Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 05.04.2007 - 74237/01   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2007,56065
EGMR, 05.04.2007 - 74237/01 (https://dejure.org/2007,56065)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 05.04.2007 - 74237/01 (https://dejure.org/2007,56065)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 05. April 2007 - 74237/01 (https://dejure.org/2007,56065)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2007,56065) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    BAYSAYEVA v. RUSSIA

    Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 13+2, Art. 13+3, Art. 13+5, Art. 34, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 38, Art. 38 Abs. 1 Buchst. a, Art. 41 MRK
    Preliminary objection (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies) partially dismissed Preliminary objection (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies) partially joined to merits and dismissed Violation of Art. 2 No violation of Art. 3 in respect of the failure to protect the ...

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (104)Neu Zitiert selbst (3)

  • EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91

    McCANN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 05.04.2007 - 74237/01
    The Court has to establish, first, whether the costs and expenses indicated by the applicant were actually incurred and, second, whether they were necessary (see McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 27 September 1995, Series A no. 324, § 220).
  • EGMR, 27.04.1988 - 9659/82

    BOYLE AND RICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 05.04.2007 - 74237/01
    In view of the Court's findings above with regard to Articles 2 and 3, these complaints are clearly "arguable" for the purposes of Article 13 (see Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 27 April 1988, Series A no. 131, § 52).
  • EGMR, 13.06.2000 - 23531/94

    TIMURTAS c. TURQUIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 05.04.2007 - 74237/01
    Failure on a Government's part to submit such information which is in their hands, without a satisfactory explanation, may not only give rise to the drawing of inferences as to the well-foundedness of the applicant's allegations, but may also reflect negatively on the level of compliance by a respondent State with its obligations under Article 38 § 1 (a) of the Convention (see Timurtas v. Turkey, no. 23531/94, § 66, ECHR 2000-VI).
  • EGMR, 18.12.2012 - 2944/06

    ASLAKHANOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

    Having regard to the numerous previous cases concerning disappearances in Chechnya and Ingushetia which have come before it, the Court has found that in the particular context of the conflict, when a person was detained by unidentified State agents without any subsequent acknowledgment of the detention, this could be regarded as life-threatening (see, among many others, Bazorkina v. Russia, no. 69481/01, 27 July 2006; Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615/02, ECHR 2006-XIII (extracts); Luluyev and Others v. Russia, no. 69480/01, ECHR 2006-VIII (extracts); Baysayeva v. Russia, no. 74237/01, 5 April 2007; Akhmadova and Sadulayeva v. Russia, no. 40464/02, 10 May 2007; Alikhadzhiyeva v. Russia, no. 68007/01, 5 July 2007; and Dubayev and Bersnukayeva v. Russia, nos.
  • EGMR, 05.09.2013 - 61204/09

    I v. SWEDEN

    Having regard to its case-law concerning disappearances and ill-treatment in Chechnya (see, among many others, Bazorkina v. Russia, no. 69481/01, 27 July 2006; Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615/02, ECHR 2006-XIII (extracts); Luluyev and Others v. Russia, no. 69480/01, ECHR 2006-XIII (extracts); Baysayeva v. Russia, no. 74237/01, 5 April 2007; and Akhmadova v. Russia, no. 25548/07, 3 April 2012) and having regard to the recent information on the human rights and security situation in Chechnya, the Court is well aware of on-going disappearances, of arbitrary violence, of impunity and ill-treatment in detention facilities, notably with regard to certain categories of people, such as former rebels, their relatives, political adversaries of Ramsan Kadyrov, journalists, human rights activists and individuals who have lodged complaints with international organisations.
  • EGMR, 21.12.2010 - 45744/08

    JASINSKIS v. LATVIA

    A remedy whose only consequence is a possibility to obtain compensation for the alleged violation would not suffice (ibid., see also Senses v. Turkey (dec.), no. 24991/94, 14 November 2000; Baysayeva v. Russia, no. 74237/01, §§ 108 and 109, 5 April 2007; and Dzieciak v. Poland, no. 77766/01, § 80, 9 December 2008).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht