKEY

  In the light of the above, the Court concludes that the applicant's complaint under Article 10 of the Convention was thus brought, at least in substance, to the attention of the domestic courts (see, mutatis mutandis, Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183/95, §§ 36-39, ECHR 1999-I and Kar and Others v. Turkey, no. 58756/00, §§ 35-38, 3 May 2007).