Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  YUNUSOVA AND YUNUSOV v. AZERBAIJAN (No. 2)

  Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention);Violation of Article 5 - Right to liberty and security (Article 5-1 - Lawful arrest or detention;Article 5-1-c - Reasonable suspicion);Violation of Article 5 - Right ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  YUNUSOVA AND YUNUSOV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Art. 3, Art. 5, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 5 Abs. 1 Buchst. c, Art. 5 Abs. 3, Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 2, Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 18, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 4 Art. ... 2, Protokoll Nr. 4 Art. 2 Abs. 1 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (15)Zitiert selbst (25)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 17.03.2016 - 69981/14

  RASUL JAFAROV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.07.2020 - 68817/14

  The background information is similar to a large extent to that in the cases of Rasul Jafarov v. Azerbaijan (no. 69981/14, 17 March 2016); Mammadli v. Azerbaijan (no. 47145/14, 19 April 2018); and Aliyev v. Azerbaijan (nos. 68762/14 and 71200/14, 20 September 2018) in that the applicants' arrest was based in part on similar criminal charges.

  Moreover, a number of politicians from the ruling political party and members of the Government made similar comments about NGO activists and human-rights defenders in Azerbaijan (for the content of some of these comments see Rasul Jafarov v. Azerbaijan, no. 69981/14, §§ 36-41, 17 March 2016).

  The third-party comments were similar to those made in Rasul Jafarov, no. 69981/14, §§ 99-113, 17 March 2016.

• EGMR, 20.09.2018 - 68762/14

  INTIGAM ALIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.07.2020 - 68817/14

  The background information is similar to a large extent to that in the cases of Rasul Jafarov v. Azerbaijan (no. 69981/14, 17 March 2016); Mammadli v. Azerbaijan (no. 47145/14, 19 April 2018); and Aliyev v. Azerbaijan (nos. 68762/14 and 71200/14, 20 September 2018) in that the applicants' arrest was based in part on similar criminal charges.

  For it to be compatible with the Convention, a limitation of this right must, in particular, pursue an aim that can be linked to one of those listed in this provision (see Aliyev v. Azerbaijan, nos. 68762/14 and 71200/14, § 182, 20 September 2018).

• EGMR, 04.02.2016 - 81553/12

  MAMMADOV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.07.2020 - 68817/14

  Following Mr Bagirov's suspension from the bar, the domestic authorities stopped allowing him to meet with six of his clients who were being held in detention, including the applicants (for further details see Hilal Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 81553/12, §§ 51-57, 4 February 2016, and Rasul Jafarov, cited above, §§ 43-49).

  The submissions made by the parties are identical to those made in respect of the same complaint raised in Hilal Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 81553/12, §§ 111-14, 4 February 2016, and Rasul Jafarov, cited above, §§ 172-75.

• EGMR, 19.04.2018 - 47145/14

  MAMMADLI v. AZERBAIJAN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.07.2020 - 68817/14

  The background information is similar to a large extent to that in the cases of Rasul Jafarov v. Azerbaijan (no. 69981/14, 17 March 2016); Mammadli v. Azerbaijan (no. 47145/14, 19 April 2018); and Aliyev v. Azerbaijan (nos. 68762/14 and 71200/14, 20 September 2018) in that the applicants' arrest was based in part on similar criminal charges.

  148653/13 and 3 others, §§ 91-96, 7 June 2018; Mammadli v. Azerbaijan, no. 47145/14, §§ 48-53, 19 April 2018; Rasul Jafarov, cited above, §§ 114-118; and Ilgar Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 15172/13, §§ 87-89, 22 May 2014.

• EGMR, 02.06.2016 - 59620/14

  YUNUSOVA AND YUNUSOV v. AZERBAIJAN

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.07.2020 - 68817/14

  On the same day the investigator decided to apply in respect of the second applicant the preventive measure of placement under police supervision, taking into account his state of health (for further details see Yunusova and Yunusov v. Azerbaijan, no. 59620/14, § 19, 2 June 2016).

  In this context, the Court observes that the second applicant had been suffering from chronic hypertension and had already been hospitalised with a similar diagnosis in the past, in particular, from 25 to 28 April 2014, that is shortly before the alleged events (see Yunusova and Yunusov v. Azerbaijan, no. 59620/14, § 33, 2 June 2016).

• EGMR, 22.10.2018 - 35553/12

  Präventivhaft: EGMR lässt Polizei Spielraum im Umgang mit Hooligans

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.07.2020 - 68817/14

  In order to be covered by Article 5 § 1 (b), an arrest and detention must also be aimed at or directly contribute to securing the fulfilment of that obligation and not be punitive in character (see S., V. and A. v. Denmark [GC], nos. 35553/12 and 2 others, §§ 79-80, 22 October 2018).
• EGMR, 25.09.2018 - 76639/11

  Denisov v. Ukraine

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.07.2020 - 68817/14

  In this context, the Court reiterates that the concept of "private life" is a broad term not susceptible to exhaustive definition (see Bensaid v. the United Kingdom, no. 44599/98, § 47, ECHR 2001-I; Bărbulescu v. Romania [GC], no. 61496/08, § 70, 5 September 2017 (extracts); and Denisov v. Ukraine [GC], no. 76639/11, § 95, 25 September 2018), which covers also the physical and psychological integrity of a person (Medžlis Islamske Zajednice Brčko and Others v. Bosnia and Herzegovina [GC], no. 17224/11, § 76, 27 June 2017).
• EGMR, 25.07.2013 - 11082/06

  Michail Borissowitsch Chodorkowski

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.07.2020 - 68817/14

  11082/06 and 13772/05, 25 July 2013, submitted that the restrictions imposed by the State in the present case had not been applied for any purpose other than one envisaged by Article 5 and strictly for the proper investigation of serious criminal offences allegedly committed by the applicants.
• EGMR, 28.04.2005 - 41604/98

  Recht auf Achtung des Privatlebens und der Wohnung (Einsatz von Durchsuchungen …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.07.2020 - 68817/14

  However, in the Court's view, the above unspecified "emerging necessity" within the criminal case against R.M. and the mere fact that the latter was in close relationship with the applicants and had cooperated with the Association cannot be considered, in the absence of any concrete purpose of those measures, as reasonable grounds for suspecting that evidence relevant for the investigation of that criminal case might have been found as a result of those searches (compare Buck v. Germany, no. 41604/98, § 41, ECHR 2005 IV where the search and seizure order was aimed at disclosing the identity of the person liable for the speeding offence).
• EGMR, 20.03.2018 - 37685/10

  RADOMILJA AND OTHERS v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 16.07.2020 - 68817/14

  Having the power to decide on the characterisation to be given in law to the facts of a complaint (see Radomilja and Others v. Croatia [GC], nos. 37685/10 and 22768/12, § 126, 20 March 2018), the Court considers that in the circumstances of the present case the applicants' complaint falls to be examined under Article 8, which reads as follows:.
• EGMR, 04.04.2000 - 26629/95

  WITOLD LITWA c. POLOGNE
• EGMR, 15.10.2013 - 26291/06

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 22.05.2008 - 65755/01

  ILIYA STEFANOV v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 06.07.2005 - 43579/98
• EGMR, 09.11.2010 - 37138/06

  FARHAD ALIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 07.11.2013 - 4494/07

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 31.01.2017 - 38898/04

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 10.02.2015 - 77818/12

  PENCHEVI v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 24.04.2012 - 41794/04

  CHUMAKOV v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 13.02.2018 - 61064/10

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 09.12.2010 - 16966/06

  MURADVERDIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 24.02.2011 - 33908/04

  BENET PRAHA, SPOL. S R.O., v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
• EGMR, 02.06.2016 - 7031/05

  INTERNATIONAL BANK FOR COMMERCE AND DEVELOPMENT AD AND OTHERS v. BULGARIA
• EGMR, 25.06.2020 - 81024/12

  BAGIROV v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 17.09.2020 - 62775/14

  MIRGADIROV v. AZERBAIJAN AND TURKEY

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 08.04.2021 - 47621/13

  Impfpflicht in Tschechien: Impflicht für Kinder ist keine …

  Dans d'autres affaires, la Cour s'appuie sur les observations des parties uniquement et, ce faisant, laisse entendre qu'elle s'abstient d'agir d'office (voir, par exemple, Turek c. Slovaquie, no 57986/00, § 99, CEDH 2006-II (extraits), Peev c. Bulgarie, no 64209/01, § 62, 26 juillet 2007, Starokadomski c. Russie, no 42239/02, § 83, 31 juillet 2008, Goubkine c. Russie, no 36941/02, § 155, 23 avril 2009, Oliari et autres c. Italie, nos 18766/11 et 36030/11, § 185, 21 juillet 2015, Ibrahimov et autres c. Azerbaïdjan, nos 69234/11 et 2 autres, § 80, 11 février 2016, Mozer c. République de Moldova et Russie [GC], no 11138/10, §§ 193-199, 23 février 2016, Biržietis c. Lituanie, no 49304/09, § 58, 14 juin 2016, Kryževičius c. Lituanie, no 67816/14, §§ 67-70, 11 décembre 2018, P.T. c. République de Moldova, no 1122/12, §§ 29-33, 26 mai 2020, et Yunusova et Yunusov c. Azerbaïdjan (no 2), no 68817/14, §§ 152-159, 16 juillet 2020).
• EGMR, 25.08.2026 - 2170/24

  Osman Kavala

  Bien que les infractions dont le requérant a été accusé et pour lesquelles il a ensuite été condamné soient d'une particulière gravité, les éléments constitutifs essentiels de ces infractions ne pouvaient raisonnablement être regardés comme réunis au vu des faits établis (voir, mutatis mutandis, Yunusova et Yunusov c. Azerbaïdjan (no 2), no 68817/14, § 190, 16 juillet 2020).
• EGMR, 14.10.2021 - 74288/14

  DEMOCRACY AND HUMAN RIGHTS RESOURCE CENTRE v. AZERBAIJAN and 1 other application

  68762/14 and 71200/14, 20 September 2018; and Yunusova and Yunusov v. Azerbaijan (no. 2), no. 68817/14, 16 July 2020).

  In that connection, the Court reiterates that the freezing of bank accounts has to be regarded as a measure of control of the use of property (see Uzan and Others v. Turkey, nos. 19620/05 and 3 others, § 194, 5 March 2019, and Yunusova and Yunusov v. Azerbaijan (no. 2), no. 68817/14, § 167, 16 July 2020).

• EGMR, 22.04.2021 - 37816/12

  ZEYNALLI v. AZERBAIJAN and 1 other application

  The Court finds, and this is not in dispute between the parties, that the searches of the applicant's home and the premises of the Xural newspaper, which was the applicant's workplace, and the seizure of various materials constituted an interference with the exercise of the applicant's right to respect for his private life and home within the meaning of Article 8 § 1 of the Convention (see Saint-Paul Luxembourg S.A. v. Luxembourg, no. 26419/10, §§ 37-39, 18 April 2013; Amarandei and Others v. Romania, no. 1443/10, § 215, 26 April 2016; Aliyev v. Azerbaijan, nos. 68762/14 and 71200/14, § 178, 20 September 2018; and Yunusova and Yunusov v. Azerbaijan (no. 2), no. 68817/14, § 148, 16 July 2020).
• EGMR, 08.07.2025 - 13609/20

  DEMIRTA?ž c. TURQUIE

  De même, alors que le requérant avait été accusé d'infractions graves, les éléments constitutifs essentiels de ces infractions ne pouvaient être raisonnablement considérés comme réunis au regard des faits existants (voir, mutatis mutandis, entre plusieurs autres, Yunusova et Yunusov c. Azerbaïdjan (no 2), no 68817/14, § 190, 16 juillet 2020).
• EGMR, 28.05.2024 - 4573/22

  ZAREMA MUSAYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Such hurriedness suggests that the Chechen officials were prepared for such a development and wanted the first applicant as a defendant, not a witness (see, mutatis mutandis, Khodorkovskiy v. Russia, no. 5829/04, §§ 134-43, 31 May 2011, and Yunusova and Yunusov v. Azerbaijan (no. 2), no. 68817/14, §§ 91-97, 16 July 2020).
• EGMR, 13.07.2023 - 1/16

  HUSEYNOV v. AZERBAIJAN

  68762/14 and 71200/14, 20 September 2018; and Yunusova and Yunusov v. Azerbaijan (no. 2), no. 68817/14, 16 July 2020).
• EGMR, 06.07.2023 - 54588/13

  GULIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN

  However, considering that he did not submit any supporting evidence confirming the alleged amount of his monthly salary, the Court dismisses the claim for pecuniary damage on the grounds that it is unsubstantiated (compare ibid., §§ 56-57, and Kulykov and Others v. Ukraine, nos. 5114/09 and 17 others, § 154-55, 19 January 2017; contrast Yunusova and Yunusov v. Azerbaijan (no. 2), no. 68817/14, § 206, 16 July 2020, and Hülya Ebru Demirel v. Turkey, no. 30733/08, § 57-58, 19 June 2018).
• EGMR, 04.07.2024 - 24460/16

  RUSTAMKHANLI v. AZERBAIJAN

  In that regard, the Court reiterates that the freezing of bank accounts has to be regarded as a measure of control of the use of property (see Uzan and Others v. Turkey, nos. 19620/05 and 3 others, § 194, 5 March 2019, and Yunusova and Yunusov v. Azerbaijan (no. 2), no. 68817/14, § 167, 16 July 2020).
• EGMR, 12.09.2023 - 2059/16

  HASANOV AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJAN

  Rn. 42 Having regard to the individual circumstances of the applications and the Convention practice in similar cases against Azerbaijan, the Court considers that the sums awarded to the applicants for non-pecuniary damage on the national level cannot be deemed unreasonable (for a similar approach see Ohlen v. Denmark (striking out), no. 63214/00, § 31, 24 February 2005; compare also Ilgar Mammadov v. Azerbaijan, no. 15172/13, § 151, 22 May 2014; Ilgar Mammadov v. Azerbaijan (no. 2), no. 919/15, § 269, 16 November 2017; Yunusova and Yunusov v. Azerbaijan (no. 2), no. 68817/14, § 206, 16 July 2020; Mirgadirov v. Azerbaijan and Turkey, no. 62775/14, § 160, 17 September 2020; Avaz Zeynalov v. Azerbaijan, nos.
• EGMR, 20.06.2024 - 8826/20

  NAMAZLI v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR, 13.11.2025 - 5778/17

  MANUKYAN v. ARMENIA
• EGMR, 15.04.2021 - 55765/12

  TREYD 2008, TOV v. UKRAINE
• EGMR - 24420/20 (anhängig)

  SULEYMANOV v. AZERBAIJAN
• EGMR - 45571/17 (anhängig)

  AKSAN c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA