Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  PAIC v. CROATIA

  Violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings;Article 6-1 - Fair hearing;Article 6-3-d - Examination of witnesses);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just satisfaction) ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  PAIC v. CROATIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 3 Buchst. d MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (9)Neu Zitiert selbst (2)

• EGMR, 17.07.2001 - 29900/96

  SADAK AND OTHERS v. TURKEY (No. 1)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.03.2016 - 47082/12

  The fact that a witness is absent from the country where the proceedings are being conducted is in not itself sufficient to satisfy the requirements of Article 6 § 3 (d), which requires the Contracting States to take positive steps to enable the accused to examine or have examined witnesses testifying against him (see Sadak and Others v. Turkey, nos. 29900/96, 29901/96, 29902/96 and 29903/96, § 67, ECHR 2001-VIII, and Gabrielyan v. Armenia, no. 8088/05, § 81, 10 April 2012).
• EGMR, 10.04.2012 - 8088/05

  GABRIELYAN v. ARMENIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.03.2016 - 47082/12

  The fact that a witness is absent from the country where the proceedings are being conducted is in not itself sufficient to satisfy the requirements of Article 6 § 3 (d), which requires the Contracting States to take positive steps to enable the accused to examine or have examined witnesses testifying against him (see Sadak and Others v. Turkey, nos. 29900/96, 29901/96, 29902/96 and 29903/96, § 67, ECHR 2001-VIII, and Gabrielyan v. Armenia, no. 8088/05, § 81, 10 April 2012).

• EGMR, 03.03.2020 - 58956/12

  SULA c. ITALIE

  Elle rappelle qu'elle doit tenir compte des aspects suivants: la façon dont le tribunal du fond a abordé les preuves non vérifiées, l'administration d'autres éléments à charge et la valeur probante de ceux-ci, et les mesures procédurales prises en vue de compenser l'impossibilité de contre-interroger directement les deux témoins au procès (voir, parmi beaucoup d'autres, Paic c. Croatie, no 47082/12, § 42, 29 mars 2016).
• EGMR, 11.12.2018 - 7203/12

  DIMOVIC AND OTHERS v. SERBIA

  Neither is there any indication that the national courts were aware that a statement of an absent witness, such as R.K., carried less weight (see, in this regard, Paic v. Croatia, no. 47082/12, § 43, 29 March 2016; Dimovic, cited above, § 44; and Manucharyan v. Armenia, no. 35688/11, § 58, 24 November 2016).
• EGMR, 27.06.2017 - 70792/10

  VALDHUTER c. ROUMANIE

  L'avocate du requérant a pu assister à cette audition, mais il ne ressort pas des pièces du dossier qu'elle ait été autorisée à poser des questions à l'intéressé (paragraphe 31 ci-dessus ; voir, mutatis mutandis, Paic c. Croatie, no 47082/12, § 47, 29 mars 2016).

 
• EGMR, 12.01.2017 - 54146/09

  BÁTEK AND OTHERS v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC

  In making this assessment the Court will look at the proceedings as a whole, including the way in which the evidence was obtained, taking into account the rights of the defence, but also the interests of the public and the victims, in seeing crime properly prosecuted (see Schatschaschwili v. Germany [GC], no. 9154/10, §§ 100 and 101, 15 December 2015, Paic v. Croatia, no. 47082/12, § 27, 29 March 2016, and Ibrahim and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], nos.
• EGMR, 02.11.2021 - 35366/15

  TARTOUSI c. ROUMANIE

  Elle rappelle qu'elle doit tenir compte des aspects suivants: la façon dont la Haute Cour a abordé la preuve non vérifiée, l'administration d'autres éléments à charge et la valeur probante de ceux-ci, et les mesures procédurales prises en vue de compenser l'impossibilité de contre-interroger directement le témoin Y.T. au procès (Schatschaschwili, précité, § 125-131, et Paic c. Croatie, no 47082/12, § 42, 29 mars 2016).
• EGMR, 06.12.2018 - 18550/13

  MARTIROSYAN v. ARMENIA

  There are a number of reasons why a witness may not attend trial (see Al-Khawaja and Tahery, cited above, §§ 120-125), including situations where the witness has proved to be untraceable (see Tseber v. the Czech Republic, no. 46203/08, § 48, 22 November 2012, and Paic v. Croatia, no. 47082/12, § 34, 29 March 2016).
• EGMR, 26.10.2023 - 42179/14

  ROMANIUK v. POLAND

  While it is true that R.W.'s testimony was read out at the trial, that the applicant had the opportunity to give his own version of the events and that he availed himself of that opportunity, it has not been shown that there have been sufficient counterbalancing factors to compensate for the handicap under which the defence laboured (see Kuchta, cited above, § 66, and Paic v. Croatia, no. 47082/12, § 51, 29 March 2016).
• EGMR, 14.12.2017 - 65078/10

  GRYB v. UKRAINE

  The Court formulated the general principles to be applied in cases where a prosecution witness did not attend the trial and statements previously made by him or her were admitted as evidence in Al-Khawaja and Tahery ([GC], nos. 26766/05 and 22228/06, ECHR 2011), and Schatschaschwili (cited above), and applied them recently in Paic v. Croatia (no. 47082/12, §§ 27-31, 29 March 2016).
• EGMR, 02.03.2017 - 16980/06

  PALCHIK v. UKRAINE

  The Court formulated the general principles to be applied in cases where a prosecution witness did not attend the trial and statements previously made by him or her were admitted as evidence in Al-Khawaja and Tahery, cited above, and Schatschaschwili v. Germany ([GC], no. 9154/10, ECHR 2015), and applied them recently in Paic v. Croatia (no. 47082/12, §§ 27-31, 29 March 2016).