Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  TEKIN c. TURQUIE

  Art. 2, Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 14, Art. 18, Art. 41 MRK
  Non-violation de l'art. 2 Violation de l'art. 3 Non-lieu à examiner l'art. 5-1 Non-lieu à examiner l'art. 6-1 Non-violation de l'art. 10 Violation de l'art. 13 Non-violation de l'art. 14 Non-violation de l'art. 18 Préjudice moral - réparation pécuniaire ...

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  TEKIN v. TURKEY

  Art. 2, Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 14, Art. 18, Art. 41 MRK
  No violation of Art. 2 Violation of Art. 3 Not necessary to examine Art. 5-1 Not necessary to examine Art. 6-1 No violation of Art. 10 Violation of Art. 13 No violation of Art. 14 No violation of Art. 18 Non-pecuniary damage - financial award Costs and expenses ...

Verfahrensgang

• EKMR, 20.02.1995 - 22496/93
• EGMR, 09.06.1998 - 22496/93

Wird zitiert von ...Neu Zitiert selbst (1)

• EGMR, 04.12.1995 - 18896/91

  RIBITSCH c. AUTRICHE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 09.06.1998 - 22496/93

  The Court has assessed these facts against the standards imposed by Article 3. It recalls that, in respect of a person deprived of his liberty, recourse to physical force which has not been made strictly necessary by his own conduct diminishes human dignity and is in principle an infringement of the right set forth in Article 3 (see the Ribitsch v. Austria judgment of 4 December 1995, Series A no. 336, p. 26, § 38).

  It will be recalled that in the Ribitsch case the applicant had a medical examination both on the day of his release and the next day (see the judgment of 4 December 1995, Series A no. 336, p. 9, § 13).

• EGMR, 27.10.2011 - 21240/05

  NABOYSHCHIKOV v. RUSSIA

  In respect of a person deprived of his liberty or, more generally, confronted by security forces, recourse to physical force which has not been made strictly necessary by his own conduct diminishes human dignity and is in principle an infringement of the right set forth in Article 3 (see Tekin v. Turkey, no. 22496/93, §§ 52 and 53, Reports 1998-IV; Assenov and Others, cited above, § 94; Labita v. Italy [GC], cited above, § 120; and Güzel Sahin and Others v. Turkey, no. 68263/01, § 46, 21 December 2006).