Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  HALIS v. TURKEY

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 2, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 10 Violation of Art. 6-1 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings ...

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 23.05.2002 - 30007/96
• EGMR, 11.01.2005 - 30007/96

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Zitiert selbst (6)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 04.12.2003 - 35071/97

  GUNDUZ v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2005 - 30007/96

  In particular, the Court observes that the national judges did not seek to interpret or to give any special weight to the term "tasfiye" in their reasoning leading to the conviction of the applicant (see Müslüm Gündüz v. Turkey, no. 35071/97, § 48, 4 December 2003).
• EGMR, 21.01.1999 - 29183/95

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2005 - 30007/96

  The Court reiterates the basic principles laid down in its judgments concerning Article 10 (see, in particular, the following judgments, Ceylan, cited above, § 32, Öztürk v. Turkey [GC], no. 22479/93, § 64, ECHR 1999-VI, Ä°brahim Aksoy, cited above, § 51-53, and Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183/95, § 45, ECHR 1999).
• EGMR, 28.09.1999 - 22479/93

  ÖZTÜRK v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2005 - 30007/96

  The Court reiterates the basic principles laid down in its judgments concerning Article 10 (see, in particular, the following judgments, Ceylan, cited above, § 32, Öztürk v. Turkey [GC], no. 22479/93, § 64, ECHR 1999-VI, Ä°brahim Aksoy, cited above, § 51-53, and Fressoz and Roire v. France [GC], no. 29183/95, § 45, ECHR 1999).

• EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23168/94

  KARATAS c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2005 - 30007/96

  The Court takes into account, furthermore, the background to cases submitted to it, particularly problems linked to the prevention of terrorism (see Karakas v. Turkey [GC], no. 23168/94, § 54, ECHR 1999-IV).
• EGMR, 16.10.2007 - 11/04

  VOTTO c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2005 - 30007/96

  11/04/2005.
• EGMR, 18.07.2000 - 26680/95

  SENER v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.01.2005 - 30007/96

  Against this background, the Court considers that the reasons given by the Istanbul State Security Court for convicting and sentencing the applicant, although relevant, cannot be considered sufficient to justify the interference with his right to freedom of expression (see Sener v. Turkey, no. 26680/95, § 45, 18 July 2000).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 10.11.2005 - 54789/00

  BOCOS-CUESTA v. THE NETHERLANDS

  In these circumstances, the Court considers that national law allows for adequate reparation by entitling the applicant to a fresh determination of the criminal charges against him (see Gençel v. Turkey, no. 53431/99, § 27, 23 October 2003; and Halis v. Turkey, no. 30007/96, § 49, 11 January 2005).
• EGMR, 08.11.2007 - 11287/03

  LELIEVRE c. BELGIQUE

  Dans ce sens je partage l'opinion exprimée par le juge Garlicki dans l'affaire Stenka c. Pologne (no 3675/03, 31 janvier 2007) d'après laquelle la Cour semble parfois tentée par le recours à une certaine automaticité dans ses décisions relatives à la satisfaction équitable allouée pour le dommage moral en général (voir aussi l'opinion dissidente du juge Pavlovschi dans l'affaire Halis c. Turquie, no 30007/96, 11 avril 2005) et plus particulièrement quant à la durée excessive de la détention provisoire.