Neue Kooperation: dejure.org × Doctrine bringen KI-Power für Aktenanalyse, Recherche und Texterstellung. Doctrine entdecken
×
Weitere Entscheidung unten: EGMR, 05.09.2018

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 14.03.2017 - 36216/13   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2017,6117
EGMR, 14.03.2017 - 36216/13 (https://dejure.org/2017,6117)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 14.03.2017 - 36216/13 (https://dejure.org/2017,6117)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 14. März 2017 - 36216/13 (https://dejure.org/2017,6117)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2017,6117) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (58)Zitiert selbst (9)

  • EGMR, 21.07.2015 - 18766/11

    Italien muß Rechtsrahmen für gleichgeschlechtliche Lebensgemeinschaft schaffen

    Auszug aus EGMR, 14.03.2017 - 36216/13
    As regards the Government's argument that the applicant should have lodged a constitutional complaint under section 62 of the Constitutional Court Act (see paragraphs 117-118 above), the Court, having regard to its case-law (see, for example, Oliari and Others v. Italy, nos. 18766/11 and 36030/11, §§ 94-95, 21 July 2015, and Iordache v. Romania, no. 6817/02, §§ 57-67, 14 October 2008), considers that the violation complained of indeed concerns a continuing situation rather than a specific decision of the domestic authorities.
  • EGMR, 01.10.2009 - 76836/01

    Verweigerung der Zuerkennung von Rechtspersönlichkeit an Scientology-Kirchen

    Auszug aus EGMR, 14.03.2017 - 36216/13
    Having regard to the specific circumstances of the present case which concerns an evolving situation, and taking into account that the case is still pending, the Court does not consider it necessary to indicate individual measures that the State has to adopt for the execution of the present judgment (compare Kimlya and Others v. Russia, nos. 76836/01 and 32782/03, § 109, ECHR 2009).
  • EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 32842/96

    NUUTINEN v. FINLAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 14.03.2017 - 36216/13
    As stated in the judgment, in a case like the present one it is the Court's task to examine whether the domestic authorities took all the necessary steps to facilitate contact that could reasonably be demanded in the specific circumstances of the case (see paragraph 142 of the judgment, and, among other authorities, Nuutinen v. Finland, no. 32842/96, § 128, ECHR 2000-VIII; Ball v. Andorra, no. 40628/10, § 49, 11 December 2012; Kuppinger v. Germany, no. 62198/11, § 101, 15 January 2015; and Ribić v. Croatia, no. 27148/12, § 93, 2 April 2015).
  • EGMR, 06.07.2005 - 43579/98
    Auszug aus EGMR, 14.03.2017 - 36216/13
    The Court also notes that it is its standard practice to rule that an award in relation to costs and expenses is to be paid directly to the lawyers upon the applicant's request to this end (see, for example, Nachova and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], nos. 43577/98 and 43579/98, §§ 174-75, ECHR 2005-VII).
  • EGMR, 11.12.2012 - 40628/10

    BALL v. ANDORRA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 14.03.2017 - 36216/13
    As stated in the judgment, in a case like the present one it is the Court's task to examine whether the domestic authorities took all the necessary steps to facilitate contact that could reasonably be demanded in the specific circumstances of the case (see paragraph 142 of the judgment, and, among other authorities, Nuutinen v. Finland, no. 32842/96, § 128, ECHR 2000-VIII; Ball v. Andorra, no. 40628/10, § 49, 11 December 2012; Kuppinger v. Germany, no. 62198/11, § 101, 15 January 2015; and Ribić v. Croatia, no. 27148/12, § 93, 2 April 2015).
  • EKMR, 04.09.1996 - 26376/95

    LAYLLE v. GERMANY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 14.03.2017 - 36216/13
    What is more, if a court would base a decision on the views of children who are palpably unable to form and articulate an opinion as to their wishes - for example, because of a loyalty conflict and/or their exposure to the alienating behaviour of one parent -such a decision could run contrary to Article 8 of the Convention (see Laylle v. Germany, no. 26376/95, Commission decision of 4 September 1996, unreported).
  • EGMR, 07.02.2002 - 53176/99

    MIKULIC v. CROATIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 14.03.2017 - 36216/13
    The Court, being master of the characterisation to be given in law to the facts of the case, and having regard to its case-law on the subject (see, for example, Mikulić v. Croatia, no. 53176/99, § 73, ECHR 2002-I), considers that in the circumstances of the present case the complaint under Article 13 of the Convention must be regarded as absorbed by the complaint under Article 8 thereof.
  • EGMR, 25.11.2014 - 10140/13

    KRUSKIC v. CROATIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 14.03.2017 - 36216/13
    It follows that, in so far as the present application is brought on behalf of the applicant's children, it is incompatible ratione personae with the provisions of the Convention within the meaning of its Article 35 § 3 and must be rejected, pursuant to Article 35 § 4 thereof (see, mutatis mutandis, Kruškić v. Croatia (dec.), no. 10140/13, 25 November 2014).
  • EGMR, 24.06.2008 - 8673/05

    [ENG]

    Auszug aus EGMR, 14.03.2017 - 36216/13
    They further referred to the Court's case-law (see Sahin v. Germany (dec.), no. 30943/96, 12 December 2000, and Eberhard and M. v. Slovenia, no. 8673/05 and 9733/05, § 88, 1 December 2009), under which in such cases the non-custodial parent could not bring an application in the name of his or her children.
  • EGMR, 29.10.2019 - 23641/17

    PISICA c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA

    However, while the Court's case-law requires children's views to be taken into account, those views are not necessarily immutable, and children's objections, which must be given due weight, are not necessarily sufficient to override the parents' interests, especially their interests in having regular contact with their child (see K.B. and Others v. Croatia, no. 36216/13, § 143, 14 March 2017).
  • EGMR, 06.07.2021 - 47220/19

    A.M. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

    23280/08 and 2334/10, §§ 39-42, 6 October 2016; and K.B. and Others v. Croatia, no. 36216/13, §§ 109-10, 14 March 2017).

    Having referred to Sahin v. Germany (dec.) (no. 30943/96, 10 December 2000), Moog v. Germany (nos. 23280/08 and 2334/10, §§ 39-42, 6 October 2016), and K.B. and Others v. Croatia (no. 36216/13, §§ 109-10, 14 March 2017), the Court reached the conclusion that the applicant did not have locus standi to act on behalf of the children.

    23280/08 and 2334/10, §§ 39-42, 6 October 2016; and K.B. and Others v. Croatia, no. 36216/13, §§ 109-10, 14 March 2017).".

  • EGMR, 30.06.2020 - 70879/11

    ILYA LYAPIN v. RUSSIA

    Generally, a child's interests dictate that the child's ties with his or her family must be maintained, except in cases where the family has proved to be particularly unfit and this may harm the child's health and development (see, for instance, K.B. and Others v. Croatia, no. 36216/13, § 143, 14 March 2017).

    What is more, if a court based a decision on the views of children who were palpably unable to form and articulate an opinion as to their wishes - for example, because of a conflict of loyalty and/or their exposure to the alienating behaviour of one parent - such a decision could run counter to Article 8 of the Convention (see K.B. and Others v. Croatia, no. 36216/13, § 143, 14 March 2017 and the authorities cited therein).

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
dejure.org Übersicht EGMR

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 05.09.2018 - 27148/12, 36216/13   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2018,27350
EGMR, 05.09.2018 - 27148/12, 36216/13 (https://dejure.org/2018,27350)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 05.09.2018 - 27148/12, 36216/13 (https://dejure.org/2018,27350)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 05. September 2018 - 27148/12, 36216/13 (https://dejure.org/2018,27350)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2018,27350) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    RIBIC CONTRE LA CROATIE ET 1 AUTRE AFFAIRE

    Informations fournies par le gouvernement concernant les mesures prises permettant d'éviter de nouvelles violations. Versement des sommes prévues dans l'arrêt (französisch)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    RIBIC AGAINST CROATIA AND 1 OTHER CASE

    Information given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations. Payment of the sums provided for in the judgment (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Zitiert selbst (1)

  • EGMR, 13.03.2025 - 27313/21

    CALVEZ c. FRANCE

    Rn. 65 Or, de l'avis de la Cour, la durée entre le jugement en première instance et l'arrêt d'appel est acceptable, dans les circonstances de l'espèce, compte tenu de la durée du placement et de l'âge de l'enfant au moment de cette mesure (comparer avec les durées dans les arrêts Ribić c. Croatie, no 27148/12, §§ 97-100, 2 avril 2015, A.L. c. France, précité, §§ 67-73, Paparrigopoulos c. Grèce, no 61657/16, §§ 49-50, 30 juin 2022, Q et R c. Slovénie, no 19938/20, §§ 76-83, 8 février 2022, Hýbkovi, précité, § 93, et T.C. c. Italie, précité, §§ 59-61).
  • EGMR, 05.03.2019 - 51051/15

    BITTOUN c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA

    À ce sujet, elle réaffirme que dans les affaires concernant la relation entre un parent et son enfant, il faut témoigner d'une diligence exceptionnelle, car le passage du temps risque de trancher en pratique la question posée (voir, par exemple, Ribić c. Croatie, no 27148/12, § 92, 2 avril 2015).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
dejure.org Übersicht EGMR
dejure.org nutzen ohne Ablenkung
Werbung abschalten. Jetzt buchen! Keine automatische Verlängerung.
Info zum PUR-Angebot
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht