Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  GIRISEN v. TURKEY

  Violation of Article 6+6-3-c - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) (Article 6 - Right to a fair trial;Article 6-3-c - Defence through legal assistance);Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 13.03.2018 - 53567/07
• EGMR, 11.12.2019 - 53567/07

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Zitiert selbst (27)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 29.11.2011 - 31610/08

  ALTINOK c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.03.2018 - 53567/07

  The current practice under Law no. 5271 is outlined in Altınok v. Turkey (no. 31610/08, §§ 28-31, 29 November 2011).

  As regards the second period, the Court reiterates that it examined the remedy provided for by the new Code of Criminal Procedure in Altınok v. Turkey, (no. 31610/08, §§ 50-61, 29 November 2011) (see paragraphs 23 and 41).

• EGMR, 02.02.2016 - 2082/05

  CETINKAYA v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.03.2018 - 53567/07

  The Court reiterates that within the context of Turkish law, lodging a formal complaint with the public prosecutor's office and, where appropriate, filing an objection against a decision not to prosecute, would be sufficient to fulfil the requirements of Article 35 of the Convention (see Aydın Çetinkaya v. Turkey, no. 2082/05, § 84, 2 February 2016 with further references therein; and compare Aksoy v. Turkey, 18 December 1996, § 56-57, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-VI).

  It further considers that the most appropriate form of redress would be a retrial in accordance with the requirements of Article 6 of the Convention, should the applicant so request (see Aydın Çetinkaya v. Turkey, no. 2082/05, § 119, 2 February 2016).

• EGMR, 04.09.2014 - 140/10

  Belgien wegen Auslieferung von Ex-Fußballprofi verurteilt

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.03.2018 - 53567/07

  The Court reiterates its well-established case-law to the effect that the assessment of an applicant's obligation to exhaust domestic remedies is normally carried out with reference to the date on which the application was lodged with it (see Trabelsi v. Belgium, no. 140/10, § 89, ECHR 2014 (extracts)), subject to exceptions which may be justified by the particular circumstances of the case, notably following the creation of new remedies.

• EGMR, 25.03.1999 - 25444/94

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.03.2018 - 53567/07

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the following criteria: the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicants and the relevant authorities (see, among many other authorities, Pélissier and Sassi v. France [GC], no. 25444/94, § 67, ECHR 1999-II).
• EGMR, 17.12.2004 - 33348/96

  CUMPANA AND MAZARE v. ROMANIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.03.2018 - 53567/07

  It therefore decides not to award him anything under this head (see CumpÇŽnÇŽ and MazÇŽre v. Romania [GC], no. 33348/96, § 134, ECHR 2004-XI).
• EGMR, 02.02.2016 - 11/05

  GÜRBÜZ AND ÖZÇELIK v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.03.2018 - 53567/07

  Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that the length of the proceedings was excessive and failed to meet the "reasonable time" requirement (see Daneshpayeh v. Turkey, cited above, § 28, and Gürbüz and Özçelik v. Turkey, no. 11/05, § 24, 2 February 2016).
• EGMR, 05.09.2017 - 38907/09

  KOÇ v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.03.2018 - 53567/07

  Likewise, the Court of Cassation dealt with the issue in a formalistic manner and failed to remedy this shortcoming (see Bayram Koç v. Turkey, no. 38907/09, § 23, 5 September 2017).
• EGMR, 16.07.2009 - 21086/04

  DANESHPAYEH c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.03.2018 - 53567/07

  In that connection, the Court further reiterates that it has already held that the Turkish law in force at the material time did not provide any effective remedies in respect of the complaints about the length of proceedings (see Daneshpayeh v. Turkey, no. 21086/04, § 37, 16 July 2009).
• EGMR, 07.06.2018 - 36391/02

  SALDUZ CONTRE LA TURQUIE ET 83 AUTRES AFFAIRES

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.03.2018 - 53567/07

  Therefore, in the Court's view, the applicant's request for a lawyer while in police custody or his subsequent complaint as to the absence of legal assistance before the national authorities would be devoid of any prospect of success (see, among others, Taşçıgil v. Turkey, no. 16943/03, § 32, 3 March 2009).
• EGMR, 17.07.2012 - 8140/08

  CEVIZ c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 13.03.2018 - 53567/07

  He also specifically argued that the principle of equality of arms had been violated in that the Assize Court had decided the case on the basis of the case file and had not informed him of the public prosecutor's opinion (that was also the case in respect of the applicant in Ceviz v. Turkey, no. 8140/08, § 40, 17 July 2012).
• EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 2091/07

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 08.12.2009 - 1966/07

  SAYIK ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 04.03.2014 - 28074/08

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 08.04.2004 - 71503/01
• EGMR, 16.10.2012 - 51770/07

  DEMIR c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 12.01.2006 - 18888/02

  IÇYER c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 25.01.2000 - 34979/97

  WALKER v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 05.06.2007 - 43256/04

  BAGRIYANIK c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 28.01.2014 - 11929/12

  TUTAL AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 12.10.2006 - 72277/01

  DVOYNYKH v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 24.05.2016 - 44023/09

  BATMAZ v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 19.02.2008 - 15041/03

  YALÇIN c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 30.01.2007 - 45977/99

  ÇOBANOGLU ET BUDAK c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 28.05.2014 - 2173/04

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 26.10.2006 - 56796/00

  DANOV v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 05.09.2017 - 47622/10

  ARICAN c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 05.12.2017 - 9510/06

  OK AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen