Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  LYNCH AND WHELAN v. IRELAND

  Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 35 MRK
  Partly inadmissible (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 18.06.2013 - 70495/10, 74565/10
• EGMR, 08.07.2014 - 70495/10
• EGMR - 70495/10 (anhängig)

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Zitiert selbst (6)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 12.02.2008 - 21906/04

  KAFKARIS c. CHYPRE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.06.2013 - 70495/10

  The Supreme Court considered the life sentence at issue in Kafkaris v. Cyprus ([GC], no. 21906/04, ECHR 2008) to be similar to that at issue in the present case.

  The second applicant notes that the Court accepted in Kafkaris v. Cyprus ([GC], no. 21906/04, ECHR 2008) that a punitive but reducible life sentence could be compatible with Article 3 of the Convention.

• EGMR, 10.04.2012 - 24027/07

  Briten dürfen Hassprediger an USA ausliefern

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.06.2013 - 70495/10

  It considers that the nature of the life sentences at issue in the present and the Kafkaris cases are similar: indeed the evidence of regular review and of early release of life prisoners in Ireland indicates that the present applicants have a greater likelihood of being released than had Mr Kafkaris and, indeed, than had the applicants in Babar Ahmad and Others v. the United Kingdom (nos. 24027/07, 11949/08, 36742/08, 66911/09 and 67354/09, § 242, 10 April 2012).
• EGMR, 27.04.1988 - 9659/82

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.06.2013 - 70495/10

  There being no "arguable claim" of a violation of Article 3, the second applicant's associated complaint under Article 13 is equally manifestly ill-founded (Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 27 April 1988, Series A no. 131, p. 23, § 52).

• EGMR, 31.05.2005 - 25165/94

  AKDENIZ v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.06.2013 - 70495/10

  It being the "master of the characterisation" to be given in law to the facts before it (Akdeniz v. Turkey, no. 25165/94, § 88, 31 May 2005), the Court considers that the facts invoked by the applicants fall to be examined under Articles 5 §§ 1 and 4 and 6 § 1 of the Convention.
• EGMR, 02.09.2010 - 36295/02

  IORGOV v. BULGARIA (no. 2)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.06.2013 - 70495/10

  It recalls, in this respect, that comparatively severer sentences had been found not to violate Article 3 (for example, Iorgov v. Bulgaria (no. 2), no. 36295/02, 2 September 2010; and Törköly v. Turkey, (dec.), no. 4413/06, 5 April 2011).
• EGMR, 05.04.2011 - 4413/06

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 18.06.2013 - 70495/10

  It recalls, in this respect, that comparatively severer sentences had been found not to violate Article 3 (for example, Iorgov v. Bulgaria (no. 2), no. 36295/02, 2 September 2010; and Törköly v. Turkey, (dec.), no. 4413/06, 5 April 2011).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen