Volltextveröffentlichungen (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  G.S. v. BULGARIA

  Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Extradition) (Conditional) (Iran) (englisch)

• juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)

Sonstiges

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  G.S. c. BULGARIE

  Art. 3 MRK
  [FRE]

Papierfundstellen

• NVwZ 2020, 783
• NVwZ-RR 2020, 457

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Neu Zitiert selbst (11)

• EGMR, 22.04.2014 - 73869/10

  G.C. c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.04.2019 - 36538/17

  This raises the question whether the Government are estopped from pleading non-exhaustion of domestic remedies (see Dhahbi v. Italy, no. 17120/09, §§ 24-25, 8 April 2014; G.C. v. Italy, no. 73869/10, §§ 36-37, 22 April 2014; Boris Kostadinov v. Bulgaria, no. 61701/11, § 44, 21 January 2016; and Khlaifia and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 16483/12, §§ 52-54, 15 December 2016).
• EGMR, 07.07.1989 - 14038/88

  Jens Söring

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.04.2019 - 36538/17

  They were first set out in Soering v. the United Kingdom (7 July 1989, §§ 81-91, Series A no. 161), and were more recently restated in detail in Mamatkulov and Askarov v. Turkey ([GC], nos. 46827/99 and 46951/99, § 66-70, ECHR 2005-I), Babar Ahmad and Others v. the United Kingdom (nos. 24027/07 and 4 others, §§ 167-79, 10 April 2012), Harkins and Edwards v. the United Kingdom (nos. 9146/07 and 32650/07, §§ 119-31, 17 January 2012), Savriddin Dzhurayev v. Russia (no. 71386/10, §§ 148-53, ECHR 2013 (extracts)) and Trabelsi v. Belgium (no. 140/10, §§ 116-20, ECHR 2014 (extracts)), as well as in a judgment against Bulgaria (see M.G. v. Bulgaria, no. 59297/12, §§ 74-82, 25 March 2014).
• EGMR, 26.09.2013 - 8139/09

  OTHMAN (ABU QATADA) CONTRE LE ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.04.2019 - 36538/17

  The principles governing the assessment of assurances by the destination State were, for their part, comprehensively set out in Othman (Abu Qatada) v. the United Kingdom (no. 8139/09, §§ 186-89, ECHR 2012 (extracts)).

 
• EGMR, 21.01.2016 - 61701/11

  BORIS KOSTADINOV v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.04.2019 - 36538/17

  This raises the question whether the Government are estopped from pleading non-exhaustion of domestic remedies (see Dhahbi v. Italy, no. 17120/09, §§ 24-25, 8 April 2014; G.C. v. Italy, no. 73869/10, §§ 36-37, 22 April 2014; Boris Kostadinov v. Bulgaria, no. 61701/11, § 44, 21 January 2016; and Khlaifia and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 16483/12, §§ 52-54, 15 December 2016).
• EGMR, 23.06.2015 - 2478/15

  NICKLINSON AND LAMB v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.04.2019 - 36538/17

  2478/15 and 1787/15, § 90, 23 June 2015).
• EGMR, 06.11.1980 - 7654/76

  VAN OOSTERWIJCK c. BELGIQUE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.04.2019 - 36538/17

  The exhaustion rule is neither absolute nor capable of being applied automatically; in reviewing whether it has been observed it is essential to have regard to the particular circumstances of the case (see, among other authorities, Van Oosterwijck v. Belgium, 6 November 1980, § 35, Series A no. 40; Akdivar and Others v. Turkey, 16 September 1996, § 69, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1996-IV; and D.H. and Others v. the Czech Republic [GC], no. 57325/00, § 116, ECHR 2007-IV).
• EGMR, 19.03.1991 - 11069/84

  CARDOT c. FRANCE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.04.2019 - 36538/17

  The exhaustion rule also requires that any procedural means capable of preventing the breach of the Convention be used in the domestic proceedings (see Cardot v. France, 19 March 1991, § 34, Series A no. 200).
• EGMR, 17.01.2012 - 9146/07

  HARKINS AND EDWARDS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.04.2019 - 36538/17

  They were first set out in Soering v. the United Kingdom (7 July 1989, §§ 81-91, Series A no. 161), and were more recently restated in detail in Mamatkulov and Askarov v. Turkey ([GC], nos. 46827/99 and 46951/99, § 66-70, ECHR 2005-I), Babar Ahmad and Others v. the United Kingdom (nos. 24027/07 and 4 others, §§ 167-79, 10 April 2012), Harkins and Edwards v. the United Kingdom (nos. 9146/07 and 32650/07, §§ 119-31, 17 January 2012), Savriddin Dzhurayev v. Russia (no. 71386/10, §§ 148-53, ECHR 2013 (extracts)) and Trabelsi v. Belgium (no. 140/10, §§ 116-20, ECHR 2014 (extracts)), as well as in a judgment against Bulgaria (see M.G. v. Bulgaria, no. 59297/12, §§ 74-82, 25 March 2014).
• EGMR, 26.01.2010 - 9742/07

  KING v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.04.2019 - 36538/17

  Nor is there anything to imply that, in the event of conviction, flogging would be outside the normal range of sentencing options available to the Iranian courts in the specific circumstances of his case (contrast King v. the United Kingdom (dec.), no. 9742/07, § 19, 26 January 2010, and López Elorza, cited above, §§ 112-16), that as an alien he would be treated more leniently, or that, once imposed, such a sentence would not be carried out.
• EGMR, 10.04.2012 - 24027/07

  Babar Ahmad u.a. ./. Vereinigtes Königreich

  Auszug aus EGMR, 04.04.2019 - 36538/17

  They were first set out in Soering v. the United Kingdom (7 July 1989, §§ 81-91, Series A no. 161), and were more recently restated in detail in Mamatkulov and Askarov v. Turkey ([GC], nos. 46827/99 and 46951/99, § 66-70, ECHR 2005-I), Babar Ahmad and Others v. the United Kingdom (nos. 24027/07 and 4 others, §§ 167-79, 10 April 2012), Harkins and Edwards v. the United Kingdom (nos. 9146/07 and 32650/07, §§ 119-31, 17 January 2012), Savriddin Dzhurayev v. Russia (no. 71386/10, §§ 148-53, ECHR 2013 (extracts)) and Trabelsi v. Belgium (no. 140/10, §§ 116-20, ECHR 2014 (extracts)), as well as in a judgment against Bulgaria (see M.G. v. Bulgaria, no. 59297/12, §§ 74-82, 25 March 2014).
• EGMR, 25.04.2013 - 71386/10

  SAVRIDDIN DZHURAYEV v. RUSSIA

• EGMR, 30.01.2024 - 53050/21

  ZLATANOV v. BULGARIA

  17153/11 and 29 others, § 72, 25 March 2014; and G.S. v. Bulgaria, no. 36538/17, § 71 in fine, 4 April 2019).
• EGMR, 30.08.2022 - 46564/15

  KORPORATIVNA TARGOVSKA BANKA AD v. BULGARIA

  It is hence open to question whether there is estoppel (see, mutatis mutandis, G.S. v. Bulgaria, no. 36538/17, §§ 69-70, 4 April 2019).
• VG Kassel, 02.02.2021 - 3 K 221/17

  Iran: subsidiärer Schutz wegen drohender Strafe von Peitschenhieben

  Das Gericht ist mit dem Europäischen Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (EGMR, Urteil vom 4. April 2019 - 36538/17 -, juris) der Auffassung, dass die dem Kläger im Iran drohende Strafe von 74 Peitschenhieben eine Art. 3 EMRK verletzende Bestrafung ist.