Neue Kooperation: dejure.org × Doctrine bringen KI-Power für Aktenanalyse, Recherche und Texterstellung. Doctrine entdecken
×

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 19.10.2004 - 67299/01   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2004,55580
EGMR, 19.10.2004 - 67299/01 (https://dejure.org/2004,55580)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 19.10.2004 - 67299/01 (https://dejure.org/2004,55580)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 19. Oktober 2004 - 67299/01 (https://dejure.org/2004,55580)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2004,55580) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (121)Zitiert selbst (6)

  • EGMR, 22.10.2002 - 57984/00

    ANDRASIK AND OTHERS v. SLOVAKIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 19.10.2004 - 67299/01
    57984/00, 60237/00, 60242/00, 60679/00, 60680/00, 68563/01, 60226/00, 22 October 2002).
  • EGMR, 03.06.2004 - 45656/99

    CATALDO v. ITALY

    Auszug aus EGMR, 19.10.2004 - 67299/01
    Only when these conditions are satisfied does the subsidiary nature of the protective mechanism of the Convention preclude examination of an application (see Cataldo v. Italy (dec.), no. 45656/99, 3 June 2004, with further references).
  • EKMR, 03.05.1988 - 12860/87

    ANDERSEN v. DENMARK

    Auszug aus EGMR, 19.10.2004 - 67299/01
    The applicant's status as a victim then depends on whether the redress afforded at domestic level on the basis of the facts about which he complains before the Court (see Andersen v. Denmark, no. 12860/87, and Frederiksen and Others v. Denmark, no. 12719/87, Commission decisions of 3 May 1988, unreported; Normann v. Denmark (dec.), no. 44704/98, 14 June 2001; and Jensen and Rasmussen v. Denmark (dec.), no. 52620/99, 20 March 2003) was adequate and sufficient having regard to just satisfaction as provided for under Article 41 of the Convention.
  • EKMR, 03.05.1988 - 12719/87

    FREDERIKSEN c. DANEMARK

    Auszug aus EGMR, 19.10.2004 - 67299/01
    The applicant's status as a victim then depends on whether the redress afforded at domestic level on the basis of the facts about which he complains before the Court (see Andersen v. Denmark, no. 12860/87, and Frederiksen and Others v. Denmark, no. 12719/87, Commission decisions of 3 May 1988, unreported; Normann v. Denmark (dec.), no. 44704/98, 14 June 2001; and Jensen and Rasmussen v. Denmark (dec.), no. 52620/99, 20 March 2003) was adequate and sufficient having regard to just satisfaction as provided for under Article 41 of the Convention.
  • EGMR, 07.09.2004 - 62216/00

    SIRANCOVA v. SLOVAKIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 19.10.2004 - 67299/01
    In the light of all the material in its possession, including the promptness of the findings and award made by the Constitutional Court in the present case, the Court considers that the sum accorded to the applicant cannot be considered as unreasonable (see Cataldo, cited above, Širancová v. Slovakia (dec.), no. 62216/00, 7 September 2004, Eštok v. Slovakia (dec.), no. 63994/00, 28 September 2004 and, a contrario, Scordino v. Italy (dec.), no. 36813/97, 27 March 2003).
  • EGMR, 28.09.2004 - 63994/00

    ESTOK v. SLOVAKIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 19.10.2004 - 67299/01
    In the light of all the material in its possession, including the promptness of the findings and award made by the Constitutional Court in the present case, the Court considers that the sum accorded to the applicant cannot be considered as unreasonable (see Cataldo, cited above, Širancová v. Slovakia (dec.), no. 62216/00, 7 September 2004, Eštok v. Slovakia (dec.), no. 63994/00, 28 September 2004 and, a contrario, Scordino v. Italy (dec.), no. 36813/97, 27 March 2003).
  • EGMR, 11.10.2005 - 52690/99

    MAJEWSKI v. POLAND

    However, it took into account the state of the proceedings at that time and found a violation of the applicant's right to a hearing without unjustified delay (see Dubjakova v. Slovakia, (dec), no 67299/01, 19 October 2004).
  • EGMR, 28.10.2014 - 15048/09

    ASLAN AND ASLAN v. TURKEY

    À la lumière de tous les éléments dont elle dispose, et tenant compte en particulier des caractéristiques de ce recours (Cocchiarella, précité, § 96) et de la célérité avec laquelle la Cour constitutionnelle a procédé au redressement du grief en cause (voir, en ce sens, Dubjakova c. Slovaquie (déc.), no 67299/01, 19 octobre 2004), la Cour estime que les sommes accordées aux requérants ne peuvent pas être considérées comme manifestement insuffisantes.
  • EGMR, 17.12.2009 - 20075/03

    SHILBERGS v. RUSSIA

    These include also the value of the award judged in the light of the ordinary living standards and the general level of incomes in the State concerned and the fact that the remedy in the national system is closer and more accessible than an application to the Court (see Scordino, cited above, §§ 206 and 268, and Dubjaková v. Slovakia (dec.), no. 67299/01, 19 October 2004, with further references).
Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
dejure.org Übersicht EGMR
dejure.org nutzen ohne Ablenkung
Werbung abschalten. Jetzt buchen! Keine automatische Verlängerung.
Info zum PUR-Angebot
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht