Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 27.11.2008 - 28674/03   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2008,50972
EGMR, 27.11.2008 - 28674/03 (https://dejure.org/2008,50972)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 27.11.2008 - 28674/03 (https://dejure.org/2008,50972)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 27. November 2008 - 28674/03 (https://dejure.org/2008,50972)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2008,50972) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

 
Sortierung



Kontextvorschau





Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (7)Neu Zitiert selbst (5)

  • EGMR, 22.02.1994 - 12954/87

    RAIMONDO v. ITALY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 27.11.2008 - 28674/03
    The Court finds that the measure in issue did not amount to a deprivation of liberty within the meaning of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention as the mere restrictions on the liberty of movement resulting from special supervision fall to be dealt with under Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 of the Convention (see Guzzardi v. Italy, judgment of 6 November 1980, Series A no. 39, p. 33, § 92; Raimondo v. Italy, judgment of 22 February 1994, Series A no. 281-A, p. 19, § 39; and Toeva v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 53329/99, 9 September 2004).
  • EGMR, 06.11.1980 - 7367/76

    GUZZARDI v. ITALY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 27.11.2008 - 28674/03
    The Court finds that the measure in issue did not amount to a deprivation of liberty within the meaning of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention as the mere restrictions on the liberty of movement resulting from special supervision fall to be dealt with under Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 of the Convention (see Guzzardi v. Italy, judgment of 6 November 1980, Series A no. 39, p. 33, § 92; Raimondo v. Italy, judgment of 22 February 1994, Series A no. 281-A, p. 19, § 39; and Toeva v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 53329/99, 9 September 2004).
  • EGMR, 16.10.2001 - 37555/97

    O'HARA c. ROYAUME-UNI

    Auszug aus EGMR, 27.11.2008 - 28674/03
    Facts which raise a suspicion need not be of the same level as those necessary to bring a charge (see O"Hara v. the United Kingdom, no. 37555/97, § 36, ECHR 2001-X).
  • EGMR, 11.12.2003 - 39084/97

    YANKOV c. BULGARIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 27.11.2008 - 28674/03
    The relevant provisions of the CCP and the Bulgarian courts" practice before 1 January 2000 are summarised in the Court's judgments in several similar cases (see, among others, Nikolova v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 31195/96, §§ 25-36, ECHR 1999-II; Ilijkov v. Bulgaria, no. 33977/96, §§ 55-59, 26 July 2001; and Yankov v. Bulgaria, no. 39084/97, §§ 79-88, ECHR 2003-XII (extracts)).
  • EGMR, 12.07.2007 - 68490/01

    STANKOV v. BULGARIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 27.11.2008 - 28674/03
    The system of court fees, which existed at the relevant time, in proceedings under the SMRDA and the practice of the domestic courts has been summarised in the cases of Stankov v. Bulgaria (no. 68490/01, §§ 19 21, ECHR 2007-...) and Mihalkov v. Bulgaria (no. 67719/01, §§ 19-23, 10 April 2008).
  • EGMR, 29.04.2014 - 9043/05

    NATSVLISHVILI AND TOGONIDZE v. GEORGIA

    The Court further notes that it may be considered as a common feature of European criminal justice systems for an accused to obtain the lessening of charges or receive a reduction of his or her sentence in exchange for a guilty or nolo contendere plea in advance of trial or for providing substantial cooperation with the investigative authority (see the comparative legal study, paragraphs 62-75 above; see also, in this connection, Slavcho Kostov v. Bulgaria, no. 28674/03, § 17, 27 November 2008, and Rucinski v. Poland, no. 33198/04, § 12, 20 February 2007).
  • EGMR, 06.04.2021 - 46130/14

    VENKEN ET AUTRES c. BELGIQUE

    La Cour n'y décèle aucune charge disproportionnée (voir et comparer avec Slavtcho Kostov c. Bulgarie, no 28674/03, § 62, 27 novembre 2008, et Barbotin, précité, § 57).
  • EGMR, 29.01.2019 - 23226/16

    NIKITIN AND OTHERS v. ESTONIA

    But it seems to me that an issue of effectiveness of the remedy arises where the amount is "derisory" (see Wainwright v. the United Kingdom, no. 12350/04, § 55, ECHR 2006-X (a contrario)), (wholly) "inadequate" (see Slavcho Kostov v. Bulgaria, no. 28674/03, § 64, 27 November 2008), or "unreasonably low" (as claimed by the applicant in the present case - see paragraph 212 of the judgment; see Sabev v. Bulgaria, no. 27887/06, §§ 92 and 102, 28 May 2013).
  • EGMR, 19.11.2020 - 25338/16

    BARBOTIN c. FRANCE

    S'agissant, d'autre part, de la mise à la charge du requérant des frais d'expertise, la Cour rappelle le principe selon lequel les règles en matière de frais de procédure ne doivent pas faire peser un fardeau excessif sur le détenu dont l'action est fondée (Neshkov et autres précité, § 184; Ulemek c. Croatie, no 21613/16, §§ 107-108, 31 octobre 2019, Sukachov c. Ukraine, no 14057/17, § 115, 30 janvier 2020 et, par exemple, Slavtcho Kostov c. Bulgarie, no 28674/03, § 62, 27 novembre 2008) et considère que tel a été le cas en l'espèce.
  • EGMR, 19.10.2017 - 60873/09

    VANCHEV v. BULGARIA

    However, a decision or measure favourable to an applicant is not, in principle, sufficient to deprive him or her of the status of being a "victim" for the purposes of Article 34 of the Convention unless the national authorities have acknowledged, either expressly or in substance, and then afforded appropriate redress for the breach of the Convention (see, among others, Dalban v. Romania [GC], no. 28114/95, § 44, ECHR 1999-VI; Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978/05, § 115, ECHR 2010; and Slavcho Kostov v. Bulgaria, no. 28674/03, § 41, 27 November 2008).
  • EGMR, 10.02.2011 - 18382/05

    RADKOV v. BULGARIA (No. 2)

    Like Mr Stankov, the applicant cannot be criticised for having claimed an excessive sum, as there is no indication that at the relevant time there existed a well-developed and accessible case-law which might have assisted him in determining the likely quantum of an award in respect of poor conditions of detention (see also, mutatis mutandis, Slavcho Kostov v. Bulgaria, no. 28674/03, §§ 62 and 63, 27 November 2008).
  • EGMR, 14.06.2011 - 75873/01

    ERMENKOVA v. BULGARIA

    Since Stankov, the court fees" system in question has been abandoned in Bulgaria and replaced, in cases concerning claims for damages against State or municipal bodies, by a simple fee not dependent on the value of the claim (Slavcho Kostov v. Bulgaria, no. 28674/03, § 22, 27 November 2008).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht