Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  I v. FINLAND

  Art. 8, Art. 8 Abs. 1, Art. 29, Art. 29 Abs. 3, Art. 41 MRK
  Violation of Art. 8 Pecuniary damage - award Non-pecuniary damage - award (englisch)

Wird zitiert von ... (19)Zitiert selbst (7)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 08.06.2006 - 41585/98

  LEHTINEN v. FINLAND (No. 2)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.07.2008 - 20511/03

  Furthermore, the Court reiterates that under Article 41 of the Convention no awards are made in respect of the time or work put into an application by the applicant as this cannot be regarded as monetary costs actually incurred by him or her (see Lehtinen v. Finland (no. 2), no. 41585/98, § 57, 8 June 2006).
• EGMR, 26.03.1987 - 9248/81

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.07.2008 - 20511/03

  The processing of information relating to an individual's private life comes within the scope of Article 8 § 1 (see Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341/95, § 43, ECHR 2000-V, Leander v. Sweden, judgment of 26 March 1987, Series A no. 116, § 48).
• EGMR, 09.10.1979 - 6289/73

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.07.2008 - 20511/03

  Although the object of Article 8 is essentially that of protecting the individual against arbitrary interference by the public authorities, it does not merely compel the State to abstain from such interference: in addition to this primarily negative undertaking, there may be positive obligations inherent in an effective respect for private or family life (see Airey v. Ireland, judgment of 9 October 1979, Series A no. 32, p. 17, § 32).

• EGMR, 13.02.2003 - 42326/98

  Schutz des Rechts auf Achtung des Privatlebens und Familienlebens; Möglichkeit …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.07.2008 - 20511/03

  These obligations may involve the adoption of measures designed to secure respect for private life even in the sphere of the relations of individuals between themselves (see X and Y v. the Netherlands, judgment of 26 March 1985, Series A no. 91, p. 11, § 23; Odièvre v. France [GC], no. 42326/98, ECHR 2003-III).
• EGMR, 04.05.2000 - 28341/95

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.07.2008 - 20511/03

  The processing of information relating to an individual's private life comes within the scope of Article 8 § 1 (see Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341/95, § 43, ECHR 2000-V, Leander v. Sweden, judgment of 26 March 1987, Series A no. 116, § 48).
• EGMR, 09.03.2004 - 61827/00

  GLASS c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.07.2008 - 20511/03

  The hospital was a public hospital for whose acts the State is responsible for the purposes of the Convention (see Glass v. the United Kingdom, no. 61827/00, § 71, ECHR 2004-II).
• EGMR, 27.09.2005 - 50882/99

  PETRI SALLINEN AND OTHERS v. FINLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 17.07.2008 - 20511/03

  Having regard to the finding relating to Article 8, the Court considers that it is not necessary to examine this aspect of the application (see, among other authorities, Sallinen and Others v. Finland, no. 50882/99, § 102, 110, 27 September 2005, Copland, cited above, §§ 50-51).

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 09.01.2018 - 1874/13

  LÓPEZ RIBALDA v. SPAIN and 1 other application

  The Court has considered relevant in this connection whether or not a particular individual was targeted by the monitoring measure (compare Rotaru v. Romania [GC], no. 28341/95, §§ 43-44, ECHR 2000-V; Peck, cited above, § 59; and Perry, cited above, § 38) and whether personal data was processed or used in a manner constituting an interference with respect for private life (see, in particular, Perry, cited above, §§ 40-41, and I. v. Finland, no. 20511/03, § 35, 17 July 2008).
• KG, 10.04.2025 - 20 U 68/23

  Recht einer Person auf Auskunft über ihre personenbezogenen (Gesundheits-)Daten; …

  Rn. 17 Zugriffsprotokolle seien auch unabhängig von der Datenschutz-Grundverordnung nach dem Urteil des Europäischen Gerichtshofs für Menschenrechte vom 17.07.2008 - no. 20511/03 - offenzulegen.

  Aus der von der Klägerin zitierten Entscheidung des Europäischen Gerichtshofs für Menschenrechte vom 17.07.2008 - no. 20511/03 - bzw. Art. 8 EMRK folgt ein neben dem Auskunftsanspruch bestehender Herausgabeanspruch ebenso wenig.

• EGMR, 30.10.2012 - 57375/08

  Abtreibungsverbot in Polen: Lebensschützer und der "Fall Agata"

  The hospital was a public hospital for whose acts the State is responsible for the purposes of the Convention (see Glass v. the United Kingdom, no. 61827/00, § 71, ECHR 2004-II, and I. v. Finland, no. 20511/03, § 35, 17 July 2008).

• EGMR, 07.07.2015 - 28005/12

  M.N. AND OTHERS v. SAN MARINO

  They referred respectively to I. v. Finland (no. 20511/03, 17 July 2008) and Perry v. the United Kingdom (no. 63737/00, ECHR 2003-IX (extracts)).
• EGMR, 15.09.2022 - 24867/13

  MARCHENKO v. UKRAINE

  The Court reiterates that personal information relating to a patient belongs to his or her private life (see, for example, I. v. Finland, no. 20511/03, § 35, 17 July 2008, and L.L. v. France, no. 7508/02, § 32, ECHR 2006-XI).

  [4] Z v. Finland, 25 February 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997, § 96; Kiyutin v. Russia, no. 2700/10, ECHR 2011, § 64; Armonienė v. Lithuania, no. 36919/02, 25 November 2008, § 40; Biriuk v. Lithuania, no. 23373/03, 25 November 2008, § 39; I. v. Finland, no. 20511/03, 17 July 2008, § 38; C.C. v. Spain, no. 1425/06, 6 October 2009, § 33; P.T. v. the Republic of Moldova, no. 1122/12, 26 May 2020, §§ 5-6, 26.

• EGMR, 26.01.2017 - 42788/06

  [ENG]

  This is all the more true where the information concerns a person's distant past (see Rotaru, cited above, § 43, and M.M. v. the United Kingdom, no. 24029/07, § 187, 13 November 2012) or when the processing affects highly intimate and sensitive categories of information, notably the information relating to physical or mental health of an identifiable individual (see, in particular, Z. v. Finland, 25 February 1997, § 95, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-I; I. v. Finland, no. 20511/03, § 40, 17 July 2008; P. and S. v. Poland, no. 57375/08, § 128, 30 October 2012; L.H. v. Latvia, no. 52019/07, § 56, 29 April 2014; and Y.Y. v. Russia, no. 40378/06, § 38, 23 February 2016).
• EGMR, 27.02.2018 - 66490/09

  MOCKUTÄ- v. LITHUANIA

  The Court reiterates that personal information relating to a patient belongs to his or her private life (see, for example, I. v. Finland, no. 20511/03, § 35, 17 July 2008, and L.L. v. France, no. 7508/02, § 32, ECHR 2006-XI).
• EGMR, 29.04.2014 - 52019/07

  [ENG]

  Citing I. v. Finland (no. 20511/03, § 38, 17 July 2008), the applicant submitted that the collection of her personal data had undermined her confidence in the medical profession and in the health services in general.
• EGMR, 27.04.2010 - 27138/04

  CIUBOTARU v. MOLDOVA

  The Court recalls in this latter connection that in the case of I. v. Finland (no. 20511/03, § 44, 17 July 2008) in finding a violation of Article 8 of the Convention the Court gave weight to the fact that the State had placed too heavy a burden of proof on the applicant in civil proceedings in which she sought compensation for the dissemination of information about her medical condition.
• EGMR, 23.02.2016 - 40378/06

  Y.Y. v. RUSSIA

  The Court reiterates that personal information relating to a patient belongs to his or her private life (see, for example, I. v. Finland, no. 20511/03, § 35, 17 July 2008, and L.L. v. France, no. 7508/02, § 32, ECHR 2006-XI).
• EGMR, 02.10.2012 - 7259/03

  [ENG]
• EGMR, 10.03.2026 - 35473/23

  THORENFELDT v. NORWAY
• EGMR, 28.06.2022 - 34872/16

  WIERZBICKI v. POLAND
• EGMR, 22.10.2020 - 79783/13

  J.M. AND A.T. v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"
• EGMR, 17.02.2015 - 648/10

  Y. c. TURQUIE
• EGMR, 30.08.2022 - 8647/12

  Y.G. v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 12.12.2017 - 7653/06

  M.M. v. RUSSIA
• EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 20376/05

  VARAPNICKAITE-MAZYLIENE v. LITHUANIA
• EGMR, 20.01.2009 - 23815/04

  USLU v. TURKEY (No. 2)