Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  DENIZCI ET AUTRES c. CHYPRE

  Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 8, Art. 14, Art. 34, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 37, Art. 37 Abs. 1 Buchst. a, Art. 41, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protok... oll Nr. 4 Art. 2, Protokoll Nr. 4 Art. 2 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 4 Art. 2 Abs. 3, Protokoll Nr. 4 Art. 3 MRK
  Exception préliminaire rejetée (non-épuisement des voies de recours internes) Radiation partielle du rôle Non-violation de l'art. 2 Violation de l'art. 3 Violation de l'art. 5 Non-lieu à examiner l'art. 8 Non-lieu à examiner P1-1 Violation de P4-2 Non-lieu à ...

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  DENIZCI AND OTHERS v. CYPRUS

  Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 8, Art. 14, Art. 34, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 37, Art. 37 Abs. 1 Buchst. a, Art. 41, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protok... oll Nr. 4 Art. 2, Protokoll Nr. 4 Art. 2 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 4 Art. 2 Abs. 3, Protokoll Nr. 4 Art. 3 MRK
  Preliminary objection rejected (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies) Partly struck out of the list No violation of Art. 2 Violation of Art. 3 Violation of Art. 5 Not necessary to examine Art. 8 Not necessary to examine P1-1 Violation of P4-2 Not necessary to ...

Verfahrensgang

• EKMR, 20.01.1998 - 25316/94
• EGMR, 23.05.2001 - 25316/94, 25317/94, 25318/94, 25319/94, 25320/94, 25321/94, 27207/95

Wird zitiert von ... (14)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91

  McCANN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.05.2001 - 25316/94

  The Court reiterates that the obligation to protect life under Article 2, read in conjunction with the State's general duty under Article 1 "to secure to everyone within [its] jurisdiction the rights and freedoms defined in [the] Convention", requires by implication that there should be some form of effective official investigation when individuals have been killed as a result of the use of force (see Timurtas v. Turkey, no. 23531/94, § 87, ECHR 2000-VI, and, mutatis mutandis, McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 27 September 1995, Series A no. 324, p. 49, § 161).
• EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94

  Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.05.2001 - 25316/94

  The Court also reiterates that, where an individual has an arguable claim that there has been a violation of Article 3 of the Convention, the notion of an effective remedy entails, on the part of the State, a thorough and effective investigation capable of leading to the identification and punishment of those responsible (see Aksoy, cited above, p. 2287, § 98, and Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 79, ECHR 1999-V).
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.05.2001 - 25316/94

  The Court reiterates that mere restrictions on liberty of movement resulting from special supervision fall to be dealt with under Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 (see Raimondo v. Italy, judgment of 22 February 1994, Series A no. 281-A, p. 19, § 39, and Labita v. Italy [GC], no 26772/95, ECHR 2000-IV).

 
• EGMR, 22.02.1994 - 12954/87

  RAIMONDO v. ITALY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.05.2001 - 25316/94

  The Court reiterates that mere restrictions on liberty of movement resulting from special supervision fall to be dealt with under Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 (see Raimondo v. Italy, judgment of 22 February 1994, Series A no. 281-A, p. 19, § 39, and Labita v. Italy [GC], no 26772/95, ECHR 2000-IV).
• EGMR, 13.06.2000 - 23531/94

  TIMURTAS c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.05.2001 - 25316/94

  The Court reiterates that the obligation to protect life under Article 2, read in conjunction with the State's general duty under Article 1 "to secure to everyone within [its] jurisdiction the rights and freedoms defined in [the] Convention", requires by implication that there should be some form of effective official investigation when individuals have been killed as a result of the use of force (see Timurtas v. Turkey, no. 23531/94, § 87, ECHR 2000-VI, and, mutatis mutandis, McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 27 September 1995, Series A no. 324, p. 49, § 161).
• EGMR, 21.12.2000 - 30873/96

  EGMEZ c. CHYPRE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 23.05.2001 - 25316/94

  The Court also recalls that in Egmez v. Cyprus (no. 30873/96, ECHR 2000-XII) the applicant had made a complaint to the Ombudsman which resulted in a report naming some of the officers responsible for the alleged ill-treatment of the applicant.

• EGMR, 18.01.2018 - 48151/11

  FÉDÉRATION NATIONALE DES ASSOCIATIONS ET SYNDICATS DE SPORTIFS (FNASS) ET AUTRES …

  Il ne s'agit en rien de mesure de surveillance policière des intéressés comme celles qui ont pu être décrites dans l'affaire Labita précitée ou encore dans l'affaire Denizci et autres c. Chypre (nos 25316-25321/94 et 27207/95, CEDH 2001-V).

  De même, l'obligation faite à des requérants de se présenter à la police chaque fois qu'ils souhaitaient changer de lieu de résidence ou rendre visite à leur famille ou à leurs amis s'analyse en une atteinte à leur liberté de circulation (Denizci et autres c. Chypre, nos 25316-25321/94 et 27207/95, §§ 346-347 et 403-404, CEDH 2001-V, et Bolat c. Russie, no 14139/03, § 65, 5 octobre 2006).

• EGMR, 26.03.2024 - 38963/18

  V.I. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

  In the present case, regard being had to the documents in its possession and the above criteria, the Court considers it reasonable to award the sum of EUR 7, 420 in respect of costs and expenses, plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicant, to be paid into the bank account indicated by his representative (see Denizci and Others v. Cyprus, nos. 25316/94 and 6 others, § 428, ECHR 2001-V, and Cobzaru v. Romania, no. 48254/99, § 111, 26 July 2007).
• EGMR, 31.03.2005 - 38187/97

  ADALI v. TURKEY

  Bearing in mind the above findings, it is worth pointing that in the case of Denizci and Others v. Cyprus (nos. 25316-25321/94 and 27207/95, ECHR 2001-V), which concerned, among other issues, the killing of one of the applicants' son and his friend in southern Cyprus, the Court held that the investigation was adequate and sufficient because the local police went to the scene, a plan of the incident site was drawn up and a list of the objects found established.

 
• EGMR, 22.02.2007 - 1509/02

  TATISHVILI v. RUSSIA

  La Cour rappelle avoir jugé que l'obligation faite à des requérants de se présenter à la police chaque fois qu'ils souhaitaient changer de lieu de résidence ou rendre visite à leur famille ou à leurs amis s'analysait en une atteinte à leur liberté de circulation (Denizci et autres c. Chypre, nos 25316-25321/94 et 27207/95, §§ 346-347 et 403-404, CEDH 2001-V, et Bolat c. Russie, no 14139/03, § 65, 5 octobre 2006).
• EGMR, 23.02.2016 - 55354/11

  CIVEK c. TURQUIE

  L'obligation de l'État à cet égard implique le devoir primordial d'assurer le droit à la vie en mettant en place une législation pénale concrète dissuadant de commettre des atteintes contre les personnes et s'appuyant sur un mécanisme d'application conçu pour en prévenir, réprimer et sanctionner les violations (Denizci et autres c. Chypre, nos 25316-25321/94 et 27207/95, § 375, CEDH 2001-V).
• EGMR, 18.09.2012 - 12214/07

  EGMEZ v. CYPRUS

  The Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe concluded its examination of the cases of Egmez v. Cyprus (cited above) and Denizci and Others v. Cyprus (nos. 25316-25321/94 and 27207/95, ECHR 2001-V) by adopting Resolution ResDH(2006)13, the relevant parts of which read as follows:.
• EGMR, 27.04.2010 - 27138/04

  CIUBOTARU v. MOLDOVA

  In the present case, regard being had to the itemised list submitted and to the complexity of the case, the Court awards EUR 3, 500 in respect of the costs incurred by the applicant's representative, who submitted the observations on the case, to be paid into a bank account indicated by him (see Denizci and Others v. Cyprus, nos. 25316-25321/94 and 27207/95, § 428, ECHR 2001-V, and Cobzaru v. Romania, no. 48254/99, § 111, 26 July 2007).
• EGMR, 14.12.2004 - 58478/00

  RUPA c. ROUMANIE

  Pour ce qui est de la possibilité d'introduire une action devant les tribunaux civils, la Cour rappelle que lorsqu'un individu formule une allégation défendable de violation de l'article 3 de la Convention, la notion de recours effectif implique, de la part de l'Etat, des investigations approfondies et effectives propres à conduire à l'identification et au châtiment des responsables (Denizci et autres c. Chypre, no 25316-25321/94 et 27207/95, § 358, CEDH 2001-V, et Selmouni c. France [GC], no 25803/94, § 79, CEDH 1999-V).
• EGMR, 07.12.2006 - 15007/02

  IVANOV v. UKRAINE

  The interference mentioned in the preceding paragraphs breaches Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 unless it is "in accordance with law", pursues one of the legitimate aims set out in Article 2 §§ 3 and 4 of Protocol No. 4 and is, in addition, necessary in a democratic society to achieve the aim or aims in question (see, Denizci and Others v. Cyprus, nos. 25316-25321/94 and 27207/95, § 405, ECHR 2001-V).
• EGMR, 02.12.2008 - 20612/02

  SLAVOV and OTHERSv. BULGARIA

  The Court therefore finds no reasons relating to respect for human rights, as defined in the Convention and its Protocols, which would require it to continue the examination of the complaints of these three applicants (Article 37 § 1 in fine) (see Denizci and Others v. Cyprus, nos. 25316-25321/94 and 27207/95, § 369, ECHR 2001-V).
• EGMR, 05.10.2006 - 14139/03

  BOLAT v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 21.10.2004 - 71225/01

  K. c. LETTONIE
• EGMR, 14.12.2021 - 56180/15

  DUBALARI v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
• EGMR, 29.04.2010 - 7864/06

  CAKIR v. CYPRUS