Weitere Entscheidungen unten: EGMR | EGMR, 13.11.2012 | EGMR, 07.06.2018

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 17.09.2014 - 10865/09, 45886/07, 32431/08   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2014,25256
EGMR, 17.09.2014 - 10865/09, 45886/07, 32431/08 (https://dejure.org/2014,25256)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 17.09.2014 - 10865/09, 45886/07, 32431/08 (https://dejure.org/2014,25256)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 17. September 2014 - 10865/09, 45886/07, 32431/08 (https://dejure.org/2014,25256)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2014,25256) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (4)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    MOCANU ET AUTRES c. ROUMANIE

    Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 3, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 35 Abs. 3, Art. 41 MRK
    Exceptions préliminaires rejetées (Article 35-1 - Epuisement des voies de recours internes Délai de six mois Article 35-3 - Situation continue) Partiellement irrecevable Violation de l'article 2 - Droit à la vie (Article 2-1 - Enquête efficace) (Volet procédural) ...

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    MOCANU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA

    Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 3, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 35 Abs. 3, Art. 41 MRK
    Preliminary objections dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies Six month period Article 35-3 - Continuing situation) Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect) ...

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    MOCANU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA - [Deutsche Übersetzung] Zusammenfassung durch das Österreichische Institut für Menschenrechte (ÖIM)

    [DEU] Preliminary objections dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies;Six month period;Article 35-3 - Continuing situation);Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural ...

  • juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (6)Neu Zitiert selbst (51)

  • EGMR, 16.06.2015 - 40167/06

    SARGSYAN c. AZERBAÏDJAN

    Auszug aus EGMR, 17.09.2014 - 10865/09
    An applicant has to become active once it is clear that no effective investigation will be provided, in other words once it becomes apparent that the respondent State will not fulfil its obligation under the Convention (see Chiragov and Others v. Armenia (dec.) [GC], no. 13216/05, § 136, 14 December 2011, and Sargsyan v. Azerbaijan (dec.) [GC], no. 40167/06, § 135, 14 December 2011, both referring to Varnava and Others, cited above, § 161).

    An applicant has to become active once it is clear that no effective investigation will be provided, in other words, once it becomes apparent that the respondent State will not fulfil its obligation under the Convention (see Chiragov and Others v. Armenia (dec.) [GC], no. 13216/05, § 136, 14 December 2011, and Sargsyan v. Azerbaijan (dec.) [GC], no. 40167/06, § 135, 14 December 2011, both referring to Varnava and Others, cited by the Court, § 161).

  • EGMR - 45886/07

    [FRE]

    Auszug aus EGMR, 17.09.2014 - 10865/09
    Costs and expenses in respect of the applications by Mrs Anca Mocanu and the applicant association (nos. 10865/09 and 45886/07).

    10865/09 and 45886/07;.

  • EGMR, 16.06.2015 - 13216/05

    CHIRAGOV ET AUTRES c. ARMÉNIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 17.09.2014 - 10865/09
    An applicant has to become active once it is clear that no effective investigation will be provided, in other words once it becomes apparent that the respondent State will not fulfil its obligation under the Convention (see Chiragov and Others v. Armenia (dec.) [GC], no. 13216/05, § 136, 14 December 2011, and Sargsyan v. Azerbaijan (dec.) [GC], no. 40167/06, § 135, 14 December 2011, both referring to Varnava and Others, cited above, § 161).

    An applicant has to become active once it is clear that no effective investigation will be provided, in other words, once it becomes apparent that the respondent State will not fulfil its obligation under the Convention (see Chiragov and Others v. Armenia (dec.) [GC], no. 13216/05, § 136, 14 December 2011, and Sargsyan v. Azerbaijan (dec.) [GC], no. 40167/06, § 135, 14 December 2011, both referring to Varnava and Others, cited by the Court, § 161).

     
  • EGMR, 13.01.2009 - 33750/03

    YETER v. TURKEY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 17.09.2014 - 10865/09
    The Court has also held that in cases concerning torture or ill-treatment inflicted by State agents, criminal proceedings ought not to be discontinued on account of a limitation period, and also that amnesties and pardons should not be tolerated in such cases (see Abdülsamet Yaman v. Turkey, no. 32446/96, § 55, 2 November 2004; Yeter v. Turkey, no. 33750/03, § 70, 13 January 2009; and Association "21 December 1989" and Others, cited above, § 144).

    [25] See Abdülsamet Yaman v. Turkey, no. 32446/96, § 55, 2 November 2004; Yeter v. Turkey, no. 33750/03, § 70, 13 January 2009; and Ä°zci v. Turkey, no. 42606/05, § 73, 23 July 2013.

  • EGMR, 09.03.2010 - 3575/05

    EMRAH AYDINLAR ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 17.09.2014 - 10865/09
    Thus, the Court has rejected as out of time applications where there had been excessive or unexplained delay on the part of applicants once they had, or ought to have, become aware that no investigation had been instigated or that the investigation had lapsed into inaction or become ineffective and, in any of those eventualities, there was no immediate, realistic prospect of an effective investigation being provided in the future (see, inter alia, Narin v. Turkey, cited above, § 51; Aydinlar and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no. 3575/05, 9 March 2010; and the decision in Frandes, cited above, §§ 18-23).

    In a number of cases the Court has rejected as out of time applications where there had been an excessive or unexplained delay on the part of applicants once they had, or ought to have, become aware that no investigation had been instigated or that the investigation had lapsed into inaction or become ineffective and, in any of those scenarios, that there was no immediate, realistic prospect of an effective investigation being provided in the future (see, inter alia, Narin v. Turkey, cited by the Court, § 51; Aydinlar and Others v. Turkey (dec.), no. 3575/05, 9 March 2010; and the decision in Frandes, cited by the Court, §§ 18-23).

  • EGMR, 24.04.2012 - 12442/04

    CRAINICEANU ET FRUMUSANU c. ROUMANIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 17.09.2014 - 10865/09
    In this connection, the Grand Chamber endorses the Chamber's finding that the investigation was entrusted to military prosecutors who, like the accused (two of whom were generals), were officers in a relationship of subordination within the military hierarchy, a finding which has already led the Court to conclude that there has been a violation of the procedural aspect of Article 2 and Article 3 of the Convention in previous cases against Romania (see Barbu Anghelescu v. Romania, no. 46430/99, § 67, 5 October 2004; Bursuc v. Romania, no. 42066/98, § 107, 12 October 2004; and, more recently, Sandru and Others, cited above, § 74; Association "21 December 1989" and Others, cited above, § 137; and Crainiceanu and Frumusanu v. Romania, no. 12442/04, § 92, 24 April 2012).

    [34] For a description of the transitional period experienced by Romanian society from December 1989 to September 1991 and references to the "massive use of lethal force against the civilian population" during the "anti-government demonstrations preceding the transition from a totalitarian regime to a more democratic regime", see Sandru and Others, cited above, "Association 21 December 1989" and Others, cited above, and Crainiceanu and Frumusanu v. Romania, no. 12442/04, 24 April 2012.

  • EGMR, 08.03.2011 - 29007/06

    LAPUSAN ET AUTRES c. ROUMANIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 17.09.2014 - 10865/09
    Lastly, in several cases lodged against Romania, the Court has dismissed similar objections raised by the Government based on the same final judgment dating from 2008 that they rely upon in the present case (see Association "21 December 1989" and Others, cited above, §§ 119-125; Lapusan and Others v. Romania, nos. 29007/06, 30552/06, 31323/06, 31920/06, 34485/06, 38960/06, 38996/06, 39027/06 and 39067/06, § 69, 8 March 2011; and Pastor and Å¢iclete v. Romania, nos.

    On the contrary, the importance of those stakes for Romanian society should have led the authorities to deal with the case promptly and without delay in order to avoid any appearance of collusion in or tolerance of unlawful acts (see, inter alia, Lapusan and Others v. Romania, nos. 29007/06, 30552/06, 31323/06, 31920/06, 34485/06, 38960/06, 38996/06, 39027/06 and 39067/06, § 94, 8 March 2011, concerning a lapse of more than sixteen years since the opening of an investigation intended to lead to the identification and punishment of those responsible for repression of the anti-communist demonstrations of 1989, and more than eleven years since the entry into force of the Convention).

  • EGMR, 07.07.1989 - 14038/88

    Jens Söring

    Auszug aus EGMR, 17.09.2014 - 10865/09
    It reiterates that Article 3, 1ike Article 2, must be regarded as one of the most fundamental provisions of the Convention and as enshrining core values of the democratic societies making up the Council of Europe (see Soering v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 7 July 1989, Series A no. 161, p. 34, § 88).
  • EGMR, 04.12.2003 - 39272/98

    M.C. c. BULGARIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 17.09.2014 - 10865/09
    The third-party intervener emphasised that Article 3 of the Convention required States to put in place criminal laws which effectively punished serious human rights violations by appropriate sanctions (it referred to the judgments in M.C. v. Bulgaria, no. 39272/98, § 150, ECHR 2003-XII; Çamdereli v. Turkey, no. 28433/02, § 38, 17 July 2008; and Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978/05, § 117, ECHR 2010).
  • EGMR, 25.04.1978 - 5856/72

    Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …

    Auszug aus EGMR, 17.09.2014 - 10865/09
    Moreover, the Court had admitted that where abuses were perpetrated by State agents, their psychological effects could be even greater (Tyrer v. the United Kingdom, 25 April 1978, § 33, Series A no. 26).
  • EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91

    McCANN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  • EGMR, 14.03.2002 - 46477/99

    PAUL ET AUDREY EDWARDS c. ROYAUME-UNI

  • EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

    FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE

  • EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 28883/95

    McKERR c. ROYAUME-UNI

  • EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 57947/00

    ISSAIEVA, YOUSSOUPOVA ET BAZAÏEVA c. RUSSIE

  • EGMR, 15.04.2012 - 29520/09

    [ENG]

  • EGMR, 06.07.2005 - 43579/98
  • EGMR, 25.01.2000 - 34979/97

    WALKER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  • EGMR, 29.01.2002 - 38587/97

    BAYRAM and YILDIRIM v. TURKEY

  • EGMR, 27.03.2014 - 58428/10

    MATYTSINA v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 24.05.2011 - 33810/07

    ASSOCIATION

  • EGMR, 12.07.2005 - 64320/01
  • EGMR, 31.07.2012 - 23016/04

    ER AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  • EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 57948/00
  • EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 130/10
  • EGMR, 06.04.2004 - 21689/93

    AHMET ÖZKAN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  • EGMR, 10.07.2012 - 21099/06

    YETISEN c. TURQUIE

  • EGMR, 05.10.2004 - 46430/99

    BARBU ANGHELESCU c. ROUMANIE

  • EGMR, 02.07.2002 - 76573/01

    DENNIS AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  • EGMR, 12.10.2004 - 42066/98

    BURSUC c. ROUMANIE

  • EGMR, 11.03.2014 - 60441/13

    GÜRTEKIN AND OTHERS v. CYPRUS

  • EGMR, 23.07.2013 - 42606/05

    IZCI v. TURKEY

  • EGMR, 08.11.2011 - 23607/08

    HALAT c. TURQUIE

  • EGMR, 17.07.2008 - 28433/02

    CAMDERELI v. TURKEY

  • EGMR, 30.08.2011 - 51987/07

    ATALLAH c. FRANCE

  • EGMR, 17.05.2011 - 35802/05

    FRANDES c. ROUMANIE

  • EGMR, 15.12.2009 - 18907/02

    NARIN v. TURKEY

  • EGMR, 29.01.2013 - 13072/05

    ROMAN v. FINLAND

  • EGMR, 15.02.2011 - 4704/04

    PALIC v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA

  • EGMR, 08.02.2011 - 29883/06

    MICU c. ROUMANIE

  • EGMR, 31.05.2011 - 1721/07

    NASIRKHAYEVA v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 16.04.2013 - 43531/08

    VELEV v. BULGARIA

  • EGMR, 19.04.2011 - 30911/06

    PASTOR AND TICLETE v. ROMANIA

  • EGMR, 30.04.2013 - 37204/02

    GUSAR v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND ROMANIA

  • EGMR, 18.09.2012 - 34403/05

    TOMA c. ROUMANIE

  • RFH, 01.10.1940 - I 53/40
  • EGMR, 17.09.2009 - 10249/03

    Rückwirkende Strafschärfung und Anerkennung des Meistbegünstigungsprinzips als …

  • EGMR, 16.07.1971 - 2614/65

    RINGEISEN v. AUSTRIA

  • EGMR, 01.03.2010 - 46113/99

    Demopoulos ./. Türkei und 7 andere

  • EGMR, 10.09.2010 - 31333/06

    McFARLANE v. IRELAND

  • EGMR, 20.07.2004 - 47940/99

    BALOGH v. HUNGARY

  • EGMR, 19.05.2015 - 34708/08

    OLIVIER c. BELGIQUE

    Les personnes désireuses de se prévaloir de la compétence de contrôle de la Cour relativement à des griefs dirigés contre un État ont donc l'obligation d'utiliser auparavant les recours qu'offre le système juridique de celui-ci (voir, parmi beaucoup d'autres, Akdivar et autres c. Turquie, 16 septembre 1996, § 65, Recueil 1996-IV, Vuckovic et autres c. Serbie [GC], no 17153/11, § 70, 25 mars 2014, et Mocanu et autres c. Roumanie [GC], nos 10865/09, 45886/07 et 32431/08, § 221, CEDH 2014 (extraits)).

    Cela étant, la Cour a fréquemment souligné qu'il faut appliquer la règle de l'épuisement des recours internes avec une certaine souplesse et sans formalisme excessif (Ringeisen c. Autriche, 16 juillet 1971, § 89, série A no 13, Akdivar et autres, précité, § 69, Vuckovic et autres c. Serbie [GC], no 17153/11, § 76, 25 mars 2014, et Mocanu et autres c. Roumanie [GC], nos 10865/09, 45886/07 et 32431/08, § 224, CEDH 2014 (extraits)).

  • EGMR, 10.11.2015 - 3534/06

    INCIN c. TURQUIE

    C'est pourquoi, elle ne doit pas examiner la présente affaire en appliquant la règle des six mois comme elle l'avait fait dans les affaires concernant des disparitions de personnes dans un contexte de conflit international ou d'état d'urgence instauré dans un pays (Varnava et autres c. Turquie ([GC], nos 16064/90, 16065/90, 16066/90, 16068/90, 16069/90, 16070/90, 16071/90, 16072/90 et 16073/90, § 162, CEDH 2009, Yetisen et autres c. Turquie, no 21099/06, §§ 72-85, 10 juillet 2012, Er et autres c. Turquie, no 23016/04, § 52, 31 juillet 2012, et Mocanu et autres c. Roumanie [GC], nos 10865/09, 45886/07 et 32431/08, § 267, CEDH 2014 (extraits)).
  • EGMR, 03.02.2015 - 50858/09

    HUTANU c. ROUMANIE

    Ils doivent exister à un degré suffisant de certitude non seulement en théorie mais aussi en pratique, sans quoi leur manquent l'effectivité et l'accessibilité voulues (Mocanu et autres c. Roumanie [GC], nos 10865/09, 45886/07 et 32431/08, § 222, CEDH 2014 (extraits)).
     
  • EGMR, 08.03.2016 - 54992/10

    KYTIOPOIIA LITHOGRAFIA STYLIANOS S. KOSKINIDIS AVEE c. GRÈCE

    Les personnes désireuses de se prévaloir de la compétence de contrôle de la Cour relativement à des griefs dirigés contre un État ont donc l'obligation d'utiliser auparavant les recours qu'offre le système juridique de celui-ci (voir, parmi beaucoup d'autres, Mocanu et autres c. Roumanie [GC], nos 10865/09, 45886/07 et 32431/08, § 221, 17 septembre 2014).
  • EGMR, 13.09.2016 - 48974/12

    MADONIA c. ITALIE

    Les personnes désireuses de se prévaloir de la compétence de contrôle de la Cour relativement à des griefs dirigés contre un État ont donc l'obligation d'utiliser auparavant les recours qu'offre le système juridique de celui-ci (voir, parmi beaucoup d'autres, Akdivar et autres c. Turquie, 16 septembre 1996, § 65, Recueil des arrêts et décisions 1996-IV, Vuckovic et autres c. Serbie [GC], nos 17153/11 et 29 autres, § 70, 25 mars 2014, CEDH 2014, et Mocanu et autres c. Roumanie [GC], nos 10865/09, 45886/07 et 32431/08, § 221, CEDH 2014 (extraits)).
  • EGMR, 21.10.2014 - 1891/10

    SCIABICA c. ITALIE ET ALLEMAGNE

    Sie soll als erstes die Rechtssicherheit sicherstellen, indem sie gewährleistet, dass die Rechtssachen, die Fragen im Hinblick auf die Konvention aufwerfen, innerhalb einer angemessenen Frist geprüft werden können, und sie soll auch die Behörden und anderen betroffenen Personen vor der Ungewissheit schützen, in der sie gelassen würden, wenn ein längerer Zeitraum verstreichen würde (Mocanu und andere./. Rumänien [GK], Nrn. 10865/09, 45886/07 und 32431/08, Rdnr. 258, 17.
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR - 45886/07   

Anhängiges Verfahren
Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/9999,86543
EGMR - 45886/07 (https://dejure.org/9999,86543)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/9999,86543) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (166)Neu Zitiert selbst (1)

  • EGMR, 26.11.2014 - 28341/95

    ROTARU CONTRE LA ROUMANIE

    Auszug aus EGMR - 45886/07
    L'essentiel du droit interne pertinent est décrit dans les arrêts Rotaru c. Roumanie [GC], no 28341/95, § 31, CEDH 2000-V, et Dumitru Popescu c. Roumanie (no 2), no 71525/01, §§ 40-46, 26 avril 2007.

    Dans l'affirmative, l'ingérence dans l'exercice de ce droit était-elle prévue par la loi et nécessaire, au sens de l'article 8 § 2 (Rotaru c. Roumanie [GC], no 28341/95, CEDH 2000-V) ?.

  • EGMR, 28.09.2015 - 23380/09

    BOUYID v. BELGIUM

    10865/09, 45886/07 and 32431/08, § 315, ECHR 2014 (extracts)).
  • EGMR, 23.03.2016 - 43611/11

    F.G. v. SWEDEN

    The Court will therefore also examine the two Articles together (see, among other authorities, mutatis mutandis, Mocanu and Others v. Romania [GC], nos. 10865/09, 45886/07 and 32431/08, § 314, ECHR 2014 (extracts); T.A. v. Sweden, no. 48866/10, § 37, 19 December 2013; K.A.B. v. Sweden, no. 886/11, § 67, 5 September 2013; Kaboulov v. Ukraine, no. 41015/04, § 99, 19 November 2009; and F.H. v. Sweden, no. 32621/06, § 72, 20 January 2009).
  • EGMR, 21.07.2015 - 18766/11

    Italien muß Rechtsrahmen für gleichgeschlechtliche Lebensgemeinschaft schaffen

    of, or from the date of knowledge of that act or its effect on or prejudice to the applicant (see Mocanu and Others v. Romania [GC], nos. 10865/09, 45886/07 and 32431/08, § 259, ECHR 2014 (extracts)).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 13.11.2012 - 10865/09, 32431/08, 45886/07   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2012,55412
EGMR, 13.11.2012 - 10865/09, 32431/08, 45886/07 (https://dejure.org/2012,55412)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 13.11.2012 - 10865/09, 32431/08, 45886/07 (https://dejure.org/2012,55412)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 13. November 2012 - 10865/09, 32431/08, 45886/07 (https://dejure.org/2012,55412)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2012,55412) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    MOCANU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA

    Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 3, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 41 MRK
    Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect) No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect) Violation of ...

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    MOCANU ET AUTRES c. ROUMANIE

    Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 3, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 35, Art. 41 MRK
    Partiellement irrecevable Violation de l'article 2 - Droit à la vie (Article 2-1 - Enquête efficace) (Volet procédural) Non-violation de l'article 3 - Interdiction de la torture (Article 3 - Traitement dégradant Traitement inhumain) (Volet matériel) Violation de ...

Sonstiges (3)

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (4)Neu Zitiert selbst (18)

  • EGMR, 24.05.2011 - 33810/07

    ASSOCIATION

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2012 - 10865/09
    The Court reiterates that it had already dismissed a similar objection in its judgment in the case of Association "21 December 1989" and Others (nos. 33810/07 and 18817/08, §§ 119-125, 24 May 2011).

    In the instant case, the Court notes that the applicant has previously lodged another application before it, registered as no. 33810/07, raising, under Article 8, a complaint similar to that raised in the context of the present application, which is registered as number 45886/07. The previous application, adducing evidence which has also been submitted in the instant case, resulted in the finding of a violation of Article 8 (see Association "21 December 1989" and Others, cited above, §§ 161-176).

    The Court must therefore determine whether, in the present case, the application is "substantially the same" as the matter submitted to it in application no. 33810/07.

    The Court has ruled that, in the event of widespread use of lethal force against the civilian population during anti-Government demonstrations preceding the transition from a totalitarian regime to a more democratic system, the Court cannot accept that an investigation has been effective where it is terminated as a result of the statutory limitation of criminal liability, when it is the authorities themselves who have remained inactive (see Association "21 December 1989" and Others v. Romania, nos. 33810/07 and 18817/08, § 144, 24 May 2011).

    Such an investigation may not end with prescription (see Association "21 December 1989" and Others v. Romania, nos. 33810/07 and 18817/08, § 144, 24 May 2011).

  • EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

    LABITA c. ITALIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2012 - 10865/09
    According to the Government, this conduct by the applicant in response to the alleged threats was such as to prove the absence of any attitude on the part of the State agents that was likely to arouse any "fear" or "anguish" (see Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 120, ECHR 2000-IV).

    Such an investigation, as with one under Article 2, should be capable of leading to the identification and punishment of those responsible (see, inter alia, Assenov and Others v. Bulgaria, 28 October 1998, § 102, Reports 1998-VIII; Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 131, ECHR 2000-IV; Çamdereli v. Turkey, cited above, §§ 36-37; and Vladimir Romanov v. Russia, cited above, § 81).

  • EGMR, 22.03.2001 - 34044/96

    Schießbefehl

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2012 - 10865/09
    In the context of States which have gone through a transition to a democratic regime, it is legitimate for a State governed by the rule of law to bring criminal proceedings against persons who have committed crimes under a former regime (see, mutatis mutandis, Streletz, Kessler and Krenz v. Germany [GC], nos. 34044/96, 35532/97 and 44801/98, §§ 80-81, ECHR 2001-II).
     
  • EGMR, 04.12.2003 - 39272/98

    M.C. c. BULGARIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2012 - 10865/09
    For an investigation to be effective in practice it is a prerequisite that the State has enacted criminal-law provisions penalising practices that are contrary to Article 3 (compare, mutatis mutandis, M.C. v. Bulgaria, no. 39272/98, §§ 150, 153 and 166, ECHR 2003-XII; Nikolova and Velichkova v. Bulgaria, cited above, § 57; and Çamdereli v. Turkey, cited above, § 38)." The fact that such an investigation ends with prescription requires a serious analysis on the part of the Court as to the compatibility of such an outcome with the requirements of Article 3. Be that as it may, the case at issue is even more serious, since the events of 13 and 14 June 1990 are part of the process through which Romania overthrew the former totalitarian regime.
  • EGMR, 04.10.2007 - 32772/02

    Verein gegen Tierfabriken Schweiz (VGT) ./. Schweiz

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2012 - 10865/09
    46133/99 and 48183/99, 3 October 2002; Folgerø and Others v. Norway (dec.), no. 15472/02, 14 February 2006; and Verein gegen Tierfabriken Schweiz (VgT) v. Switzerland (no. 2) [GC], no. 32772/02, § 63, ECHR 2009-...).
  • EGMR, 29.06.2007 - 15472/02

    Folgerø u. a. ./. Norwegen

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2012 - 10865/09
    46133/99 and 48183/99, 3 October 2002; Folgerø and Others v. Norway (dec.), no. 15472/02, 14 February 2006; and Verein gegen Tierfabriken Schweiz (VgT) v. Switzerland (no. 2) [GC], no. 32772/02, § 63, ECHR 2009-...).
  • EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

    FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2012 - 10865/09
    The Court points out that it has concluded on many occasions, in cases raising issues similar to those raised here, that there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, ECHR 2000-VII, and Saileanu v. Romania, no. 46268/06, § 50, 2 February 2010).
  • EGMR, 24.07.2003 - 46133/99

    SMIRNOVA c. RUSSIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2012 - 10865/09
    46133/99 and 48183/99, 3 October 2002; Folgerø and Others v. Norway (dec.), no. 15472/02, 14 February 2006; and Verein gegen Tierfabriken Schweiz (VgT) v. Switzerland (no. 2) [GC], no. 32772/02, § 63, ECHR 2009-...).
  • EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 28883/95

    McKERR c. ROYAUME-UNI

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2012 - 10865/09
    In all cases, however, the next-of-kin of the victim must be involved in the procedure to the extent necessary to safeguard his or her legitimate interests (see McKerr v. the United Kingdom, no. 28883/95, § 115, ECHR 2001-III).
  • EGMR, 24.07.2008 - 41461/02

    VLADIMIR ROMANOV v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 13.11.2012 - 10865/09
    Firstly, the State authorities must have conducted a thorough and effective investigation capable of leading to the identification and punishment of those responsible (see, inter alia, Krastanov v. Bulgaria, no. 50222/99, § 48, 30 September 2004; Çamdereli v. Turkey, no. 28433/02, §§ 28-29, 17 July 2008; and Vladimir Romanov v. Russia, no. 41461/02, §§ 79 and 81, 24 July 2008, cited above).
  • EGMR, 19.12.2006 - 43124/98

    TÜRKMEN c. TURQUIE

  • EGMR, 17.07.2008 - 28433/02

    CAMDERELI v. TURKEY

  • EGMR, 13.01.2009 - 33750/03

    YETER v. TURKEY

  • EGMR, 20.05.2008 - 68881/01

    HÜSEYIN SIMSEK c. TURQUIE

  • EGMR, 25.10.2017 - 19506/05

    EBCIN AGAINST TURKEY

  • EGMR, 02.02.2010 - 46268/06

    SAILEANU c. ROUMANIE

  • EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 11014/05

    SERBAN c. ROUMANIE

  • EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94

    Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …

  • EGMR, 09.12.2014 - 44814/07

    KADRI BUDAK c. TURQUIE

    Toutefois, les situations continues ne sont pas toutes identiques (Mocanu et autres c. Roumanie [GC], nos 10865/09, 45886/07 et 32431/08, §§ 261-269, CEDH 2014 (extraits)).
  • EGMR, 16.12.2014 - 49037/09

    DMITRIJEVS v. LATVIA

    This means not only a lack of hierarchical or institutional connection but also a practical independence (see, for example, Mocanu and Others v. Romania [GC], nos. 10865/09, 45886/07 and 32431/08, § 320, ECHR 2014 (extracts)).
  • EGMR, 09.12.2014 - 27979/08

    ABOLINS v. LATVIA

    The rule is therefore an indispensable part of the functioning of this system of protection (see Mocanu and Others v. Romania [GC], nos. 10865/09, 45886/07 and 32431/08, § 220, ECHR 2014 (extracts)).
  • EGMR, 13.01.2015 - 45458/12

    VER EECKE ET REULEN c. BELGIQUE

    Les principes généraux relatifs à l'exigence de l'épuisement des voies de recours internes au sens de l'article 35 § 1 de la Convention ont récemment été rappelés par la Cour dans l'arrêt Vuckovic et autres c. Serbie ([GC], no 17153/11, §§ 69-77, 25 mars 2014) auxquels la Cour renvoie pour les besoins de la présente affaire (voir également Mocanu et autres c. Roumanie [GC], nos 10865/09, 45886/07 et 32431/08, §§ 220-225, CEDH 2014 (extraits)).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 07.06.2018 - 10865/09, 45886/07, 32431/08   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2018,20195
EGMR, 07.06.2018 - 10865/09, 45886/07, 32431/08 (https://dejure.org/2018,20195)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 07.06.2018 - 10865/09, 45886/07, 32431/08 (https://dejure.org/2018,20195)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 07. Juni 2018 - 10865/09, 45886/07, 32431/08 (https://dejure.org/2018,20195)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2018,20195) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    MOCANU ET AUTRES CONTRE LA ROUMANIE

    Informations fournies par le gouvernement concernant les mesures prises permettant d'éviter de nouvelles violations. Versement des sommes prévues dans l'arrêt (französisch)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    MOCANU AND OTHERS AGAINST ROMANIA

    Information given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations. Payment of the sums provided for in the judgment (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (12)

  • EGMR, 31.03.2020 - 82284/17

    JEANTY c. BELGIQUE

    Les principes généraux sont énoncés notamment dans les arrêts El-Masri (précité, §§ 182-185), Mocanu et autres c. Roumanie ([GC], nos 10865/09 et 2 autres, §§ 316-326, CEDH 2014 (extraits)), et Bouyid c. Belgique ([GC], no 23380/09, §§ 114-123, CEDH 2015).
  • EGMR, 30.08.2016 - 17850/11

    NASRETTIN ASLAN ET ZEKI ASLAN c. TURQUIE

    La Cour renvoie aux principes généraux tels qu'ils se trouvent énoncés notamment dans les arrêts El-Masri c. l'ex-République yougoslave de Macédoine [GC], no 39630/09, §§ 182-185, CEDH 2012, et Mocanu et autres c. Roumanie [GC], nos 10865/09, 45886/07 et 32431/08, §§ 316-326, CEDH 2014 (extraits)).
  • EGMR, 23.02.2016 - 29272/08

    ÖZEN ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE

    La Cour renvoie aux principes généraux tels qu'ils se trouvent énoncés notamment dans les arrêts El-Masri c. l'ex-République Yougoslave de Macédoine ([GC], no 39630/09, §§ 182-185, CEDH 2012), Mocanu et autres c. Roumanie ([GC], nos 10865/09, 45886/07 et 32431/08, §§ 316-326, CEDH 2014 (extraits)), et Bouyid, précité, §§ 114-123).
     
  • EGMR, 07.07.2022 - 48195/17

    TOROSIAN c. GRÈCE

    Principes généraux 66. La Cour renvoie aux principes généraux tels qu'ils se trouvent énoncés notamment dans les arrêts Bouyid c. Belgique ([GC], no 23380/09, §§ 114-123, CEDH 2015), El-Masri (précité, §§ 182-185) et Mocanu et autres c. Roumanie ([GC], nos 10865/09, 45886/07 et 32431/08, §§ 316-326, CEDH (extraits)).
  • EGMR, 15.11.2022 - 3824/17

    GÜNGÖR c. TÜRKIYE

    La Cour renvoie aux principes généraux tels qu'ils se trouvent énoncés notamment dans les arrêts El-Masri (précité, §§ 182-185), Mocanu et autres c. Roumanie [GC], nos 10865/09 et 2 autres, §§ 316-326, CEDH 2014 (extraits).
  • EGMR, 13.09.2016 - 41642/08

    ÜSTDAG c. TURQUIE

    Or, elle rappelle qu'une réponse rapide des autorités peut être considérée comme essentielle pour préserver la confiance du public dans le respect du principe de légalité et éviter toute apparence de complicité ou de tolérance relativement à des actes illégaux, (voir, mutatis mutandis, Mocanu et autres c. Roumanie [GC], nos 10865/09, 45886/07 et 32431/08, § 323, CEDH 2014 (extraits), et Armani Da Silva, précité, § 237).
  • EGMR, 26.01.2023 - 60990/14

    B.Y. c. GRÈCE

    Appréciation de la Cour 58. La Cour renvoie aux principes généraux pertinents tels qu'ils se trouvent énoncés notamment dans les arrêts Bouyid c. Belgique ([GC], no 23380/09, §§ 114-123, CEDH 2015), El-Masri c. l'ex-République yougoslave de Macédoine ([GC], no 39630/09, §§ 182-185, CEDH 2012) et Mocanu et autres c. Roumanie ([GC], nos 10865/09 et 2 autres, §§ 316-326, CEDH 2014 (extraits)).
  • EGMR, 18.09.2018 - 38759/14

    L.G. c. BELGIQUE

    La Cour renvoie aux principes généraux pertinents tels que dégagés notamment dans les arrêts Mocanu et autres c. Roumanie ([GC], nos 10865/09 et 2 autres, §§ 316-326, CEDH 2014 (extraits)), et Bouyid c. Belgique ([GC], no 23380/09, §§ 114-123, CEDH 2015).
  • EGMR, 10.07.2018 - 27399/17

    AHKIM c. BELGIQUE

    La Cour a établi dans un certain nombre d'affaires, dont celles dirigées contre la Belgique, sa pratique en ce qui concerne les allégations de mauvais traitements infligés par les forces de l'ordre et l'effectivité des enquêtes à cet égard (voir, parmi beaucoup d'autres, Mocanu et autres c. Roumanie [GC], nos 10865/09, 45886/07 et 32431/08, §§ 316-326, CEDH 2014 (extraits), et Bouyid c. Belgique [GC], no 23380/09, §§ 80-90 et 100-123, CEDH 2015) ainsi que l'interdiction de comportements racistes (Natchova et autres c. Bulgarie [GC], nos 43577/98 et 43579/98, §§ 160-161, CEDH 2005-VII, et Turan Cakir c. Belgique, no 44256/06, §§ 73-82, 10 mars 2009).
  • EGMR, 26.04.2018 - 42660/11

    ANDERSEN c. GRÈCE

    La Cour renvoie aux principes généraux tels qu'ils se trouvent énoncés notamment dans les arrêts Bouyid c. Belgique ([GC], no 23380/09, §§ 114-123, CEDH 2015), El-Masri (précité, §§ 182-185) et Mocanu et autres c. Roumanie ([GC], nos 10865/09, 45886/07 et 32431/08, §§ 316-326, CEDH (extraits)).
  • EGMR, 15.11.2016 - 12259/13

    ATDEMIR c. TURQUIE

  • EGMR, 15.05.2018 - 4370/12

    BARAN c. TURQUIE

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht