Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 10.09.2002 - 76574/01 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ALLEN c. ROYAUME-UNI
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Art. 5 MRK
Irrecevable (französisch) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
ALLEN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Art. 5 MRK
Inadmissible (englisch)
Wird zitiert von ... (15) Zitiert selbst (3)
- EGMR, 25.02.1993 - 10828/84
FUNKE v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.09.2002 - 76574/01
En prononçant l'arrêt, Lord Hutton prit note des arguments du requérant au titre de la Convention, tirés en particulier des affaires Funke c. France (arrêt du 25 février 1993, série A no 256-A) et Saunders c. Royaume-Uni (arrêt du 17 décembre 1996, Recueil des arrêts et décisions 1996-VI) et selon lesquels la manière dont l'accusation avait recueilli des preuves à l'encontre de l'intéressé portait atteinte à son droit à un procès équitable puisqu'il avait été contraint, sous peine de sanction, de s'incriminer lui-même en fournissant la liste de ses biens, et estima ce qui suit:. - EGMR, 03.05.2001 - 31827/96
Verstoß gegen die Grundsätze des fairen Verfahrens wegen des Zwangs der Vorlegung …
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.09.2002 - 76574/01
Il n'a pas non plus été poursuivi pour ne pas avoir donné d'informations pouvant contribuer à sa propre incrimination dans une affaire pénale en cours ou escomptée, comme dans les affaires Funke (arrêt précité), Heaney et McGuinness c. Irlande (no 34720/97, CEDH 2000-XII), et J.B. c. Suisse (no 31827/96, CEDH 2001-III). - EGMR, 21.12.2000 - 34720/97
HEANEY ET McGUINNESS c. IRLANDE
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.09.2002 - 76574/01
Il n'a pas non plus été poursuivi pour ne pas avoir donné d'informations pouvant contribuer à sa propre incrimination dans une affaire pénale en cours ou escomptée, comme dans les affaires Funke (arrêt précité), Heaney et McGuinness c. Irlande (no 34720/97, CEDH 2000-XII), et J.B. c. Suisse (no 31827/96, CEDH 2001-III).
- EGMR, 29.06.2007 - 15809/02
Recht auf ein faires Verfahren und Selbstbelastungsfreiheit (Kriterien für eine …
The question of the use of the statements in criminal proceedings did not arise, as his refusal to make a statement was not used as evidence: it constituted the offence itself (see Allen v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 76574/01, ECHR 2002-VIII).The Court noted that there were no pending or anticipated criminal proceedings against the applicant and the fact that he may have lied in order to prevent the revenue authorities from uncovering conduct which might possibly lead to a prosecution did not suffice to bring the privilege against self-incrimination into play (see Allen v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 76574/01, ECHR 2002-VIII).
- EGMR, 08.04.2004 - 38544/97
Recht auf ein faires Strafverfahren: Schweigerecht und Selbstbelastungsfreiheit …
The Court noted that there were no pending or anticipated criminal proceedings against the applicant and the fact that he may have lied in order to prevent the revenue authorities from uncovering conduct which might possibly lead to a prosecution did not suffice to bring the privilege against self-incrimination into play (see Allen v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 76574/01, ECHR 2002-VIII). - EGMR, 05.04.2012 - 11663/04
Steuerparadies, nur nicht für Schweizer
Le Gouvernement affirme, en se référant à l'affaire Allen c. Royaume-Uni, que l'obligation de fournir des informations au cours d'une procédure en rappel d'impôt ne saurait violer l'interdiction de contribuer à sa propre incrimination en l'absence de procédure pénale prévisible (décision du 10 septembre 2002, no 76574/01, CEDH 2002-VIII).
- EGMR, 21.04.2009 - 19235/03
MARTTINEN v. FINLAND
The mere fact that the applicant failed to arrive at the Bailiff's office, thus not replying to any possible questions - whether or not allegedly having any relevance to the present examination - motivated the administrative fine (see Allen v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 76574/01, ECHR 2002-VIII). - EGMR, 04.10.2022 - 58342/15
DE LEGÉ v. THE NETHERLANDS
Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) does not preclude this (see [Allen v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 76574/01, 10 September 2002] and [Marttinen v. Finland, no. 19235/03, § 68, 21 April 2009]).In Allen v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 76574/01, ECHR 2002-VIII, the Court held that the requirement on the applicant to make a declaration of his assets to the revenue service did not disclose any issue under Article 6 even though a separate penalty was attached to a failure to do so.
- EGMR, 18.02.2010 - 39660/02
Recht auf konkreten und wirksamen Verteidigerbeistand bei der ersten Vernehmung …
Rn. 77 43. Applying these principles to the facts of the case, the Court notes that the trial court's use made of the admissions made on 21 February 2001, which led to the institution of criminal proceedings against the applicant and then served for convicting him of theft, is at the heart of the applicant's complaints under Article 6 of the Convention (compare Saunders, cited above, §§ 67 and 74; and Allen v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 76574/01, 10 September 2002). - EGMR, 04.10.2005 - 6563/03
Schweigerecht und Selbstbelastungsfreiheit (Grundsätze des Schutzes gemäß Art. 6 …
The Court noted that there were no pending or anticipated criminal proceedings against the applicant and the fact that he may have lied in order to prevent the revenue authorities from uncovering conduct which might possibly lead to a prosecution did not suffice to bring the privilege against self-incrimination into play (see Allen v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 76574/01, ECHR 2002-VIII). - EGMR, 15.09.2020 - 10487/16
SAVIC v. AUSTRIA
The fact that he may have lied in order to prevent the revenue authorities from uncovering conduct which might possibly lead to a prosecution did not suffice to bring the privilege against self-incrimination into play (see Allen v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 76574/01, § 1, ECHR 2002-VIII). - EGMR, 16.06.2015 - 784/14
VAN WEERELT v. THE NETHERLANDS
Indeed, the obligation to make disclosure of income and capital for the purposes of the calculation and assessment of tax is a common feature of the tax systems of member states and it would be difficult to envisage them functioning effectively without it (see Allen v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 76574/01, 10 September 2002, and King v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 13881/02, 8 April 2003). - EGMR, 23.03.2006 - 38258/03
VAN VONDEL v. THE NETHERLANDS
The right in question does not per se prohibit the use of compulsory powers to require persons to provide information about, for instance, their financial assets even though a penalty may be attached to a failure to do so (see Allen v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 76574/01, ECHR 2002-VIII) or, in the context of the present case, compulsory powers to require persons to provide information to a parliamentary commission of inquiry, as it would be difficult to envisage such a commission functioning effectively without such powers. - EGMR, 08.12.2015 - 56936/13
EKLUND v. FINLAND
- EGMR, 16.03.2010 - 37670/04
[ENG]
- EGMR, 18.03.2004 - 58452/00
LUCKHOF and SPANNER v. AUSTRIA
- EGMR, 18.03.2004 - 63207/00
RIEG v. AUSTRIA
- EGMR, 08.04.2003 - 13881/02
KING v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen. Falls Sie noch kein Benutzerkonto haben, können Sie sich in weniger als einer Minute eines kostenlos anlegen "Registrieren".