Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  GODENAU v. GERMANY

  No violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression-general (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression) (englisch)

Kurzfassungen/Presse

• hessenschau.de (Pressebericht, 29.11.2022)

  Hessen darf "Schwarze Liste" für Lehrer führen

Besprechungen u.ä.

• zeitschrift-jse.de (Fallmäßige Aufbereitung - für Studienzwecke)

  Zur Rechtmäßigkeit "schwarzer Listen" für den Staatsdienst ungeeigneter Lehrer

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  GODENAU v. GERMANY

  Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 11, Art. 11 Abs. 1, Art. 14 MRK
  [ENG]

Papierfundstellen

• NVwZ 2023, 1233

Wird zitiert von ... (4)Zitiert selbst (12)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 24.11.2005 - 27574/02

  Otto ./. Deutschland

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.11.2022 - 80450/17

  The party is generally considered to be right-wing and has been under scrutiny by the offices for the protection of the Constitution (Verfassungsschutzämter) in various German Länder; it has not, however, been declared unconstitutional by the Federal Constitutional Court under Article 21 § 2 of the German Basic Law (for earlier cases concerning members of that party, see Otto v. Germany (dec.), no. 27574/02, 24 November 2005, and Erdel v. Germany (dec.), no. 30067/04, 13 February 2007).

  According to the well-established case-law of the Court, the right to recruitment to civil service had deliberately been omitted from the Convention and as such the refusal to appoint a person as a civil servant could not provide the basis for a complaint under the Convention (they referred to, inter alia, Glasenapp v. Germany, 28 August 1986, § 48, Series A no. 104; Wille v. Liechtenstein [GC], no. 28396/95, § 41, ECHR 1999-VII; and Otto v. Germany (dec.), no. 27574/02, 24 November 2005).

• EGMR, 15.10.2020 - 40495/15

  Polizeiliche Tatprovokation (Begriff: mittelbare Tatprovokation - Bestimmtsein …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.11.2022 - 80450/17

  The Court reiterates that in order to lodge an application in accordance with Article 34 of the Convention, an individual must be able to show that he or she was "directly affected" by the measure complained of (see Akbay and Others v. Germany, nos. 40495/15 and 2 others, § 67, 15 October 2020, with further references).
• EGMR, 17.07.2014 - 47848/08

  CENTER OF LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CAMPEANU v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.11.2022 - 80450/17

  Having regard to the facts of the case and the parties' submissions, which essentially referred to the arguments they had made in respect of Article 10, its findings under that latter provision and the parallels it has drawn in its assessments under Articles 10 and 11 in earlier cases concerning the dismissal of teachers (see, for example, Volkmer, cited above), the Court considers that it has examined the main legal questions raised in the present application, and that there is thus no need to give a separate ruling on the remaining complaints (see, mutatis mutandis, Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania [GC], no. 47848/08, § 156, ECHR 2014).

• EGMR, 22.11.2001 - 39799/98

  Rechtmäßigkeit der Entlassung eines Lehrers wegen mangelnder persönlicher Eignung …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.11.2022 - 80450/17

  The Court has already recognised in earlier cases that the duty of loyalty to the Constitution imposed on civil servants and public employees under German law was an expression of a "democracy capable of defending itself" and that restrictions on the freedom of expression of teachers deriving from that duty of loyalty pursued legitimate aims under Article 10 § 2 of the Convention, notably the prevention of disorder and the protection of the rights of others (see Vogt, cited above, § 51, and Volkmer v. Germany (dec.), no. 39799/98, 22 November 2001).
• EGMR, 07.07.2020 - 57462/19

  MAHI c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.11.2022 - 80450/17

  In subsequent cases concerning teachers, the Court did not delve into the question whether their status under the relevant domestic law was that of civil servants or other public employees and instead focused on their role as teachers, being a symbol of authority for their pupils in the field of education, and reiterated that the particular duties and responsibilities incumbent on them also applied to a certain extent to their activities outside school (see Mahi v. Belgium (dec.), no. 57462/19, § 32, 7 July 2020, with further references).
• EGMR, 26.09.1995 - 17851/91

  Radikalenerlaß

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.11.2022 - 80450/17

  The applicant's earlier dismissal, in respect of which a friendly settlement had been reached in the proceedings before the Wiesbaden Labour Court, was not the subject matter of the present case, distinguishing it from that in Vogt v. Germany (26 September 1995, Series A no. 323).
• BAG, 12.05.2011 - 2 AZR 479/09

  Anfechtung - außerordentliche Kündigung - politische Treuepflicht - öffentlicher …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.11.2022 - 80450/17

  According to the well-established case-law of the domestic courts, the suitability for employment in public service within the meaning of Article 33(2) of the Basic Law entails a duty of loyalty to the Constitution (see, for example, Federal Labour Court, no. 2 AZR 479/09, judgment of 12 May 2011, at para. 23 - juris, with further references).
• EGMR, 28.10.1999 - 28396/95

  Nichtberufung eines liechtensteiner Richters in das Amt des Gerichtspräsidenten …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.11.2022 - 80450/17

  According to the well-established case-law of the Court, the right to recruitment to civil service had deliberately been omitted from the Convention and as such the refusal to appoint a person as a civil servant could not provide the basis for a complaint under the Convention (they referred to, inter alia, Glasenapp v. Germany, 28 August 1986, § 48, Series A no. 104; Wille v. Liechtenstein [GC], no. 28396/95, § 41, ECHR 1999-VII; and Otto v. Germany (dec.), no. 27574/02, 24 November 2005).
• EGMR, 28.08.1986 - 9228/80

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.11.2022 - 80450/17

  According to the well-established case-law of the Court, the right to recruitment to civil service had deliberately been omitted from the Convention and as such the refusal to appoint a person as a civil servant could not provide the basis for a complaint under the Convention (they referred to, inter alia, Glasenapp v. Germany, 28 August 1986, § 48, Series A no. 104; Wille v. Liechtenstein [GC], no. 28396/95, § 41, ECHR 1999-VII; and Otto v. Germany (dec.), no. 27574/02, 24 November 2005).
• EGMR, 13.01.2015 - 44230/06

  PETROPAVLOVSKIS v. LATVIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.11.2022 - 80450/17

  As evidenced by the lecture she had organised in Barcelona in 2015, the inclusion on the list in question had not deterred the applicant from continuing her political activities and expressing her views, which meant that the impugned measure had not had a chilling effect on her (they referred to Petropavlovskis v. Latvia, no. 44230/06, § 77, ECHR 2015).
• EGMR, 13.02.2007 - 30067/04

  E. E. gegen Deutschland
• EGMR, 30.06.2020 - 58512/16

  CIMPERSEK v. SLOVENIA

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 14.12.2023 - 59433/18

  EGMR zu den Rechten von Beamten: Lehrer dürften nicht streiken

  While the Convention does not dictate how education is to be provided and still less does it prescribe any specific status for teachers, the Court emphasises the huge importance, from a public-policy perspective, of an efficient educational system capable of providing teaching and educating children, in a credible manner, about freedom, democracy, human rights and the rule of law (see Godenau v. Germany, no. 80450/17, § 54, 29 November 2022).
• BVerwG, 11.06.2026 - 2 C 12.25

  Annahme einer Verfassungstreuepflichtverletzung durch Chat-Beiträge setzt …

  Veränderungen im Verständnis der freiheitlichen demokratischen Grundordnung gelten für die Verfassungstreuepflicht von Beamten daher erst recht und in besonderer Weise (vgl. hierzu auch EGMR, Urteil vom 29. November 2022 - Nr. 80450/17, Godenau/Deutschland - NVwZ 2023, 1233 Rn. 52 m. w. N.).
• OVG Rheinland-Pfalz, 05.06.2024 - 3 A 10684/23

  Lehrer; Coronapandemie; Redebeiträge während Demonstrationen und Äußerungen in …

  Denn anders als dort wurde der Beklagten nicht die Mitgliedschaft oder Kandidatur für eine nicht verbotene Partei zur Last gelegt, sondern fußen die Vorwürfe auf individuell zurechenbaren Äußerungen der Beklagten, die mit ihren beamtenrechtlichen Pflichten als Lehrerin unvereinbar waren und sind (vgl. hierzu auch EGMR, Godenau/Deutschland, Urteil vom 29. November 2022 - 80450/17 -, NVwZ 2023, 1233 [1235 Rn. 56] sowie, auch insgesamt zum Vorstehenden: Dienstgerichtshof für Richter beim OLG Stuttgart…, Urteil vom 18. März 2021 - DGH 2/19 -, juris Rn. 231).
• EGMR, 04.02.2025 - 50763/22

  ERCAN c. TÜRKIYE et 20 autres affaires

  Rn. 49 S'agissant de l'argument des requérants relatif à l'importance de l'instruction dans la langue maternelle, pris isolément, la Cour relève d'une manière générale l'importance considérable, du point de vue des politiques publiques, d'enseigner et d'éduquer les enfants, de manière crédible, sur la liberté, la démocratie, les droits de l'homme et l'État de droit (Godenau c. Allemagne, no 80450/17, § 54, 29 novembre 2022 ; voir aussi Humpert et autres c. Allemagne [GC], nos 59433/18 et 3 autres, § 137, 14 décembre 2023).