Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SHURIYYA ZEYNALOV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  SHURIYYA ZEYNALOV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 3 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (15)

• EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91

  McCANN AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.09.2020 - 69460/12

  The object and purpose of the Convention as an instrument for the protection of individual human beings requires that Article 2 be interpreted and applied so as to make its safeguards practical and effective (see McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, §§ 146-47, Series A no. 324; Anguelova v. Bulgaria, no. 38361/97, § 109, ECHR 2002-IV; and Mustafayev v. Azerbaijan, no. 47095/09, § 52, 4 May 2017).
• EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94

  Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.09.2020 - 69460/12

  Even in the most difficult circumstances, such as the fight against terrorism and organised crime, the Convention prohibits in absolute terms torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (see Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 95, ECHR 1999-V; Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 119, ECHR 2000-IV; and Bouyid v. Belgium [GC], no. 23380/09, § 81, ECHR 2015).
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.09.2020 - 69460/12

  Even in the most difficult circumstances, such as the fight against terrorism and organised crime, the Convention prohibits in absolute terms torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (see Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 95, ECHR 1999-V; Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 119, ECHR 2000-IV; and Bouyid v. Belgium [GC], no. 23380/09, § 81, ECHR 2015).

 
• EGMR, 20.05.1999 - 21594/93

  Verursachung des Todes eines türkischen Staatsangehörigen durch türkische …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.09.2020 - 69460/12

  The investigation must be effective in the sense that it is capable of leading to the establishment of the facts and, where appropriate, the identification and punishment of those responsible (see Ogur v. Turkey [GC], no. 21594/93, § 88, ECHR 1999-III, and Mustafa Tunç and Fecire Tunç, cited above, § 172).
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 21986/93

  Verursachung des Todes eines Gefangenen in türkischer Haft - Umfang der …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.09.2020 - 69460/12

  It is incumbent on the State to account for any injuries suffered in custody, an obligation which is particularly stringent when an individual dies (see, for example, Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 99, ECHR 2000-VII; Shumkova v. Russia, no. 9296/06, § 89, 14 February 2012; and Çoselav v. Turkey, no. 1413/07, § 53, 9 October 2012).
• EGMR, 19.04.2001 - 28524/95

  PEERS v. GREECE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.09.2020 - 69460/12

  Ill-treatment must attain a minimum level of severity if it is to fall within the scope of Article 3. Assessment of this minimum level depends on all the circumstances of the case, such as the duration of the treatment, its physical or mental effects and, in some cases, the sex, age and state of health of the victim (see Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, § 162, Series A no. 25; Kud??a v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 91, ECHR 2000-XI; and Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, § 67, ECHR 2001-III).
• EGMR, 14.03.2002 - 46477/99

  PAUL ET AUDREY EDWARDS c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.09.2020 - 69460/12

  The essential purpose of such an investigation is to secure the effective implementation of the domestic laws which protect the right to life (see, mutatis mutandis, Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, § 69, ECHR 2002-II, and Malik Babayev v. Azerbaijan, no. 30500/11, § 79, 1 June 2017).
• EGMR, 13.06.2002 - 38361/97

  ANGUELOVA v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.09.2020 - 69460/12

  The object and purpose of the Convention as an instrument for the protection of individual human beings requires that Article 2 be interpreted and applied so as to make its safeguards practical and effective (see McCann and Others v. the United Kingdom, 27 September 1995, §§ 146-47, Series A no. 324; Anguelova v. Bulgaria, no. 38361/97, § 109, ECHR 2002-IV; and Mustafayev v. Azerbaijan, no. 47095/09, § 52, 4 May 2017).
• EGMR, 02.04.2009 - 22684/05

  MURADOVA v. AZERBAIJAN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.09.2020 - 69460/12

  Nevertheless, where allegations are made under Article 3 of the Convention, the Court must apply particularly thorough scrutiny, even if certain domestic proceedings and investigations have already taken place (see Avsar, cited above, §§ 283-84, and Muradova v. Azerbaijan, no. 22684/05, § 99, 2 April 2009).
• EGMR, 14.02.2012 - 9296/06

  SHUMKOVA v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 10.09.2020 - 69460/12

  It is incumbent on the State to account for any injuries suffered in custody, an obligation which is particularly stringent when an individual dies (see, for example, Salman v. Turkey [GC], no. 21986/93, § 99, ECHR 2000-VII; Shumkova v. Russia, no. 9296/06, § 89, 14 February 2012; and Çoselav v. Turkey, no. 1413/07, § 53, 9 October 2012).
• EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 30500/11

  MALIK BABAYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 27.11.2014 - 1157/10

  KARSAKOVA v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 04.05.2017 - 47095/09

  MUSTAFAYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 03.02.2011 - 8532/06

  GEPPA v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 09.10.2012 - 1413/07

  ÇOSELAV v. TURKEY

• EGMR, 07.07.2022 - 72611/14

  TAGIYEVA v. AZERBAIJAN

  The Court observes that this issue has already been noted in previous cases against Azerbaijan (see Huseynova, cited above, § 113, and Shuriyya Zeynalov v. Azerbaijan, no. 69460/12, § 86, 10 September 2020).