Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 01.07.2014 - 56925/08 |
Volltextveröffentlichungen (4)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
A.B. c. SUISSE
Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 10 Abs. 2 MRK
Violation de l'article 10 - Liberté d'expression-Générale (Article 10-1 - Liberté d'expression) (französisch) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
A.B. v. SWITZERLAND
Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 10 Abs. 2 MRK
Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression -General (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression) (englisch) - Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
A.B. v. SWITZERLAND - [Deutsche Übersetzung] Zusammenfassung durch das Österreichische Institut für Menschenrechte (ÖIM)
[DEU] Violation of Article 10 - Freedom of expression -General (Article 10-1 - Freedom of expression)
- juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)
Kurzfassungen/Presse (2)
- internet-law.de (Kurzinformation)
EGMR zur Verurteilung eines Journalisten wegen Veröffentlichung von Informationen aus einem Gerichtsverfahren
- RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)
Sonstiges (3)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
A.B. v. Switzerland
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Videoaufzeichnung der mündlichen Verhandlung)
Bédat v. Switzerland
[13.05.2015]
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[FRE]
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 01.07.2014 - 56925/08
- EGMR, 29.03.2016 - 56925/08
Wird zitiert von ... Neu Zitiert selbst (25)
- EGMR, 07.06.2007 - 1914/02
DUPUIS AND OTHERS v. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.07.2014 - 56925/08
These aims correspond to maintaining "the authority and impartiality of the judiciary" and to protecting "the reputation or rights of others" (see Ernst and Others v. Belgium, no. 33400/96, § 98, 15 July 2003, and Dupuis and Others v. France, no. 1914/02, § 32, 7 June 2007).The majority rightly point out that it is legitimate for special protection to be afforded to the secrecy of a judicial investigation, in view of what is at stake in criminal proceedings, both for the administration of justice and for the right of persons under investigation to be presumed innocent (see paragraph 53 of the judgment, and Dupuis and Others v. France, no. 1914/02, § 44, 7 June 2007; see also Principle 2 of the Principles concerning the provision of information through the media in relation to criminal proceedings, appended to Recommendation Rec(2003)13 of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe of 10 July 2003 on the provision of information through the media in relation to criminal proceedings).
- EGMR, 24.04.2008 - 17107/05
CAMPOS DAMASO c. PORTUGAL
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.07.2014 - 56925/08
As in Campos Dâmaso v. Portugal (no. 17107/05, § 35, 24 April 2008), no non-professional judge could have been called on to determine the case.With particular reference to the case of Campos Dâmaso v. Portugal (no. 17107/05, § 36, 24 April 2008), the majority consider that it has not been established how the disclosure of this kind of confidential information could have had a negative impact on the accused's trial or his right to be presumed innocent (see paragraph 55 of the judgment).
- EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 40660/08
Caroline von Hannover kann keine Untersagung von Bildveröffentlichungen über sie …
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.07.2014 - 56925/08
40660/08 and 60641/08, § 107, ECHR 2012; and Aksu v. Turkey [GC], nos.
- EGMR, 07.12.1976 - 5493/72
HANDYSIDE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.07.2014 - 56925/08
However, any individuals, including journalists, who exercise their freedom of expression undertake "duties and responsibilities", the scope of which depends on their situation and the technical means which they use (see, mutatis mutandis, Handyside v. the United Kingdom, 7 December 1976, § 49 in fine, Series A no. 24). - EGMR, 25.03.1985 - 8734/79
Barthold ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.07.2014 - 56925/08
By the same token, it is liable to hamper the media in performing their task as a purveyor of information and public watchdog (see, mutatis mutandis, Barthold v. Germany, 25 March 1985, § 58, Series A no. 90; Lingens v. Austria, 8 July 1986, § 44, Series A no. 103; Monnat v. Switzerland, no. 73604/01, § 70, ECHR 2006-X; and Stoll, cited above, § 154). - EGMR, 15.02.2005 - 68416/01
STEEL ET MORRIS c. ROYAUME-UNI
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.07.2014 - 56925/08
Such are the demands of pluralism, tolerance and broadmindedness, without which there is no "democratic society" (see Stoll, cited above, § 101; Steel and Morris v. the United Kingdom, no. 68416/01, § 87, ECHR 2005-II; and Mouvement raëlien suisse, cited above, § 48). - EGMR, 22.04.2013 - 48876/08
Verbot politischer Fernsehwerbung
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.07.2014 - 56925/08
This does not mean that the supervision is limited to ascertaining whether the respondent State exercised its discretion reasonably, carefully and in good faith; what the Court has to do is to look at the interference complained of in the light of the case as a whole and determine whether it was "proportionate to the legitimate aim pursued" and whether the reasons adduced by the national authorities to justify it are "relevant and sufficient" (see, among other authorities, Stoll, cited above, § 101; Mouvement raëlien suisse v. Switzerland [GC], no. 16354/06, § 48, ECHR 2012; and Animal Defenders International v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 48876/08, § 100, ECHR 2013). - EGMR, 26.04.1995 - 15974/90
PRAGER ET OBERSCHLICK c. AUTRICHE
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.07.2014 - 56925/08
Journalistic freedom also covers possible recourse to a degree of exaggeration, or even provocation (see Prager and Oberschlick v. Austria, 26 April 1995, § 38, Series A no. 313; Thoma, cited above, §§ 45 and 46; Perna v. Italy [GC], no. 48898/99, § 39, ECHR 2003-V; and Ormanni v. Italy, no. 30278/04, § 59, 17 July 2007). - EGMR, 12.09.2011 - 28955/06
PALOMO SÁNCHEZ ET AUTRES c. ESPAGNE
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.07.2014 - 56925/08
Where this balancing exercise has been undertaken by the national authorities in conformity with the criteria laid down in the Court's case-law, the Court would require strong reasons to substitute its view for that of the domestic courts (see, among other authorities, Palomo Sánchez and Others v. Spain [GC], nos. 28955/06, 28957/06, 28959/06 and 28964/06, § 57, ECHR 2011; Axel Springer AG v. Germany [GC], no. 39954/08, § 88, 7 February 2012; Von Hannover v. Germany (no. 2) [GC], nos. - EGMR, 22.10.2007 - 21279/02
LINDON, OTCHAKOVSKY-LAURENS ET JULY c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 01.07.2014 - 56925/08
Lastly, the Court reiterates that the nature and severity of the penalty imposed are factors to be taken into account when assessing the proportionality of the interference (see, for example, Sürek, cited above, § 64, second indent; Lindon, Otchakovsky-Laurens and July v. France [GC], nos. 21279/02 and 36448/02, § 59, ECHR 2007-IV; and Stoll, cited above, § 153). - EGMR, 28.06.2011 - 28439/08
PINTO COELHO c. PORTUGAL
- EGMR, 25.04.2006 - 77551/01
DAMMANN c. SUISSE
- EGMR, 08.07.1999 - 26682/95
SÜREK c. TURQUIE (N° 1)
- EGMR, 21.09.2006 - 73604/01
Monnat / Schweiz "L´honneur perdu de la Suisse"
- EGMR, 23.07.2009 - 12268/03
HACHETTE FILIPACCHI ASSOCIES (ICI PARIS) c. FRANCE
- EGMR, 18.04.2013 - 7075/10
AGEYEVY v. RUSSIA
- EGMR, 28.09.2000 - 37698/97
LOPES GOMES DA SILVA c. PORTUGAL
- EGMR, 09.11.2006 - 64772/01
LEEMPOEL AND S.A. ED. CINE REVUE c. BELGIQUE
- EGMR, 17.07.2007 - 30278/04
ORMANNI c. ITALIE
- EGMR, 23.09.1994 - 15890/89
JERSILD v. DENMARK
- EGMR, 20.05.1999 - 21980/93
BLADET TROMSØ ET STENSAAS c. NORVEGE
- EGMR, 29.03.2001 - 38432/97
THOMA v. LUXEMBOURG
- KAG Mainz, 03.11.2011 - M 17/11
Beteiligung bei Versetzung
- EGMR, 15.07.2003 - 33400/96
ERNST ET AUTRES c. BELGIQUE
- EGMR, 24.11.2005 - 53886/00
TOURANCHEAU ET JULY c. FRANCE
- Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 16.09.2021 - C-302/20
Autorité des marchés financiers - Vorabentscheidungsverfahren - Binnenmarkt für …
66 Vgl. zur Relevanz einer eingetretenen Rechtsverletzung bei Dritten oder hinsichtlich des geschützten Rechtsguts, EGMR, Urteil vom 1. Juli 2014, A.B./Schweiz (CE:ECHR:2014:0701JUD005692508, § 55), unter Verweis auf Urteil vom 7. Juni 2007, Dupuis u. a./Frankreich (CE:ECHR:2007:0607JUD000191402).