Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  CIUBOTARU v. MOLDOVA

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Preliminary objection joined to merits (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies) Violation of Art. 8 Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 27.04.2010 - 27138/04
• EGMR, 27.04.2016 - 27138/04

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (10)

• EGMR, 29.04.2002 - 2346/02

  Vereinbarkeit der strafrechtlichen Verfolgung der Beihilfe zum Selbstmord mit der …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.04.2010 - 27138/04

  It covers the physical and psychological integrity of a person (see Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346/02, § 61, ECHR 2002-III, and Y.F. v. Turkey, no. 24209/94, § 33, ECHR 2003-IX).
• EGMR, 04.12.2008 - 30562/04

  S. und Marper ./. Vereinigtes Königreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.04.2010 - 27138/04

  In a more recent judgment, in the case of S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom ([GC], nos. 30562/04 and 30566/04, § 66, 4 December 2008), the Court further held that ethnic identity was also a detail pertaining to the individual's identity falling within the ambit of Article 8.
• EGMR, 11.07.2002 - 28957/95

  Christine Goodwin ./. Vereinigtes Königreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.04.2010 - 27138/04

  The notion of personal autonomy is an important principle underlying the interpretation of the guarantees provided for by Article 8. Under this principle protection is given to the personal sphere of each individual, including the right to establish details of their identity as individual human beings (see Burghartz v. Switzerland, 22 February 1994, § 24, Series A no. 280-B; Christine Goodwin v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28957/95, § 90, ECHR 2002-VI).

 
• EGMR, 09.10.1979 - 6289/73

  AIREY v. IRELAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.04.2010 - 27138/04

  The Court reiterates that in the assessment of the present case it should be borne in mind that the Convention is intended to guarantee not rights that are theoretical or illusory but rights that are practical and effective (see Airey v. Ireland, 9 October 1979, § 24, Series A no. 32).
• EGMR, 28.01.2003 - 44647/98

  PECK c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.04.2010 - 27138/04

  The Court has held that gender identification, name and sexual orientation and sexual life were details pertaining to an individual's identity falling within the personal sphere protected by Article 8 (see, among other authorities, Bensaid v. the United Kingdom, no. 44599/98, § 47, ECHR 2001-I with further references, and Peck v. the United Kingdom, no. 44647/98, § 57, ECHR 2003-I).
• EGMR, 06.02.2001 - 44599/98

  BENSAID c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.04.2010 - 27138/04

  The Court has held that gender identification, name and sexual orientation and sexual life were details pertaining to an individual's identity falling within the personal sphere protected by Article 8 (see, among other authorities, Bensaid v. the United Kingdom, no. 44599/98, § 47, ECHR 2001-I with further references, and Peck v. the United Kingdom, no. 44647/98, § 57, ECHR 2003-I).
• EGMR, 22.02.1994 - 16213/90

  BURGHARTZ c. SUISSE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.04.2010 - 27138/04

  The notion of personal autonomy is an important principle underlying the interpretation of the guarantees provided for by Article 8. Under this principle protection is given to the personal sphere of each individual, including the right to establish details of their identity as individual human beings (see Burghartz v. Switzerland, 22 February 1994, § 24, Series A no. 280-B; Christine Goodwin v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 28957/95, § 90, ECHR 2002-VI).
• EGMR, 22.07.2003 - 24209/94

  Y.F. c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.04.2010 - 27138/04

  It covers the physical and psychological integrity of a person (see Pretty v. the United Kingdom, no. 2346/02, § 61, ECHR 2002-III, and Y.F. v. Turkey, no. 24209/94, § 33, ECHR 2003-IX).
• EGMR, 26.07.2007 - 48254/99

  COBZARU v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.04.2010 - 27138/04

  In the present case, regard being had to the itemised list submitted and to the complexity of the case, the Court awards EUR 3, 500 in respect of the costs incurred by the applicant's representative, who submitted the observations on the case, to be paid into a bank account indicated by him (see Denizci and Others v. Cyprus, nos. 25316-25321/94 and 27207/95, § 428, ECHR 2001-V, and Cobzaru v. Romania, no. 48254/99, § 111, 26 July 2007).
• EGMR, 23.05.2001 - 25316/94

  DENIZCI ET AUTRES c. CHYPRE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.04.2010 - 27138/04

  In the present case, regard being had to the itemised list submitted and to the complexity of the case, the Court awards EUR 3, 500 in respect of the costs incurred by the applicant's representative, who submitted the observations on the case, to be paid into a bank account indicated by him (see Denizci and Others v. Cyprus, nos. 25316-25321/94 and 27207/95, § 428, ECHR 2001-V, and Cobzaru v. Romania, no. 48254/99, § 111, 26 July 2007).