Weitere Entscheidung unten: EKMR, 07.04.1997

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 27644/95   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2000,28673
EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 27644/95 (https://dejure.org/2000,28673)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 06.04.2000 - 27644/95 (https://dejure.org/2000,28673)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 06. April 2000 - 27644/95 (https://dejure.org/2000,28673)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2000,28673) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    ATHANASSOGLOU ET AUTRES c. SUISSE

    Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 37, Art. 37 Abs. 1 Buchst. a MRK
    Non-violation de l'Art. 6-1 Non-violation de l'Art. 13 Radiation partielle du rôle Non-lieu à examiner l'exception préliminaire (non-épuisement des voies de recours internes) (französisch)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    ATHANASSOGLOU AND OTHERS v. SWITZERLAND

    Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 37, Art. 37 Abs. 1 Buchst. a MRK
    No violation of Art. 6-1 No violation of Art. 13 Partly struck out of the list Not necessary to examine preliminary objection (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies) (englisch)

  • juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)

Kurzfassungen/Presse

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (83)Neu Zitiert selbst (7)

  • EGMR, 21.02.1975 - 4451/70

    GOLDER c. ROYAUME-UNI

    Auszug aus EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 27644/95
    In the words of the Court's Golder judgment, Article 6 § 1 embodies the "right to a court", of which the right of access, that is the right to institute proceedings before courts in civil matters, constitutes one aspect (see the Golder v. the United Kingdom judgment of 21 February 1975, Series A no. 18, p. 18, § 36).
  • EGMR, 23.06.1981 - 6878/75

    LE COMPTE, VAN LEUVEN ET DE MEYERE c. BELGIQUE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 27644/95
    The Court reiterates that, according to its well-established case-law, Article 6 § 1 of the Convention may be relied on by individuals who consider that an interference with the exercise of one of their (civil) rights is unlawful and complain that they have not had the possibility of submitting that claim to a court meeting the requirements of Article 6 § 1 (see the Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere v. Belgium judgment of 23 June 1981, Series A no. 43, p. 20, § 44).
  • EGMR, 21.09.1993 - 12350/86

    KREMZOW v. AUSTRIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 27644/95
    The Court considers that the Government's argument is so closely linked to the substance of the applicants' complaints under Article 6 § 1 that the preliminary objection should be joined to the merits (see, for example, the Kremzow v. Austria judgment of 21 September 1993, Series A no. 268-B, p. 41, § 42).
     
  • EGMR, 26.03.1992 - 11760/85

    ÉDITIONS PÉRISCOPE v. FRANCE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 27644/95
    The Court must ascertain whether the applicants' arguments were sufficiently tenable; it does not have to decide whether they were well-founded in terms of the applicable Swiss legislation (see, mutatis mutandis, the Le Calvez judgment cited above, pp. 1899-900, § 56, and the Editions Périscope v. France judgment of 26 March 1992, Series A no. 234-B, p. 65, § 38).
  • EGMR, 21.09.1994 - 17101/90

    FAYED c. ROYAUME-UNI

    Auszug aus EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 27644/95
    As the Court has consistently held, mere tenuous connections or remote consequences are not sufficient to bring Article 6 § 1 into play (see the following judgments: Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere cited above, pp. 21-22, § 47; Fayed v. the United Kingdom, 21 September 1994, Series A no. 294-B, pp. 45-46, § 56; Masson and Van Zon v. the Netherlands, 28 September 1995, Series A no. 327-A, p. 17, § 44; Balmer-Schafroth and Others cited above, p. 1357, § 32; Le Calvez v. France, 29 July 1998, Reports 1998-V, pp. 1899-900, § 56).
  • EGMR, 28.09.1995 - 15346/89

    MASSON AND VAN ZON v. THE NETHERLANDS

    Auszug aus EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 27644/95
    As the Court has consistently held, mere tenuous connections or remote consequences are not sufficient to bring Article 6 § 1 into play (see the following judgments: Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere cited above, pp. 21-22, § 47; Fayed v. the United Kingdom, 21 September 1994, Series A no. 294-B, pp. 45-46, § 56; Masson and Van Zon v. the Netherlands, 28 September 1995, Series A no. 327-A, p. 17, § 44; Balmer-Schafroth and Others cited above, p. 1357, § 32; Le Calvez v. France, 29 July 1998, Reports 1998-V, pp. 1899-900, § 56).
  • EGMR, 27.04.1988 - 9659/82

    BOYLE AND RICE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

    Auszug aus EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 27644/95
    Article 13 has been consistently interpreted by the Court as requiring a remedy only in respect of grievances which can be regarded as "arguable" in terms of the Convention (see, for example, the Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom judgment of 27 April 1988, Series A no. 131, p. 23, § 52).
  • EGMR, 09.04.2024 - 53600/20

    Verein Klimaseniorinnen Schweiz u.a. ./. Schweiz - Staatliche Maßnahmen gegen …

    De plus, l'issue de la procédure doit être directement déterminante pour le droit en question, un lien ténu ou des répercussions lointaines ne suffisant pas à faire entrer en jeu l'article 6 § 1. Enfin, le droit doit revêtir un caractère « civil'(voir, pour un exemple très récent, Grzeda, précité, § 257, avec d'autres références ; dans le domaine environnemental, voir aussi Athanassoglou et autres c. Suisse [GC], no 27644/95, § 43, CEDH 2000-IV, et Association Burestop 55 et autres, précité, § 52).

    In matters of general policy, on which opinions within a democratic society may reasonably differ widely, the role of the domestic policy-maker should be given special weight (see James and Others v. the United Kingdom, judgment of 21 February 1986, Series A no. 98, p. 32, § 46, where the Court found it natural that the margin of appreciation "available to the legislature in implementing social and economic policies should be a wide one") (Hatton and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 36022/97, § 97, ECHR 2003-VIII with further authorities, see also Athanassoglou and Others v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27644/95, § 54, ECHR 2000-IV);.

    After a detailed consideration of the assessment and inspection reports concerning the relevant power plant as well as the back-fitting to address the major on-going developments in nuclear power plant safety technology, the Court, nevertheless and contrary to the conclusion reached by the Commission (reported as Greenpeace Schweiz and others v Switzerland (Dec), no. 27644/95, 7 April 1997), concluded (at § 51) that "the facts of the present case provide an insufficient basis for distinguishing it from the Balmer-Schaffroth and Others case".

  • EGMR, 07.05.2021 - 4907/18

    XERO FLOR w POLSCE sp. z o. o. - Unabhängigkeit der polnischen Gerichte

    The dispute must be genuine and serious; it may relate not only to the actual existence of a right, but also to its scope and the manner of its exercise; and, finally, the result of the proceedings must be directly decisive for the right in question, mere tenuous connections or remote consequences not being sufficient to bring Article 6 § 1 into play (see, among many other authorities, Athanassoglou and Others v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27644/95, § 43, ECHR 2000-IV; Károly Nagy v. Hungary [GC], no. 56665/09, § 60, 14 September 2017; and Denisov v. Ukraine [GC], no. 76639/11, § 44, 25 September 2018, with further references).
  • EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 30474/14

    ALI AND OTHERS v. SWITZERLAND AND ITALY

    The Court will confine itself to noting that, according to its standing case-law, Article 13 requires a remedy in domestic law to be available in respect only of such grievances as are "arguable" in terms of the Convention (see, among many other authorities, Boyle and Rice v. the United Kingdom, 27 April 1988, § 52, Series A no. 131; more recently, Athanassoglou and Others v. Switzerland [GC], no. 27644/95, § 58, ECHR 2000-IV; Hatton and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 36022/97, § 137, ECHR 2003-VIII; Taheri Kandomabadi v. the Netherlands (dec.), nos.
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.

Rechtsprechung
   EKMR, 07.04.1997 - 27644/95   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/1997,28097
EKMR, 07.04.1997 - 27644/95 (https://dejure.org/1997,28097)
EKMR, Entscheidung vom 07.04.1997 - 27644/95 (https://dejure.org/1997,28097)
EKMR, Entscheidung vom 07. April 1997 - 27644/95 (https://dejure.org/1997,28097)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/1997,28097) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Neu Zitiert selbst (4)

  • EGMR, 26.08.1997 - 22110/93

    BALMER-SCHAFROTH AND OTHERS v. SWITZERLAND

    Auszug aus EKMR, 07.04.1997 - 27644/95
    Reference is thereby made to the submissions in Application No. 22110/93, Balmer-Schafroth and others v. Switzerland, Dec.

    The applicants also refer to the submissions in Application No. 22110/93, Balmer-Schafroth and others v. Switzerland, Dec.

    Reference is made in particular to the Commission's decision in Application No. 22110/93, Balmer-Schafroth and others v. Switzerland, Dec.

    The Commission further recalls its decision in Application No. 22110/93, Balmer-Schafroth and others v. Switzerland, Dec.

  • EGMR, 26.06.1986 - 8543/79

    VAN MARLE AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDS

    Auszug aus EKMR, 07.04.1997 - 27644/95
    Reference is made to the Van Marle v. Netherlands judgment (see Eur. Court HR, judgment of 26 June 1986, Series A no. 101, p. 12, para. 36).
  • EGMR, 25.11.1993 - 14282/88

    ZANDER v. SWEDEN

    Auszug aus EKMR, 07.04.1997 - 27644/95
    The dispute must be genuine and serious; it may relate not only to the actual existence of a right but also to its scope and the manner of its exercise; and finally, the result of the proceedings must be directly decisive for the right in question (see Eur. Court HR, Zander v. Sweden judgment of 25 November 1993, Series A no. 279-B, p. 38 et seq., paras. 22 et seq.).
  • EGMR, 27.10.1987 - 10426/83

    PUDAS c. SUÈDE

    Auszug aus EKMR, 07.04.1997 - 27644/95
    Furthermore, the result of the proceedings was not directly decisive for such a right, as required by the case-law of the Convention organs (see Eur. Court HR, Pudas v. Sweden judgment of 27 October 1987, Series A no. 125-A, p. 14, para. 31).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht