Neue Kooperation: dejure.org × Doctrine bringen KI-Power für Aktenanalyse, Recherche und Texterstellung. Doctrine entdecken
×
Weitere Entscheidung unten: EGMR, 08.06.2010

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 20.11.2013 - 31583/96, 43120/05, 31038/06, 13637/03, 42332/06, 20138/03, 24205/06, 26846/05, 31622/07, 20841/02, 35833/03, 31116/03, 55470/00, 44025/08, 38816/97, 39631/06, 34907/05, 36161/05, 20251/04, 8713/03, 23623/07, 72976/01, 26744/02, 8363/04, 31820/06, 44521/0   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2013,64487
EGMR, 20.11.2013 - 31583/96, 43120/05, 31038/06, 13637/03, 42332/06, 20138/03, 24205/06, 26846/05, 31622/07, 20841/02, 35833/03, 31116/03, 55470/00, 44025/08, 38816/97, 39631/06, 34907/05, 36161/05, 20251/04, 8713/03, 23623/07, 72976/01, 26744/02, 8363/04, 31820/06, 44521/0 (https://dejure.org/2013,64487)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 20.11.2013 - 31583/96, 43120/05, 31038/06, 13637/03, 42332/06, 20138/03, 24205/06, 26846/05, 31622/07, 20841/02, 35833/03, 31116/03, 55470/00, 44025/08, 38816/97, 39631/06, 34907/05, 36161/05, 20251/04, 8713/03, 23623/07, 72976/01, 26744/02, 8363/04, 31820/06, 44521/0 (https://dejure.org/2013,64487)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 20. November 2013 - 31583/96, 43120/05, 31038/06, 13637/03, 42332/06, 20138/03, 24205/06, 26846/05, 31622/07, 20841/02, 35833/03, 31116/03, 55470/00, 44025/08, 38816/97, 39631/06, 34907/05, 36161/05, 20251/04, 8713/03, 23623/07, 72976/01, 26744/02, 8363/04, 31820/06, 44521/0 (https://dejure.org/2013,64487)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2013,64487) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    KLAMECKI ET 57 AUTRES AFFAIRES CONTRE LA POLOGNE

    Informations fournies par le gouvernement concernant les mesures prises permettant d'éviter de nouvelles violations. Versement des sommes prévues dans l'arrêt (französisch)

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    KLAMECKI AND 57 OTHER CASES AGAINST POLAND

    Information given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations. Payment of the sums provided for in the judgment (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Zitiert selbst (67)

  • EGMR, 23.09.2008 - 2361/05

    VRENCEV v. SERBIA

    Whenever the danger of absconding can be avoided by bail or other guarantees, the accused must be released, it being incumbent on the national authorities to always duly consider such alternatives (see, mutatis mutandis, G.K. v. Poland, no. 38816/97, § 85, 20 January 2004), notwithstanding the fact that it cannot be required of them that the examination of bail takes place with any more speed than is demanded of the first automatic review of the applicant's detention, which the Court has already identified as being a maximum of four days (see McKay v. the United Kingdom, cited above, § 47).
  • EGMR, 06.02.2003 - 40698/98

    ORATOWSKI v. POLAND

    That day, therefore, is the starting point of the six-month period as regards his complaint (see G.K. v. Poland (dec.), no. 38816/97, 8 December 1998, unreported).
  • EGMR, 21.01.2003 - 37444/97

    BAGINSKI v. POLAND

    The Court has already dealt with a number of similar cases against Poland that arose out of the fact that under domestic criminal legislation applicable at the material time there was no possibility for a person detained at the investigative stage to be brought before anyone other than a prosecutor (see, among many other examples, G.K. v. Poland (dec.), no. 38816/97, 8 December 1998, unreported).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
dejure.org Übersicht EGMR

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 08.06.2010 - 39631/06   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2010,63096
EGMR, 08.06.2010 - 39631/06 (https://dejure.org/2010,63096)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 08.06.2010 - 39631/06 (https://dejure.org/2010,63096)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 08. Juni 2010 - 39631/06 (https://dejure.org/2010,63096)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2010,63096) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (16)Zitiert selbst (6)

  • EGMR, 26.10.2000 - 30210/96

    Ableitung einer allgemeinen Verpflichtung zur Entlassung eines …

    Auszug aus EGMR, 08.06.2010 - 39631/06
    The Court firstly reiterates that the general principles regarding the right "to trial within a reasonable time or to release pending trial", as guaranteed by Article 5 § 3 of the Convention, have been set out in a number of its previous judgments (see, among many other authorities, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 110 et seq., ECHR 2000-XI, and Bak v. Poland, no. 7870/04, §§ 56-65, 16 January 2007).
  • EGMR, 04.05.2006 - 17584/04

    CELEJEWSKI v. POLAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 08.06.2010 - 39631/06
    The relevant domestic law and practice concerning the imposition of pre-trial detention (aresztowanie tymczasowe), the grounds for its extension, release from detention and the rules governing other "preventive measures" (srodki zapobiegawcze) are set out in the Court's judgments in the cases of Golek v. Poland, no. 31330/02, §§ 27-33, 25 April 2006, and Celejewski v. Poland, no. 17584/04, §§ 22-23, 4 August 2006.
  • EGMR, 16.01.2007 - 7870/04

    BAK v. POLAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 08.06.2010 - 39631/06
    The Court firstly reiterates that the general principles regarding the right "to trial within a reasonable time or to release pending trial", as guaranteed by Article 5 § 3 of the Convention, have been set out in a number of its previous judgments (see, among many other authorities, Kudla v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 110 et seq., ECHR 2000-XI, and Bak v. Poland, no. 7870/04, §§ 56-65, 16 January 2007).
  • EGMR, 17.07.2007 - 48666/99

    KUCERA v. SLOVAKIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 08.06.2010 - 39631/06
    Such restrictions as limitations on the number of family visits, supervision of those visits and, if so justified by the nature of the offence, subjection of a detainee to a special prison regime or special arrangements for visits constitute an interference with his rights under Article 8 but are not, by themselves, in breach of that provision (ibid. §§ 62-63; see also Kucera v. Slovakia, no. 48666/99, §§ 127-128, 17 July 2007).
  • EGMR, 04.07.2000 - 27915/95

    NIEDBALA v. POLAND

    Auszug aus EGMR, 08.06.2010 - 39631/06
    The expression "in accordance with the law" not only necessitates compliance with domestic law, but also relates to the quality of that law (see, Niedbala v. Poland, no. 27915/95, § 79, 4 July 2000).
  • EGMR, 19.01.2010 - 141/07

    WEGERA c. POLOGNE

    Auszug aus EGMR, 08.06.2010 - 39631/06
    The Court further observes, that it had already held that Article 217 § 1 of the Code of Execution of Criminal Sentences did not indicate with reasonable clarity the scope and manner of the exercise of any discretion conferred on the relevant authorities to restrict visiting rights (see Wegera v. Poland, no. 141/07, § 74-75, 19 January 2010).
  • EGMR, 17.04.2012 - 20071/07

    [ENG]

    In consequence, in similar Polish cases the Court has held that an unreasoned refusal to grant visit permissions was not in "accordance with the law" and found a breach of Article 8 on account of the arbitrariness of the interference (see, for instance, Wegera v. Poland, no. 141/07, § 74-75, 19 January 2010; Gradek v. Poland no 39631/06, §§ 47-48, 8 June 2010; and Nurzynski, cited above, §§ 41-42).
  • EGMR, 18.09.2012 - 31622/07

    [ENG]

    Other relevant domestic law and practice concerning family visits is outlined in the judgment Gradek v. Poland, no. 39631/06, §§ 20-24, 8 June 2010.

    The Court further observes that it has already held that Article 217 § 1 of the Code of Execution of Criminal Sentences did not indicate with reasonable clarity the scope and manner of the exercise of any discretion conferred on the relevant authorities to restrict visiting rights (see Wegera v. Poland, no. 141/07, § 74-75, 19 January 2010, and Gradek v. Poland, no. 39631/06, § 43, 8 June 2010).

  • EGMR, 20.11.2013 - 31583/96

    KLAMECKI ET 57 AUTRES AFFAIRES CONTRE LA POLOGNE

    39631/06.
  • EGMR, 23.10.2014 - 28403/05

    VINTMAN v. UKRAINE

    The expression "in accordance with the law" not only necessitates compliance with domestic law, but also relates to the quality of that law (see Niedbala v. Poland, no. 27915/95, § 79, 4 July 2000, and Gradek v. Poland, no. 39631/06, § 42, 8 June 2010).
  • EGMR, 21.02.2012 - 39912/06

    [ENG]

    In the present case, contrary to the case of Gradek (Gradek v. Poland, no. 39631/06, 8 June 2010) the Gdansk Regional Court informed the applicant about the reasons for refusal of a visit from the applicant's alleged cousin - J.Ch.
  • EGMR, 01.02.2011 - 19218/07

    [ENG]

    For these reasons the Court has recently concluded in the case of Gradek v. Poland, no. 39631/06, § 47, 8 June 2010) that an unreasoned refusal of family visits in detention was not in accordance with the law.
  • EGMR, 01.02.2011 - 31820/06

    [ENG]

    It also found that the unreasoned refusal of family visits in detention was not in accordance with the law (see Gradek v. Poland, no. 39631/06, § 48, 8 June 2010).
  • EGMR, 09.10.2012 - 39502/08

    [ENG]

    Other relevant domestic law and practice concerning family visits are stated in the judgment Gradek v. Poland, no. 39631/06, §§ 20-24, 8 June 2010.
  • EGMR, 03.07.2012 - 21780/07

    ALEKSEJEVA v. LATVIA

    The expression "in accordance with the law" not only necessitates compliance with domestic law, but also relates to the quality of that law (Niedbala v. Poland, no. 27915/95, § 79, 4 July 2000, and Gradek v. Poland, no. 39631/06, § 42, 8 June 2010).
  • EGMR, 13.09.2011 - 15476/02

    BYSTROWSKI v. POLAND

    The relevant domestic law and practice concerning detainees" right to receive visitors in remand centres are stated in the Court's judgment in the case of Gradek v. Poland, no. 39631/06, §§ 21-25, 8 June 2010.
  • EGMR, 21.09.2010 - 41656/02

    [ENG]

  • EGMR, 30.11.2021 - 568/19

    MY?šLIWIEC v. POLAND

  • EGMR, 27.03.2012 - 18480/06

    [ENG]

  • EGMR, 21.12.2010 - 46859/06

    [ENG]

  • EGMR, 14.09.2010 - 30447/07

    [ENG]

  • EGMR, 01.06.2010 - 20920/04

    [ENG]

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
dejure.org Übersicht EGMR
dejure.org nutzen ohne Ablenkung
Werbung abschalten. Jetzt buchen! Keine automatische Verlängerung.
Info zum PUR-Angebot
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht