Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  NATSVLISHVILI AND TOGONIDZE v. GEORGIA

  Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 2, Art. 34, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1, Protokoll Nr. 7 Art. 2 MRK
  No violation of Article 6 - Right to a fair trial (Article 6 - Criminal proceedings Article 6-1 - Fair hearing) No violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 7 - Right of appeal in criminal matters (Article 2 of Protocol No. 7 - Higher tribunal Review of conviction ...

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Natsvlishvili and Togonidze v. Georgia

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Videoaufzeichnung der mündlichen Verhandlung)

  Natsvlishvili and Togonidze v. Georgia

  [15.10.2013]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 25.06.2013 - 9043/05
• EGMR, 29.04.2014 - 9043/05

Papierfundstellen

• NJW 2015, 1745

Wird zitiert von ... (24)Neu Zitiert selbst (10)

• EGMR, 17.09.2009 - 10249/03

  Rückwirkende Strafschärfung und Anerkennung des Meistbegünstigungsprinzips als …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.04.2014 - 9043/05

  This cannot be a problem in itself, since neither the letter nor the spirit of Article 6 prevents a person from waiving these safeguards of his or her own free will (see Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249/03, § 135, 17 September 2009).
• EGMR, 23.11.1993 - 14032/88

  POITRIMOL c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.04.2014 - 9043/05

  In addition, it must not run counter to any important public interest (see, amongst other authorities, Scoppola (no. 2), cited above, § 135-136; Poitrimol v. France, 23 November 1993, § 31, Series A no. 277-A; and Hermi v. Italy [GC], no. 18114/02, § 73, ECHR 2006-XII).
• EGMR, 13.02.2001 - 29731/96

  Dieter Krombach

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.04.2014 - 9043/05

  It reiterates in this connection that the Contracting States enjoy a wide margin of appreciation under Article 2 of Protocol No. 7 (see, amongst others, Krombach v. France, no. 29731/96, § 96, ECHR 2001-II).

 
• EGMR, 10.02.1995 - 15175/89

  ALLENET DE RIBEMONT c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.04.2014 - 9043/05

  It suffices, even in the absence of any formal finding, that there is some reasoning to suggest that the official regards the accused as guilty (see, mutatis mutandis, Allenet de Ribemont v. France, 10 February 1995, § 35, Series A no. 308, and Minelli v. Switzerland, 25 March 1983, § 37, Series A no. 62).
• EGMR, 25.03.1983 - 8660/79

  Minelli ./. Schweiz

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.04.2014 - 9043/05

  It suffices, even in the absence of any formal finding, that there is some reasoning to suggest that the official regards the accused as guilty (see, mutatis mutandis, Allenet de Ribemont v. France, 10 February 1995, § 35, Series A no. 308, and Minelli v. Switzerland, 25 March 1983, § 37, Series A no. 62).
• EGMR, 10.04.2012 - 24027/07

  Babar Ahmad u.a. ./. Vereinigtes Königreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.04.2014 - 9043/05

  24027/07, 11949/08 and 36742/08, ECHR 6 July 2010).
• EGMR, 18.05.1999 - 28972/95

  NINN-HANSEN c. DANEMARK

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.04.2014 - 9043/05

  This may occur so with regard to the impartiality of the court under Article 6 § 1, as well as with regard to the presumption of innocence embodied in Article 6 § 2 (see Shuvalov v. Estonia, no. 39820/08 and 14942/09, § 82, 29 May 2012; Ninn-Hansen v. Denmark (dec.), no. 28972/95, ECHR 1999-V; and Anguelov v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 45963/99, 14 December 2004).
• EGMR, 29.05.2012 - 39820/08

  SHUVALOV v. ESTONIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.04.2014 - 9043/05

  This may occur so with regard to the impartiality of the court under Article 6 § 1, as well as with regard to the presumption of innocence embodied in Article 6 § 2 (see Shuvalov v. Estonia, no. 39820/08 and 14942/09, § 82, 29 May 2012; Ninn-Hansen v. Denmark (dec.), no. 28972/95, ECHR 1999-V; and Anguelov v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 45963/99, 14 December 2004).
• EGMR, 27.11.2008 - 28674/03

  SLAVCHO KOSTOV v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.04.2014 - 9043/05

  The Court further notes that it may be considered as a common feature of European criminal justice systems for an accused to obtain the lessening of charges or receive a reduction of his or her sentence in exchange for a guilty or nolo contendere plea in advance of trial or for providing substantial cooperation with the investigative authority (see the comparative legal study, paragraphs 62-75 above; see also, in this connection, Slavcho Kostov v. Bulgaria, no. 28674/03, § 17, 27 November 2008, and Rucinski v. Poland, no. 33198/04, § 12, 20 February 2007).
• EGMR, 13.04.2006 - 45963/99

  TSONEV v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 29.04.2014 - 9043/05

  This may occur so with regard to the impartiality of the court under Article 6 § 1, as well as with regard to the presumption of innocence embodied in Article 6 § 2 (see Shuvalov v. Estonia, no. 39820/08 and 14942/09, § 82, 29 May 2012; Ninn-Hansen v. Denmark (dec.), no. 28972/95, ECHR 1999-V; and Anguelov v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 45963/99, 14 December 2004).

• Generalanwalt beim EuGH, 14.12.2023 - C-432/22

  PT () und l'auteur d'une infraction) - Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung - …

  2 EGMR, 29. April 2014, Natsvlishvili und Togonidze/Georgien, CE:ECHR:2014:0429JUD000904305, § 90.

  56 EGMR, 29. April 2014, Natsvlishvili und Togonidze/Georgien, CE:ECHR:2014:0429JUD000904305, §§ 91 und 92.

  57 Für den EGMR hat die strafprozessuale Absprache nicht nur den wichtigen Vorteil, dass eine schnelle Erledigung von Strafverfahren möglich wird und die Gerichte, die Staatsanwaltschaften und die Verteidiger entlastet werden, sondern ist sie auch bei richtiger Anwendung ein wirksames Mittel im Kampf gegen die Korruption und das organisierte Verbrechen sowie ein Faktor zur Verminderung der Zahl der verhängten Strafen und folglich der Zahl der Inhaftierten (EGMR, 29. April 2014, Natsvlishvili und Togonidze/Georgien, CE:ECHR:2014:0429JUD000904305, § 90).

• EGMR, 23.02.2016 - 46632/13

  Alexei Anatoljewitsch Nawalny

  To be effective for Convention purposes, therefore, any waiver of procedural rights must always be established in an unequivocal manner, must be attended by minimum safeguards commensurate with its importance and must not run counter to any important public interest (see Scoppola v. Italy (no. 2) [GC], no. 10249/03, § 135, 17 September 2009, and Natsvlishvili and Togonidze v. Georgia, no. 9043/05, §§ 90-91, ECHR 2014 (extracts), with further references).
• EGMR, 12.05.2015 - 36862/05

  GOGITIDZE AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA

  One of those amendments introduced plea bargaining into the Code of Criminal Procedure (see Natsvlishvili and Togonidze v. Georgia, no. 9043/05, § 49, ECHR 2014 (extracts)), whilst the second one, which concerned both the Code of Criminal Procedure and the Code of Administrative Procedure, regulated the mechanism for the forfeiture of wrongfully acquired property.

 
• EGMR, 25.11.2021 - 63703/19

  MUCHA v. SLOVAKIA

  First, while there are various models of plea-bargaining procedures and arrangements across the Convention landscape, Slovakia has a system in which the plea-bargaining processes result in a criminal conviction (see Natsvlishvili and Togonidze v. Georgia, no. 9043/05, §§ 62-75, ECHR 2014 (extracts)).
• EGMR, 30.01.2024 - 37777/22

  GEMEINNÜTZIGE PRIVATSTIFTUNG ANAS SCHAKFEH v. AUSTRIA

  In the absence of such indicators which would render an unnamed suspect identifiable, the Court has not considered Article 6 § 2 to be implicated or violated (Kalliola and Others, cited above; Béres and Others v. Hungary, nos. 59588/12 and 2 others, § 32, 17 January 2017; Natsvlishvili and Togonidze v. Georgia, no. 9043/05, § 104, ECHR 2014 (extracts); Shuvalov v. Estonia, nos.
• EGMR, 25.03.2021 - 15931/15

  DI MARTINO ET MOLINARI c. ITALIE

  Ainsi, en matière de transactions pénales, la Cour a déjà eu l'occasion d'observer que la possibilité pour un accusé d'obtenir une atténuation des charges ou une réduction de peine à condition qu'il reconnaisse sa culpabilité, ou qu'il renonce avant le procès à contester les faits ou encore qu'il coopère pleinement avec les autorités d'enquête, est chose courante dans les systèmes de justice pénale des États européens (voir l'étude de droit comparé dans l'affaire Natsvlishvili et Togonidze c. Géorgie, no 9043/05, §§ 62-75 et, CEDH 2014 (extraits)).
• EGMR, 18.11.2021 - 54563/11

  PAR AND HYODO v. AZERBAIJAN

  The Court notes that plea bargaining or out-of-court settlement procedure in criminal proceedings are possible in some legal systems (see, for a comparative study in the Council of Europe member States, Natsvlishvili and Togonidze v. Georgia, no. 9043/05, §§ 62-75, ECHR 2014 (extracts)).
• EGMR, 27.06.2023 - 11643/20

  ISPIRYAN v. LITHUANIA

  The Court reiterates that the presumption of innocence enshrined in paragraph 2 of Article 6 is one of the elements of a fair criminal trial that is required by paragraph 1 (see, among many other authorities, Deweer v. Belgium, 27 February 1980, § 56, Series A no. 35; Allenet de Ribemont v. France, 10 February 1995, § 35, Series A no. 308; and Natsvlishvili and Togonidze v. Georgia, no. 9043/05, § 103, ECHR 2014 (extracts)).
• EGMR, 11.01.2022 - 21609/16

  CORNESCHI v. ROMANIA

  While the Court's task is not to substitute itself for the national courts in their interpretation and application of the applicable provisions, the Court must nevertheless reiterate its cornerstone principle that any waiver of procedural rights must always, if it is to be effective for Convention purposes, be established in an unequivocal manner and be attended by minimum safeguards commensurate with its importance; additionally, it must not run counter to any important public interest (see, among many other authorities, Natsvlishvili and Togonidze v. Georgia, no. 9043/05, § 91, ECHR 2014 (extracts)).
• EGMR, 02.02.2021 - 26198/13

  STEFANOV v. BULGARIA

  The question whether a statement by a public official is in breach of the principle of the presumption of innocence must be determined in the context of the particular circumstances of the specific case (see Natsvlishvili and Togonidze v. Georgia, no. 9043/05, § 103, ECHR 2014 (extracts), and Lolov and Others, cited above, § 63).
• EGMR, 20.10.2020 - 13112/07

  FELIX GUTU c. RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA
• EGMR, 31.10.2017 - 56795/13

  BAURAS v. LITHUANIA
• EGMR, 25.07.2017 - 2728/16

  ROSTOVTSEV v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 24.01.2017 - 57435/09

  PAULIKAS v. LITHUANIA
• EGMR, 17.01.2017 - 30459/13

  GAKHARIA v. GEORGIA
• EGMR, 15.09.2020 - 21218/12

  CIVINSKAITE v. LITHUANIA
• EGMR, 10.10.2019 - 8284/07

  BATIASHVILI v. GEORGIA
• EGMR - 20674/17 (anhängig)

  CINQUE v. ITALY
• EGMR, 07.11.2017 - 64734/11

  LEUSKA AND OTHERS v. ESTONIA
• EGMR, 09.06.2016 - 2308/06

  SARANCHOV v. UKRAINE
• EGMR, 14.05.2020 - 12391/06

  KADAGISHVILI v. GEORGIA
• EGMR, 28.04.2020 - 1654/15

  DANIJA c. SUISSE
• EGMR, 09.10.2018 - 29593/17

  CORALLO v. THE NETHERLANDS
• EGMR, 09.09.2014 - 5358/14

  X AND Y v. GEORGIA