Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  MIAH v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Art. 3, Art. 7, Art. 8 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (22)Zitiert selbst (6)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 26.04.1979 - 6538/74

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.04.2010 - 53080/07

  The expression "in accordance with the law" requires first, that the impugned measure should have a basis in domestic law, but also refers to the quality of the law in question, requiring that it be accessible to the persons concerned and formulated with sufficient precision to enable them - if need be, with appropriate advice - to foresee, to a degree that is reasonable in the circumstances, the consequences which a given action may entail (The Sunday Times v. the United Kingdom (no. 1), 26 April 1979, §§ 47-49, Series A no. 30).
• EGMR, 27.05.2008 - 26565/05

  N. ./. Vereinigtes Königreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.04.2010 - 53080/07

  For Article 3, the mere fact of return to a country where one's economic position will be worse than in a Contracting State is not sufficient to meet the threshold of ill-treatment proscribed by Article 3 (see, mutatis mutandis, N. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 26565/05, § 42, 27 May 2008) and the Court is unable to find that the applicant, a young man in good health, would have been particularly vulnerable at the time of his deportation.
• EGMR, 18.02.1991 - 12313/86

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.04.2010 - 53080/07

  For instance, when assessing the nature and seriousness of the offences committed by an applicant, it has to be taken into account whether he or she committed them as a juvenile or as an adult (see, for instance, Moustaquim v. Belgium, judgment of 18 February 1991, Series A no. 193, p. 19, § 44, and Radovanovic v. Austria, no. 42703/98, § 35, 22 April 2004).

• EGMR, 07.11.2000 - 31519/96

  KWAKYE-NTI ET DUFIE contre les PAYS-BAS

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.04.2010 - 53080/07

  It also recalls that in immigration cases it has held that there will be no family life between parents and adult children unless they can demonstrate additional elements of dependence (Iyisan v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 7673/08, 9 February 2010; Kwakye-Ntl and Dufie v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 31519/96, 7 November 2000).
• EGMR, 17.02.2009 - 27319/07

  ONUR v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.04.2010 - 53080/07

  The same considerations must also apply to adult siblings (see, for example, Onur v. the United Kingdom, no. 27319/07, § 45, 17 February 2009).
• EGMR, 09.02.2010 - 7673/08

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.04.2010 - 53080/07

  It also recalls that in immigration cases it has held that there will be no family life between parents and adult children unless they can demonstrate additional elements of dependence (Iyisan v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 7673/08, 9 February 2010; Kwakye-Ntl and Dufie v. the Netherlands (dec.), no. 31519/96, 7 November 2000).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 02.04.2013 - 27725/10

  EGMR; Dublin II VO; Abschiebung nach Italien: Keine systemische Mängel

  The Court further reiterates that the mere fact of return to a country where one's economic position will be worse than in the expelling Contracting State is not sufficient to meet the threshold of ill-treatment proscribed by Article 3 (see Miah v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 53080/07, § 14, 27 April 2010 and, mutatis mutandis, N. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 26565/05, § 42, ECHR 2008), that Article 3 cannot be interpreted as obliging the High Contracting Parties to provide everyone within their jurisdiction with a home, and that this provision does not entail any general obligation to give refugees financial assistance to enable them to maintain a certain standard of living (see M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece, cited above, § 249).
• EGMR, 18.06.2013 - 53852/11

  HALIMI v. AUSTRIA AND ITALY

  The Court further reiterates that the mere fact of return to a country where ones economic position will be worse than in the expelling Contracting State is not sufficient to meet the threshold of ill-treatment proscribed by Article 3 (see Miah v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 53080/07, § 14, 27 April 2010, and, mutatis mutandis, N. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 26565/05, § 42, ECHR 2008); that Article 3 cannot be interpreted as obliging the High Contracting Parties to provide everyone within their jurisdiction with a home; and that this provision does not entail any general obligation to give refugees financial assistance to enable them to maintain a certain standard of living (see M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], no. 30696/09, § 249, ECHR 2011).
• EGMR, 12.01.2021 - 26957/19

  KHAN v. DENMARK

  25 of the judgment delivered by the European Court of Human Rights on 27 April 2010 concerning application no. 53080/07, Miah v. the United Kingdom, which states, inter alia, that the alien's sentence of imprisonment for one year for the last in a series of offences was 'at the lower end of the scale to which a presumption in favour of deportation would apply'.

  He noted that in general, the Court had considered that a sentence of imprisonment for twelve months, for the last in a series of offences, was "at the lower end of the scale to which a presumption in favour of deportation would apply" (see Miah v. United Kingdom (dec.), no. 53080/07, 27 April 2010).

• EGMR, 25.04.2017 - 41697/12

  KRASNIQI v. AUSTRIA

  The applicant had committed all of his criminal offences as an adult, which added to their severity (see Miah v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 53080/07, § 24, 27 April 2010, and Balogun v. the United Kingdom, no. 60286/09, § 49, 10 April 2012).
• EGMR, 23.04.2015 - 38030/12

  KHAN v. GERMANY

  Es wird tatsächlich nur selten vorkommen, dass ein niedergelassener Migrant nicht in der Lage sein wird zu belegen, dass seine Abschiebung einen Eingriff in sein durch Artikel 8 EMRK garantiertes Privatleben darstellt (siehe Miah./. Vereinigtes Königreich (Entsch.), Individualbeschwerde Nr. 53080/07, Rdnr. 17, 27.
• EGMR, 17.09.2013 - 3202/09

  [ENG]

  The mere fact of return to a country where the applicant's economic position will be worse than in a Contracting State is not sufficient to meet the threshold of ill-treatment proscribed by Article 3 (see Miah v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 53080/07, § 14, 27 April 2010 and Abdi Ibrahim v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 14535/10, § 31, 18 September 2012).

  The Court also accepts that the applicant's removal to Uganda interfered with the private life which she had unquestionably established in the United Kingdom (see Miah v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 53080/07, § 17, 27 April 2010).

• EGMR, 23.10.2018 - 7841/14

  LEVAKOVIC v. DENMARK

  It must therefore be accepted that the totality of social ties between settled migrants and the community in which they are living constitutes part of the concept of "private life" within the meaning of Article 8. Indeed, it will be a rare case where a settled migrant is unable to demonstrate that his or her deportation would interfere with his or her private life as guaranteed by Article 8 (see Miah v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 53080/07, § 17, 27 April 2010).
• EGMR, 04.06.2013 - 6198/12

  DAYTBEGOVA AND MAGOMEDOVA v. AUSTRIA

  The Court further reiterates that the mere fact of return to a country where one's economic position will be worse than in the expelling Contracting State is not sufficient to meet the threshold of ill-treatment proscribed by Article 3 (see Miah v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 53080/07, § 14, 27 April 2010, and, mutatis mutandis, N. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 26565/05, § 42, ECHR 2008), that Article 3 cannot be interpreted as obliging the High Contracting Parties to provide everyone within their jurisdiction with a home, and that this provision does not entail any general obligation to give refugees financial assistance to enable them to maintain a certain standard of living (see M.S.S. v. Belgium and Greece [GC], no. 30696/09, § 249, ECHR 2011).
• EGMR, 19.03.2013 - 45971/08

  SAVASCI v. GERMANY

  Daher gab es keine unüberwindbaren Hindernisse, die seiner Reintegration in sein Herkunftsland entgegenstanden (vgl. Miah./. Vereinigtes Königreich, Individualbeschwerde Nr. 53080/07, Rdnr. 25, 27. April 2010).
• EGMR, 12.01.2021 - 56803/18

  MUNIR JOHANA v. DENMARK

  It must therefore be accepted that the totality of social ties between settled migrants and the community in which they are living constitutes part of the concept of "private life" within the meaning of Article 8. Indeed, it will be a rare case where a settled migrant is unable to demonstrate that his or her deportation would interfere with his or her private life as guaranteed by Article 8 (see Miah v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 53080/07, § 17, 27 April 2010).
• EGMR, 10.04.2012 - 60286/09

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 18.06.2013 - 73874/11

  ABUBEKER v. AUSTRIA AND ITALY
• EGMR, 11.04.2023 - 57766/19

  LOUKILI v. THE NETHERLANDS
• EGMR, 20.11.2018 - 16711/15

  MOHAMMAD v. DENMARK
• EGMR, 03.07.2012 - 52178/10

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 20.12.2011 - 6222/10

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 22.01.2013 - 15620/09

  SHALA v. GERMANY
• EGMR, 04.01.2012 - 4512/02

  KOSTADINOVIC c. BULGARIE
• EGMR, 18.09.2012 - 14535/10

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 10.04.2012 - 53586/08

  AKBULUT v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 07.06.2011 - 21783/08

  ANAM v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 16.10.2012 - 56090/08

  M.S. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM