Neue Kooperation: dejure.org × Doctrine bringen KI-Power für Aktenanalyse, Recherche und Texterstellung. Doctrine entdecken
×
Weitere Entscheidung unten: EGMR, 23.09.2008

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 31.01.2018 - 50939/99, 4574/06, 17725/07, 54179/00, 23522/05, 316/07, 50388/06, 3494/05, 11011/05, 17582/04, 4930/05, 22443/05, 9459/05, 2917/05, 23321/09, 1236/05, 13160/07, 33612/03, 37952/04, 18404/04, 20400/03, 52658/99   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2018,2154
EGMR, 31.01.2018 - 50939/99, 4574/06, 17725/07, 54179/00, 23522/05, 316/07, 50388/06, 3494/05, 11011/05, 17582/04, 4930/05, 22443/05, 9459/05, 2917/05, 23321/09, 1236/05, 13160/07, 33612/03, 37952/04, 18404/04, 20400/03, 52658/99 (https://dejure.org/2018,2154)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 31.01.2018 - 50939/99, 4574/06, 17725/07, 54179/00, 23522/05, 316/07, 50388/06, 3494/05, 11011/05, 17582/04, 4930/05, 22443/05, 9459/05, 2917/05, 23321/09, 1236/05, 13160/07, 33612/03, 37952/04, 18404/04, 20400/03, 52658/99 (https://dejure.org/2018,2154)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 31. Januar 2018 - 50939/99, 4574/06, 17725/07, 54179/00, 23522/05, 316/07, 50388/06, 3494/05, 11011/05, 17582/04, 4930/05, 22443/05, 9459/05, 2917/05, 23321/09, 1236/05, 13160/07, 33612/03, 37952/04, 18404/04, 20400/03, 52658/99 (https://dejure.org/2018,2154)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2018,2154) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    BAKAN CONTRE LA TURQUIE ET 21 AUTRES AFFAIRES

    Informations fournies par le gouvernement concernant les mesures prises permettant d'éviter de nouvelles violations. Versement des sommes prévues dans l'arrêt (französisch)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    BAKAN AGAINST TURKEY AND 21 OTHER CASES

    Information given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations. Payment of the sums provided for in the judgment (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

  • EGMR, 07.03.2006 - 50939/99
  • EGMR, 12.06.2007 - 50939/99
  • EGMR, 31.01.2018 - 50939/99, 4574/06, 17725/07, 54179/00, 23522/05, 316/07, 50388/06, 3494/05, 11011/05, 17582/04, 4930/05, 22443/05, 9459/05, 2917/05, 23321/09, 1236/05, 13160/07, 33612/03, 37952/04, 18404/04, 20400/03, 52658/99
 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Zitiert selbst (24)

  • VK Niedersachsen, 20.09.2002 - 18/02

    Unverzüglichkeit der Rüge: Rügefrist beträgt bei einem fachkundigen Unternehmen …

    Auszug aus EGMR, 31.01.2018 - 50939/99
    18/02/2015.

    18/02/2009.

  • RG, 18.05.1905 - 20/05

    Ist fahrlässige Übertretung der Vorschrift des § 368 Nr. 10 St.G.B.'s strafbar?

    Auszug aus EGMR, 31.01.2018 - 50939/99
    20/05/2010.

    20/05/2008.

  • EGMR, 03.06.2008 - 15/02

    DURUK ET YÜCEDAG c. TURQUIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 31.01.2018 - 50939/99
    15/02/2011.
  • EGMR, 28.06.2011 - 18443/08

    BINGOLBALI ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE

    L'article 6 § 1, s'il garantit aux plaideurs un droit effectif d'accès aux tribunaux pour les décisions relatives à leurs « droits et obligations de caractère civil ", laisse à l'Etat le choix des moyens à employer à cette fin (Bakan c. Turquie, no 50939/99, § 66, 12 juin 2007).
  • EGMR, 27.08.2019 - 82054/17

    TEMIZ c. TURQUIE

    La Cour décide d'examiner ce grief sous l'angle de l'article 6 § 1 de la Convention (pour des affaires concernant l'assistance judiciaire dans le système judiciaire turc, voir Kaba c. Turquie, no 1236/05, § 24, 1 mars 2011, Bakan c. Turquie, no 50939/99, §§ 74-78, 12 juin 2007).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
dejure.org Übersicht EGMR

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 23.09.2008 - 17582/04   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2008,58902
EGMR, 23.09.2008 - 17582/04 (https://dejure.org/2008,58902)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 23.09.2008 - 17582/04 (https://dejure.org/2008,58902)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 23. September 2008 - 17582/04 (https://dejure.org/2008,58902)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2008,58902) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (11)Zitiert selbst (6)

  • EGMR, 12.06.2007 - 50939/99

    BAKAN c. TURQUIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2008 - 17582/04
    The relevant domestic law and practice in force at the material time are outlined in the Bakan v. Turkey judgment (no. 50939/99, §§ 36-40, 12 June 2007).

    The Court observes that it has already examined the similar grievances in the past and has found a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention on the ground, inter alia, that the legal aid system in Turkey fails to offer individuals substantial guarantees to protect them from arbitrariness (see, in particular, Bakan v. Turkey, no. 50939/99, §§ 74-78, 12 June 2007, Amaç and Okkan v. Turkey, nos.

  • EGMR, 19.06.2001 - 28249/95

    KREUZ c. POLOGNE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2008 - 17582/04
    The Court refers to the general principles established in its case-law concerning access to a tribunal within the meaning of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and, more specifically, the requirement to pay court fees (see, in particular, Kreuz v. Poland, no. 28249/95, §§ 52-57, ECHR 2001-VI and the further references therein, and Mehmet and Suna YiÄŸit v. Turkey, no. 52658/99, §§ 33-34, 17 July 2007).
  • EGMR, 17.07.2007 - 52658/99

    MEHMET AND SUNA YIGIT v. TURKEY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2008 - 17582/04
    The Court refers to the general principles established in its case-law concerning access to a tribunal within the meaning of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and, more specifically, the requirement to pay court fees (see, in particular, Kreuz v. Poland, no. 28249/95, §§ 52-57, ECHR 2001-VI and the further references therein, and Mehmet and Suna YiÄŸit v. Turkey, no. 52658/99, §§ 33-34, 17 July 2007).
  • EGMR, 20.11.2007 - 54179/00

    AMAÇ ET OKKAN c. TURQUIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2008 - 17582/04
    54179/00 and 54176/00, § 66, 20 November 2007, and Mehmet Hüsni Tunç v. Turkey, no. 20400/03, § 29, 21 February 2008).
  • EGMR, 21.02.2008 - 20400/03

    TUNÇ c. TURQUIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2008 - 17582/04
    54179/00 and 54176/00, § 66, 20 November 2007, and Mehmet Hüsni Tunç v. Turkey, no. 20400/03, § 29, 21 February 2008).
  • EGMR, 12.12.2006 - 38667/02

    ERTOGRUL KILIC c. TURQUIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 23.09.2008 - 17582/04
    The Court considers that the finding of violation constitutes in itself sufficient compensation for any non-pecuniary damage suffered by the applicant (see, mutatis mutandis, ErtuÄŸrul Kılıç v. Turkey, no. 38667/02, § 28, 12 December 2006.
  • EGMR, 31.01.2018 - 50939/99

    BAKAN CONTRE LA TURQUIE ET 21 AUTRES AFFAIRES

    17582/04.
  • EGMR, 12.12.2017 - 24536/09

    DIK v. TURKEY

    The Court observes that it has already examined similar grievances in the past and has found a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention on the grounds, inter alia, that the legal aid system in Turkey fails to offer individuals substantial guarantees to protect them from arbitrariness (see, in particular, Bakan v. Turkey, no. 50939/99, §§ 74-78, 12 June 2007; Mehmet and Suna Yiğit v. Turkey, no. 52658/99, §§ 31-39, 17 July 2007; and Eyüp Kaya v. Turkey, no. 17582/04, §§ 22-26, 23 September 2008).
  • EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 2917/05

    [ENG]

    The Court notes that it has already examined similar grievances in the past and has found a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention on the ground, inter alia, that the legal aid system in Turkey fails to offer individuals substantial guarantees to protect them from arbitrariness (see, in particular, Bakan v. Turkey, no. 50939/99, §§ 74-78, 12 June 2007; Mehmet and Suna YiÄŸit, cited above, §§ 31-39; Eyüp Kaya v. Turkey, no. 17582/04, §§ 22-26, 23 September 2008; and Kaba v. Turkey, no. 1236/05, §§ 19-25, 1 March 2011).
  • EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 23321/09

    KIRAN v. TURKEY

    The Court observes that it has already examined similar grievances in the past and has found a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention on the ground, inter alia, that the legal aid system in Turkey fails to offer individuals substantial guarantees to protect them from arbitrariness (see Bakan v. Turkey, no. 50939/99, §§ 74-78, 12 June 2007; Mehmet and Suna YiÄŸit v. Turkey, cited above, §§ 31-39; Eyüp Kaya v. Turkey, no. 17582/04, §§ 22-26, 23 September 2008; and Kaba, cited above, §§ 19-25).
  • EGMR, 01.03.2011 - 1236/05

    [ENG]

    The Court observes that it has already examined similar grievances in the past and has found a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention on the ground, inter alia, that the legal aid system in Turkey fails to offer individuals substantial guarantees to protect them from arbitrariness (see, in particular, Bakan v. Turkey, no. 50939/99, §§ 74-78, 12 June 2007; Mehmet and Suna YiÄŸit, cited above, §§ 31-39 and Eyüp Kaya v. Turkey, no. 17582/04, §§ 22-26, 23 September 2008).
  • EGMR, 14.12.2021 - 13761/17

    ERSOY v. TURKEY

    The Court further observes that it has already examined similar grievances in the past and has found a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention on the grounds, inter alia, that the legal aid system in Turkey fails to offer individuals substantial guarantees to protect them from arbitrariness (see, in particular, Bakan v. Turkey, no. 50939/99, §§ 74-78, 12 June 2007; Mehmet and Suna Yiğit v. Turkey, no. 52658/99, §§ 31-39, 17 July 2007; Eyüp Kaya v. Turkey, no. 17582/04, §§ 22-26, 23 September 2008; Kaba v. Turkey, no. 1236/05, §§ 19-25, 1 March 2011; and Ilbeyi Kemaloğlu and Meriye Kemaloğlu v. Turkey, no. 19986/06, § 52, 10 April 2012).
  • EGMR, 28.11.2017 - 1313/08

    GÜRAKIN v. TURKEY

    The Court observes that it has already examined similar grievances in the past and has found a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention on the grounds, inter alia, that the legal aid system in Turkey fails to offer individuals substantial guarantees to protect them from arbitrariness (see, in particular, Bakan v. Turkey, no. 50939/99, §§ 74-78, 12 June 2007; Mehmet and Suna Yiğit v. Turkey, no. 52658/99, §§ 31-39, 17 July 2007; and Eyüp Kaya v. Turkey, no. 17582/04, §§ 22-26, 23 September 2008).
  • EGMR, 28.01.2014 - 9564/13

    FATIH PRES SAN. VE TIC. LTD. STI. v. TURKEY

    The Court reiterates that it has already examined grievances with regard to domestic courts" refusal of legal aid and has found a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention on the ground, inter alia, that the legal aid system in Turkey failed to offer individuals substantial guarantees to protect them from arbitrariness (see Bakan v. Turkey, no. 50939/99, §§ 74-78, 12 June 2007; Mehmet and Suna YiÄŸit v. Turkey, no. 52658/99, §§ 33-39, 17 July 2007; Eyüp Kaya v. Turkey, no. 17582/04, §§ 22-26, 23 September 2008; and Kaba v. Turkey, no. 1236/05, §§ 19-25, 1 March 2011).
  • EGMR - 11720/19 (anhängig)

    ERSOY v. TÜRKIYE

    Has there been a violation of the applicant's right of access to a court, as guaranteed by Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, in the proceedings before the administrative courts (see, in particular, Bakan v. Turkey, no. 50939/99, §§ 66-78, 12 June 2007; Mehmet and Suna Yiğit v. Turkey, no. 52658/99, §§ 33-39, 17 July 2007; Eyüp Kaya v. Turkey, no. 17582/04, §§ 22-26, 23 September 2008; Kaba v. Turkey, no. 1236/05, §§ 19-25, 1 March 2011; and İlbeyi Kemaloğlu and Meriye Kemaloğlu v. Turkey, no. 19986/06, § 52, 10 April 2012)?.
  • EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 17725/07

    ALKAN v. TURKEY

    The Court observes that it has already examined similar grievances in the past and has found a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention on the ground, inter alia, that the legal aid system in Turkey fails to offer individuals substantial guarantees to protect them from arbitrariness (see Bakan v. Turkey, no. 50939/99, §§ 74-78, 12 June 2007; Mehmet and Suna YiÄŸit, cited above, §§ 31-39; Eyüp Kaya v. Turkey, no. 17582/04, §§ 22-26, 23 September 2008; and Kaba v. Turkey, no. 1236/05, §§ 19-25, 1 March 2011).
  • EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 316/07

    SERAP DEMIRCI v. TURKEY

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
dejure.org Übersicht EGMR
dejure.org nutzen ohne Ablenkung
Werbung abschalten. Jetzt buchen! Keine automatische Verlängerung.
Info zum PUR-Angebot
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht