Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SOPHIA ANDREOU v. TURKEY

  (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 15.06.1999 - 18360/91
• EGMR, 27.01.2009 - 18360/91
• EGMR, 22.06.2010 - 18360/91

Wird zitiert von ... (0)Zitiert selbst (11)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 27.02.1980 - 6903/75

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.01.2009 - 18360/91

  Although the heirs of a deceased applicant cannot claim a general right for the examination of the application brought by the latter to be continued by the Court (see Scherer v. Switzerland, 25 March 1994, Series A no. 287), the Court has accepted on a number of occasions that close relatives of a deceased applicant are entitled to take his or her place (see Deweer v. Belgium, 27 February 1980, § 37, Series A no. 35, and Raimondo v. Italy, 22 February 1994, § 2, Series A no. 281-A).
• EGMR, 22.02.1994 - 12954/87

  RAIMONDO v. ITALY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.01.2009 - 18360/91

  Although the heirs of a deceased applicant cannot claim a general right for the examination of the application brought by the latter to be continued by the Court (see Scherer v. Switzerland, 25 March 1994, Series A no. 287), the Court has accepted on a number of occasions that close relatives of a deceased applicant are entitled to take his or her place (see Deweer v. Belgium, 27 February 1980, § 37, Series A no. 35, and Raimondo v. Italy, 22 February 1994, § 2, Series A no. 281-A).
• EGMR, 22.05.2001 - 33592/96

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.01.2009 - 18360/91

  However, there are exceptions to the rule which may be justified by the particular circumstances of each case (see Baumann v. France, no. 33592/96, § 47, ECHR 2001-V (extracts)).

• EGMR, 06.09.2001 - 69789/01

  BRUSCO v. ITALY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.01.2009 - 18360/91

  Examples of such exceptions are to be found in the cases against Italy which raised similar questions and in which the Court found that certain specific facts justified departing from the general principle (see Brusco v. Italy, (dec.) no. 69789/01, ECHR 2001-IX).
• EGMR, 12.01.2006 - 18888/02

  IÇYER c. TURQUIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.01.2009 - 18360/91

  57984/00, 60226/00, 60242/00, 60679/00, 60680/00 and 68563/01, ECHR 2002-IX; and Içyer v. Turkey, no. 18888/02, ECHR 2006-I).
• EGMR, 05.09.2002 - 77784/01

  NOGOLICA c. CROATIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.01.2009 - 18360/91

  In other examples the Court also took the view, in the light of the specific facts of the cases concerned, and having regard to the subsidiary nature of the Convention mechanism, that new domestic remedies had not been exhausted (see the following decisions: Nogolica v. Croatia, no. 77784/01, ECHR 2002-VIII; Slavicek v. Croatia, no. 20862/02, ECHR 2002-VII; Andrásik and Others v. Slovakia, nos.
• EGMR, 22.10.2002 - 57984/00

  ANDRASIK AND OTHERS v. SLOVAKIA

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.01.2009 - 18360/91

  57984/00, 60226/00, 60242/00, 60679/00, 60680/00 and 68563/01, ECHR 2002-IX; and Içyer v. Turkey, no. 18888/02, ECHR 2006-I).
• EGMR, 04.07.2002 - 20862/02

  SLAVICEK contre la CROATIE

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.01.2009 - 18360/91

  In other examples the Court also took the view, in the light of the specific facts of the cases concerned, and having regard to the subsidiary nature of the Convention mechanism, that new domestic remedies had not been exhausted (see the following decisions: Nogolica v. Croatia, no. 77784/01, ECHR 2002-VIII; Slavicek v. Croatia, no. 20862/02, ECHR 2002-VII; Andrásik and Others v. Slovakia, nos.
• EGMR, 25.03.1994 - 17116/90

  SCHERER v. SWITZERLAND

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.01.2009 - 18360/91

  Although the heirs of a deceased applicant cannot claim a general right for the examination of the application brought by the latter to be continued by the Court (see Scherer v. Switzerland, 25 March 1994, Series A no. 287), the Court has accepted on a number of occasions that close relatives of a deceased applicant are entitled to take his or her place (see Deweer v. Belgium, 27 February 1980, § 37, Series A no. 35, and Raimondo v. Italy, 22 February 1994, § 2, Series A no. 281-A).
• EGMR, 24.09.2002 - 42295/98

  Auszug aus EGMR, 27.01.2009 - 18360/91

  For the purposes of the instant case, the Court is prepared to accept that the applicant's husband and children can pursue the application initially brought by Mrs Sophia Andreou (see, mutatis mutandis, Kirilova and Others v. Bulgaria, nos. 42908/98, 44038/98, 44816/98 and 7319/02, § 85, 9 June 2005, and Nerva and Others v. the United Kingdom, no. 42295/98, § 33, ECHR 2002-VIII).
• RG, 18.06.1927 - I 13/27

  Deutsch-Polnisches Abkommen über Oberschlesien

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen

Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  ANDREOU v. TURKEY

  Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1, Art. 1 MRK
  Admissible (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 15.06.1999 - 18360/91
• EGMR, 27.01.2009 - 18360/91
• EGMR, 22.06.2010 - 18360/91

Wird zitiert von ... (3)Zitiert selbst (2)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EKMR, 26.05.1975 - 6780/74

  CYPRUS v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.06.1999 - 18360/91

  Being unable to return there until her death, she was the victim of a violation of Article 8 of the Convention (applications Nos. 6780/74 and 6950/75 Cyprus v. Turkey, Comm. Report, 10.7.76, unpublished, §§ 208-210; application No. 8007/77 Cyprus v. Turkey, Comm.
• EKMR, 04.03.1991 - 15299/89

  CHRYSOSTOMOS, PAPACHRYSOSTOMOU AND LOIZIDOU v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 15.06.1999 - 18360/91

  15299/89 15300/89 and 15318/89 Chrysostomos, Papachrysostomou and Loizidou v. Turkey.

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• BGH, 23.08.2011 - 1 StR 153/11

  Recht auf Beschwerde; Recht auf Verfahrensbeschleunigung; Individualbeschwerde; …

  Dem entspricht, dass Individualbeschwerden gemäß Art. 35 Abs. 3 MRK zurückgewiesen werden, wenn die gerügten Handlungen oder Unterlassungen dem beklagten Staat nicht zuzurechnen wären (vgl. EGMR, Entscheidung vom 15. Juni 1999, Nr. 18360/91; EKMR, Entscheidung vom 14. April 1998, Nr. 20652/92).
• BGH, 17.03.2010 - 2 StR 397/09

  Beeinträchtigungen des Konfrontationsrechts durch andere Vertragsstaaten der EMRK …

  Eine Beschwerde ist gemäß Art. 35 Abs. 3 MRK für unzulässig zu erklären, wenn die gerügte Handlung oder Unterlassung dem beklagten Staat nicht zuzurechnen ist (EGMR, Entscheidungen vom 15. Juni 1999, Nr. 18360/91; EKMR, Entscheidung vom 14. April 1998, Nr. 20652/92;… vgl. Grabenwerter, EMRK 3. Aufl. 2008 § 13 Rdn. 42 m.w.N.).
• OLG Rostock, 02.08.2010 - I Ws 128/10

  Anwendung der "Vollstreckungslösung" im Verfahren der Umwandlung einer …

  Rn. 11 Eine entsprechende Individualbeschwerde des Verurteilten gegen die Bundesrepublik Deutschland wäre gemäß Art. 35 Abs. 3 MRK für unzulässig zu erklären, weil die gerügte Handlung oder Unterlassung ihr nicht zuzurechnen ist (EGMR Entscheidungen v. 15.6. 1999, Nr. 18360/91; EKMR Entscheidung v. 14.4.1998, Nr. 20652/92;… vgl. Grabenwerter EMRK, 3. Aufl., § 13 Rn 42 mwN).

Volltextveröffentlichung

• Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

  SOPHIA ANDREOU v. TURKEY

  (englisch)

Verfahrensgang

• EGMR, 15.06.1999 - 18360/91
• EGMR, 27.01.2009 - 18360/91
• EGMR, 22.06.2010 - 18360/91

Wird zitiert von ...Zitiert selbst (10)

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 23.03.1995 - 15318/89

  LOIZIDOU c. TURQUIE (EXCEPTIONS PRÉLIMINAIRES)

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.06.2010 - 18360/91

  Furthermore, the Court has taken into account the uncertainties, inherent in any attempt to quantify the real losses incurred by the applicant (see Loizidou v. Turkey, (preliminary objections), 23 March 1995, § 102, Series A no. 310, and (merits), 18 December 1996, § 32, Reports 1996-VI).
• EGMR, 20.02.2001 - 25182/94

  CANKOÇAK v. TURKEY

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.06.2010 - 18360/91

  Her heirs are therefore entitled to a measure of compensation in respect of losses directly related to this violation of her rights as from the date of the deposit of Turkey's declaration recognising the right of individual petition under former Article 25 of the Convention, namely 22 January 1987, until the day of the applicant's death, namely 15 December 1993 (see paragraph 4 of the principal judgment; see also, mutatis mutandis, Cankoçak v. Turkey, nos. 25182/94 and 26956/95, § 26, 20 February 2001, and Demades v. Turkey (just satisfaction), no. 16219/90, § 21, 22 April 2008).
• RG, 18.06.1927 - I 13/27

  Deutsch-Polnisches Abkommen über Oberschlesien

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.06.2010 - 18360/91

  (e) Kyrenia, Ayios Amvrosios, Bambatzera, field with trees, sheet/plan 13/27, plot no. 226, area: 11, 851 m², share: whole;.

• EGMR, 01.03.2010 - 46113/99

  Demopoulos ./. Türkei und 7 andere

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.06.2010 - 18360/91

  46113/99, 3843/02, 13751/02, 13466/03, 10200/04, 14163/04, 19993/04, 21819/04, 1 March 2010) and argued that the applicant's heirs should address their claims to the Immovable Property Commission (the "IPC") instituted by the "TRNC" Law 67/2005.
• EGMR - 21819/04

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.06.2010 - 18360/91

  46113/99, 3843/02, 13751/02, 13466/03, 10200/04, 14163/04, 19993/04, 21819/04, 1 March 2010) and argued that the applicant's heirs should address their claims to the Immovable Property Commission (the "IPC") instituted by the "TRNC" Law 67/2005.
• EGMR - 19993/04

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.06.2010 - 18360/91

  46113/99, 3843/02, 13751/02, 13466/03, 10200/04, 14163/04, 19993/04, 21819/04, 1 March 2010) and argued that the applicant's heirs should address their claims to the Immovable Property Commission (the "IPC") instituted by the "TRNC" Law 67/2005.
• EGMR - 14163/04

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.06.2010 - 18360/91

  46113/99, 3843/02, 13751/02, 13466/03, 10200/04, 14163/04, 19993/04, 21819/04, 1 March 2010) and argued that the applicant's heirs should address their claims to the Immovable Property Commission (the "IPC") instituted by the "TRNC" Law 67/2005.
• EGMR - 10200/04

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.06.2010 - 18360/91

  46113/99, 3843/02, 13751/02, 13466/03, 10200/04, 14163/04, 19993/04, 21819/04, 1 March 2010) and argued that the applicant's heirs should address their claims to the Immovable Property Commission (the "IPC") instituted by the "TRNC" Law 67/2005.
• EGMR - 13466/03

  [ENG]

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.06.2010 - 18360/91

  46113/99, 3843/02, 13751/02, 13466/03, 10200/04, 14163/04, 19993/04, 21819/04, 1 March 2010) and argued that the applicant's heirs should address their claims to the Immovable Property Commission (the "IPC") instituted by the "TRNC" Law 67/2005.
• EGMR, 01.03.2010 - 3843/02

  Auszug aus EGMR, 22.06.2010 - 18360/91

  46113/99, 3843/02, 13751/02, 13466/03, 10200/04, 14163/04, 19993/04, 21819/04, 1 March 2010) and argued that the applicant's heirs should address their claims to the Immovable Property Commission (the "IPC") instituted by the "TRNC" Law 67/2005.

alle Zitatstellen anzeigen
• EGMR, 19.07.2012 - 48163/08

  [ENG]

  However, the Court observes that Mrs M. Prezelj has not introduced an autonomous complaint concerning a potential violation of her right to trial within a reasonable time with respect to the part of the proceedings in which she participated as successor to Mr Vinko Jama, but merely successfully requested to pursue the application lodged by the deceased (see paragraphs 27-28 above, and, mutatis mutandis, Sophia Andreou v. Turkey (just satisfaction), no. 18360/91, § 33, 22 June 2010).