Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  JELSEVAR AND OTHERS v. SLOVENIA

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 10, Art. 10 Abs. 1, Art. 35 MRK
  Inadmissible (englisch)

• juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  JELSEVAR AND OTHERS v. SLOVENIA

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Papierfundstellen

• afp 2015, 417

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Zitiert selbst (6)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 07.02.2012 - 40660/08

  Caroline von Hannover kann keine Untersagung von Bildveröffentlichungen über sie …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.03.2014 - 47318/07

  40660/08 and 60641/08, § 107, ECHR 2012).
• EGMR, 22.10.2007 - 21279/02

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.03.2014 - 47318/07

  The limited impact criterion has also been applied in the context of the potential damage that literary creations were capable of causing to a person's reputation (see Lindon, Otchakovsky-Laurens and July v. France [GC], nos. 21279/02 and 36448/02, § 47, ECHR 2007-IV).
• EGMR, 09.04.2009 - 28070/06

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.03.2014 - 47318/07

  However, in order for Article 8 to come into play, the attack on personal honour and reputation must attain a certain level of seriousness and must have been carried out in a manner causing prejudice to personal enjoyment of the right to respect for private life (see A. v. Norway, no. 28070/06, § 64, 9 April 2009, and Axel Springer AG v. Germany [GC] (no. 39954/08, § 83, 7 February 2012).

• EGMR, 13.11.2019 - 39401/04

  MGN LIMITED AGAINST THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.03.2014 - 47318/07

  In this regard, where the balancing exercise has been undertaken by the domestic courts in conformity with the criteria laid down in the Court's case law, the Court would require strong reasons to substitute its view for that of the domestic courts (see MGN Limited v. the United Kingdom, no. 39401/04, §§ 150 and 155, 18 January 2011, and Von Hannover v. Germany (no. 2) [GC], nos.
• EGMR, 21.11.2013 - 16882/03

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.03.2014 - 47318/07

  Like the Court in the case of Putistin v. Ukraine (no. 16882/03, § 33, 21 November 2013), the Constitutional Court accepted that an attack on the reputation of the applicants" deceased mother could affect the applicants" own personality rights (see paragraph 19 above).
• EGMR, 22.11.2011 - 17320/10

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.03.2014 - 47318/07

  In cases where a person's reputation is affected by the publication of a book, the Court has established that the right to respect for private life has to be balanced against the right to freedom of expression (see Chauvy and Others v. France, no. 64915/01, § 70, ECHR 2004-VI; see also John Anthony Mizzi v. Malta, no. 17320/10, § 32, 22 November 2011), States having a positive obligation to protect individuals" right to reputation, as an element of their "private life" under Article 8 of the Convention (see Pfeifer, cited above, § 38).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 30.08.2016 - 55442/12

  MEDIPRESS-SOCIEDADE JORNALISTICA, LDA c. PORTUGAL

  Si la mise en balance par les autorités nationales s'est faite dans le respect des critères établis par la jurisprudence de la Cour, il faut des raisons sérieuses pour que celle-ci substitue son avis à celui des juridictions internes (MGN Limited c. Royaume-Uni, no 39401/04, §§ 150 et 155, 18 janvier 2011, Palomo Sánchez et autres c. Espagne [GC], nos 28955/06, 28957/06, 28959/06 et 28964/06, § 57, CEDH 2011, Jelševar et autres c. Slovénie (déc.), no 47318/07, § 32, 11 mars 2014, et Almeida Leitão Bento Fernandes, précité, § 50).
• EGMR, 12.03.2015 - 25790/11

  ALMEIDA LEITAO BENTO FERNANDES c. PORTUGAL

  Si la mise en balance par les autorités nationales s'est faite dans le respect des critères établis par la jurisprudence de la Cour, il faut des raisons sérieuses pour que celle-ci substitue son avis à celui des juridictions internes (MGN Limited c. Royaume-Uni, no 39401/04, §§ 150 et 155, 18 janvier 2011 ; Palomo Sánchez et autres c. Espagne [GC], nos 28955/06, 28957/06, 28959/06 et 28964/06, § 57, CEDH 2011 ; et, dernièrement, Jelševar et autres c. Slovénie (déc.), no 47318/07, § 32, 11 mars 2014).
• EGMR, 28.06.2022 - 34872/16

  WIERZBICKI v. POLAND

  Rn. 14 Moreover, where the balancing exercise has been undertaken by the domestic courts in conformity with the criteria laid down in the Court's case-law, the Court would require strong reasons to substitute its view for that of the domestic courts (see Fürst-Pfeifer v. Austria, nos. 33677/10 and 52340/10, § 40, 17 May 2016, and Marta Jelševar and Others v. Slovenia, no. 47318/07, § 32, 11 March 2014).