Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 06.11.2003 - 48047/99 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2003,49318) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
Wird zitiert von ... (2) Neu Zitiert selbst (10)
- EGMR, 26.09.1995 - 17851/91
Radikalenerlaß
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2003 - 48047/99
The Court considers that this complaint falls to be examined under Article 10 of the Convention (see Vogt v. Germany, judgment of 26 September 1995, Series A no. 323). - EGMR, 06.09.1978 - 5029/71
Klass u.a. ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2003 - 48047/99
In principle, it does not suffice for an individual applicant to claim that the mere existence of a law violates his rights under the Convention; it is necessary that the law should have been applied to his detriment (see Klass and Others v. Germany, judgment of 6 September 1978, Series A no. 28, pp. 17-18, § 33). - EGMR, 29.04.1999 - 25088/94
CHASSAGNOU ET AUTRES c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2003 - 48047/99
The term "association" possesses an autonomous meaning; the classification in national law has only relative value and constitutes no more than a starting-point (see Chassagnou and Others v. France [GC], nos. 25088/94, 28331/95 and 28443/95, § 100, ECHR 1999-III).
- EGMR, 23.06.1981 - 6878/75
LE COMPTE, VAN LEUVEN ET DE MEYERE c. BELGIQUE
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2003 - 48047/99
The first question the Court has to determine is whether the BDU and the UDB are associations for the purposes of Article 11 of the Convention and whether their establishment prevents medical doctors and dentists from forming or joining professional associations (see Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere v. Belgium, judgment of 23 June 1981, Series A no. 43, pp. 26-27, §§ 62-66). - EGMR, 02.07.2002 - 30668/96
WILSON, NATIONAL UNION OF JOURNALISTS AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2003 - 48047/99
Insofar as the applicants submit that the formation of other trade unions will be futile, given that only the BDU and the UDB may negotiate the National Framework Agreement with the National Health Security Fund, the Court notes that the Convention does not per se guarantee to trade unions the right to collective bargaining (see Wilson & the National Union of Journalists and Others v. the United Kingdom, nos. 30668/96, 30671/96 and 30678/96, § 44, ECHR 2002-V). - EGMR, 30.06.1993 - 16130/90
SIGURĐUR A. SIGURJÓNSSON v. ICELAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2003 - 48047/99
The unions were essentially private-law associations, much like the one at issue in the case of Sigurđur A. Sigurjónsson v. Iceland (judgment of 30 June 1993, Series A no. 264). - EGMR, 06.11.2001 - 53430/99
FEDERATION CHRETIENNE DES TEMOINS DE JEHOVAH DE FRANCE v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2003 - 48047/99
The Court reiterates that it is not its task to rule on legislation in abstracto (see Fédération Chrétienne des Témoins de Jéhovah v. France (dec.), no. 53430/99, ECHR 2001-XI). - EGMR, 08.09.1989 - 14331/88
REVERT AND LEGALLAIS v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2003 - 48047/99
The Court starts by noting that the Convention organs have consistently held that the regulatory bodies of the liberal professions are not associations within the meaning of Article 11 of the Convention (see Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere, cited above, pp. 26-27, §§ 64-65, as regards the Belgian Ordre des médecins; Revert and Legallais v. France, nos. 14331/88 and 14332/88, Commission decision of 8 September 1989, Decisions and Reports (DR) 62, p. 309, as regards the French Ordre des architectes; A. and Others v. Spain, no. 13750/88, Commission decision of 2 July 1990, DR 66, p. 188, as regards the Spanish bar association; Vialas Simón v. Spain, no. 16685/90, Commission decision of 8 July 1992, unreported, as regards the Spanish Ordres des médecins; O.V.R. v. Russia (dec.), no. 44319/98, ECHR 2001-V, as regards the Russian notary chambers). - EKMR, 02.07.1990 - 13750/88
v. ESPAGNE
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2003 - 48047/99
The Court starts by noting that the Convention organs have consistently held that the regulatory bodies of the liberal professions are not associations within the meaning of Article 11 of the Convention (see Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere, cited above, pp. 26-27, §§ 64-65, as regards the Belgian Ordre des médecins; Revert and Legallais v. France, nos. 14331/88 and 14332/88, Commission decision of 8 September 1989, Decisions and Reports (DR) 62, p. 309, as regards the French Ordre des architectes; A. and Others v. Spain, no. 13750/88, Commission decision of 2 July 1990, DR 66, p. 188, as regards the Spanish bar association; Vialas Simón v. Spain, no. 16685/90, Commission decision of 8 July 1992, unreported, as regards the Spanish Ordres des médecins; O.V.R. v. Russia (dec.), no. 44319/98, ECHR 2001-V, as regards the Russian notary chambers). - EKMR, 08.07.1992 - 16685/90
VIALAS SIMÓN contre l'ESPAGNE
Auszug aus EGMR, 06.11.2003 - 48047/99
The Court starts by noting that the Convention organs have consistently held that the regulatory bodies of the liberal professions are not associations within the meaning of Article 11 of the Convention (see Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere, cited above, pp. 26-27, §§ 64-65, as regards the Belgian Ordre des médecins; Revert and Legallais v. France, nos. 14331/88 and 14332/88, Commission decision of 8 September 1989, Decisions and Reports (DR) 62, p. 309, as regards the French Ordre des architectes; A. and Others v. Spain, no. 13750/88, Commission decision of 2 July 1990, DR 66, p. 188, as regards the Spanish bar association; Vialas Simón v. Spain, no. 16685/90, Commission decision of 8 July 1992, unreported, as regards the Spanish Ordres des médecins; O.V.R. v. Russia (dec.), no. 44319/98, ECHR 2001-V, as regards the Russian notary chambers).
- EGMR, 21.05.2013 - 34118/11
ORDRE DES AVOCATS DEFENSEURS ET AVOCATS PRES LA COUR D'APPEL DE MONACO c. MONACO
Il en déduit que l'Ordre des avocats constitue, au regard de la jurisprudence de la Cour, une personne morale de droit public, participant ŕ l'exécution du service public de la justice et exerçant des prérogatives de puissance publique, ce qui exclut la possibilité de lui reconnaître la qualité de victime au sens de l'article 34 de la Convention (Le Compte, Van Leuven et De Meyere c. Belgique, 23 juin 1981, §§ 64-65, série A no 43, Section de commune d'Antilly c. France (déc.), no 45129/98, CEDH 1999-VIII, Popov et autre c. Bulgarie (déc.), no 48047/99, 6 novembre 2003, Bota c. Roumanie (déc.), no 24057/03, 12 octobre 2004, et Tanase c. Moldova [GC], no 7/08, § 104, CEDH 2010-...). - EGMR, 06.05.2008 - 17029/05
NATIONAL NOTARY CHAMBER v. ALBANIA
The Court notes at the outset that the Convention institutions have consistently held that the regulatory bodies of the liberal professions are not associations within the meaning of Article 11 of the Convention (see Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere, cited above, pp. 26-27, §§ 64-65, as regards the Belgian Ordre des médecins; Revert and Legallais v. France, nos. 14331/88 and 14332/88, Commission decision of 8 September 1989, Decisions and Reports (DR) 62, p. 309, as regards the French Ordre des architectes; A. and Others v. Spain, no. 13750/88, Commission decision of 2 July 1990, DR 66, p. 188, as regards the Spanish Bar Association; Vialas Simón v. Spain, no. 16685/90, Commission decision of 8 July 1992, unreported, as regards the Spanish Ordre des médecins; O.V.R. v. Russia (dec.), no. 44319/98, ECHR 2001-V, as regards the Russian notary chambers; and Popov and Others, Vakarelova, Markov and Bankov v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 48047/99, as regards two Bulgarian professional organisations of doctors and dentists).