Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  CEVRIOGLU v. TURKEY

  Remainder inadmissible (Article 35-3 - Manifestly ill-founded);Violation of Article 2 - Right to life (Article 2 - Positive obligations;Article 2-1 - Effective investigation) (Procedural aspect);Non-pecuniary damage - award (Article 41 - Non-pecuniary damage;Just ...

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  CEVRIOGLU v. TURKEY

  Art. 1, Art. 2, Art. 2+1, Art. 8 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (14)Neu Zitiert selbst (12)

• EGMR, 09.06.2009 - 33401/02

  Opuz ./. Türkei

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 69546/12

  Such a positive obligation may apply not only to situations concerning the requirement of personal protection of one or more individuals identifiable in advance as the potential target of a lethal act (see, for instance, Paul and Audrey Edwards, cited above, § 57 (murder of a prisoner); Branko Tomasic and Others v. Croatia, no. 46598/06, §§ 52-53, 15 January 2009; and Opuz v. Turkey, no. 33401/02, § 129, ECHR 2009 (killings in the context of domestic violence); Van Colle v. the United Kingdom, no. 7678/09, § 88, 13 November 2012 (killing of a witness); Kiliç v. Turkey, no. 22492/93, § 63, ECHR 2000-III, and Mahmut Kaya v. Turkey, no. 22535/93, § 88, ECHR 2000-III (killing of an individual in a conflict zone); and Yabansu and Others v. Turkey, no. 43903/09, § 91, 12 November 2013 (killing of an individual by a third party during military service)), but also in cases raising the obligation to afford general protection to society (see Maiorano and Others v. Italy, no. 28634/06, § 107, 15 December 2009; Gorovenky and Bugara v. Ukraine, nos.
• EGMR, 20.03.2008 - 15339/02

  BUDAYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 69546/12

  The relevant regulations must also provide for appropriate procedures, taking into account the technical aspects of the activity in question, for identifying shortcomings in the processes concerned and any errors committed by those responsible at different levels (see Öneryildiz, cited above, §§ 89-90, and Budayeva and Others v. Russia, nos. 15339/02, 21166/02, 20058/02, 11673/02 and 15343/02, § 131-132, ECHR 2008 (extracts)).
• EGMR, 17.01.2002 - 32967/96

  CALVELLI ET CIGLIO c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 69546/12

  However, Article 2 of the Convention will not be satisfied if the protection afforded by domestic law exists only in theory, and does not operate effectively in practice (see Calvelli and Ciglio v. Italy [GC], no. 32967/96, § 53, ECHR 2002-I).

 
• EGMR, 28.03.2000 - 22535/93

  MAHMUT KAYA v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 69546/12

  Such a positive obligation may apply not only to situations concerning the requirement of personal protection of one or more individuals identifiable in advance as the potential target of a lethal act (see, for instance, Paul and Audrey Edwards, cited above, § 57 (murder of a prisoner); Branko Tomasic and Others v. Croatia, no. 46598/06, §§ 52-53, 15 January 2009; and Opuz v. Turkey, no. 33401/02, § 129, ECHR 2009 (killings in the context of domestic violence); Van Colle v. the United Kingdom, no. 7678/09, § 88, 13 November 2012 (killing of a witness); Kiliç v. Turkey, no. 22492/93, § 63, ECHR 2000-III, and Mahmut Kaya v. Turkey, no. 22535/93, § 88, ECHR 2000-III (killing of an individual in a conflict zone); and Yabansu and Others v. Turkey, no. 43903/09, § 91, 12 November 2013 (killing of an individual by a third party during military service)), but also in cases raising the obligation to afford general protection to society (see Maiorano and Others v. Italy, no. 28634/06, § 107, 15 December 2009; Gorovenky and Bugara v. Ukraine, nos.
• EGMR, 28.03.2000 - 22492/93

  KILIÇ v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 69546/12

  Such a positive obligation may apply not only to situations concerning the requirement of personal protection of one or more individuals identifiable in advance as the potential target of a lethal act (see, for instance, Paul and Audrey Edwards, cited above, § 57 (murder of a prisoner); Branko Tomasic and Others v. Croatia, no. 46598/06, §§ 52-53, 15 January 2009; and Opuz v. Turkey, no. 33401/02, § 129, ECHR 2009 (killings in the context of domestic violence); Van Colle v. the United Kingdom, no. 7678/09, § 88, 13 November 2012 (killing of a witness); Kiliç v. Turkey, no. 22492/93, § 63, ECHR 2000-III, and Mahmut Kaya v. Turkey, no. 22535/93, § 88, ECHR 2000-III (killing of an individual in a conflict zone); and Yabansu and Others v. Turkey, no. 43903/09, § 91, 12 November 2013 (killing of an individual by a third party during military service)), but also in cases raising the obligation to afford general protection to society (see Maiorano and Others v. Italy, no. 28634/06, § 107, 15 December 2009; Gorovenky and Bugara v. Ukraine, nos.
• EGMR, 18.09.2014 - 74448/12

  BLJAKAJ AND OTHERS v. CROATIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 69546/12

  In principle, this positive obligation will arise in the context of any activity, whether public or not, in which the right to life may be at stake (see Öneryildiz v. Turkey [GC], no. 48939/99, § 71, ECHR 2004-XII, and Bljakaj and Others v. Croatia, no. 74448/12, § 108, 18 September 2014).
• EGMR, 09.05.2006 - 60255/00

  PEREIRA HENRIQUES c. LUXEMBOURG

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 69546/12

  In the latter circumstances, the positive obligation covers a wide range of sectors (see Ciechonska v. Poland, no. 19776/04, §§ 62-63, 14 June 2011), including dangers emanating from buildings and construction work (see Pereira Henriques and Others v. Luxembourg (dec.), no. 60255/00, 26 August 2003; Banel v. Lithuania, no. 14326/11, §§ 67-73, 18 June 2013; and Kostovi v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 28511/11, 15 April 2014).
• EGMR, 13.11.2012 - 7678/09

  VAN COLLE v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 69546/12

  Such a positive obligation may apply not only to situations concerning the requirement of personal protection of one or more individuals identifiable in advance as the potential target of a lethal act (see, for instance, Paul and Audrey Edwards, cited above, § 57 (murder of a prisoner); Branko Tomasic and Others v. Croatia, no. 46598/06, §§ 52-53, 15 January 2009; and Opuz v. Turkey, no. 33401/02, § 129, ECHR 2009 (killings in the context of domestic violence); Van Colle v. the United Kingdom, no. 7678/09, § 88, 13 November 2012 (killing of a witness); Kiliç v. Turkey, no. 22492/93, § 63, ECHR 2000-III, and Mahmut Kaya v. Turkey, no. 22535/93, § 88, ECHR 2000-III (killing of an individual in a conflict zone); and Yabansu and Others v. Turkey, no. 43903/09, § 91, 12 November 2013 (killing of an individual by a third party during military service)), but also in cases raising the obligation to afford general protection to society (see Maiorano and Others v. Italy, no. 28634/06, § 107, 15 December 2009; Gorovenky and Bugara v. Ukraine, nos.
• EGMR, 12.11.2013 - 43903/09

  YABANSU ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 69546/12

  Such a positive obligation may apply not only to situations concerning the requirement of personal protection of one or more individuals identifiable in advance as the potential target of a lethal act (see, for instance, Paul and Audrey Edwards, cited above, § 57 (murder of a prisoner); Branko Tomasic and Others v. Croatia, no. 46598/06, §§ 52-53, 15 January 2009; and Opuz v. Turkey, no. 33401/02, § 129, ECHR 2009 (killings in the context of domestic violence); Van Colle v. the United Kingdom, no. 7678/09, § 88, 13 November 2012 (killing of a witness); Kiliç v. Turkey, no. 22492/93, § 63, ECHR 2000-III, and Mahmut Kaya v. Turkey, no. 22535/93, § 88, ECHR 2000-III (killing of an individual in a conflict zone); and Yabansu and Others v. Turkey, no. 43903/09, § 91, 12 November 2013 (killing of an individual by a third party during military service)), but also in cases raising the obligation to afford general protection to society (see Maiorano and Others v. Italy, no. 28634/06, § 107, 15 December 2009; Gorovenky and Bugara v. Ukraine, nos.
• EGMR, 23.06.2015 - 20620/10

  ERCAN BOZKURT v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.10.2016 - 69546/12

  36146/05 and 42418/05, § 32, 12 January 2012; and Ercan Bozkurt v. Turkey, no. 20620/10, § 54, 23 June 2015).
• EGMR, 20.03.2008 - 21166/02
• EGMR, 15.04.2014 - 28511/11

  KOSTOVI c. BULGARIE

• EGMR, 20.11.2018 - 47933/09

  ASMA c. TURQUIE

  En ce qui concerne les mesures de sécurité qui s'imposent sur les chantiers de construction, il convient de se référer à l'arrêt Cevrioglu c. Turquie (no 69546/12, §§ 33 à 40, 4 octobre 2016).

  Il en va de même concernant les activités menées sur les sites de construction, lesquelles peuvent également présenter des risques pour la vie humaine en raison de leur nature intrinsèquement dangereuse (Cevrioglu c. Turquie, no 69546/12, § 57, 4 octobre 2016 ; voir aussi, Pereira Henriques et autres c. Luxembourg (déc.), no 60255/00, 26 août 2003, et Kostovi c. Bulgarie (déc.), no 28511/11, 15 avril 2014).

• EGMR, 07.11.2023 - 63543/09

  DURDAJ AND OTHERS v. ALBANIA

  Further to this, the Court notes that Zamira Durdaj and Feruzan Durdaj, as well as Sabrije Picari were all awarded pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage in the amounts not lower than what the Court has awarded under Article 41 of the Convention in comparable cases (compare Budayeva and Others, cited above, § 205; Vovk and Bogdanov, cited above, § 81; Cevrioglu v. Turkey, no. 69546/12, § 87, 4 October 2016; and Lovyginy v. Ukraine, no. 22323/08, § 120, 23 June 2016).
• EGMR, 21.11.2023 - 42749/19

  ERDAL MUHAMMET ARSLAN ET AUTRES c. TÜRKIYE

  Le choix des mesures que l'État doit adopter pour se conformer à ses obligations positives au titre de l'article 2 relève en principe de sa marge d'appréciation (Nicolae Virgiliu Tanase, précité, § 169, Cevrioglu c. Turquie, no 69546/12, §§ 54 et 55, 4 octobre 2016).

 
• EGMR, 17.10.2023 - 29906/14

  DIMAKSYAN v. ARMENIA

  The Court considers that, given the known risks inherent in military service, which have the potential for life-endangering incidents especially in the context of ongoing hostilities (see in this respect the applicant's submissions in paragraph 48 above), the respondent State has a particularly compelling responsibility towards military servicemen, who have to encounter the very real dangers posed by serving in the military on a daily basis (see, mutatis mutandis, Cevrioglu v. Turkey, no. 69546/12, § 67, 4 October 2016).
• EGMR, 04.09.2018 - 72781/12

  YIRDEM ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE

  Toutefois, si l'atteinte au droit à la vie ou à l'intégrité physique n'est pas volontaire, l'obligation positive découlant de l'article 2 de mettre en place un système judiciaire efficace n'exige pas nécessairement dans tous les cas un recours de nature pénale (Cevrioglu c. Turquie, no 69546/12, § 54, 4 octobre 2016).
• EGMR, 23.01.2024 - 42565/19

  PERICOLO v. ITALY

  However, Article 2 of the Convention will not be satisfied if the protection afforded by domestic law exists only in theory and does not operate effectively in practice (see Cevrioglu v. Turkey, no. 69546/12, § 53, 4 October 2016).
• EGMR, 11.12.2018 - 61772/12

  TÜLAY YILDIZ c. TURQUIE

  Toutefois, si l'atteinte au droit à la vie ou à l'intégrité physique n'est pas volontaire, l'obligation positive découlant de l'article 2 de mettre en place un système judiciaire efficace n'exige pas nécessairement dans tous les cas un recours de nature pénale (Cevrioglu c. Turquie, no 69546/12, § 54, 4 octobre 2016).
• EGMR, 07.05.2020 - 43881/10

  VARDOSANIDZE v. GEORGIA

  Such a positive obligation may apply not only to situations concerning the requirement of personal protection of one or more individuals identifiable in advance as the potential target of a lethal act, but also in cases raising the obligation to afford general protection to society (see Nicolae Virgiliu Tanase, cited above, § 135, and Cevrioglu v. Turkey, no. 69546/12, § 50, 4 October 2016, with further references).
• EGMR, 05.03.2019 - 36680/11

  BIÇAKLI c. TURQUIE

  Toutefois, si l'atteinte au droit à la vie ou à l'intégrité physique n'est pas volontaire, l'obligation positive découlant de l'article 2 de mettre en place un système judiciaire efficace n'exige pas nécessairement dans tous les cas un recours de nature pénale (Cevrioglu c. Turquie, no 69546/12, § 54, 4 octobre 2016).
• EGMR, 19.09.2017 - 28678/10

  BINNUR UZUN ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE

  La Cour renvoie aux principes pertinents pour l'examen de la présente affaire, tels que récapitulés, par exemple, dans l'arrêt Cevrioglu c. Turquie (no 69546/12, §§ 49 à 52, 4 octobre 2016), arrêt qui, au demeurant, présente nombre d'affinités avec l'espèce.
• EGMR - 25846/16 (anhängig)

  CHERTOVSKIKH v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 23.06.2020 - 16000/16

  NEDELCU c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 24.07.2018 - 80784/13

  VLASE c. ROUMANIE
• EGMR, 05.01.2017 - 56995/10

  ÖZ v. TURKEY