Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MENNITTO v. ITALY

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses partial award - Convention proceedings (englisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MENNITTO c. ITALIE

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation de l'Art. 6-1 Préjudice moral - réparation pécuniaire Remboursement partiel frais et dépens - procédure de la Convention (französisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EKMR, 10.09.1998 - 33804/96
• EGMR, 05.10.2000 - 33804/96

Wird zitiert von ... (30)Zitiert selbst (3)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 27644/95

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.10.2000 - 33804/96

  The outcome of the proceedings must be directly decisive for the right in question (see the following judgments: Acquaviva v. France, 21 November 1995, Series A no. 333-A, p. 14, § 46; Balmer-Schafroth and Others v. Switzerland, 26 August 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-IV, p. 1357, § 32; Le Calvez v. France, 29 July 1998, Reports 1998-V, pp. 1899-900, § 56; and Athanassoglou and Others v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27644/95, § 43, ECHR 2000-IV).
• EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 34884/97

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.10.2000 - 33804/96

  The Court observes that it has found on a number of occasions (see, for example, Bottazzi v. Italy [GC], no. 34884/97, § 22, ECHR 1999-V) that in Italy there is a practice incompatible with the Convention resulting from an accumulation of breaches of the "reasonable time" requirement.
• EGMR, 26.02.1993 - 13023/87

  SALESI c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.10.2000 - 33804/96

  Lastly, the Court considers that the right in question, which was of an economic nature, was a "civil" right within the meaning of its case-law (see, among other authorities, the Salesi v. Italy judgment of 26 February 1993, Series A no. 257-E, pp. 59-60, § 19).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 23.02.2017 - 43395/09

  [FRE]

  The dispute must be genuine and serious; it may relate not only to the actual existence of a right but also to its scope and the manner of its exercise; and finally, the result of the proceedings must be directly decisive for the right in question, mere tenuous connections or remote consequences not being sufficient to bring Article 6 § 1 into play (see, among many other authorities, Mennitto v. Italy [GC], no. 33804/96, § 23, ECHR 2000-X; Micallef v. Malta [GC], no. 17056/06, § 74, ECHR 2009; and Boulois v. Luxembourg [GC], no. 37575/04, § 90, ECHR 2012).
• EGMR, 15.03.2022 - 43572/18

  GRZĘDA v. POLAND

  Lastly, the right must be a "civil" right (see Mennitto v. Italy [GC], no. 33804/96, § 23, ECHR 2000-X).
• EGMR, 02.02.2010 - 36137/04

  KROSTA v. POLAND

  The outcome of the proceedings must be directly decisive for the right in question (see, among other authorities, Athanassoglou and Others v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27644/95, § 43, ECHR 2000-IV; Mennitto v. Italy [GC], no. 33804/96, § 23, ECHR 2000-X, and Markovic and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 1398/03, § 93, ECHR 2006-...).

  In reaching that conclusion, the Court had regard, inter alia, to the similarities between the compensation claims asserted before the Foundation and disputes over entitlement to social security and welfare benefits, which generally fall within the scope of Article 6 (see Mennitto v. Italy [GC], no. 33804/96, § 28, ECHR 2000-X; Tsfayo v. the United Kingdom, no. 60860/00, § 39, 14 November 2006).

• EGMR, 18.05.2010 - 20870/04

  BELKA v. POLAND

  The outcome of the proceedings must be directly decisive for the right in question (see, among other authorities, Athanassoglou and Others v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27644/95, § 43, ECHR 2000-IV; Mennitto v. Italy [GC], no. 33804/96, § 23, ECHR 2000-X, Zwiazek Nauczycielstwa Polskiego v. Poland, no. 42049/98, § 28, ECHR 2004-IX).

  In reaching that conclusion, the Court had regard, inter alia, to the similarities between the compensation claims asserted before the Foundation and disputes over entitlement to social security and welfare benefits, which generally fall within the scope of Article 6 (see Mennitto v. Italy [GC], no. 33804/96, § 28, ECHR 2000-X; Tsfayo v. the United Kingdom, no. 60860/00, § 39, 14 November 2006).

• EGMR, 02.02.2010 - 31438/06

  KADLUCZKA v. POLAND

  The outcome of the proceedings must be directly decisive for the right in question (see, among other authorities, Athanassoglou and Others v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27644/95, § 43, ECHR 2000-IV; Mennitto v. Italy [GC], no. 33804/96, § 23, ECHR 2000-X, and Markovic and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 1398/03, § 93, ECHR 2006-...).

  In reaching that conclusion, the Court had regard, inter alia, to the similarities between the compensation claims asserted before the Foundation and disputes over entitlement to social security and welfare benefits, which generally fall within the scope of Article 6 (see Mennitto v. Italy [GC], no. 33804/96, § 28, ECHR 2000-X; Tsfayo v. the United Kingdom, no. 60860/00, § 39, 14 November 2006).

• EGMR, 18.05.2010 - 41285/02

  SZAL v. POLAND

  The outcome of the proceedings must be directly decisive for the right in question (see, among other authorities, Athanassoglou and Others v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27644/95, § 43, ECHR 2000-IV; Mennitto v. Italy [GC], no. 33804/96, § 23, ECHR 2000-X, Zwiazek Nauczycielstwa Polskiego v. Poland, no. 42049/98, § 28, ECHR 2004-IX).

  In reaching that conclusion, the Court had regard, inter alia, to the similarities between the compensation claims asserted before the Foundation and disputes over entitlement to social security and welfare benefits, which generally fall within the scope of Article 6 (see Mennitto v. Italy [GC], no. 33804/96, § 28, ECHR 2000-X; Tsfayo v. the United Kingdom, no. 60860/00, § 39, 14 November 2006).

• EGMR, 11.06.2015 - 19844/08

  [ENG]

  The dispute must be genuine and serious; it may relate not only to the actual existence of a right but also to its scope and the manner of its exercise; and, finally, the result of the proceedings must be directly decisive for the right in question, mere tenuous connections or remote consequences not being sufficient to bring Article 6 § 1 into play (see, inter alia, Mennitto v. Italy [GC], no. 33804/96, § 23, ECHR 2000-X; Gülmez v. Turkey, no. 16330/02, § 28, 20 May 2008).
• EGMR, 28.04.2009 - 17214/05

  Savino ./. Italien / Persichetti ./. Italien

  L'issue de la procédure doit être directement déterminante pour le droit en question (voir, notamment, Athanassoglou et autres c. Suisse [GC], no 27644/95, § 43, CEDH 2000-IV ; Mennitto c. Italie [GC], no 33804/96, § 23, CEDH 2000-X).
• EGMR, 01.04.2025 - 51455/21

  MANOWSKA v. POLAND and 5 other applications

  Lastly, the right must be a "civil" right (see Mennitto v. Italy [GC], no. 33804/96, § 23, ECHR 2000-X).
• EGMR, 23.07.2013 - 30633/11

  LAY LAY COMPANY LIMITED v. MALTA

  The dispute must be genuine and serious; it may relate not only to the actual existence of a right but also to its scope and the manner of its exercise; and, lastly, the result of the proceedings must be directly decisive for the right in question, mere tenuous connections or remote consequences not being sufficient to bring Article 6 § 1 into play (see, inter alia, Mennitto v. Italy [GC], no. 33804/96, § 23, ECHR 2000 X, and Micallef v. Malta [GC], no. 17056/06, § 74, ECHR 2009).
• EGMR, 01.03.2005 - 22860/02

  WOS v. POLAND
• EGMR, 20.11.2012 - 33197/09

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 16.02.2010 - 29334/06

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 14.11.2006 - 60860/00

  TSFAYO v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 15.01.2009 - 42454/02

  MENCHINSKAYA v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 18.12.2025 - 33818/22

  LATORRE ATANCE v. SPAIN
• EGMR, 19.02.2013 - 9737/06

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 27.05.2010 - 13279/05

  NEJDET SAHIN AND PERIHAN SAHIN c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 18.05.2010 - 25168/05

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 02.04.2013 - 2581/05

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 22.11.2011 - 18544/08

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 05.10.2010 - 16472/04

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 22.06.2010 - 9297/08

  TEIMURAZ ANDRONIKASHVILI v. GEORGIA
• EGMR, 03.02.2009 - 37341/04

  KIKOLASHVILI v. GEORGIA
• EGMR, 23.01.2003 - 23379/94

  KIENAST v. AUSTRIA
• EGMR, 22.11.2001 - 41978/98

  BOZHILOV v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 13.10.2009 - 16778/02

  JAKOWICZ v. POLAND
• EGMR, 18.03.2008 - 34532/02

  KLINAR & KLINAR v. SLOVENIA
• EGMR, 10.05.2012 - 57062/08

  SOCIEDADE DE CONSTRUCOES MARTINS & VIEIRA, LDA ET AUTRES c. PORTUGAL
• EGMR, 09.10.2003 - 54640/00

  SYLVESTER v. AUSTRIA