Volltextveröffentlichungen (3)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  AL FAYED c. FRANCE

  Art. 2, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13 MRK
  Irrecevable (französisch)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  AL FAYED v. FRANCE

  Art. 2, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

• Österreichisches Institut für Menschenrechte

  (französisch)

Kurzfassungen/Presse

• RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)

Wird zitiert von ... (40)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 19.12.2017 - 56080/13

  LOPES DE SOUSA FERNANDES v. PORTUGAL

  Öneryıldız, cited above, § 93, as well as Al Fayed v. France (dec.), no. 38501/02, §§ 73-78, 27 September 2007, and Railean v. Moldova, no. 23401/04, § 28, 5 January 2010.
• EGMR, 02.02.2016 - 3648/04

  CAVIT TINARLIOGLU c. TURQUIE

  Il en va notamment ainsi lorsque les actes ou omissions imputables aux autorités nationales s'inscrivent dans le contexte d'erreurs de jugement ou d'imprudences (comparer avec paragraphe 112 ci-dessus), d'autant plus si les circonstances à l'origine de l'incident litigieux ne peuvent être qualifiées de suspectes (voir, par exemple, Al Fayed c. France (déc.), no 38501/02, §§ 73-78, 27 septembre 2007, et Anna Todorova, précité, § 74) et/ou si elles ne révèlent pas une inaction injustifiée des autorités face à un risque réel menaçant la vie des individus et que ces dernières ne pouvaient ignorer (voir par exemple, Kolyadenko et autres, précité, §§ 190 et 202).
• EGMR, 03.11.2011 - 28096/04

  [ENG]

  This obligation indisputably applies in the context of designing a framework for protection of life from road traffic accidents (see, for example, Rajkowska v. Poland (dec.), no. 37393/02, 27 November 2007; Al Fayed v. France (dec.), no. 38501/02, §§ 73-78, 27 September 2007; Railean v. Moldova, no. 23401/04, § 30, 5 January 2010).

• EGMR, 17.10.2013 - 36660/08

  ZUBKOVA v. UKRAINE

  This obligation also applies in the context of designing a framework for protection of life from road traffic accidents (see, for example, Al Fayed v. France (dec.), no. 38501/02, §§ 73-78, 27 September 2007; Rajkowska v. Poland (dec.), no. 37393/02, 27 November 2007; Railean v. Moldova, no. 23401/04, § 30, 5 January 2010).
• EGMR, 12.07.2016 - 45104/05

  [ENG]

  In particular, the obligation indisputably applies in the context of designing a legislative framework for road traffic safety (see, for example, Rajkowska v. Poland (dec.), no. 37393/02, 27 November 2007; Al Fayed v. France (dec.), no. 38501/02, §§ 73-78, 27 September 2007; Railean v. Moldova, no. 23401/04, § 30, 5 January 2010; and Anna Todorova, cited above, § 72).
• EGMR, 05.11.2015 - 51151/10

  BASYUK v. UKRAINE

  This obligation indisputably applies in the context of designing a framework for protection of life from road traffic accidents (see, for example, Rajkowska v. Poland (dec.), no. 37393/02, 27 November 2007; Al Fayed v. France (dec.), no. 38501/02, §§ 73-78, 27 September 2007; and Railean v. Moldova, no. 23401/04, § 30, 5 January 2010).
• EGMR, 05.01.2010 - 23401/04

  [ENG]

  The mere fact that the authorities have been informed of the death will give rise ipso facto to an obligation under Article 2 of the Convention to carry out an effective investigation into the circumstances in which it occurred (see Sabuktekin v. Turkey, no. 27243/95, § 98, ECHR 2002-II (extracts); Kavak v. Turkey, no. 53489/99, § 45, 6 July 2006; and Al Fayed v. France (dec.), no. 38501/02, 27 September 2007).
• EGMR, 06.02.2020 - 40394/10

  SAKVARELIDZE v. GEORGIA

  This obligation also applies in the context of designing a framework for the protection of life from road traffic accidents (see, for example, Al Fayed v. France (dec.), no. 38501/02, §§ 73-78, 27 September 2007; Rajkowska v. Poland (dec.), no. 37393/02, 27 November 2007; and Railean v. Moldova, no. 23401/04, § 30, 5 January 2010).
• EGMR, 11.02.2014 - 69527/10

  VASILCA v. MOLDOVA

  The mere fact that the authorities have been informed of the death will give rise ipso facto to an obligation under Article 2 of the Convention to carry out an effective investigation into the circumstances in which it occurred (see Sabuktekin v. Turkey, no. 27243/95, § 98, ECHR 2002-II; Kavak v. Turkey, no. 53489/99, § 45, 6 July 2006; and Al Fayed v. France (dec.), no. 38501/02, 27 September 2007).
• EGMR, 13.04.2021 - 77370/16

  I.I. AND M.S. v. BULGARIA

  But they did so with full reasons, and it does not appear that those reasons were arbitrary or manifestly failed to take into account relevant elements (see paragraphs 27, 37 and 48 above, and, mutatis mutandis, Grams v. Germany (dec.), no. 33677/96, ECHR 1999-VII; Al Fayed v. France (dec.), no. 38501/02, §§ 81-82, 27 September 2007; and Georgi Georgiev v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 34137/03, 11 January 2011).
• EGMR, 24.02.2015 - 62578/09

  CIOBANU v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
• EGMR, 12.01.2012 - 22737/04

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 23.03.2010 - 12219/05

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 06.11.2012 - 52744/07

  [FRE]
• EGMR, 24.05.2011 - 23302/03

  ANNA TODOROVA v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 27.01.2011 - 44862/04

  [ENG]
• EGMR - 23302/03

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 19.01.2021 - 53918/11

  VELESCO c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA
• EGMR, 29.09.2015 - 61946/12

  ZOLTAI v. HUNGARY AND IRELAND
• EGMR, 15.09.2015 - 37847/13

  LARI v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA
• EGMR, 19.05.2015 - 66309/09

  GÖKDEMIR v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 13.11.2012 - 34885/06

  DEMIR v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 11.01.2011 - 34137/03

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 09.02.2023 - 55761/20

  BOUILLE c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 10.05.2016 - 78587/12

  PREDA c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 13.10.2015 - 15022/08

  HACIÖMEROGLU v. TURKEY
• EGMR, 07.07.2015 - 8050/13

  CONSTANTIN v. ROMANIA
• EGMR, 13.11.2014 - 80909/12

  STARCEVIC v. CROATIA
• EGMR, 22.10.2013 - 41107/07

  KOCESKI v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"
• EGMR, 03.09.2013 - 15762/10

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 23.07.2013 - 42009/04

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 15.11.2011 - 50553/07

  DUBOIS ET AUTRES c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 01.02.2022 - 29260/11

  STANKOVI c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 10.06.2021 - 82189/17

  EL KODWA ARAFAT c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 17.10.2017 - 28008/14

  KRIVOLUTSKAYA v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 02.12.2010 - 19406/05

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 19.10.2010 - 45033/08

  SOCIETE TOP SA c. FRANCE
• EGMR, 11.03.2014 - 18295/08

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 09.07.2013 - 53248/09

  ERDAL c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 01.07.2014 - 2896/09

  HENDERSON c. FRANCE