Neue Kooperation: dejure.org × Doctrine bringen KI-Power für Aktenanalyse, Recherche und Texterstellung. Doctrine entdecken
×
Weitere Entscheidung unten: EGMR, 21.09.2006

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 20.03.2008 - 77626/01   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2008,63955
EGMR, 20.03.2008 - 77626/01 (https://dejure.org/2008,63955)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 20.03.2008 - 77626/01 (https://dejure.org/2008,63955)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 20. März 2008 - 77626/01 (https://dejure.org/2008,63955)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2008,63955) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    AZIYEVY v. RUSSIA

    Art. 2, Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 13 MRK
    Violation of Article 2 - Right to life Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Procedural aspect) Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security Violation of Article 13 - Right to an effective remedy (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (56)Zitiert selbst (16)

  • EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 7615/02

    IMAKAÏEVA c. RUSSIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.03.2008 - 77626/01
    The Court further notes that it has already found on a number of occasions that the provisions of Article 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure do not preclude disclosure of documents from a pending investigation file, but rather set out a procedure for and limits to such disclosure (see Mikheyev v. Russia, no. 77617/01, § 104, 26 January 2006, and Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615/02, § 123, ECHR 2006-... (extracts)).

    The Court notes with great concern that a number of cases have come before it which suggest that the phenomenon of "disappearances" is well known in Chechnya (see, among other authorities, Bazorkina, cited above; Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615/02, ECHR 2006-... (extracts); Luluyev and Others v. Russia, no. 69480/01, ECHR 2006-... (extracts); Akhmadova and Sadulayeva v. Russia, no. 40464/02, 10 May 2007; and Baysayeva v. Russia, no. 74237/01, 5 April 2007).

    Furthermore, the Court notes that it is its standard practice to rule that awards in relation to costs and expenses are to be paid directly into the applicant's representatives" accounts (see, for example, ToÄŸcu, cited above, § 158; Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, § 175, ECHR 2005-VII; and Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615/02, ECHR 2006-...).

  • EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91
    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.03.2008 - 77626/01
    The object and purpose of the Convention as an instrument for the protection of individual human beings also requires that Article 2 be interpreted and applied so as to make its safeguards practical and effective (see McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 27 September 1995, Series A no. 324, pp. 45-46, §§ 146-147).
  • EGMR, 14.03.2002 - 46477/99

    PAUL ET AUDREY EDWARDS c. ROYAUME-UNI

    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.03.2008 - 77626/01
    The passage of time will inevitably erode the amount and quality of the evidence available and the appearance of a lack of diligence will cast doubt on the good faith of the investigative efforts, as well as drag out the ordeal for the members of the family (see Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, § 86, ECHR 2002-II).
  • EGMR, 18.06.2002 - 25656/94

    ORHAN v. TURKEY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.03.2008 - 77626/01
    It is especially in respect of the latter that a relative may claim directly to be a victim of the authorities" conduct (see Orhan v. Turkey, no. 25656/94, § 358, 18 June 2002).
  • EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 69480/01

    LOULOUÏEV ET AUTRES c. RUSSIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.03.2008 - 77626/01
    The Court notes with great concern that a number of cases have come before it which suggest that the phenomenon of "disappearances" is well known in Chechnya (see, among other authorities, Bazorkina, cited above; Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615/02, ECHR 2006-... (extracts); Luluyev and Others v. Russia, no. 69480/01, ECHR 2006-... (extracts); Akhmadova and Sadulayeva v. Russia, no. 40464/02, 10 May 2007; and Baysayeva v. Russia, no. 74237/01, 5 April 2007).
  • EGMR, 24.03.2005 - 21894/93

    AKKUM AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.03.2008 - 77626/01
    The burden of proof is thus shifted to the Government and if they fail in their arguments, issues will arise under Article 2 and/or Article 3 (see ToÄŸcu v. Turkey, no. 27601/95, § 95, 31 May 2005, and Akkum and Others v. Turkey, no. 21894/93, § 211, ECHR 2005-II).
  • EGMR, 05.04.2007 - 74237/01

    BAYSAYEVA v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.03.2008 - 77626/01
    The Court notes with great concern that a number of cases have come before it which suggest that the phenomenon of "disappearances" is well known in Chechnya (see, among other authorities, Bazorkina, cited above; Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615/02, ECHR 2006-... (extracts); Luluyev and Others v. Russia, no. 69480/01, ECHR 2006-... (extracts); Akhmadova and Sadulayeva v. Russia, no. 40464/02, 10 May 2007; and Baysayeva v. Russia, no. 74237/01, 5 April 2007).
  • EGMR, 06.07.2005 - 43579/98
    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.03.2008 - 77626/01
    Furthermore, the Court notes that it is its standard practice to rule that awards in relation to costs and expenses are to be paid directly into the applicant's representatives" accounts (see, for example, ToÄŸcu, cited above, § 158; Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, § 175, ECHR 2005-VII; and Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615/02, ECHR 2006-...).
  • EGMR, 31.05.2005 - 27693/95

    CELIKBILEK v. TURKEY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.03.2008 - 77626/01
    The Court would stress in this regard that the evaluation of the evidence and the establishment of the facts is a matter for the Court, and it is incumbent on it to decide on the evidentiary value of the documents submitted to it (see Çelikbilek v. Turkey, no. 27693/95, § 71, 31 May 2005).
  • OLG Hamburg, 18.01.2010 - 13 W 28/09

    Grundbucheintragung bei Zuerwerb von Wohnungseigentum: Nachverpfändung von …

    Auszug aus EGMR, 20.03.2008 - 77626/01
    29/09/2008.
  • EGMR, 26.01.2006 - 77617/01

    MIKHEYEV v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 57942/00

    KHASHIYEV AND AKAYEVA v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 27.07.2006 - 69481/01

    BAZORKINA v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 13.06.2000 - 23531/94

    TIMURTAS c. TURQUIE

  • EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 57950/00

    ISAYEVA v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 57945/00
  • EGMR, 02.12.2010 - 15563/06

    [ENG]

    She relied on the case of Aziyevy v. Russia (no. 77626/01, 20 March 2008).

    As regards the applicants' reference to Article 3 of the Convention, the Court considers that, in the circumstances, no separate issue arises in respect of Article 13, read in conjunction with Article 3 of the Convention (see Kukayev v. Russia, no. 29361/02, § 119, 15 November 2007, and Aziyevy v. Russia, no. 77626/01, § 118, 20 March 2008).

  • EGMR, 18.04.2013 - 54765/09

    [ENG]

    As regards the applicant's reference to Article 5 of the Convention, the Court considers that, in the circumstances, no separate issue arises in respect of Article 13 read in conjunction with Article 5 of the Convention (see Aziyevy v. Russia, no. 77626/01, § 118, 20 March 2008, and Alikhadzhiyeva v. Russia, no. 68007/01, § 96, 5 July 2007).
  • EGMR, 14.03.2013 - 15438/05

    [ENG]

    In so far as the applicant could be understood to also refer to Article 5 of the Convention, the Court considers that, in the circumstances, no separate issue arises in respect of Article 13, read in conjunction with Article 5 of the Convention (see Aziyevy v. Russia, no. 77626/01, § 118, 20 March 2008, and Alikhadzhiyeva v. Russia, no. 68007/01, § 96, 5 July 2007).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
dejure.org Übersicht EGMR

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 21.09.2006 - 77626/01   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2006,58992
EGMR, 21.09.2006 - 77626/01 (https://dejure.org/2006,58992)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 21.09.2006 - 77626/01 (https://dejure.org/2006,58992)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 21. September 2006 - 77626/01 (https://dejure.org/2006,58992)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2006,58992) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Zitiert selbst (2)

  • EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 57950/00

    ISAYEVA v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 21.09.2006 - 77626/01
    With reference to the Court's judgment in the case of Isayeva v. Russia, they further argued that they had not been obliged to apply to courts in other regions of Russia in order to exhaust domestic remedies (see Isayeva v. Russia no. 57950/00, §§ 151-161, 24 February 2005).
  • EGMR, 28.05.2002 - 73065/01

    BULUT and YAVUZ v. TURKEY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 21.09.2006 - 77626/01
    In such a situation, the six-month period might be calculated from the time when the applicant becomes aware, or should have become aware, of these circumstances (see Bulut and Yavuz v. Turkey (dec.), no. 73065/01, 28 May 2002).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
dejure.org Übersicht EGMR
dejure.org nutzen ohne Ablenkung
Werbung abschalten. Jetzt buchen! Keine automatische Verlängerung.
Info zum PUR-Angebot
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht