Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  HRDALO v. CROATIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 2, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 Remainder inadmissible Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed (englisch)

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Hrdalo v. Croatia

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 27.09.2011 - 23272/07
• EGMR, 29.04.2015 - 23272/07

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 16.12.1992 - 13710/88

  NIEMIETZ v. GERMANY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.09.2011 - 23272/07

  The Court reiterates that "private life" is a broad term not susceptible to exhaustive definition (see Niemietz v. Germany, 16 December 1992, § 29, Series A no. 251-B), and that individuals" right to reputation is an element of their "private life" protected under Article 8 of the Convention (see, for example, Chauvy and Others v. France, no. 64915/01, § 70, ECHR 2004-VI; Pfeifer v. Austria, no. 12556/03, § 38, ECHR 2007-XII; and Petrina v. Romania, no. 78060/01, § 28, 14 October 2008).
• EGMR, 27.10.1993 - 14448/88

  DOMBO BEHEER B.V. v. THE NETHERLANDS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.09.2011 - 23272/07

  The Court reiterates that the principle of equality of arms, which is one of the elements of the broader concept of a fair hearing, requires each party to be given a reasonable opportunity to present its case under conditions that do not place it at a substantial disadvantage vis-à-vis its opponent (see, among many other authorities, Dombo Beheer B.V. v. the Netherlands, 27 October 1993, § 33, Series A no. 274, and Ankerl v. Switzerland, 23 October 1996, § 38, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-V).
• EGMR, 23.06.1993 - 12952/87

  RUIZ-MATEOS c. ESPAGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.09.2011 - 23272/07

  Each party must be given the opportunity to have knowledge of and comment on the observations filed or evidence adduced by the other party (see, for example, Ruiz-Mateos v. Spain, 23 June 1993, § 63, Series A no. 262, and Wynen v. Belgium, no. 32576/96, § 32, ECHR 2002-VIII).

 
• EGMR, 14.10.2008 - 78060/01

  PETRINA c. ROUMANIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.09.2011 - 23272/07

  The Court reiterates that "private life" is a broad term not susceptible to exhaustive definition (see Niemietz v. Germany, 16 December 1992, § 29, Series A no. 251-B), and that individuals" right to reputation is an element of their "private life" protected under Article 8 of the Convention (see, for example, Chauvy and Others v. France, no. 64915/01, § 70, ECHR 2004-VI; Pfeifer v. Austria, no. 12556/03, § 38, ECHR 2007-XII; and Petrina v. Romania, no. 78060/01, § 28, 14 October 2008).
• EGMR, 28.02.2002 - 59109/00

  JOVANOVIC contre la CROATIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.09.2011 - 23272/07

  This happened on 17 March 2004 when the Government of Croatia adopted the decision on his removal (see, mutatis mutandis, Jovanovic v. Croatia (dec.), no. 59109/00, ECHR 2002-III).
• EGMR, 12.04.2011 - 34388/05

  CELIK (BOZKURT) v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.09.2011 - 23272/07

  The scope of Article 6 § 2 thus also extends to various administrative proceedings conducted simultaneously with the criminal proceedings against an applicant or after the conclusion of criminal proceedings ending without a decision finding the accused guilty in so far as there are such links between the criminal proceedings and the parallel administrative proceedings as to justify extending the scope of Article 6 § 2 to cover the latter (see Vassilios Stavropoulos v. Greece, no. 35522/04, 27 September 2007; Paraponiaris v. Greece, no. 42132/06, 25 September 2008, and Çelik (Bozkurt) v. Turkey, no. 34388/05, 12 April 2011).