Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  KULKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (31)Zitiert selbst (31)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR - 13110/06

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.01.2009 - 25114/03

  (Applications nos. 25114/03, 11512/03, 9794/05, 37403/05, 13110/06, 19469/06, 42608/06, 44928/06, 44972/06 and 45022/06).

  The case originated in ten applications (nos. 25114/03, 11512/03, 9794/05, 37403/05, 13110/06, 19469/06, 42608/06, 44928/06, 44972/06, 45022/06) against the Russian Federation lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ("the Convention") by twelve Russian nationals ("the applicants").

  The applicant N. Sobakar (no.13110/06) was represented by Mr I. Sivoldayev, a lawyer practising in Voronezh.

  13110/06.

• KAG Mainz, 30.10.2008 - M 26/08

  Eingruppierung Kirchenmusiker

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.01.2009 - 25114/03

  Voronezh Central District Court, 2/08/05, enforceable on 26/08/05.

  Voronezh Central District Court, 2/08/05, enforceable on 26/08/05.

• EGMR, 24.07.2003 - 52854/99

  RIABYKH c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.01.2009 - 25114/03

  A departure from that principle is justified only when made necessary by circumstances of a substantial and compelling character, such as correction of fundamental defects or miscarriage of justice (see Brumarescu v. Romania [GC], no. 28342/95, § 61, ECHR 1999-VII; Ryabykh v. Russia, no. 52854/99, § 51-52, ECHR 2003-IX).

• EGMR, 07.05.2002 - 59498/00

  BURDOV v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.01.2009 - 25114/03

  The Court reiterates that an unreasonably long delay in enforcement of a binding judgment may breach the Convention (see Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, ECHR 2002-III).
• EGMR, 20.07.2004 - 50178/99

  NIKITINE c. RUSSIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.01.2009 - 25114/03

  The authorities must strike a fair balance between the interests of the applicants and the need to ensure the proper administration of justice (Nikitin v. Russia, no. 50178/99, § 59, ECHR 2004-VIII).
• BPatG, 17.11.2011 - 3 ZA (pat) 54/11

  Patentnichtigkeitsklageverfahren - mehrere Gerichtsgebühren bei nachträglicher …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.01.2009 - 25114/03

  2nd judgment of 15/09/04.
• EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 25/02

  BALÇIK AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.01.2009 - 25114/03

  (25/02/06).
• EGMR, 18.01.2007 - 20887/03

  KOT v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.01.2009 - 25114/03

  It reiterates that the mere disagreement about the application of the material law is not in itself an exceptional circumstance justifying departure from the principle of legal certainty (see Kot v. Russia, no. 20887/03, § 29, 18 January 2007).
• KAG Mainz, 18.07.2012 - M 25/12

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.01.2009 - 25114/03

  2nd judgment of 25/12/03.
• EGMR, 15.02.2007 - 22000/03

  RAYLYAN v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 08.01.2009 - 25114/03

  The reasonableness of such delay is to be determined having regard in particular to the complexity of the enforcement proceedings, the applicant's own behaviour and that of the competent authorities, the amount and the nature of court award (see Raylyan v. Russia, no. 22000/03, § 31, 15 February 2007).
• VG der Evangelischen Landeskirche in Württemberg, 07.10.2005 - 18/04
• EGMR, 06.03.2003 - 41510/98

  JASIUNIENE v. LITHUANIA
• VG der Evangelischen Landeskirche in Württemberg, 27.11.2009 - 5/09

  Datenschutzrecht
• VK Rheinland-Pfalz, 14.05.2002 - 11/02
• EGMR, 10.04.2008 - 21071/05

  WASSERMAN v. RUSSIA (No. 2)
• EGMR, 06.05.2004 - 33408/03

  DENISOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 12.06.2008 - 30616/05

  AKASHEV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 24.02.2005 - 43883/02

  PLOTNIKOVY v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 28.09.2006 - 24247/04

  PRISYAZHNIKOVA AND DOLGOPOLOV v. RUSSIA
• VG der Evangelischen Landeskirche in Württemberg, 17.12.2004 - 8/04
• EGMR, 03.04.2008 - 11589/04

  TETSEN v. RUSSIA
• RG, 31.03.1903 - 28/03

  Zur Bestimmung des Begriffs "Standesherr" in § 7 des zum …
• EGMR, 15.02.2007 - 30671/03

  BORIS VASILYEV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 03.05.2007 - 3352/05

  DERKACH v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 10.07.2007 - 14217/04

  NEMAKINA v. RUSSIA
• VG der Evangelischen Landeskirche in Württemberg, 17.05.2002 - 5/02
• EGMR, 15.05.2007 - 23500/04

  YAKIMENKO v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 19.04.2007 - 63235/00

  Öffentlicher Dienst und civil rights
• EGMR, 07.06.2007 - 2999/03

  DOVGUCHITS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 03.05.2007 - 30672/03

  SOBELIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 21.06.2007 - 2191/03

  PRIDATCHENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 21.09.2016 - 58263/00

  TIMOFEYEV AND 234 OTHER CASES AGAINST THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

  25114/03+.

  25114/03+.

• EGMR, 30.07.2015 - 39678/03

  [ENG]

  25114/03 et al., § 67, 8 January 2009; and Tarnopolskaya and Others v. Russia, nos.
• EGMR, 28.03.2017 - 33636/09

  [ENG]

  Ils mentionnent à cet égard l'arrêt Koulkov et autres c. Russie (nos 25114/03, 11512/03, 9794/05, 37403/05, 13110/06, 19469/06, 42608/06, 44928/06, 44972/06 et 45022/06, § 28, 8 janvier 2009).

• EGMR, 25.10.2011 - 44387/04

  TKHYEGEPSO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  As a result, the Court frequently accepted in the past the applicants" claims for compensation of damage arising from inflation losses during the prolonged failure to pay judgment debts (see, among many others, Kulkov and Others v. Russia, nos. 25114/03 et al., § 64, 8 January 2009).
• EGMR, 15.03.2016 - 2982/05

  [ENG]

  The domestic judgments delivered in the applicants' favour remained unenforced for more than a year prior to their quashing, which, according to the Court's practice, gives rise to a violation of the Convention (see Kulkov and Others v. Russia, nos. 25114/03 et al., § 35, 8 January 2009, with further references).
• EGMR, 05.04.2016 - 5623/09

  TRAPEZNIKOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Consequently, final and enforceable judgments could still be reviewed over a far longer period on relatively minor grounds (see, among many other authorities, Prisyazhnikova and Dolgopolov v. Russia, no. 24247/04, § 25, 28 September 2006; Sobelin and Others v. Russia, nos. 30672/03 et al., §§ 56-61, 3 May 2007; and Kulkov and Others v. Russia, nos. 25114/03 et al., § 31, 8 January 2009).
• EGMR, 10.05.2012 - 34616/02

  [ENG]

  Furthermore, the Court considers that, as in the case of quashing by way of supervisory review, a successful litigant's legitimate reliance on res judicata may be frustrated in a very similar manner by waiving the time-limits for appeal (see, mutatis mutandis, Kulkov and Others v. Russia, nos. 25114/03 et al., § 27, 8 January 2009).
• EGMR, 09.02.2016 - 24130/04

  [ENG]

  Having regard to its finding of a violation of Article 6 of the Convention on account of the quashing of these judgments in supervisory-review proceedings, the Court does not consider it necessary to examine separately the issue of their non-enforcement since their quashing took place within a relatively short time after they had become binding and enforceable (see Kulkov and Others v. Russia, nos. 25114/03 et al., § 35, 8 January 2009, with further references).
• EGMR, 14.01.2010 - 14290/03

  KAZAKEVICH AND OTHER "ARMY PENSIONERS" CASES v. RUSSIA

  25114/03 et al., § 19, 8 January 2009).
• EGMR, 06.03.2012 - 28309/03

  [ENG]

  The Court also bears in mind that the principles insisting that a final judicial decision must not be called into question and should be enforced represent two aspects of the same general concept, namely the right to a court (see Sobelin and Others, cited above, § 67, and Kulkov and Others v. Russia, nos. 25114/03 et al., § 35, 8 January 2009) and that the applicants had complained at the outset of the violation of that right by the authorities.
• EGMR, 08.12.2015 - 36299/03

  KOVALENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 18.09.2012 - 30351/06

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 21.06.2016 - 7873/09

  SHEYMAN v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 19.02.2013 - 65795/09

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 29.03.2011 - 40713/04

  SHCHUROV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 07.12.2021 - 15364/11

  KONSTANTINOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 08.12.2015 - 22419/05

  KLIMOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 18.09.2012 - 27127/05

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 21834/05

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 05.04.2011 - 38597/04

  KIRILENKO v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 20.05.2010 - 12157/06

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 30.07.2009 - 27114/04

  KHOTULEVA v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 11.10.2016 - 43603/09

  PULYAYEV c. RUSSIE
• EGMR, 19.04.2016 - 18451/04

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 15.03.2016 - 34248/05

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 18.12.2012 - 30354/06

  SMIRNOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA AND OTHER APPLICATIONS
• EGMR, 14.02.2012 - 30432/06

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 18.02.2010 - 11470/03

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 22.12.2009 - 10277/05

  IGNATYEVA v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 25.06.2009 - 42600/05

  OOO LINK OIL SPB v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 08.03.2016 - 23304/05

  KONOVALOVA v. RUSSIA