Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 10.01.2017 - 62864/09 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MECIAR AND OTHERS v. SLOVAKIA
Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 - Protection of property (Article 1 para. 2 of Protocol No. 1 - Control of the use of property) (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 21.02.2012 - 62864/09
- EGMR, 10.01.2017 - 62864/09
Wird zitiert von ... (5) Zitiert selbst (22)
- VG der Evangelischen Landeskirche in Württemberg, 01.04.2005 - 16/04
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.01.2017 - 62864/09
16/04/1997 - 17/01/2008.16/04/1997 - 13/08/2003.
16/04/1997 - 17/05/1999.
16/04/1997 - 26/05/2006.
16/04/1997 - 14/09/2001.
16/04/1997 - 22/03/2004.
16/04/1997 - 02/04/2004.
16/04/1997 - 08/03/2004.
16/04/1997 - 08/09/1998.
16/04/1997 - 06/04/2005.
16/04/1997 - 09/02/2004.
16/04/1997 - 07/12/2001.
16/04/1997 - 12/06/2008.
16/04/1997 - 17/10/2005.
16/04/1997 - 17/04/2003.
16/04/1997 - 18/01/2006.
16/04/1997 - 24/01/2005.
16/04/1997 - 23/06/2004.
16/04/1997 - 27/12/2002.
16/04/1997 - 19/10/2001.
16/04/1997 - 10/04/2003.
16/04/1997 - 08/09/1998.
16/04/1997 - 24/10/2000.
16/04/1997 - 11/06/2008.
16/04/1997 - 20/02/2008.
16/04/1997 - 28/04/2003.
16/04/1997 - 06/06/2003.
16/04/1997 - 21/11/2002.
16/04/1997 - 17/08/2005.
16/04/1997 - 23/10/2001.
16/04/1997 - 15/11/2005.
16/04/1997 - 29/05/2007.
16/04/1997 - 21/05/2007.
16/04/1997 - 16/03/2004.
16/04/1997 - 26/02/2007.
16/04/1997 - 06/06/2006.
16/04/1997 - 30/05/2006.
16/04/1997 - 18/10/2001.
16/04/1997 - 15/08/2005.
16/04/1997 - 24/08/2006.
16/04/1997 - 03/09/2002.
16/04/1997 - 05/08/2003.
16/04/1997 - 03/01/2008.
16/04/1997 - 08/02/2007.
16/04/1997 -.
16/04/1997 -.
16/04/1997 -.
16/04/1997 -.
16/04/1997 -.
16/04/1997 -.
16/04/1997 - 30/09/2013.
16/04/1997 - 27/04/2011.
16/04/1997 - 11/11/2010.
16/04/1997 - 11/11/2010.
16/04/1997 - 01/10/2013.
16/04/1997 - 29/09/2010.
- EGMR, 15.02.2007 - 18/03
VANZHULA v. RUSSIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.01.2017 - 62864/09
18/03/1992 -.18/03/1992 -.
18/03/1992 - 31/01/2011.
18/03/1992 - 31/01/2013.
18/03/1992 - 31/01/2014.
18/03/1992 - 31/07/2010.
18/03/1992 - 31/10/2011.
18/03/1992 - 28/02/2011.
18/03/1992 - 28/02/2011.
18/03/1992 - 31/03/2010.
18/03/1992 - 31/10/2009.
18/03/1992 -.
18/03/1992 - 31/01/2012.
18/03/1992 -.
18/03/1992 -.
18/03/1992 -.
18/03/1992 -.
18/03/1992 -.
18/03/1992 - 31/01/2014.
- KAG Freiburg, 04.04.2008 - 10/07
Unterlassungsanspruch bezüglich der Anwendung einer Dienstvereinbarung über eine …
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.01.2017 - 62864/09
10/07/1994 - 01/09/2005.10/07/1994 - 31/08/2007.
10/07/1994 - 31/12/2005.
10/07/1994 - 01/04/2007.
10/07/1994 - 31/05/2004.
10/07/1994 - 30/09/2004.
10/07/1994 - 30/06/2005.
10/07/1994 - 31/08/2013.
10/07/1994 -.
10/07/1994 -.
10/07/1994 -.
10/07/1994 -.
10/07/1994 -.
10/07/1994 -.
10/07/1994 -.
(10/07/1994 - 12/01/2004).
- VGH der UEK, 14.11.2005 - 13/04
- EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 25/02
BALÇIK AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
- EGMR, 19.11.2015 - 17694/10
MAIO ET AUTRES c. ITALIE
- KAG Aachen, 07.02.2006 - 30/05
- OLG Hamburg, 18.01.2010 - 13 W 28/09
Grundbucheintragung bei Zuerwerb von Wohnungseigentum: Nachverpfändung von …
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.01.2017 - 62864/09
16/04/1997 - 29/09/2010. - VG der Evangelischen Landeskirche in Württemberg, 19.02.2005 - 12/04
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.01.2017 - 62864/09
(25/02/1997 - 12/04/2004). - VG der Evangelischen Landeskirche in Württemberg, 01.06.2012 - 10/12
Auszug aus EGMR, 10.01.2017 - 62864/09
30/01/1999 - 10/12/2006. - VG der Evangelischen Landeskirche in Württemberg, 07.10.2005 - 18/04
- VK Niedersachsen, 20.09.2002 - 18/02
Unverzüglichkeit der Rüge: Rügefrist beträgt bei einem fachkundigen Unternehmen …
- VG der Evangelischen Landeskirche in Württemberg, 04.04.2003 - 19/02
- KAG Freiburg, 30.09.2011 - 8/11
Verhängung einer Geldbuße
- VGH Baden, 03.08.1949 - 10/48
Erfassung und Räumung einer Wohnung
- KAG Mainz, 26.06.2012 - M 21/11
Eingruppierung; Zustimmungsersetzung
- EGMR, 06.12.2011 - 10/10
BRUNNER v. TURKEY
- KAG Aachen, 08.08.2006 - 15/06
- KAG Aachen, 19.06.2006 - 11/06
- RG, 30.05.1908 - I 30/08
Förmlichkeiten des Protestes, durch den die Präsentation eines eigenen …
- EGMR, 05.03.2020 - 30255/09
BITTÓ AND OTHERS AGAINST SLOVAKIA AND 10 OTHER CASES
- EGMR, 05.07.2016 - 23785/07
BUKOVCANOVÁ AND OTHERS v. SLOVAKIA
- EGMR, 27.06.2017 - 51414/11
BALAN AND OTHERS v. SLOVAKIA
44218/07, 54831/07, 33176/08, 47150/08; Mečiar and Others v. Slovakia, no. 62864/09, 10 January 2017).The parents of one of the applicants (Mr Šindelár) lodged application no. 62864/09 concerning the rent control applicable to flats that he owned in two residential buildings.
In 2010 and 2014 respectively the applicant inherited ownership shares in those residential buildings and was acknowledged as having standing to pursue the application in his late parents' stead (see Mečiar and Others v. Slovakia, no. 62864/09, §§ 12-13, 10 January 2017).
The claims put forward by Mr Šindelár in the present application concern the same flats and the same periods during which those flats were subject to rent control as submitted by his late parents in application no. 62864/09, which he pursued in their stead.
- EGMR, 09.01.2018 - 47922/14
DRAHOS AND OTHERS v. SLOVAKIA and 5 other applications
44218/07, 54831/07, 33176/08, 47150/08; and Mečiar and Others v. Slovakia, no. 62864/09, 10 January 2017; Matuschka and Others v. Slovakia [Committee], nos.In Bittó and Others (merits) and subsequent rent-control cases (see, among other authorities, Mečiar and Others v. Slovakia, no. 62864/09, 10 January 2017), the Court found (i) that the rent-control scheme had amounted to an interference with the applicants' property, (ii) that that interference had constituted a means of State control of the use of their property to be examined under the second paragraph of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, (iii) that it had been "lawful" within the meaning of that Article, (iv) that it had pursued a legitimate social-policy aim, and (v) that it had been "in accordance with the general interest", as required by the second paragraph of that Article (see Bittó and Others (merits), cited above, §§ 101-04).
- EGMR, 04.10.2018 - 15493/12
KUKLÍK AND OTHERS v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
He presented his estimates of free-market rent only in a table, without substantiating them with any relevant evidence, such as a relevant expert opinion showing the difference between the regulated and the market rent (contrast Mečiar and Others v. Slovakia, no. 62864/09, § 8, 10 January 2017, and Čapský and Jeschkeová (just satisfaction), cited above, §§ 48-49; contrast also Riedel and Others v. Slovakia, nos. - EGMR, 27.06.2017 - 33076/10
MATUSCHKA AND OTHERS v. SLOVAKIA and 1 other application
- EGMR, 27.06.2017 - 46609/13
BAJZÍK AND OTHERS v. SLOVAKIA
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen. Falls Sie noch kein Benutzerkonto haben, können Sie sich in weniger als einer Minute eines kostenlos anlegen "Registrieren".