Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SNEERSONE AND KAMPANELLA v. ITALY

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 8 Abs. 2, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Preliminary objection dismissed (non-exhaustion of domestic remedies) Violation of Art. 8 No violation of Art. 8 Remainder inadmissible Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)

• juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  [ENG]

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 12.07.2011 - 14737/09
• EGMR, 02.04.2014 - 14737/09

Papierfundstellen

• FamRZ 2011, 1482

Wird zitiert von ... (2)Zitiert selbst (17)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 22.03.2001 - 34044/96

  Schießbefehl

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.07.2011 - 14737/09

  (i) The Convention cannot be interpreted in a vacuum, but, in accordance with Article 31 § 3 (c) of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969), account is to be taken of any relevant rules of international law applicable to the Contracting Parties (see Streletz, Kessler and Krenz v. Germany [GC], nos. 34044/96, 35532/97 and 44801/98, § 90, ECHR 2001-II).
• EGMR, 13.07.2000 - 25735/94

  Fall E. gegen DEUTSCHLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.07.2011 - 14737/09

  (v) "The child's interests" are primarily considered to be the following two: to have his or her ties with his or her family maintained, unless it is proved that such ties are undesirable, and to be allowed to develop in a sound environment (see, among many other authorities, Elsholz v. Germany [GC], no. 25735/94, § 50, ECHR 2000-VIII, and Marsálek v. the Czech Republic, no. 8153/04, § 71, 4 April 2006).
• EGMR, 23.09.1994 - 19823/92

  HOKKANEN v. FINLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.07.2011 - 14737/09

  To that end they enjoy a certain margin of appreciation, which remains subject, however, to European supervision whereby the Court reviews under the Convention the decisions that those authorities have taken in the exercise of that power (see, for example, Hokkanen v. Finland, 23 September 1994, § 55, Series A no. 299-A, and Kutzner v. Germany, no. 46544/99, §§ 65-66, ECHR 2002-I; see also Tiemann v. France and Germany (dec.), nos.

• EGMR, 25.01.2000 - 31679/96

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.07.2011 - 14737/09

  (ii) The positive obligations that Article 8 of the Convention imposes on States with respect to reuniting parents with their children must therefore be interpreted in the light of the UN Convention and the Hague Convention (see Maire v. Portugal, no. 48206/99, § 72, ECHR 2003-VII, and Ignaccolo-Zenide v. Romania, no. 31679/96, § 95, ECHR 2000-I).
• EGMR, 27.04.2000 - 47457/99

  Bestimmung des Aufenthaltsorts gemeinsamer Kinder nach Trennung der Eltern; Eine …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.07.2011 - 14737/09

  47457/99 and 47458/99, ECHR 2000-IV; Bianchi, cited above, § 92; and Carlson, cited above, § 69).
• EGMR, 22.06.2006 - 7548/04

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.07.2011 - 14737/09

  (iii) The Court is competent to review the procedure followed by the domestic courts, in particular to ascertain whether those courts, in applying and interpreting the provisions of the Hague Convention, have secured the guarantees of the Convention and especially those of Article 8 (see, to that effect, Bianchi v. Switzerland, no. 7548/04, § 92, 22 June 2006, and Carlson v. Switzerland, no. 49492/06, § 73, 6 November 2008).
• EGMR, 06.12.2005 - 14600/05

  ESKINAZI ET CHELOUCHE c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.07.2011 - 14737/09

  (vii) In addition, the Court must ensure that the decision-making process leading to the adoption of the impugned measures by the domestic court was fair and allowed those concerned to present their case fully (see Tiemann, cited above, and Eskinazi and Chelouche v. Turkey (dec.), no. 14600/05, ECHR 2005-XIII (extracts)).
• EGMR, 18.01.2011 - 26755/10

  Verpflichtung der Mutter einer in Australien geborenen Tochter zum Umzug nach …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.07.2011 - 14737/09

  Furthermore, the Court has more than once found that an order for return, even if it has not been enforced, in itself constitutes an interference with the right to respect for family life (see, for example, Neulinger and Shuruk, cited above, §§ 90-91, and Lipkowsky and McCormack v. Germany (dec.), no. 26755/10, 18 January 2011).
• EGMR, 26.10.2010 - 25437/08

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.07.2011 - 14737/09

  The Court has previously found that an interference occurs where domestic measures hinder the mutual enjoyment by a parent and a child of each other's company (see, for example, Raban v. Romania, no. 25437/08, § 31, 26 October 2010).
• EGMR, 04.04.2006 - 8153/04

  MARSÁLEK c. REPUBLIQUE TCHEQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 12.07.2011 - 14737/09

  (v) "The child's interests" are primarily considered to be the following two: to have his or her ties with his or her family maintained, unless it is proved that such ties are undesirable, and to be allowed to develop in a sound environment (see, among many other authorities, Elsholz v. Germany [GC], no. 25735/94, § 50, ECHR 2000-VIII, and Marsálek v. the Czech Republic, no. 8153/04, § 71, 4 April 2006).
• EGMR, 03.06.2008 - 19055/05

  DEAK v. ROMANIA AND THE UNITED KINGDOM
• EGMR, 27.10.1993 - 14448/88
• EGMR, 28.07.1999 - 25803/94

  Einstufung des in französischer Haft zugefügten Übels als Folter - Verpflichtung …
• VerfG Brandenburg, 25.08.2010 - VfGBbg 11/10

  Ablehnung des Antrags auf Erlass einer eA die darauf gerichtet ist, Träger …
• EGMR, 06.12.2007 - 39388/05

  Maumousseau und Washington ./. Frankreich
• EGMR, 02.05.2006 - 50177/99

  KÖSE ET AUTRES c. TURQUIE
• EKMR, 20.05.1996 - 23715/94

  S.P., D.P. and A.T. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• OLG Karlsruhe, 16.12.2014 - 2 UF 266/14

  Internationale Kindesentführung: Unzumutbarkeit der Kindesrückführung in den …

  Es ist daher ein fairer Ausgleich zwischen den in Rede stehenden Interessen herbeizuführen und zu berücksichtigen, dass das Kindeswohl oberste Priorität hat (EGMR…, Urteil vom 06.07.2010, Nr. 41615/07, Rn. 134 [Neulinger und Shuruk ./. Schweiz]; Urteil vom 12.07.2011, Nr. 14737/09 [Šneersone und Kampanella ./. Italien], FamRZ 2011, 1482;… Urteil vom 26.11.2013, Nr. 27853/09, Rn. 95 [X ./. Lettland]).
• OLG Karlsruhe, 03.02.2020 - 2 UF 200/19
  Es ist daher ein fairer Ausgleich zwischen den in Rede stehenden Interessen herbeizuführen und zu berücksichtigen, dass das Kindeswohl oberste Priorität hat (EuGHMR, Urteil vom 21.05.2019, FamRZ 2019, 1239 (1240); Urteil vom 06.07.2010, Nr. 41615/07, Rn. 134 [Neulinger und Shuruk ./. Schweiz], BeckRS 2011, 81381, beck-online; Urteil vom 12.07.2011, Nr. 14737/09 [Sneersone und Kampanella ./. Italien], FamRZ 2011, 1482;… Urteil vom 26.11.2013, Nr. 27853/09, Rn. 95 [X ./. Lettland], NJOZ 2014, 1825, beck-online).