Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 24.11.2016 - 42119/12 |
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
MUSTAFA HAJILI v. AZERBAIJAN
Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Degrading treatment;Inhuman treatment) (Substantive aspect);Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect) ...
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
HAJILI v. AZERBAIJAN
Wird zitiert von ... (22) Zitiert selbst (10)
- EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94
Einstufung des in französischer Haft zugefügten Übels als Folter - Verpflichtung …
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.2016 - 42119/12
Even in the most difficult circumstances, such as the fight against terrorism and organised crime, the Convention prohibits in absolute terms torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (see Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 95, ECHR 1999-V; Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 119, ECHR 2000-IV; and Bouyid v. Belgium [GC], no. 23380/09, § 81, ECHR 2015). - EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95
LABITA c. ITALIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.2016 - 42119/12
Even in the most difficult circumstances, such as the fight against terrorism and organised crime, the Convention prohibits in absolute terms torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment (see Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 95, ECHR 1999-V; Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 119, ECHR 2000-IV; and Bouyid v. Belgium [GC], no. 23380/09, § 81, ECHR 2015). - EGMR, 19.04.2001 - 28524/95
PEERS v. GREECE
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.2016 - 42119/12
Ill-treatment must attain a minimum level of severity if it is to fall within the scope of Article 3. Assessment of this minimum level depends on all the circumstances of the case, such as the duration of the treatment, its physical or mental effects and, in some cases, the sex, age and state of health of the victim (see Ireland v. the United Kingdom, 18 January 1978, § 162, Series A no. 25; Kudła v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 91, ECHR 2000-XI; and Peers v. Greece, no. 28524/95, § 67, ECHR 2001-III).
- EGMR, 04.05.2001 - 28883/95
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.2016 - 42119/12
The Court is sensitive to the subsidiary nature of its role and recognises that it must be cautious in assuming the role of a first-instance tribunal of fact where this is not rendered unavoidable by the circumstances of a particular case (see, for example, McKerr v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 28883/95, 4 April 2000). - EGMR, 10.07.2001 - 25657/94
AVSAR c. TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.2016 - 42119/12
Such proof may follow from the coexistence of sufficiently strong, clear and concordant inferences or of similar unrebutted presumptions of fact (see, among many other authorities, Avşar v. Turkey, no. 25657/94, § 282, ECHR 2001-VII). - EGMR, 05.10.2000 - 57834/00
KABLAN contre la TURQUIE
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.2016 - 42119/12
Any deficiency in the investigation which undermines its ability to establish the cause of injuries or the identity of the persons responsible will risk falling foul of this standard (see Batı and Others v. Turkey, nos. 33097/96 and 57834/00, §§ 134 and 137, ECHR 2004-IV). - EGMR, 02.04.2009 - 22684/05
MURADOVA v. AZERBAIJAN
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.2016 - 42119/12
Nevertheless, where allegations are made under Article 3 of the Convention, the Court must apply particularly thorough scrutiny, even if certain domestic proceedings and investigations have already taken place (see Avşar, cited above, §§ 283-84, and Muradova v. Azerbaijan, no. 22684/05, § 99, 2 April 2009). - EGMR, 17.04.2012 - 31805/06
[ENG]
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.2016 - 42119/12
The Court observes at the outset that the parties are in dispute about the question of whether the applicant was subjected to the use of force by the police at all (see Rizvanov v. Azerbaijan, no. 31805/06, §§ 46-48, 17 April 2012, and Hilal Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 81553/12, §§ 78-84, 4 February 2016). - EGMR, 04.02.2016 - 81553/12
MAMMADOV v. AZERBAIJAN
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.2016 - 42119/12
The Court observes at the outset that the parties are in dispute about the question of whether the applicant was subjected to the use of force by the police at all (see Rizvanov v. Azerbaijan, no. 31805/06, §§ 46-48, 17 April 2012, and Hilal Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 81553/12, §§ 78-84, 4 February 2016). - EGMR, 02.10.2012 - 2594/07
[ENG]
Auszug aus EGMR, 24.11.2016 - 42119/12
It has not been shown that there were any other reasons justifying the use of force against him (see Najafli v. Azerbaijan, no. 2594/07, § 39, 2 October 2012, and Hilal Mammadov, cited above, § 85).
- EGMR, 05.11.2020 - 3650/12
HAZIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN and 4 other applications
The relevant domestic law concerning the prohibition of ill-treatment is summarised in the case of Mustafa Hajili v. Azerbaijan (no. 42119/12, §§ 26-28, 24 November 2016).Moreover, in the present cases, the domestic authorities, having refused to institute criminal cases, did not provide any plausible explanation as to why the pieces of evidence in support of the applicants' claims were considered less credible than, inter alia, the statements of the witnesses against the applicants - in particular the representatives of the state authorities (see Mustafa Hajili v. Azerbaijan, no. 42119/12, § 52, 24 November 2016).
- EGMR, 19.03.2020 - 22004/11
SATULLAYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
The relevant provisions of the domestic law concerning the prohibition of ill-treatment are described in detail in the Court's judgment in Mustafa Hajili v. Azerbaijan (no. 42119/12, §§ 26-28, 24 November 2016).In particular, although the statements of the police officers clearly conflicted with the applicant's version of events, the investigator in charge of the case did not order a face-to-face confrontation between the applicant and the police officers (see Hilal Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 81553/12, § 96, 4 February 2016, and Mustafa Hajili v. Azerbaijan, no. 42119/12, § 52, 24 November 2016).
- EGMR, 30.01.2020 - 67374/11
YAGUBLU v. AZERBAIJAN and 2 other applications
The relevant domestic law concerning the prohibition of ill-treatment is summarised in the case of Mustafa Hajili v. Azerbaijan (no. 42119/12, §§ 26-28, 24 November 2016).The Court has already found a violation of Article 3 of the Convention under its substantive limb in respect of M.H., in that he was beaten by the police in the exercise yard of the temporary detention centre of the Nasimi district police office on 2 April 2011 (see Mustafa Hajili v. Azerbaijan, no. 42119/12, §§ 29-44, 24 November 2016).
- EGMR, 22.04.2021 - 15996/12
HAJIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
The relevant domestic law concerning the prohibition of ill-treatment is summarised in the case of Mustafa Hajili v. Azerbaijan (no. 42119/12, §§ 26-28, 24 November 2016).The domestic authorities, having refused to institute a criminal case, had failed to provide a relevant explanation as to why the pieces of evidence in support of the applicant's claims were considered less credible than, inter alia, the statements of the witnesses against the applicant, in particular the police officers (see Mustafa Hajili v. Azerbaijan, no. 42119/12, § 52, 24 November 2016).
- EGMR, 13.02.2020 - 63571/16
IBRAHIMOV v. AZERBAIJAN and 6 other applications
Namely, in the case of Mustafa Hajili v. Azerbaijan, where, as established by the Court, the applicant was subjected to ill-treatment in the exercise yard of the same detention facility, the authorities alleged that the video recordings were automatically deleted one month later (no. 42119/12, § 23, 24 November 2016), whereas in the present cases that period was allegedly limited to seven days. - EGMR, 21.02.2019 - 35432/07
MAMMADOV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
The Court refers to the general principles established in its case-law set out in the judgments Emin Huseynov v. Azerbaijan (no. 59135/09, §§ 54-57, 7 May 2015) and Mustafa Hajili v. Azerbaijan (no. 42119/12, §§ 34-37, 24 November 2016), which are equally pertinent to the present case. - EGMR, 13.02.2018 - 74389/13
PIHONI v. ALBANIA
The prosecutor did not provide any explanation as to why those testimonies were considered less credible than the statements of the police officers and the three other witnesses (see Mustafa Hajili v. Azerbaijan, no. 42119/12, § 52, 24 November 2016). - EGMR, 16.06.2022 - 44153/15
SKORUPA v. POLAND
The foregoing considerations are sufficient to enable the Court to conclude that the authorities failed to carry out an effective investigation into the applicant's credible allegations of ill-treatment (see, mutatis mutandis, Ibrahimov and Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, nos. 63571/16 and 5 others, §§ 104-05, 13 February 2020, and Mustafa Hajili v. Azerbaijan, no. 42119/12, § 51, 24 November 2016). - EGMR, 19.03.2024 - 17184/18
A v. AZERBAIJAN and 24 other applications
69234/11 and 2 others, §§ 88-129, 11 February 2016, concerning Articles 5 and 6; Mustafa Hajili v. Azerbaijan, no. 42119/12, §§ 29-53, 24 November 2016, concerning Article 3; Aliyev v. Azerbaijan, nos. - EGMR, 10.09.2020 - 69460/12
SHURIYYA ZEYNALOV v. AZERBAIJAN
Where an individual is taken into police custody in good health but is found to be injured afterwards, it is incumbent on the State to provide a plausible explanation of how those injuries were caused, failing which a clear issue arises under Article 3 of the Convention (see Selmouni, cited above, § 87, and Mustafa Hajili v. Azerbaijan, no. 42119/12, § 36, 24 November 2016). - EGMR, 13.01.2026 - 14307/17
GAHRAMAN v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 19.11.2020 - 34528/13
MAHADDINOVA AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 01.10.2020 - 3503/10
HAJI v. AZERBAIJAN and 7 other applications
- EGMR - 13830/18 (anhängig)
HASANOV v. AZERBAIJAN and 4 other applications
- EGMR - 24420/20 (anhängig)
SULEYMANOV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR - 21744/20 (anhängig)
SADIGOVA v. AZERBAIJAN and 4 other applications
- EGMR - 39527/23 (anhängig)
HASANOV v. AZERBAIJAN and 1 other application
- EGMR, 05.10.2017 - 36043/13
OSTROVE?...ECS v. LATVIA
- EGMR - 58553/18 (anhängig)
SADIGOV v. AZERBAIJAN and 1 other application
- EGMR - 4534/22 (anhängig)
HAJIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR - 12722/21 (anhängig)
SALAYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
- EGMR, 22.04.2021 - 31793/10
HASANOV v. AZERBAIJAN and 13 other applications
Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um diese Funktion zu nutzen. Falls Sie noch kein Benutzerkonto haben, können Sie sich in weniger als einer Minute eines kostenlos anlegen "Registrieren".