Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MISAN v. RUSSIA

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation of Article 8 - Right to respect for private and family life (Article 8-1 - Respect for home) (englisch)

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Misan v. Russia

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (12)Neu Zitiert selbst (6)

• EGMR, 23.10.2012 - 38623/03

  PICHUGIN v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.10.2014 - 4261/04

  The Court further reiterates that it is incumbent on the interested party to display special diligence in the defence of his interests (see Teuschler v. Germany (dec.), no. 47636/99, 4 October 2001; Novoselov v. Russia (dec.), no. 66460/01, 8 July 2004; Sukhorubchenko v. Russia, no. 69315/01, § 48, 10 February 2005; and Pichugin v. Russia, no. 38623/03, § 179, 23 October 2012).
• EGMR, 04.10.2001 - 47636/99

  TEUSCHLER contre l'ALLEMAGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.10.2014 - 4261/04

  The Court further reiterates that it is incumbent on the interested party to display special diligence in the defence of his interests (see Teuschler v. Germany (dec.), no. 47636/99, 4 October 2001; Novoselov v. Russia (dec.), no. 66460/01, 8 July 2004; Sukhorubchenko v. Russia, no. 69315/01, § 48, 10 February 2005; and Pichugin v. Russia, no. 38623/03, § 179, 23 October 2012).
• EGMR, 22.05.2008 - 65755/01

  ILIYA STEFANOV v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.10.2014 - 4261/04

  The criteria the Court has taken into consideration in determining this latter issue have included the severity of the offence in connection with which the search was effected, the manner and circumstances according to which the order was issued - in particular whether the warrant was based on a reasonable suspicion - and the content and scope of the warrant, having particular regard to the nature of the premises searched and the safeguards put in place to confine the impact of the measure within reasonable bounds (see Buck v. Germany, no. 41604/98, §§ 44-45, ECHR 2005-IV; Smirnov v. Russia, no. 71362/01, § 44, 7 June 2007; and Iliya Stefanov v. Bulgaria, no. 65755/01, § 38, 22 May 2008).

 
• EGMR, 28.04.2005 - 41604/98

  Recht auf Achtung des Privatlebens und der Wohnung (Einsatz von Durchsuchungen …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.10.2014 - 4261/04

  The criteria the Court has taken into consideration in determining this latter issue have included the severity of the offence in connection with which the search was effected, the manner and circumstances according to which the order was issued - in particular whether the warrant was based on a reasonable suspicion - and the content and scope of the warrant, having particular regard to the nature of the premises searched and the safeguards put in place to confine the impact of the measure within reasonable bounds (see Buck v. Germany, no. 41604/98, §§ 44-45, ECHR 2005-IV; Smirnov v. Russia, no. 71362/01, § 44, 7 June 2007; and Iliya Stefanov v. Bulgaria, no. 65755/01, § 38, 22 May 2008).
• EGMR, 15.02.2005 - 68416/01

  STEEL ET MORRIS c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.10.2014 - 4261/04

  Article 6 § 1 allows the State a free choice of the means to be used in guaranteeing litigants these rights (see Steel and Morris v. the United Kingdom, no. 68416/01, §§ 59-60, ECHR 2005-II).
• EGMR, 02.06.2005 - 66460/01

  NOVOSELOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 02.10.2014 - 4261/04

  The Court further reiterates that it is incumbent on the interested party to display special diligence in the defence of his interests (see Teuschler v. Germany (dec.), no. 47636/99, 4 October 2001; Novoselov v. Russia (dec.), no. 66460/01, 8 July 2004; Sukhorubchenko v. Russia, no. 69315/01, § 48, 10 February 2005; and Pichugin v. Russia, no. 38623/03, § 179, 23 October 2012).

• EGMR, 14.09.2023 - 41761/20

  KUSHNIKOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  7077/06 and 12 others, §§ 76-79, 26 June 2018, Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, 20 September 2016, Misan v. Russia, no. 4261/04, § 63, 2 October 2014, and Kruglov and Others v. Russia, nos.

  8 (1) - unlawful search - search on 06/02/2021 of the applicant's flat, search warrant issued by the Pervorechenskiy District Court in Vladivostok on 05/02/2021, on 23/03/2021 the Primorye Regional Court dismissed the applicant's appeal: broad terms and scope of the search warrant; the applicant was not a suspect (see Misan v. Russia, no. 4261/04, § 63, 2 October 2014, and Kruglov and Others v. Russia, nos. 11264/04 and 15 others, § 127, 4 February 2020).

• EGMR, 11.01.2024 - 61147/13

  TREVOGIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention in the light of its well-established case-law (see, among other authorities, Svinarenko and Slyadnev v. Russia [GC], nos. 32541/08 and 43441/08, §§ 113-39, ECHR 2014 (extracts), concerning placement in a metal cage in a courtroom during criminal proceedings, Idalov v. Russia [GC], no. 5826/03, §§ 139-49 and 154-58, 22 May 2012, regarding length and speediness of review of pre-trial detention, Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, 20 September 2016, concerning absence of a prosecuting party from the administrative proceedings, Misan v. Russia, no. 4261/04, §§ 53-64, 2 October 2014, related to a search of the applicant's home conducted in the absence of safeguards, and Konstantin Moskalev v. Russia, no. 59589/10, §§ 23-36, 7 November 2017, concerning the lack of an effective remedy in respect of the complaint about the secret surveillance).
• EGMR, 23.11.2023 - 13079/17

  PROKAYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  In the leading cases concerning searches of the applicants' homes (see Misan v. Russia, no. 4261/04, 2 October 2014 and Kruglov and Others v. Russia, nos. 11264/04 and 15 others, 4 February 2020), the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.

 
• EGMR - 63358/16 (anhängig)

  YATSENKO v. RUSSIA and 27 other applications

  No adequate and sufficient safeguards against abuse: broad terms/wide content and scope of the search warrant - objects and documents not specific enough to restrict police's discretion - not specified in the search order (see Misan v. Russia, no. 4261/04, October 2014 and Kruglov and Others v. Russia, nos.11264/04and 15 others, 4 February 2020).
• EGMR, 07.09.2023 - 75231/17

  YURGILEVICH AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  18255/10 and 5 others, §§ 114-42 9 April 2019, concerning inhuman conditions of transport of detainees; Blokhin v. Russia [GC] no. 47152/06, §§ 120-50, ECHR 2016, concerning lack of medical assistance in detention; Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, related to the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the CAO; Misan v. Russia no. 4261/04, § 70, 2 October 2014; and Kruglov and Others v. Russia, nos.
• EGMR, 05.10.2023 - 2829/18

  BOYARSHINOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (the CAO); Misan v. Russia no. 4261/04, § 70, 2 October 2014, and Kruglov and Others v. Russia, nos.
• EGMR, 16.03.2017 - 51693/13

  MODESTOU c. GRÈCE

  Les critères que la Cour prend en compte pour trancher cette dernière question sont notamment les circonstances dans lesquelles le mandat a été émis, en particulier les autres éléments de preuve disponibles à l'époque, le contenu et l'étendue du mandat, la façon dont la perquisition a été menée, y compris la présence ou non d'observateurs indépendants, et l'étendue des répercussions possibles sur le travail et la réputation de la personne visée par la perquisition (voir, parmi beaucoup d'autres, Van Rossem c. Belgique, no 41872/98, §§ 42-43, 9 décembre 2004, Smirnov c. Russie, no71362/01, § 44, 7 juin 2007, Mancevschi c. Moldova, no 33066/04, § 45, 7 octobre 2008, Misan c. Russie, no 4261/04, § 55, 2 octobre 2014 et K.S. et M.S. c. Allemagne, no 33696/11, § 44, 6 octobre 2016).
• EGMR - 15013/18 (anhängig)

  MULDAGALIYEVA v. RUSSIA and 8 other applications

  The applications concern complaints raised under Article 8 § 1 of the Convention relating to unlawful search which are the subject of well-established case law of the Court (see Misan v. Russia, no. 4261/04, 2 October 2014 and Kruglov and Others v. Russia, nos. 11264/04 and 15 others, 4 February 2020).
• EGMR - 53989/17 (anhängig)

  FRIDMAN v. RUSSIA and 19 other applications

  The applications concern complaints raised under Article 8 § 1 of the Convention relating to unlawful search which are the subject of well-established case law of the Court (see Misan v. Russia, no. 4261/04, 2 October 2014 and Kruglov and Others v. Russia, nos. 11264/04 and 15 others, 4 February 2020).
• EGMR, 18.03.2021 - 42371/08

  TORTLADZE v. GEORGIA

  Secondly, it must consider the specific circumstances of each case, including but not limited to the severity of the offence in question, the manner and circumstances in which the search warrant was issued, the availability of other evidence at the time, the content and scope of the warrant in question, and the extent of possible repercussions on the reputation of the person affected by the search (see, among many other authorities, Smirnov, § 44; Camenzind, §§ 45-46; and K.S. and M.S. v. Germany, § 44, all cited above; see also Misan v Russia, no. 4261/04, § 55, 2 October 2014, and Buck v. Germany, no. 41604/98, § 45, ECHR 2005-IV).
• EGMR - 46603/20 (anhängig)

  KLABUKOV v. RUSSIA and 1 other application
• EGMR, 22.02.2022 - 74320/10

  CHEPRUNOVY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA