Volltextveröffentlichungen (4)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ABDU c. BULGARIE

  Art. 3, Art. 14, Art. 14+3, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Exception préliminaire jointe au fond (Article 35-1 - Epuisement des voies de recours internes) Exception préliminaire rejetée (Article 35-1 - Epuisement des voies de recours internes) Partiellement irrecevable Violation de l'article 3 - Interdiction de la torture ...

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ABDU v. BULGARIA [Extracts]

  Art. 3, Art. 14, Art. 14+3, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 1, Art. 41 MRK
  Preliminary objection joined to merits (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies) Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies) Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective ...

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ABDU v. BULGARIA - [Deutsche Übersetzung] Zusammenfassung durch das Österreichische Institut für Menschenrechte (ÖIM)

  [DEU] Preliminary objection joined to merits (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies);Preliminary objection dismissed (Article 35-1 - Exhaustion of domestic remedies);Remainder inadmissible;Violation of Article 3 - Prohibition of torture (Article 3 - Effective ...

• juris(Abodienst) (Volltext/Leitsatz)

Kurzfassungen/Presse

• RIS Bundeskanzleramt Österreich (Ausführliche Zusammenfassung)

Sonstiges (2)

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  Abdu v. Bulgaria

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte (Verfahrensmitteilung)

  ABDU v. BULGARIA

  Art. 3, Art. 13, Art. 14 MRK
  [ENG]

Wird zitiert von ... (14)Neu Zitiert selbst (12)

• EGMR, 24.07.2012 - 47159/08

  B.S. c. ESPAGNE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.03.2014 - 26827/08

  41138/98 and 64320/01, § 111, ECHR 2005-VII (extracts), and B.S. v. Spain, no. 47159/08, § 41, 24 July 2012).

  In this connection, we do not think that the quotation (in paragraph 39 in fine of the judgment) from B.S. v. Spain (no. 47159/08, §§ 39-40, 24 July 2012) corroborates the conclusion reached by the majority because, unlike the acts complained of in B.S., the racist abuse denounced in the present case was not attributable to any State officials exercising supervision over the victim.

• EGMR, 10.01.2012 - 32662/06

  BISER KOSTOV v. BULGARIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.03.2014 - 26827/08

  As to the possibility of bringing an action for damages against those responsible, the Court observes that such an action, which could lead to payment of compensation but not to the prosecution of those responsible, would not fulfil the State's procedural obligations under Article 3 in a case of assault (see Biser Kostov v. Bulgaria, no. 32662/06, § 72, 10 January 2012).
• EGMR, 04.12.2003 - 39272/98

  M.C. c. BULGARIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.03.2014 - 26827/08

  The Cour reiterates that the obligation on High Contracting Parties under Article 1 of the Convention to secure to everyone within their jurisdiction the rights and freedoms defined in the Convention, taken in conjunction with Article 3, requires them to to take steps to ensure that individuals within their jurisdiction are not subjected to ill-treatment, even administered by private individuals (see A. v. the United Kingdom, 23 September 1998, § 22, Reports, 1998-VI; Z. and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29392/95, §§ 73-75, ECHR 2001-V; and M.C. v. Bulgaria, no. 39272/98, § 149, ECHR 2003-XII).

 
• EGMR, 25.04.1978 - 5856/72

  Zur "Einzelfallprüfung" und "geltungszeitlichen Interpretation" im Rahmen des …

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.03.2014 - 26827/08

  Even where the victim did not suffer serious or lasting physical injuries, the Court has held that corporal punishment inflicted on an adolescent should be described as "degrading" in so far as it constituted an assault on "precisely that which it is one of the main purposes of Article 3 to protect, namely a person's dignity and physical integrity" (see Tyrer v. United Kingdom, 25 April 1978, § 33, Series A no. 26).
• EGMR, 10.05.2001 - 29392/95

  Z ET AUTRES c. ROYAUME-UNI

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.03.2014 - 26827/08

  The Cour reiterates that the obligation on High Contracting Parties under Article 1 of the Convention to secure to everyone within their jurisdiction the rights and freedoms defined in the Convention, taken in conjunction with Article 3, requires them to to take steps to ensure that individuals within their jurisdiction are not subjected to ill-treatment, even administered by private individuals (see A. v. the United Kingdom, 23 September 1998, § 22, Reports, 1998-VI; Z. and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 29392/95, §§ 73-75, ECHR 2001-V; and M.C. v. Bulgaria, no. 39272/98, § 149, ECHR 2003-XII).
• EGMR, 06.04.2000 - 26772/95

  LABITA c. ITALIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.03.2014 - 26827/08

  The Court has considered some types of treatment "inhuman", particularly where it was premeditated, was applied for hours at a stretch and caused either actual bodily injury or intense physical and mental suffering, and also "degrading" because it was such as to arouse in its victims feelings of fear, anguish and inferiority capable of humiliating and debasing them (see, among other authorities, Labita v. Italy [GC], no. 26772/95, § 120, ECHR 2000-IV).
• KAG Aachen, 19.06.2006 - 11/06

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.03.2014 - 26827/08

  11/06/2014.
• EGMR, 06.07.2005 - 43579/98

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.03.2014 - 26827/08

  43577/98 and 43579/98, § 160, ECHR 2005-VII).
• EGMR, 12.07.2005 - 64320/01

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.03.2014 - 26827/08

  41138/98 and 64320/01, § 111, ECHR 2005-VII (extracts), and B.S. v. Spain, no. 47159/08, § 41, 24 July 2012).
• EKMR, 14.12.1973 - 4403/70

  Auszug aus EGMR, 11.03.2014 - 26827/08

  Furthermore, the former European Commission on Human Rights accepted that discrimination based on race could, in certain circumstances, of itself amount to "degrading treatment" within the meaning of Article 3 (see East African Asians v. United Kingdom, nos. 4403/70 and others, Commission report of 14 December 1973, Decisions and Reports 78, pp. 57 and 62, §§ 196 and 207).
• EGMR, 27.09.2007 - 72663/01

  NIKOLAY DIMITROV c. BULGARIE
• EGMR, 31.07.2008 - 57883/00

  VASIL PETROV c. BULGARIE

• EGMR, 12.05.2015 - 73235/12

  IDENTOBA AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA

  In the particular circumstances of the present case, in view of the applicants" allegations that the violence perpetrated against them had homophobic and transphobic overtones which rendered their ill-treatment sufficiently severe to attain the relevant threshold, and that the authorities failed both to protect them from and then sufficiently investigate that bias-motivated violence, the Court deems that the most appropriate way to proceed would be to subject the applicants" complaints to a simultaneous dual examination under Article 3 taken in conjunction with Article 14 of the Convention (compare with Abdu v. Bulgaria, no. 26827/08, § 31, 11 March 2014).

  I have explained in more detail my position with regard to the interpretation of Article 3 in the dissenting opinion written with Judge Mahoney which is attached to the judgment in the case of Abdu v. Bulgaria (no. 26827/08, 11 March 2014).

• EGMR, 14.01.2021 - 50231/13

  SABALIC v. CROATIA

  Discriminatory remarks and racist insults must in any event be considered as an aggravating factor when considering a given instance of ill-treatment in the light of Article 3 (see B.S. v. Spain, no. 47159/08, § 40, 24 July 2012; Abdu v. Bulgaria, no. 26827/08, § 23, 11 March 2014; and Identoba and Others v. Georgia, no. 73235/12, § 65, 12 May 2015).

  However, in view of the injuries which the applicant sustained and the hate motivated violence against her (see paragraph 70 above), the Court considers that the applicant's complaint should be examined under Article 3 (compare Abdu v. Bulgaria, no. 26827/08, § 39, 11 March 2014, and Skorjanec, cited above, § 36).

• EGMR, 03.03.2015 - 29263/12

  S.Z. c. BULGARIE

  Outre le constat récurrent de non-accomplissement d'actes d'enquête pertinents, dans certaines affaires la Cour a relevé que les autorités compétentes n'avaient pas tenu compte de certains éléments de preuve (Dimitrova et autres c. Bulgarie, no 44862/04, §§ 79-82, 27 janvier 2011, Nikolay Dimitrov, précité, § 76, et Dimitrov et autres, précité, § 145), n'avaient pas cherché à élucider certaines circonstances factuelles ou l'implication de certaines personnes dans l'infraction pénale (Dimitrova et autres, précité, §§ 83-84, Abdu c. Bulgarie, no 26827/08, § 49, 11 mars 2014) ou que le procureur avait refusé de manière persistante de se conformer aux instructions du tribunal relatives à l'enquête préliminaire (Biser Kostov c. Bulgarie, no 32662/06, § 82, 10 janvier 2012).

 
• EGMR, 07.10.2014 - 28490/02

  BEGHELURI AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA

  41138/98 and 64320/01, §§ 111 and 113, ECHR 2005-VII (extracts); and Abdu v. Bulgaria, no. 26827/08, § 23, 11 March 2014).
• VG Göttingen, 03.11.2016 - 2 B 361/16

  Abschiebungsandrohung; Abschiebungshindernis; Asylrecht; Bulgarien; …

  Das Versäumnis staatlicher bulgarischer Verfolgungsbehörden, möglichen rassistischen Motiven für eine Gewaltanwendung gegenüber einem sudanesischen Staatsangehörigen nachzugehen, hat in der Vergangenheit bereits zu einer Verurteilung Bulgariens durch den EGMR wegen einer Verletzung von Art. 3 EMRK geführt (Urteil vom 11.03.2014 - Nr. 26827/08 -, Abdu gegen Bulgarien).
• EGMR, 29.08.2023 - 25276/15

  VERZILOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  The Court further reiterates that the authorities' positive obligations under Article 3 of the Convention comprise an obligation to put in place a legislative and regulatory framework to shield individuals adequately from treatment incompatible with Article 3 (see X and Others v. Bulgaria [GC], no. 22457/16, § 178, 2 February 2021, and Abdu v. Bulgaria, no. 26827/08, § 41, 11 March 2014).
• EGMR, 30.11.2023 - 24225/19

  GEORGIAN MUSLIM RELATIONS AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA

  The Government distinguished the present case from a number of cases of religious or racial hatred in which the combination of actual physical confrontation with hate speech had led the Court to a finding of a violation of Article 3 of the Convention (see Abdu v. Bulgaria, no. 26827/08, § 39, 11 March 2014), and concluded that in the absence of such confrontation, the minimum level of severity had not been reached.
• VG Köln, 15.11.2022 - 20 K 3733/22
  vgl. UNHCR, Submission For the Office oft he High Commissioner for Human Rights' Compilation Report, UPR: 3rd Cycle, 36th Session, Bulgaria, vom Januar 2020; bordermonitoring.eu, Get Out! Zur Situation von Geflüchteten in Bulgarien, Juni 2020; SFH, Bericht vom 30.08.2019: Bulgarien; Muiznieks-Report (Menschenrechtskommissar des Europarats) vom 22.06.2015; EGMR, Urteil vom 11.03.2014 - Nr. 26827/08 - Abdu/Bulgarien; Human Rights Watch, Bericht vom 16.02.2016, Dispatches: What Bulgaria's "Respect" for Refugees Really Looks Like; n-tv.de vom 25.11.2016, Ausschreitungen in Bulgarien - Polizei nimmt 200 Flüchtlinge fest.
• VG Köln, 26.08.2022 - 20 K 1953/22
  vgl. UNHCR, Submission For the Office oft he High Commissioner for Human Rights' Compilation Report, UPR: 3rd Cycle, 36th Session, Bulgaria, vom Januar 2020; bordermonitoring.eu, Get Out! Zur Situation von Geflüchteten in Bulgarien, Juni 2020; SFH, Bericht vom 30.08.2019: Bulgarien; Muiznieks-Report (Menschenrechtskommissar des Europarats) vom 22.06.2015; EGMR, Urteil vom 11.03.2014 - Nr. 26827/08 - Abdu/Bulgarien; Human Rights Watch, Bericht vom 16.02.2016, Dispatches: What Bulgaria's "Respect" for Refugees Really Looks Like; n-tv.de vom 25.11.2016, Ausschreitungen in Bulgarien - Polizei nimmt 200 Flüchtlinge fest.
• VG Köln, 26.11.2015 - 20 K 712/15

  Abschiebungsandrohung, Abschiebungsverbot, systemische Mängel, unmenschliche oder …

  vgl. Muiznieks-Report (Menschenrechtskommissar des Europarats) vom 22.06.2015; EGMR, Urteil vom 11.03.2014 - Nr. 26827/08 - Abdu/Bulgarien.
• EGMR, 20.10.2015 - 15529/12

  BALÁZS v. HUNGARY
• VG Köln, 17.06.2020 - 20 K 5099/19
• VG Köln, 26.09.2019 - 20 K 14819/17
• VG Köln, 26.09.2019 - 20 K 4097/18