Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 08.12.2020 - 9143/08 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2020,41560) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SIKIC CONTRE LA CROATIE
Informations fournies par le gouvernement concernant les mesures prises permettant d'éviter de nouvelles violations. Versement des sommes prévues dans l'arrêt (französisch)
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SIKIC AGAINST CROATIA
Information given by the government concerning measures taken to prevent new violations. Payment of the sums provided for in the judgment (englisch)
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 15.07.2010 - 9143/08
- EGMR, 08.12.2020 - 9143/08
Wird zitiert von ... (3)
- EGMR, 09.04.2024 - 963/18
SPLAJT v. CROATIA
The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in cases raising issues similar to the one in the present case (see, for example, Sikic v. Croatia, no. 9143/08, §§ 33-38, 15 July 2010). - EGMR, 13.04.2021 - 44546/13
ISTRATE c. ROUMANIE
La Cour a considéré qu'après l'abandon de poursuites pénales, la présomption d'innocence exige de tenir compte, dans toute procédure ultérieure, de quelque nature qu'elle soit, y compris dans des procédures disciplinaires ou concernant la destitution d'un fonctionnaire, du fait que l'intéressé n'a pas été condamné (Vanjak c. Croatie, no 29889/04, § 41, 14 janvier 2010, et Sikic c. Croatie, no 9143/08, § 47, 15 juillet 2010). - EGMR, 17.05.2022 - 31067/15
KEHAYOV c. BULGARIE
Les principes relatifs à l'application de l'article 6 § 2 de la Convention en cas de deux procédures parallèles menées contre la même personne pour les mêmes faits ont été résumés, entre autres, dans les arrêts ? ikic c. Croatie (no 9143/08, § 53, 15 juillet 2010), Çelik (Bozkurt) c. Turquie (no 34388/05, §§ 30-32, 12 avril 2011), Kemal Coskun c. Turquie (no 45028/07, § 52, 28 mars 2017) et Istrate c. Roumanie (no 44546/13, §§ 57-62, 13 avril 2021).
Rechtsprechung
| EGMR, 15.07.2010 - 9143/08 |
Zitiervorschläge
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2010,64562) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Volltextveröffentlichung
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte
SIKIC v. CROATIA
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 2 MRK
Violation of Art. 6-1 No violation of Art. 6-1 No violation of Art. 6-2 (englisch)
Sonstiges
- Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)
[ENG]
Verfahrensgang
- EGMR, 15.07.2010 - 9143/08
- EGMR, 08.12.2020 - 9143/08
Wird zitiert von ... (6) Neu Zitiert selbst (12)
- EGMR, 09.10.1979 - 6289/73
AIREY v. IRELAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.07.2010 - 9143/08
The Court further reiterates that the Convention is intended to guarantee not rights that are theoretical or illusory but rights that are practical and effective (see Airey v. Ireland, 9 October 1979, Series A no. 32, § 24, and Puig Panella v. Spain, no. 1483/02, § 50, 25 April 2006). - EGMR, 28.06.1978 - 6232/73
König ./. Deutschland
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.07.2010 - 9143/08
The Court has recognised that in administrative proceedings the period to be taken into consideration may even start to run prior to the court proceedings, if preliminary administrative proceedings were a precondition of the former (see, among other authorities, Janssen v. Germany, no. 23959/94, § 40, 20 December 2001, and König v. Germany, judgment of 28 June 1978, Series A no. 27, § 98). - EGMR, 12.07.1988 - 10862/84
SCHENK c. SUISSE
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.07.2010 - 9143/08
Moreover, while Article 6 of the Convention guarantees the right to a fair hearing, it does not lay down any rules on the admissibility of evidence or the way it should be assessed, which are therefore primarily matters for regulation by national law and the national courts (see Schenk v. Austria, judgment of 12 July 1988, Series A no. 140, §§ 45-46, and Garcia Ruiz v. Spain, no. 30544/96, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1999-I, § 28).
- EGMR, 19.04.2007 - 63235/00
VILHO ESKELINEN AND OTHERS v. FINLAND
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.07.2010 - 9143/08
It will be for the respondent Government to demonstrate, first, that an applicant who is a civil servant does not have a right of access to a court under national law and, second, that the exclusion of the rights under Article 6 for the civil servant is justified (see Vilho Eskelinen and Others v. Finland [GC], no. 63235/00, § 62, ECHR 2007-...). - EGMR, 10.02.1995 - 15175/89
ALLENET DE RIBEMONT c. FRANCE
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.07.2010 - 9143/08
In this connection the Court reiterates that the scope of Article 6 § 2 is not limited to pending criminal proceedings against an applicant (see Allenet de Ribemont v. France, 10 February 1995, Series A no. 308, § 35, and Diamantides v. Greece (no. 2), no. 71653/01, §§ 34-35). - EGMR, 25.03.1983 - 8660/79
Minelli ./. Schweiz
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.07.2010 - 9143/08
The Court has also found the provision applicable to judicial decisions taken after the discontinuation of such proceedings (see, in particular, the following judgments: Minelli v. Switzerland, 25 March 1983, Series A no. 62, and Lutz, Englert and Nölkenbockhoff v. Germany, 25 August 1987, Series A no. 123), or following an acquittal (see Sekanina v. Austria, 25 August 1993, Series A no. 266-A; Rushiti v. Austria, no. 28389/95, 21 March 2000; and Lamanna v. Austria, no. 28923/95, 10 July 2001). - EGMR, 24.06.1993 - 14518/89
SCHULER-ZGRAGGEN c. SUISSE
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.07.2010 - 9143/08
Moreover, his case did not in the Court's view give rise to questions of public interest making such a hearing necessary (see Schuler-Zgraggen v. Switzerland, 24 June 1993, § 58, Series A no. 263; Zumtobel v. Austria, 21 September 1993, § 34, Series A no. 268-A; and Fischer v. Austria, 26 April 1995, § 44, Series A no. 312). - EGMR, 21.09.1993 - 12235/86
ZUMTOBEL v. AUSTRIA
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.07.2010 - 9143/08
Moreover, his case did not in the Court's view give rise to questions of public interest making such a hearing necessary (see Schuler-Zgraggen v. Switzerland, 24 June 1993, § 58, Series A no. 263; Zumtobel v. Austria, 21 September 1993, § 34, Series A no. 268-A; and Fischer v. Austria, 26 April 1995, § 44, Series A no. 312). - EGMR, 26.04.1995 - 16922/90
FISCHER c. AUTRICHE
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.07.2010 - 9143/08
Moreover, his case did not in the Court's view give rise to questions of public interest making such a hearing necessary (see Schuler-Zgraggen v. Switzerland, 24 June 1993, § 58, Series A no. 263; Zumtobel v. Austria, 21 September 1993, § 34, Series A no. 268-A; and Fischer v. Austria, 26 April 1995, § 44, Series A no. 312). - EGMR, 25.08.1993 - 13126/87
SEKANINA c. AUTRICHE
Auszug aus EGMR, 15.07.2010 - 9143/08
The Court has also found the provision applicable to judicial decisions taken after the discontinuation of such proceedings (see, in particular, the following judgments: Minelli v. Switzerland, 25 March 1983, Series A no. 62, and Lutz, Englert and Nölkenbockhoff v. Germany, 25 August 1987, Series A no. 123), or following an acquittal (see Sekanina v. Austria, 25 August 1993, Series A no. 266-A; Rushiti v. Austria, no. 28389/95, 21 March 2000; and Lamanna v. Austria, no. 28923/95, 10 July 2001). - EGMR, 28.04.2005 - 72758/01
Unschuldsvermutung (Entschädigungsansprüche; konkludente Schuldfeststellung bei …
- EGMR, 11.02.2003 - 56568/00
Y c. NORVEGE
- BVerwG, 08.07.2021 - 2 WD 22.20
Dienstgradherabsetzung wegen heimlicher Bildaufnahmen von sich umkleidenden …
Nach der Rechtsprechung des Europäischen Gerichtshofs für Menschenrechte kann der für die Verfahrensdauer maßgebliche Zeitraum bereits vor dem Gerichtsverfahren beginnen und ein vorgeschriebenes behördliches Vorschaltverfahren umfassen (…vgl. EGMR, Urteile vom 16. Juli 2009 - 8453/04, Bayer/Deutschland - NVwZ 2010, 1015 Rn. 44 und vom 15. Juli 2010 - 9143/08, Sikic/Kroatien - HUDOC Rn. 33). - BVerwG, 03.06.2021 - 2 WD 18.20
Dienstgradherabsetzung wegen sexuellen Missbrauchs eines Kindes nach § 176 Abs. 4 …
Nach der Rechtsprechung des Europäischen Gerichtshofs für Menschenrechte kann der für die Verfahrensdauer maßgebliche Zeitraum bereits vor dem Gerichtsverfahren beginnen und ein behördliches Vorschaltverfahren umfassen (…vgl. EGMR, Urteile vom 28. Juni 1978 - 6232/73, König/Deutschland - NJW 1979, 477 Rn. 98…, vom 20. Dezember 2001 - 23959/94, Janssen/Deutschland - hudoc Rn. 40…, vom 16. Juli 2009 - 8453/04, Bayer/Deutschland - NVwZ 2010, 1015 Rn. 44 und vom 15. Juli 2010 - 9143/08, Sikic/Kroatien - hudoc Rn. 33). - EGMR, 08.10.2019 - 56065/10
MILOVANOVIC v. SERBIA
Although this obligation cannot be construed in the same way for a constitutional court with its role as guardian of the Constitution as for an ordinary court, this role also makes it particularly necessary for a Constitutional Court sometimes to take into account considerations other than the mere chronological order in which cases are entered on the list, such as the nature of a case and its importance in political and social terms (see Süßmann, cited above, §§ 55-57; Gast and Popp v. Germany, no. 29357/95, § 75, ECHR 2000-II and ? ikic v. Croatia, no. 9143/08, § 37, 15 July 2010).
- EGMR, 05.12.2013 - 21497/12
KEKO v. CROATIA
The Court has frequently found violations of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention in cases raising issues similar to the one in the present case (see Orsus and Others v. Croatia [GC], no. 15766/03, §§ 108-110, ECHR 2010 and Sikic v. Croatia, no. 9143/08, §§ 33-38, 15 July 2010). - EGMR, 03.09.2013 - 43519/07
MILOJEVIC AND OTHERS v. SERBIA
It is the established practice of the Court that the proceedings on person's dismissal from public service can fall within the ambit of Article 6 § 2 if the above conditions are met (see Allen, cited above, § 98; Sikic v. Croatia, no. 9143/08, 15 July 2010; Çelik (Bozkurt) v. Turkey, no. 34388/05, 12 April 2011 and Vanjak v. Croatia, no. 29889/04, 14 January 2010). - EGMR, 28.06.2016 - 77903/12
BOROJEVIC v. CROATIA
The Court has established clear and extensive case-law concerning complaints relating to the excessive length of proceedings (see, for example, Frydlender v. France [GC], no. 30979/96, § 43, ECHR 2000-VII; Cocchiarella v. Italy [GC], no. 64886/01, §§ 69-98; Orsus and Others v. Croatia [GC], no. 15766/03, §§ 45-49, ECHR 2010; and Sikic v. Croatia, no. 9143/08, §§ 33-38, 15 July 2010).