Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  WOHLMEYER BAU GMBH v. AUSTRIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 41, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation of Art. 6-1 with regard to the length of the proceedings Inadmissible under Art. 6-1 with regard to impartiality and under Art. 13 Pecuniary damage - claim dismissed Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses partial award - domestic ...

Wird zitiert von ... (9)Zitiert selbst (4)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 30979/96

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.07.2004 - 20077/02

  The Court reiterates that the reasonableness of the length of proceedings must be assessed in the light of the circumstances of the case and with reference to the criteria established by its case-law, particularly the complexity of the case, the conduct of the applicant and of the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many other authorities, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII).
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 35382/97

  COMINGERSOLL S.A. v. PORTUGAL

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.07.2004 - 20077/02

  As to non-pecuniary damage, the Court reiterates that it is empowered to award compensation for non-pecuniary damage to commercial companies (see, Comingersoll v. Portugal, no. 35382/97, § 35, ECHR 2000-IV).
• EGMR, 07.12.1999 - 38952/97

  BOUILLY c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.07.2004 - 20077/02

  In this connection, the Court notes that the applicant company's applications under Section 91 of the Courts' Act lodged on 30 April 1999, on 10 October 2002 and on 14 May 2003 fulfil this requirement and awards EUR 690 for each of them, that is a total amount of EUR 2, 070. Moreover, the Court cannot exclude that the excessive duration of the proceedings increased the overall costs incurred (see Bouilly v. France, no. 38952/97, § 33, 7 December 1999).
• EGMR, 02.12.2003 - 42042/98

  PERYT v. POLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.07.2004 - 20077/02

  The Court notes in this context that an expert's work in the context of judicial proceedings is supervised by a judge who remains responsible for the preparation and speedy conduct of the proceedings (see, among other authorities, Peryt v. Poland, no. 42042/98, § 57, 2 December 2003).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 24.01.2019 - 16741/16

  FRÖHLICH v. GERMANY

  Es wurden von mehreren Parteien verschiedene Mängel an der Wohnanlage behauptet, die von einem Sachverständigen begutachtet werden mussten (siehe Wohlmeyer Bau GmbH ./. Österreich, Individualbeschwerde Nr. 20077/02, Rdnr. 52, 8. Juli 2004).
• EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 34983/02

  NOWICKY v. AUSTRIA

  In the Court's view, a detailed examination as to whether the applicant could have made more efficient use of the remedy by using it at other stages of the proceedings, would overstretch the duties incumbent on an applicant pursuant to Article 35 § 1 of the Convention (see, Wohlmeyer Bau GmbH v. Austria, no. 20077/02, § 45, 8 July 2004).
• EGMR, 06.03.2012 - 5455/06

  [ENG]

  In the Court's view, a detailed examination of whether the applicant could have made more efficient use of the remedy by using it at other stages of the proceedings, would overstretch the duties incumbent on an applicant pursuant to Article 35 § 1 of the Convention (see Kern v. Austria, no. 14206/02, § 49, 24 February 2005, and, mutatis mutandis, Wohlmeyer Bau GmbH v. Austria, no. 20077/02, § 45, 8 July 2004).

• EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 14206/02

  KERN v. AUSTRIA

  In the Court's view, a detailed examination as to whether the applicant could have made more efficient use of the remedy by using it at other stages of the proceedings, would overstretch the duties incumbent on an applicant pursuant to Article 35 § 1 of the Convention (see mutatis mutandis Wohlmeyer Bau GmbH v. Austria, no. 20077/02, § 45, 8 July 2004).
• EGMR, 21.12.2004 - 65189/01

  CENTRUM STAVEBNIHO INZENYRSTVI, A.S. c. REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE

  En effet, l'efficacité du droit garanti par l'article 6 de la Convention exige qu'une réparation pécuniaire puisse être octroyée aussi pour dommage moral, y compris à une société commerciale (voir Comingersoll c. Portugal, S.A. [GC], no 35382/97, §§ 35 et 36, CEDH 2000-IV ; Wohlmeyer Bau GmbH c. Autriche, no 20077/02, § 61, 8 juillet 2004).
• EGMR, 15.01.2009 - 33928/05

  KLUG v. AUSTRIA

  In the Court's view, a detailed examination as to whether the applicants, or their predecessors, could have made more efficient use of the remedy by using it at other stages of the proceedings, would overstretch the duties incumbent on an applicant pursuant to Article 35 § 1 of the Convention (see Kern v. Austria, no. 14206/02, § 49, 24 February 2005, and, mutatis mutandis, Wohlmeyer Bau GmbH v. Austria, no. 20077/02, § 45, 8 July 2004).
• EGMR, 24.04.2008 - 28171/04

  HEREMANS c. BELGIQUE

  Or la Cour a toujours imputé à l'Etat les retards pris par des experts agissant sous le contrôle des juridictions (Wohlmeyer Bau GmbH c. Autriche, no 20077/02, 8 juillet 2004 ; Raway et Wera c. Belgique, no 25864/04, 27 novembre 2007).
• EGMR, 21.10.2004 - 66956/01

  ULLRICH v. AUSTRIA

  A further detailed examination as to whether the applicant could have made more efficient use of the remedy by using it at other stages of the proceedings, would overstretch the duties incumbent on an applicant pursuant to Article 35 § 1 of the Convention (see mutatis mutandis Wohlmeyer Bau GmbH v. Austria, no. 20077/02, § 45, 8 July 2004).
• EGMR, 26.10.2004 - 65192/01

  FACKELMAN CR, SPOL. S R.O. c. REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE

  En effet, l'efficacité du droit garanti par l'article 6 de la Convention exige qu'une réparation pécuniaire puisse être octroyée aussi pour dommage moral, y compris à une société commerciale (voir Comingersoll c. Portugal, S.A. [GC], no 35382/97, §§ 35 et 36, CEDH 2000-IV ; Wohlmeyer Bau GmbH c. Autriche, no 20077/02, § 61, 8 juillet 2004).