Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 21.05.2013 - 4282/10   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2013,11535
EGMR, 21.05.2013 - 4282/10 (https://dejure.org/2013,11535)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 21.05.2013 - 4282/10 (https://dejure.org/2013,11535)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 21. Mai 2013 - 4282/10 (https://dejure.org/2013,11535)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2013,11535) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

  • EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 15212/03

    CHARZYNSKI c. POLOGNE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 21.05.2013 - 4282/10
    The relevant domestic law and practice concerning remedies for the excessive length of judicial proceedings, in particular the applicable provisions of the 2004 Act, are stated in the Court's decisions in the cases of Charzynski v. Poland (dec.), no. 15212/03, §§ 12-23, ECHR 2005-V; Ratajczyk v. Poland (dec.), no. 11215/02, ECHR 2005-VIII; and the judgment in the case of Krasuski v. Poland, no. 61444/00, §§ 34-46, ECHR 2005-V.

    In this regard, the Court recalls that it has already found that the 2004 Act provides for an effective remedy in respect of the excessive length of proceedings (see Charzynski v. Poland (dec.), no. 15212/03, §§ 12-23, ECHR 2005-V; Figiel v. Poland (no. 1), no. 38190/05, §§ 25-30, 17 July 2008; Figiel v. Poland (no. 2), no. 38206/05, §§ 29-34, 16 September 2008).

  • EGMR, 18.09.2007 - 28953/03

    SULWINSKA v. POLAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 21.05.2013 - 4282/10
    To this end, the Court will examine carefully the declaration in the light of the principles emerging from its case-law, in particular the Tahsin Acar judgment (Tahsin Acar v. Turkey, [GC], no. 26307/95, §§ 75-77, ECHR 2003-VI; WAZA Spólka z o.o. v. Poland (dec.), no. 11602/02, 26 June 2007; and Sulwinska v. Poland (dec.), no. 28953/03).
  • EGMR, 11.10.2005 - 52690/99

    MAJEWSKI v. POLAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 21.05.2013 - 4282/10
    The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Poland, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, §§ 69-98, ECHR 2006-V; Majewski v. Poland, no. 52690/99, 11 October 2005; Wende and Kukówka v. Poland, no. 56026/00, 10 May 2007).
  • EGMR, 16.09.2008 - 38206/05

    FIGIEL v. POLAND (No. 2)

    Auszug aus EGMR, 21.05.2013 - 4282/10
    In this regard, the Court recalls that it has already found that the 2004 Act provides for an effective remedy in respect of the excessive length of proceedings (see Charzynski v. Poland (dec.), no. 15212/03, §§ 12-23, ECHR 2005-V; Figiel v. Poland (no. 1), no. 38190/05, §§ 25-30, 17 July 2008; Figiel v. Poland (no. 2), no. 38206/05, §§ 29-34, 16 September 2008).
  • EGMR, 17.07.2008 - 38190/05

    FIGIEL v. POLAND (No. 1)

    Auszug aus EGMR, 21.05.2013 - 4282/10
    In this regard, the Court recalls that it has already found that the 2004 Act provides for an effective remedy in respect of the excessive length of proceedings (see Charzynski v. Poland (dec.), no. 15212/03, §§ 12-23, ECHR 2005-V; Figiel v. Poland (no. 1), no. 38190/05, §§ 25-30, 17 July 2008; Figiel v. Poland (no. 2), no. 38206/05, §§ 29-34, 16 September 2008).
  • EGMR, 10.05.2007 - 56026/00

    WENDE AND KUKOWKA v. POLAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 21.05.2013 - 4282/10
    The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Poland, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, §§ 69-98, ECHR 2006-V; Majewski v. Poland, no. 52690/99, 11 October 2005; Wende and Kukówka v. Poland, no. 56026/00, 10 May 2007).
  • EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

    FRYDLENDER c. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 21.05.2013 - 4282/10
    The Court has established in a number of cases, including those brought against Poland, its practice concerning complaints about the violation of one's right to a hearing within a reasonable time (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, §§ 69-98, ECHR 2006-V; Majewski v. Poland, no. 52690/99, 11 October 2005; Wende and Kukówka v. Poland, no. 56026/00, 10 May 2007).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht