Neue Kooperation: dejure.org × Doctrine bringen KI-Power für Aktenanalyse, Recherche und Texterstellung. Doctrine entdecken
×

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 30500/11   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2017,17341
EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 30500/11 (https://dejure.org/2017,17341)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 01.06.2017 - 30500/11 (https://dejure.org/2017,17341)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 01. Juni 2017 - 30500/11 (https://dejure.org/2017,17341)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2017,17341) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    MALIK BABAYEV v. AZERBAIJAN

    No violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect) (englisch)

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (61)Zitiert selbst (29)

  • EGMR, 11.07.2006 - 54810/00

    Einsatz von Brechmitteln; Selbstbelastungsfreiheit (Schutzbereich; faires …

    Auszug aus EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 30500/11
    According to the Court's case-law, an applicant is entitled to the reimbursement of costs and expenses only in so far as it has been shown that these have been actually and necessarily incurred and are reasonable as to quantum (see Jalloh v. Germany [GC], no. 54810/00, § 133, ECHR 2006-IX, and Asadbeyli and Others v. Azerbaijan, nos.
  • EGMR, 20.05.1999 - 21594/93

    Verursachung des Todes eines türkischen Staatsangehörigen durch türkische …

    Auszug aus EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 30500/11
    The investigation must be effective in the sense that it is capable of leading to the establishment of the facts and, where appropriate, the identification and punishment of those responsible (see Oğur v. Turkey [GC], no. 21594/93, § 88, ECHR 1999-III, and Mustafa Tunç and Fecire Tunç, cited above, § 172).
  • EGMR, 30.03.2016 - 5878/08

    [ENG]

    Auszug aus EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 30500/11
    The obligation to protect the right to life under Article 2 of the Convention, read in conjunction with the State's general duty under Article 1 to "secure to everyone within [its] jurisdiction the rights and freedoms defined in [the] Convention", requires by implication that there should be an effective official investigation when individuals have been killed as a result of the use of force, either by State officials or private individuals (see Tanrıkulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, § 103, ECHR 1999-IV; Branko Tomašić and Others, cited above, § 62; Mustafa Tunç and Fecire Tunç v. Turkey [GC], no. 24014/05, § 169, 14 April 2015; and Armani Da Silva v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 5878/08, § 230, ECHR 2016).
  • EGMR, 14.03.2002 - 46477/99

    PAUL ET AUDREY EDWARDS c. ROYAUME-UNI

    Auszug aus EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 30500/11
    The essential purpose of such an investigation is to secure the effective implementation of the domestic laws which protect the right to life (see, mutatis mutandis, Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United Kingdom, no. 46477/99, § 69, ECHR 2002-II, and Mezhiyeva v. Russia, no. 44297/06, § 72, 16 April 2015).
  • EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 23763/94

    TANRIKULU c. TURQUIE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 30500/11
    The obligation to protect the right to life under Article 2 of the Convention, read in conjunction with the State's general duty under Article 1 to "secure to everyone within [its] jurisdiction the rights and freedoms defined in [the] Convention", requires by implication that there should be an effective official investigation when individuals have been killed as a result of the use of force, either by State officials or private individuals (see Tanrıkulu v. Turkey [GC], no. 23763/94, § 103, ECHR 1999-IV; Branko Tomašić and Others, cited above, § 62; Mustafa Tunç and Fecire Tunç v. Turkey [GC], no. 24014/05, § 169, 14 April 2015; and Armani Da Silva v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 5878/08, § 230, ECHR 2016).
  • EGMR, 24.04.2003 - 24351/94

    AKTAS v. TURKEY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 30500/11
    In that connection, the Court notes that such an inspection - carried out by military staff belonging to the military unit in which Z.B. had served - cannot be considered to have been part of an "effective investigation" for the purposes of Article 2 of the Convention as it was carried out by persons who could not be considered as independent of anyone likely to be implicated in the events (see Aktaş v. Turkey, no. 24351/94, § 301, ECHR 2003-V (extracts), and Güzelaydın v.Turkey, no. 26470/10, § 87, 20 September 2016).
  • EGMR, 17.04.2012 - 31805/06

    [ENG]

    Auszug aus EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 30500/11
    Moreover, unlike the cases in which the applicants were able to produce a contract for legal services, according to which, the amounts due were to be paid in the event that the Court found a violation of the applicants' rights (see Pirali Orujov v. Azerbaijan, no. 8460/07, §§ 72-75, 3 February 2011, and Rizvanov v. Azerbaijan, no. 31805/06, §§ 85-89, 17 April 2012), in the present case no such a contract was submitted to the Court.
  • EGMR, 11.12.2012 - 3653/05

    [ENG]

    Auszug aus EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 30500/11
    3653/05 and 5 others, § 204, 11 December 2012).
  • EGMR, 03.02.2011 - 8460/07

    [ENG]

    Auszug aus EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 30500/11
    Moreover, unlike the cases in which the applicants were able to produce a contract for legal services, according to which, the amounts due were to be paid in the event that the Court found a violation of the applicants' rights (see Pirali Orujov v. Azerbaijan, no. 8460/07, §§ 72-75, 3 February 2011, and Rizvanov v. Azerbaijan, no. 31805/06, §§ 85-89, 17 April 2012), in the present case no such a contract was submitted to the Court.
  • EGMR, 31.07.2014 - 35587/08

    ALIYEVA AND ALIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN

    Auszug aus EGMR, 01.06.2017 - 30500/11
    In all cases, the next of kin of the victim must be involved in the procedure to such an extent as is necessary to safeguard his or her legitimate interests (see Tsintsabadze v. Georgia, no. 35403/06, § 76, 15 February 2011, and Aliyeva and Aliyev v. Azerbaijan, no. 35587/08, § 70, 31 July 2014).
  • EGMR, 15.02.2011 - 35403/06

    TSINTSABADZE v. GEORGIA

  • EGMR, 27.05.2008 - 13094/02

    HASAN ÇALISKAN ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE

  • EGMR, 30.08.2016 - 31420/11

    ÖNAL v. TURKEY

  • EGMR, 16.04.2015 - 44297/06

    [ENG]

  • EGMR, 21.06.2016 - 38287/06

    SAHINKUSU c. TURQUIE

  • EGMR, 20.09.2016 - 26470/10

    GÜZELAYDIN v. TURKEY

  • EGMR, 27.09.1995 - 18984/91
  • EGMR, 13.06.2002 - 38361/97

    ANGUELOVA v. BULGARIA

  • EGMR, 17.06.2008 - 21899/02

    ABDULLAH YILMAZ c. TURQUIE

  • EGMR, 20.02.2007 - 46748/99

    SALGIN c. TURQUIE

  • EGMR, 24.03.2009 - 27866/03

    [ENG]

  • EGMR, 24.04.2014 - 39583/05

    [ENG]

  • EGMR, 17.01.2013 - 52013/08

    [ENG]

  • EGMR, 14.02.2012 - 9296/06

    [ENG]

  • EGMR, 23.02.2010 - 20192/04

    [FRE]

  • EGMR, 30.04.2014 - 13596/05

    [ENG]

  • EGMR, 03.09.2013 - 30677/10

    DURDU v. TURKEY

  • EGMR, 21.07.2015 - 40862/08

    ABDULLATIF ARSLAN ET ZERIFE ARSLAN c. TURQUIE

  • EGMR, 27.04.2006 - 46252/99

    ATAMAN c. TURQUIE

  • EGMR, 16.11.2017 - 919/15

    ILGAR MAMMADOV v. AZERBAIJAN

    Therefore, the Court rejects the claim in respect of costs and expenses (compare Malik Babayev v. Azerbaijan, no. 30500/11, § 97, 1 June 2017).
  • EGMR, 25.06.2020 - 81024/12

    BAGIROV v. AZERBAIJAN

    The Court also points out that under Rule 60 of the Rules of Court any claim for just satisfaction must be itemised and submitted in writing together with the relevant supporting documents or vouchers, failing which the Chamber may reject the claim in whole or in part (see Malik Babayev v. Azerbaijan, no. 30500/11, § 97, 1 June 2017).
  • EGMR, 21.09.2021 - 66249/16

    ZULFIYA ALIYEVA v. AZERBAIJAN and 5 other applications

    The Court therefore rejects the applicants' claims in respect of costs and expenses (compare Malik Babayev v. Azerbaijan, no. 30500/11, § 97, 1 June 2017).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
dejure.org Übersicht EGMR
dejure.org nutzen ohne Ablenkung
Werbung abschalten. Jetzt buchen! Keine automatische Verlängerung.
Info zum PUR-Angebot
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht