Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  CIORCAN AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA

  Art. 2, Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 3, Art. 14, Art. 14+2 Abs. 1 MRK
  Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Life) (Substantive aspect) Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect) No violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment ...

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Ciorcan and Others v. Romania

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 29414/09, 44841/09
• EGMR, 17.01.2017 - 29414/09

Wird zitiert von ... (7)Zitiert selbst (32)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• VK Baden-Württemberg, 04.05.2011 - 1 VK 15/11

  Der verantwortliche Entscheidungsträger muss sich ermitteln lassen!

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 29414/09

  16/11/1973, Reghin.

  16/11/1965, Reghin.

• VerfGH Berlin, 20.12.2011 - VerfGH 28/11

  Verfassungsbeschwerde: Verletzung des Anspruchs auf effektiven Rechtsschutz iSv …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 29414/09

  29/11/1972, Reghin.
• EGMR, 04.12.1995 - 18896/91

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 29414/09

  Nevertheless, when allegations are made under Article 3 of the Convention, the Court must apply particularly thorough scrutiny - even where domestic proceedings and investigations have already taken place (see, mutatis mutandis, Ribitsch v. Austria, 4 December 1995, § 32, Series A no. 336; and Avsar v. Turkey, no. 25657/94, § 283, ECHR 2001-VII (extracts)).

• EGMR, 24.10.2002 - 37703/97

  Verantwortung des Staates für Mord durch beurlaubte Gefangene; Verpflichtung des …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 29414/09

  The essential purpose of such an investigation is to secure the effective implementation of the domestic laws which protect the right to life and, in those cases involving State agents or bodies, to ensure their accountability for deaths occurring under their responsibility (see Mastromatteo v. Italy [GC], no. 37703/97, § 89, ECHR 2002-VIII).
• EGMR, 11.06.2002 - 36042/97

  WILLIS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 29414/09

  The Court's case-law on Article 14 establishes that discrimination means treating differently, without an objective and reasonable justification, people in relevantly similar situations (see Willis v. the United Kingdom, no. 36042/97, § 48, ECHR 2002-IV).
• BPatG, 17.11.2011 - 3 ZA (pat) 54/11

  Patentnichtigkeitsklageverfahren - mehrere Gerichtsgebühren bei nachträglicher …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 29414/09

  15/09/1978, Orastie.
• EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 47159/08

  [FRE]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 29414/09

  Indeed, the authorities were under the obligation to investigate a possible causal link between the alleged racist attitudes and the abuse suffered by Ms Ciorcan and the applicants at the hands of the police (see B.S. v. Spain, no. 47159/08, § 60, 24 July 2012).
• EGMR, 29.11.2007 - 25/02

  BALÇIK AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 29414/09

  25/02/1975, Reghin.
• EGMR, 03.07.2014 - 37966/07

  ANTAYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 29414/09

  Moreover, the chief of Mures County police was not asked to explain why he had considered it necessary to require the intervention of the special forces and he was also not confronted with the contradicting statements made by his subordinates (compare with Antayev and Others v. Russia, no. 37966/07, § 127, 3 July 2014, where the Court held that, in the absence of any other explanation, the applicants" ethnic origin was the sole, or at least the decisive, reason for the involvement of a special police service in a search conducted within an investigation of a minor offence).
• EGMR, 03.06.2004 - 33097/96

  BATI AND OTHERS v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.01.2015 - 29414/09

  In addition, for an investigation to be considered effective, the authorities must take whatever steps they can to secure the evidence concerning the incident including, inter alia, a detailed statement concerning the allegations from the alleged victim, eyewitness testimony, forensic evidence and, where appropriate, additional medical reports (see, in particular, Batı and Others, v. Turkey, nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, § 134, ECHR 2004-IV (extracts)).
• EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 28883/95
• KAGH, 07.06.2013 - M 22/12

  Zustimmung der MAV beim Einsatz von Dienstleistungskräften (Anästhesieteam) - zum …
• EGMR, 10.07.2001 - 25657/94

  AVSAR c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 11.06.2009 - 19/05

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 28.06.2011 - 17/02

  LIGERES v. LATVIA
• KAG Mainz, 26.06.2012 - M 21/11

  Eingruppierung; Zustimmungsersetzung
• KAG Münster, 12.07.2010 - 28/09

  Einführung einer Verteilung der Dienstzeiten auf 5,5 Tage-Woche; Verstoß gegen §§ …
• KAG Aachen, 08.08.2006 - 15/06
• EGMR, 26.07.2007 - 48254/99

  COBZARU v. ROMANIA
• KAGH, 05.07.2013 - K 24/12
• EGMR, 05.10.2000 - 57834/00

  KABLAN contre la TURQUIE
• EGMR, 15.02.2007 - 18/03

  VANZHULA v. RUSSIA
• VG der Evangelischen Landeskirche in Württemberg, 04.04.2003 - 19/02
• EGMR, 16.01.2014 - 5269/08

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 24.05.2005 - 36088/97

  ACAR AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 05.10.2010 - 4390/03

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 23.03.2010 - 32505/02

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 20.12.2004 - 50385/99
• EGMR, 27.06.2000 - 22277/93

  ILHAN c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 04.03.2008 - 42722/02

  STOICA v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 06.07.2005 - 43579/98
• EGMR, 22.02.2011 - 24329/02

  SOARE ET AUTRES c. ROUMANIE

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 26.05.2020 - 17247/13

  MAKUCHYAN AND MINASYAN v. HUNGARY AND AZERBAIJAN

  29414/09 and 44841/09, § 152, 27 January 2015; and Angelova and Iliev, cited above, § 107).
• EGMR, 12.01.2016 - 40355/11

  BOACA AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA

  The Court is also attentive to the seriousness that attaches to a ruling that a Contracting State has violated fundamental rights (see, among others, Ciorcan and Others v. Romania, nos. 29414/09 and 44841/09, § 157, 27 January 2015; and Nachova and Others, cited above, § 147).
• EGMR, 07.07.2026 - 17713/21

  CURTUIU?ž v. ROMANIA

  La Cour estime que le grief relève de l'article 3 seul (Radomilja et autres c. Croatie [GC], nos 37685/10 et 22768/12, §§ 114 et 126, 20 mars 2018, et Ciorcan et autres c. Roumanie, nos 29414/09 et 44841/09, §§ 128-129, 27 janvier 2015).

• EGMR, 08.10.2020 - 7224/11

  AGHDGOMELASHVILI AND JAPARIDZE v. GEORGIA

  29414/09 and 44841/09, §§ 139-151 and 156-157, 27 January 2015).
• EGMR, 11.12.2018 - 655/16

  LAKATOSOVÁ AND LAKATOS v. SLOVAKIA

  29414/09 and 44841/09, § 158, 27 January 2015, which concerned the shooting and injuring of a large number of Roma during a police raid).
• EGMR, 09.05.2023 - 17421/19

  CIOCOIU-COCÎNDA v. ROMANIA

  29414/09 and 44841/09, §§ 128-29, 27 January 2015).
• EGMR, 03.09.2024 - 48789/22

  TUDOR v. ROMANIA

  29414/09 and 44841/09, §§ 128-29, 27 January 2015).