Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ION CÂRSTEA v. ROMANIA

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for private life) (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 28.10.2014 - 20531/06
• EGMR, 04.11.2015 - 20531/06
• EGMR - 20531/06

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Zitiert selbst (15)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 09.04.2009 - 28070/06

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.10.2014 - 20531/06

  There can be little doubt that the disputed article and accompanying photographs seriously prejudiced the applicant's honour and reputation and was harmful to his psychological integrity and private life (see, mutatis mutandis, A. v. Norway, no. 28070/06, § 64, 9 April 2009, Mikolajová v. Slovakia, no. 4479/03, § 55, 18 January 2011 and Roberts and Roberts v. the United Kingdom, (dec.), no. 38681/08, §§ 40-41, 5 July 2011).
• EGMR, 21.09.2010 - 34147/06

  [FRE]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.10.2014 - 20531/06

  In this connection, the Court also considers that the act of making such serious accusations against a person identified by their name and occupation, such as the applicant, involves an obligation on behalf of the journalist to provide a sufficient factual basis for his statements (see Polanco Torres et Movilla Polanco v. Spain, no. 34147/06, § 47, 21 September 2010).
• EGMR, 05.07.2011 - 38681/08

  ROBERTS AND ROBERTS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.10.2014 - 20531/06

  There can be little doubt that the disputed article and accompanying photographs seriously prejudiced the applicant's honour and reputation and was harmful to his psychological integrity and private life (see, mutatis mutandis, A. v. Norway, no. 28070/06, § 64, 9 April 2009, Mikolajová v. Slovakia, no. 4479/03, § 55, 18 January 2011 and Roberts and Roberts v. the United Kingdom, (dec.), no. 38681/08, §§ 40-41, 5 July 2011).

• EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 40660/08

  Caroline von Hannover kann keine Untersagung von Bildveröffentlichungen über sie …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.10.2014 - 20531/06

  40660/08 and 60641/08, § 107, ECHR 2012).
• EGMR, 13.02.2003 - 42326/98

  Schutz des Rechts auf Achtung des Privatlebens und Familienlebens; Möglichkeit …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.10.2014 - 20531/06

  These obligations may involve the adoption of measures designed to secure respect for private and family life, even in the sphere of the relations of individuals between themselves (see Odièvre v. France [GC], no. 42326/98, § 40, 13 February 2003 and Dickson v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 44362/04, § 70, 4 December 2007).
• EGMR, 04.12.2007 - 44362/04

  DICKSON c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.10.2014 - 20531/06

  These obligations may involve the adoption of measures designed to secure respect for private and family life, even in the sphere of the relations of individuals between themselves (see Odièvre v. France [GC], no. 42326/98, § 40, 13 February 2003 and Dickson v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 44362/04, § 70, 4 December 2007).
• EGMR, 12.09.2011 - 28955/06

  Palomo Sánchez and Others v. Spain

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.10.2014 - 20531/06

  28955/06, 28957/06, 28959/06, 28964/06, § 57, 12 September 2011; and Von Hannover v. Germany (no. 2) [GC], nos.
• EGMR, 04.06.2009 - 21277/05

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.10.2014 - 20531/06

  The rumoured marital problems of the president of a Republic or the financial difficulties of a famous singer have not been deemed to be matters of general interest (see Standard Verlags GmbH v. Austria (no. 2), no. 21277/05, § 52, 4 June 2009, and Hachette Filipacchi Associés (ICI PARIS) v. France, no. 12268/03, § 43, 23 July 2009).
• EGMR, 23.07.2009 - 12268/03

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.10.2014 - 20531/06

  The rumoured marital problems of the president of a Republic or the financial difficulties of a famous singer have not been deemed to be matters of general interest (see Standard Verlags GmbH v. Austria (no. 2), no. 21277/05, § 52, 4 June 2009, and Hachette Filipacchi Associés (ICI PARIS) v. France, no. 12268/03, § 43, 23 July 2009).
• EGMR, 13.11.2019 - 39401/04

  MGN LIMITED AGAINST THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 28.10.2014 - 20531/06

  The Court reiterates that where the balancing exercise has been undertaken by the national authorities in conformity with the criteria laid down in the Court's case-law, the Court would require strong reasons to substitute its view for that of the domestic courts (see MGN Limited v. the United Kingdom, no. 39401/04, §§ 150 and 155, 18 January 2011; Palomo Sánchez and Others v. Spain [GC], nos.
• EGMR, 14.10.2008 - 78060/01

  PETRINA c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 09.07.2002 - 46468/99

  MANOUSSOS v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC AND GERMANY
• EGMR, 12.10.2010 - 28999/03

  TIMCIUC v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 25.11.2008 - 23373/03

  BIRIUK v. LITHUANIA
• EGMR, 04.02.2003 - 61164/00

  DURINGER et AUTRES et GRUNGE contre la FRANCE

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen