Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ISMOILOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. f, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 2, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 3, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 3 Violation of Art. 5-1-f Violation of Art. 5-4 Violation of Art. 6-2 Non-pecuniary damage - award Costs and expenses - award (englisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ISMOILOV ET AUTRES c. RUSSIE

  Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. f, Art. 5 Abs. 4, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 2, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 3, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation de l'art. 3 Violation de l'art. 5-1-f Violation de l'art. 5-4 Violation de l'art. 6-2 Préjudice moral - réparation Frais et dépens - remboursement (französisch)

• Österreichisches Institut für Menschenrechte

  (englisch)

Kurzfassungen/Presse

• RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 12.12.2006 - 2947/06
• EGMR, 24.04.2008 - 2947/06

Wird zitiert von ... (11)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 11.12.2008 - 42502/06

  MUMINOV v. RUSSIA

  In support of his allegation of the risk of ill-treatment in Uzbekistan, the applicant also submitted a copy of the third-party submissions by Human Rights Watch (HRW) and the AIRE Centre in the cases of Ismoilov and Others v. Russia (no. 2947/06, judgment of 24 April 2008) and in Mamatkulov and Askarov v. Turkey ([GC], nos. 46827/99 and 46951/99, ECHR 2005-I); the 2005 report by the Memorial Human Rights Centre in cooperation with the International League for Human Rights in relation to the Second Periodic Report of Uzbekistan to the UN Human Rights Committee; the 2005 HRW Briefing Paper "Torture Reform Assessment: Uzbekistan's Implementation of the Recommendations of the Special Rapporteur on Torture" and other documents from that organisation; and various news items available on Internet sites such as www.centrasia.ru.

  The applicant's representative also relied on the third-party interveners" submissions before the Court in the cases of Mamatkulov and Askarov v. Turkey ([GC], nos. 46827/99 and 46951/99, ECHR 2005-I) and Ismoilov and Others v. Russia (no. 2947/06, 24 April 2008).

  Besides, it refers to its findings in the Nasrulloyev case concerning the divergent approaches taken by the Russian authorities on the issue of provisions applicable to detainees awaiting extradition, in particular on the issue whether Article 109 of the CCrP, which lays down the procedure and specific time-limits for reviewing detention, was applicable (see also Ryabikin v. Russia, no. 8320/04, § 129, 19 June 2008, and Ismoilov and Others v. Russia (dec.), no. 2947/06, 12 December 2006).

• EGMR, 23.10.2014 - 17239/13

  MAMAZHONOV v. RUSSIA

  In respect of the standard of review of ill-treatment claims on the domestic level the Court must be satisfied that the assessment made by the authorities of the Contracting State is adequate and sufficiently supported by domestic material as well as by material originating from other reliable and objective sources such as, for instance, other Contracting or non-Contracting States, agencies of the United Nations and reputable non-governmental organisations (see Salah Sheekh, cited above, § 136, and Ismoilov and Others v. Russia, no. 2947/06, § 120, 24 April 2008).

  Lastly, having regard to all of the substantive aspects of a case and the available relevant information, the Court would assess the existence of the real risk of suffering torture or treatment incompatible with the Convention standards (see e.g. Ismoilov and Others v. Russia, no. 2947/06, §§ 120-124, 24 April 2008).

• EGMR, 25.04.2013 - 71386/10

  [ENG]

  With reference to extradition or deportation, this means that in cases where an applicant provides reasoned grounds which cast doubt on the accuracy of the information relied on by the respondent Government, the Court must be satisfied that the assessment made by the authorities of the Contracting State is adequate and sufficiently supported by domestic materials as well as by materials originating from other reliable and objective sources, such as, for instance, other Contracting or non-Contracting States, agencies of the United Nations and reputable non-governmental organisations (see Salah Sheekh v. the Netherlands, no. 1948/04, § 136, 11 January 2007, and Ismoilov and Others v. Russia, no. 2947/06, § 120, 24 April 2008).

• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 12.05.2022 - C-883/19

  HSBC Holdings u.a./ Kommission

  {FN:67} Vgl. EGMR, 24. April 2008, 1smoilov u. a./Russland (CE:ECHR:2008:0424JUD000294706, § 161 und die dort angeführte Rechtsprechung).
• EGMR, 11.10.2011 - 46390/10

  [ENG]

  The salient issue is whether substantial grounds have been shown for believing that there is a real risk that he will face ill-treatment or death if the order for his expulsion is implemented (see Ismoilov and Others v. Russia, no. 2947/06, § 126, 24 April 2008).
• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 18.10.2012 - C-396/11

  Radu - Polizeiliche und justizielle Zusammenarbeit in Strafsachen - …

  {FN:29} - Vgl. Urteile des EGMR vom 15. November 1996, Chahal/Vereinigtes Königreich, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-V, Ziff. 112, vom 24. April 2008, 1smoilov u. a./Russland (Beschwerde Nr. 2947/06, Ziff. 135), und vom 20. September 2011 Lokpo und Toure/Ungarn (Beschwerde Nr. 10816/10, Ziff. 16).
• EGMR, 03.10.2013 - 31890/11

  [ENG]

  With reference to extradition or deportation, this means that in cases where an applicant provides reasoned grounds which cast doubt on the accuracy of the information relied on by the respondent Government, the Court must be satisfied that the assessment made by the authorities of the Contracting State is adequate and sufficiently supported by domestic materials as well as by materials originating from other reliable and objective sources, such as, for instance, other Contracting or non-Contracting States, agencies of the United Nations and reputable non-governmental organisations (see Salah Sheekh v. the Netherlands, no. 1948/04, § 136, 11 January 2007, and Ismoilov and Others v. Russia, no. 2947/06, § 120, 24 April 2008).
• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 06.11.2018 - C-492/18

  TC - Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung - Eilvorabentscheidungsverfahren - …

  {FN:25} Vgl. EGMR vom 24. April 2008, 1smoilov u. a./Russland (CE:ECHR:2008:0424JUD000294706, § 137), und EGMR vom 19. Mai 2016, J.N./Vereinigtes Königreich (CE:ECHR:2016:0519JUD003728912, § 77).
• EGMR, 21.10.2010 - 25404/09

  [ENG]

  The Court reiterates that in cases where an applicant provides reasoned grounds which cast doubt on the accuracy of the information relied on by the respondent Government, the Court must be satisfied that the assessment made by the authorities of the Contracting State is adequate and sufficiently supported by domestic materials as well as by materials originating from other reliable and objective sources such as, for instance, other Contracting or non-Contracting States, agencies of the United Nations and reputable non-governmental organisations (see Salah Sheekh, cited above, § 136, and Ismoilov and Others v. Russia, no. 2947/06, § 120, 24 April 2008).
• EGMR, 08.01.2009 - 13476/04

  KHUDYAKOVA v. RUSSIA

  The applicant did not question the availability or effectiveness of a remedy for examination of the lawfulness of her detention, contrary to all the previous Russian cases concerning extradition examined by the Court (see Bordovskiy, cited above, §§ 60-68; Garabayev v. Russia, no. 38411/02, §§ 92-98, 7 June 2007, ECHR 2007-... (extracts); Ismoilov and Others v. Russia, no. 2947/06, §§ 142-52, 24 April 2008; Nasrulloyev v. Russia, no. 656/06, §§ 79-90, 11 October 2007; Shchebet, cited above, §§ 71-79; and Ryabikin v Russia, no. 8320/04, §§ 134-41, 19 June 2008).
• EGMR, 12.03.2009 - 2929/05

  SVETLORUSOV v. UKRAINE