Volltextveröffentlichungen (4)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  I v. SWEDEN

  Art. 3 MRK
  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Expulsion) (Conditional) (Russia) (englisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  I v. SWEDEN - [Deutsche Übersetzung] by the Austrian Institute for Human Rights (ÖIM)

  [DEU] Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Expulsion) (Conditional) (Russia)

• milo.bamf.de

  Russische Föderation: zur allgemeinen Lage in Tschetschenien

• juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)

Kurzfassungen/Presse

• RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  I v. Sweden

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 05.09.2013 - 61204/09
• EGMR, 12.11.2014 - 61204/09

Wird zitiert von ... (4)Zitiert selbst (20)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 09.03.2010 - 41827/07

  Schweden, Iran, Glaubwürdigkeit, Beweislast, Vorverfolgung, Prognose, …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.09.2013 - 61204/09

  The Court accepts that, as a general principle, the national authorities are best placed to assess not just the facts but, more particularly, the credibility of witnesses since it is they who have had an opportunity to see, hear and assess the demeanour of the individuals concerned (see R.C. v. Sweden, no. 41827/07, § 52, 9 March 2010).

  Furthermore, if information is presented which gives strong reasons to question the veracity of an asylum seeker's submissions, the individual must provide a satisfactory explanation for the alleged discrepancies (see, among many other authorities, R.C. v. Sweden, no. 41827/07, 9 March 2010).

• EGMR, 12.06.2012 - 54131/10

  Asyl, Widerruf, Achtung des Familienlebens, Refoulement, subsidiärer Schutz, …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.09.2013 - 61204/09

  Nevertheless, the Court considers that the unsafe general situation there is not sufficiently serious to conclude that the return of the applicants to Russia would amount to a violation of Article 3 of the Convention (see, for example Bajsultanov v. Austria, no. 54131/10, 18 I v. SWEDEN JUDGMENT.

  Finally, the majority did not attach sufficient importance to the fact that the case concerns expulsion to a High Contracting Party to the Convention, which has undertaken to secure the fundamental rights guaranteed by it (see, as a recent authority with respect to Chechnya, Bajsultanov v. Austria, no. 54131/10, § 70, 12 June 2012).

• EGMR, 17.07.2008 - 25904/07

  Sri Lanka, Tamilen, Europäischer Menschenrechtsgerichtshof, menschenrechtswidrige …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.09.2013 - 61204/09

  First of all, it is in principle for the applicant to adduce evidence capable of proving that there are substantial grounds for believing that, if the measure complained of were to be implemented, he or she would be exposed to a real risk of being subjected to treatment contrary to Article 3. Once such evidence has been adduced, it is for the Government to dispel any doubts about it (see NA. v. the United Kingdom, no. 25904/07, § 111, 17 July 2008).

• EGMR, 19.10.2012 - 43370/04

  Transnistrien

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.09.2013 - 61204/09

  43370/04, 8252/05 and 18454/06, ECHR 2012 (extracts)).
• EGMR, 07.07.1989 - 14038/88

  Jens Söring

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.09.2013 - 61204/09

  This case-law has in fact developed since the Court's judgment in the case of Soering v. the United Kingdom (7 July 1989, Series A no. 161).
• EGMR, 13.07.2000 - 39221/98

  SCOZZARI ET GIUNTA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.09.2013 - 61204/09

  39221/98 and 41963/98, ECHR 2000-VIII (Belgium); and Demades v. Turkey, no. 16219/90, 31 July 2003 (Cyprus)).
• EGMR, 18.05.2004 - 67972/01

  SOMOGYI c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.09.2013 - 61204/09

  Article 36 § 1 of the Convention reads as follows: "In all cases before a Chamber of the Grand Chamber, a High Contracting Party one of whose nationals is an applicant shall have the right to submit written comments and to take part in hearings." 41. Article 36 § 1 of the Convention, taken together with Rule 44 § 1 (a) and (b) of the Rules of Court, allows a Member State to intervene in a case lodged with the Court by one of its nationals against another Member State (see, for example, Sisojeva and Others v. Latvia (striking out) [GC], no. 60654/00, ECHR 2007-I (Russia); Slivenko v. Latvia [GC], no. 48321/99, § 6, ECHR 2003-X (Russia); Somogyi v. Italy, no. 67972/01, ECHR 2004-IV (Hungary); Scozzari and Giunta v. Italy [GC], nos.
• EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 69480/01

  LOULOUÏEV ET AUTRES c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.09.2013 - 61204/09

  The general situation for Chechens returning to the Russian Federation 58. Having regard to its case-law concerning disappearances and ill-treatment in Chechnya (see, among many others, Bazorkina v. Russia, no. 69481/01, 27 July 2006; Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615/02, ECHR 2006-XIII (extracts); Luluyev and Others v. Russia, no. 69480/01, ECHR 2006-XIII (extracts); Baysayeva v. Russia, no. 74237/01, 5 April 2007; and Akhmadova v. Russia, no. 25548/07, 3 April 2012) and having regard to the recent information on the human rights and security situation in Chechnya, the Court is well aware of on-going disappearances, of arbitrary violence, of impunity and ill-treatment in detention facilities, notably with regard to certain categories of people, such as former rebels, their relatives, political adversaries of Ramsan Kadyrov, journalists, human rights activists and individuals who have lodged complaints with international organisations.
• EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 7615/02

  IMAKAÏEVA c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.09.2013 - 61204/09

  The general situation for Chechens returning to the Russian Federation 58. Having regard to its case-law concerning disappearances and ill-treatment in Chechnya (see, among many others, Bazorkina v. Russia, no. 69481/01, 27 July 2006; Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615/02, ECHR 2006-XIII (extracts); Luluyev and Others v. Russia, no. 69480/01, ECHR 2006-XIII (extracts); Baysayeva v. Russia, no. 74237/01, 5 April 2007; and Akhmadova v. Russia, no. 25548/07, 3 April 2012) and having regard to the recent information on the human rights and security situation in Chechnya, the Court is well aware of on-going disappearances, of arbitrary violence, of impunity and ill-treatment in detention facilities, notably with regard to certain categories of people, such as former rebels, their relatives, political adversaries of Ramsan Kadyrov, journalists, human rights activists and individuals who have lodged complaints with international organisations.
• EGMR, 27.07.2006 - 69481/01

  BAZORKINA v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 05.09.2013 - 61204/09

  The general situation for Chechens returning to the Russian Federation 58. Having regard to its case-law concerning disappearances and ill-treatment in Chechnya (see, among many others, Bazorkina v. Russia, no. 69481/01, 27 July 2006; Imakayeva v. Russia, no. 7615/02, ECHR 2006-XIII (extracts); Luluyev and Others v. Russia, no. 69480/01, ECHR 2006-XIII (extracts); Baysayeva v. Russia, no. 74237/01, 5 April 2007; and Akhmadova v. Russia, no. 25548/07, 3 April 2012) and having regard to the recent information on the human rights and security situation in Chechnya, the Court is well aware of on-going disappearances, of arbitrary violence, of impunity and ill-treatment in detention facilities, notably with regard to certain categories of people, such as former rebels, their relatives, political adversaries of Ramsan Kadyrov, journalists, human rights activists and individuals who have lodged complaints with international organisations.
• EGMR, 05.04.2007 - 74237/01

  BAYSAYEVA v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 31.07.2003 - 16219/90

  DEMADES v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 13.10.2009 - 11230/07

  PANJEHEIGHALEHEI v. DENMARK
• EGMR, 27.03.2008 - 37913/05

  HAKIZIMANA v. SWEDEN
• EGMR, 08.11.2011 - 7265/10

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 04.07.2006 - 24171/05

  KARIM v. SWEDEN
• EGMR, 03.04.2012 - 25548/07

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 15.05.2012 - 30720/09

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 01.06.2006 - 39858/04

  JELTSUJEVA v. THE NETHERLANDS
• EGMR, 24.01.2012 - 50043/09

  [ENG]

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• OVG Niedersachsen, 29.01.2019 - 9 LB 93/18

  "faktischer Iraner"; "real risk"; Abschiebung; Afghanistan; allgemeine Gewalt; …

  Insoweit sind die vorhersehbaren Folgen einer Rückkehr unter Berücksichtigung sowohl der allgemeinen Lage im Abschiebungszielstaat als auch der persönlichen Umstände des Ausländers zu prüfen (…EGMR, Urteile vom 23.8.2016 - 59166/12 [J. K. and others v. Sweden] - HUDOC Rn. 83; vom 5.9.2013 - 61204/09 [I. v. Sweden] - HUDOC Rn. 56;… vom 6.6.2013 - 2283/12 [Mohammed v. Austria] - HUDOC Rn. 95;… vom 29.1.2013 - 60367/10 [S. H. H. v. The United Kingdom] - HUDOC Rn. 72;… vom 28.6.2011 - 8319/07 und 11449/07 [Sufi and Elmi v. The United Kingdom] - HUDOC Rn. 216; hierzu bereits Senatsbeschluss vom 25.5.2018 - 19/63: Angvbanyrf Nofpuvrohatfireobg; Nstunavfgna; hazrafp...');…">4 YN 19/63 - juris Rn. 6).
• OVG Niedersachsen, 25.05.2018 - 9 LA 64/18

  Nationales Abschiebungsverbot; Afghanistan; unmenschliche oder erniedrigende …

  Insoweit sind die vorhersehbaren Folgen einer Rückkehr unter Berücksichtigung sowohl der allgemeinen Lage im Zielstaat als auch der persönlichen Umstände des Ausländers zu prüfen (EGMR, Urteile vom 5.9.2013 - 61204/09 [I. ./. Sweden] - HUDOC Rn. 56;… vom 6.6.2013 - 2283/12 [Mohammed ./. Austria] - HUDOC Rn. 95;… vom 29.1.2013 - 60367/10 [S. H. K. ./. The United Kingdom] - HUDOC Rn. 72;… vom 28.6.2011 - 8319/07 und 11449/07 [Sufi and Elmi ./. Great Britain] - HUDOC Rn. 216).
• VG Oldenburg, 09.02.2021 - 5 A 6362/17

  Afghanistan: keine inländische Fluchtalternative für Familie mit minderjährigen …

  Insoweit sind die vorhersehbaren Folgen einer Rückkehr unter Berücksichtigung sowohl der allgemeinen Lage im Abschiebungszielstaat als auch der persönlichen Umstände des Ausländers zu prüfen (EGMR, Urteile vom 23.8.2016 - 59166/12 [J. K. and others v. Sweden] - H U D O C Rn. 83; vom 5.9.2013 - 61204/09 [I. v. Sweden] - HUDOC Rn. 56; v o m 6.6.2013 - 2283/12 [ M o h a m m e d v. A u s t r i a ] - HUDOC Rn. 95; vom 2 9 .
• VG Halle, 12.07.2019 - 2 A 693/17

  Benin; Homosexualität : Klage abgewiesen.

  Insoweit sind die vorhersehbaren Folgen einer Rückkehr unter Berücksichtigung sowohl der allgemeinen Lage im Zielstaat als auch der persönlichen Umstände des Ausländers zu prüfen (EGMR, Urteile vom 5. September 2013 - 61204/09 [I. ./. Sweden] - HUDOC Rn. 56;… vom 6. Juni 2013 - 2283/12 [Mohammed ./. Austria] - HUDOC Rn. 95;… vom 29. Januar 2013 - 60367/10 [S. H. K. ./. The United Kingdom] - HUDOC Rn. 72;… vom 28. Juni 2011 - 8319/07 und 11449/07 [Sufi and Elmi ./. Great Britain] - HUDOC Rn. 216).