Neue Kooperation: dejure.org × Doctrine bringen KI-Power für Aktenanalyse, Recherche und Texterstellung. Doctrine entdecken
×

Rechtsprechung
   EGMR, 07.06.2022 - 32401/10, 44285/10, 74320/10, 74329/10, 74339/10, 3488/11, 3492/11, 14821/11, 17552/11, 19428/11, 44363/11, 73036/11, 78114/11, 2269/12, 5547/12, 5571/12, 17715/12, 65838/12, 76162/12, 60771/13, 74387/13, 79240/13   

Zitiervorschläge
https://dejure.org/2022,13053
EGMR, 07.06.2022 - 32401/10, 44285/10, 74320/10, 74329/10, 74339/10, 3488/11, 3492/11, 14821/11, 17552/11, 19428/11, 44363/11, 73036/11, 78114/11, 2269/12, 5547/12, 5571/12, 17715/12, 65838/12, 76162/12, 60771/13, 74387/13, 79240/13 (https://dejure.org/2022,13053)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 07.06.2022 - 32401/10, 44285/10, 74320/10, 74329/10, 74339/10, 3488/11, 3492/11, 14821/11, 17552/11, 19428/11, 44363/11, 73036/11, 78114/11, 2269/12, 5547/12, 5571/12, 17715/12, 65838/12, 76162/12, 60771/13, 74387/13, 79240/13 (https://dejure.org/2022,13053)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 07. Juni 2022 - 32401/10, 44285/10, 74320/10, 74329/10, 74339/10, 3488/11, 3492/11, 14821/11, 17552/11, 19428/11, 44363/11, 73036/11, 78114/11, 2269/12, 5547/12, 5571/12, 17715/12, 65838/12, 76162/12, 60771/13, 74387/13, 79240/13 (https://dejure.org/2022,13053)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2022,13053) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.

Volltextveröffentlichung

  • Europäischer Gerichtshof für Menschenrechte

    TAGANROG LRO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

    Violation of Article 9 - Freedom of thought, conscience and religion (Article 9-1 - Freedom of religion;Manifest religion or belief) read in the light of Article 11 - (Art. 11) Freedom of assembly and association (Article 11-1 - Freedom of association);Violation of ...

Sonstiges

 
Sortierung


Kontextvorschau



Hinweis: Klicken Sie auf das Sprechblasensymbol, um eine Kontextvorschau im Fließtext zu sehen. Um alle zu sehen, genügt ein Doppelklick.

Wird zitiert von ... (42)Zitiert selbst (47)

  • EGMR - 39417/17 (anhängig)

    CHRISTENSEN v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 07.06.2022 - 32401/10
    Admissibility 257. As regards Mr Christensen's initial application concerning his pre-trial detention imposed for what he considered to be a legitimate exercise of his right to freedom of religion (no. 39417/17), the Government submitted that the complaint under Article 9 was premature and inadmissible for non-exhaustion of domestic remedies, as the sentence had not yet been passed.

    39417/17.

    Application no. 39417/17, Christensen v. Russia.

  • EGMR - 10188/17 (anhängig)

    ADMINISTRATIVE CENTRE OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES IN RUSSIA AND KALIN v. RUSSIA

    Auszug aus EGMR, 07.06.2022 - 32401/10
    10188/17.

    Application no. 10188/17, Administrative Centre of Jehovah's Witnesses in Russia and Kalin v. Russia.

  • EGMR - 15962/15 (anhängig)

    SAMARA LRO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA and 6 other applications

    Auszug aus EGMR, 07.06.2022 - 32401/10
    15962/15.

    Application no. 15962/15, Samara LRO and Others v. Russia.

  • EGMR, 15.05.2025 - 1097/10

    KASHAPOV v. RUSSIA

    Rn. 8 In the leading case of Taganrog LRO and Others v. Russia (nos. 32401/10 and 19 others, §§ 152-59, 7 June 2022), as well as in other cases listed in the appendix, the Court had already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those raised in the present case.

    32401/10 and 19 others, §§ 158-59, 7 June 2022 (excessively broad definition of extremism).

    32401/10 and 19 others, §§ 158-59, 7 June 2022 (excessively broad definition of extremism).

    32401/10 and 19 others, §§ 158-59, 7 June 2022 (excessively broad definition of extremism).

    32401/10 and 19 others, §§ 158-59, 7 June 2022 (excessively broad definition of extremism).

    32401/10 and 19 others, §§ 158-59, 7 June 2022 (excessively broad definition of extremism).

    32401/10 and 19 others, §§ 158-59, 7 June 2022 (excessively broad definition of extremism).

    32401/10 and 19 others, §§ 158-59, 7 June 2022 (excessively broad definition of extremism).

    32401/10 and 19 others, §§ 158-59, 7 June 2022 (excessively broad definition of extremism), Andrey Rylkov Foundation and Others v. Russia, nos.

    32401/10 and 19 others, §§ 158-59, 7 June 2022 (excessively broad definition of extremism), Andrey Rylkov Foundation and Others v. Russia, nos.

    32401/10 and 19 others, §§ 158-59, 7 June 2022 (excessively broad definition of extremism).

    32401/10 and 19 others, §§ 158-59, 7 June 2022 (excessively broad definition of extremism).

    32401/10 and 19 others, §§ 158-59, 7 June 2022 (excessively broad definition of extremism).

    32401/10 and 19 others, §§ 158-59, 7 June 2022 (excessively broad definition of extremism).

    32401/10 and 19 others, §§ 158-59, 7 June 2022 (excessively broad definition of extremism).

    32401/10 and 19 others, §§ 158-59, 7 June 2022 (excessively broad definition of extremism), Andrey Rylkov Foundation and Others v. Russia, nos.

    32401/10 and 19 others, §§ 158-59, 7 June 2022 (excessively broad definition of extremism).

    32401/10 and 19 others, §§ 158-59, 7 June 2022 (excessively broad definition of extremism).

    32401/10 and 19 others, §§ 158-59, 7 June 2022 (excessively broad definition of extremism).

    32401/10 and 19 others, §§ 158-59, 7 June 2022 (excessively broad definition of extremism).

    32401/10 and 19 others, §§ 158-59, 7 June 2022 (excessively broad definition of extremism).

    32401/10 and 19 others, §§ 158-59, 7 June 2022 (excessively broad definition of extremism), Andrey Rylkov Foundation and Others v. Russia, nos.

    32401/10 and 19 others, §§ 158-59, 7 June 2022 (excessively broad definition of extremism).

  • EGMR - 15962/15 (anhängig)

    SAMARA LRO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA and 6 other applications

    Criminal prosecution of individual Jehovah's Witnesses (application no. 24622/16).

    On 5 August 2011 the South Federal Circuit police opened criminal proceedings under Article 282-2 § 1 of the Criminal Code for "performing organisational activities aimed at resuming and maintaining illegal activities" of the Taganrog local religious organization of Jehovah's Witnesses ("the Taganrog LRO") which had been liquidated and banned by the Rostov Regional Court on 11 September 2009 (for details, see Taganrog LRO and Others v. Russia, no. 32401/10).

    Blocking of Jehovah's Witnesses' website (application no. 2861/15).

    Banning of the book "Bearing Thorough Witness" About God's Kingdom (application no. 28108/14).

    Banning of the brochures Good News from God and What You Need to Know About God and His Purpose (application no. 16578/15).

    The applicants in case no. 28108/14 complain under Article 14 of the Convention in conjunction with Articles 6, 9 and 10 that the courts grounded their decision to ban the Jehovah's Witnesses' literature on the witness statement by a Russian Orthodox priest.

    (i) in case no. 2861/15, that the applicant Watchtower New York was not duly notified of the supervisory review hearing and deprived of the opportunity to present its position to the Supreme Court;.

    (ii) in case no. 16578/15, that the appeal court refused to consider their appeals against the decision issued in the ex parte proceedings.

    As regards the applicants in case no. 24622/16 who were sentenced for organising, or participating in, the "extremist religious organisation", was there a violation of Article 9 or Article 11 of the Convention, taken on their own or in conjunction with Article 14?.

    28108/14, 2861/15 and 16578/15, was there a violation of Article 10 of the Convention, read in the light of Article 9, taken on its own or in conjunction with Article 14, on account of the decisions pronouncing the religious literature of Jehovah's Witnesses to be extremist material, confiscating it and banning it from circulation in Russia, as well as declaring extremist the Jehovah's Witnesses' website and blocking access to it? In particular, did any of the publications or materials contain calls to violence or hate speech based on religious intolerance (see Gündüz v. Turkey, no. 35071/97, ECHR 2003-XI)? Did the domestic courts clearly identify the offending passages and attribute legal characterisation to them?.

    Was the Watchtower New York (the applicant in case no. 2861/15) afforded an opportunity to participate effectively in the supervisory proceedings before the Supreme Court of Russia? In particular, had it been notified properly and in a timely fashion about the date and place of the supervisory hearing as required by Article 6 of the Convention and did the Supreme Court verify the receipt of notification (see Gankin and Others v. Russia, nos. 2430/06 and 3 others, §§ 33-44, 31 May 2016)?.

    As regards case no. 16578/15, did the judgment of the Leninskiy District Court dated 23 October 2013 determine the applicants' civil rights and obligations? On the assumption that it did, was there a violation of the applicants' right of access to a court as guaranteed by Article 6 § 1 of the Convention on account of the domestic courts' refusal to examine their appeals (see the Constitutional Court's judgment no. 10-P of 21 April 2010, cited in paragraph 55 in the Statement of Facts)?.

    As regards the applicants in case no. 28108/14, was there a violation of Article 14, taken in conjunction with Articles 6, 9 and 10 of the Convention, on account of the fact that one of the two main grounds on which the court rested the decision was the witness statement by a Russian Orthodox priest (compare Paraskeva Todorova v. Bulgaria, no. 37193/07, §§ 35-46, 25 March 2010, and E.B. v. France [GC], no. 43546/02, § 80, 22 January 2008)?.

    24622/16.

    2861/15.

    28108/14.

    16578/15.

  • EGMR, 22.01.2026 - 11146/16

    GRITSEVICH AND KIMAYEV v. RUSSIA

    32401/10 and 19 others, §§ 158-59, 7 June 2022 (excessively broad definition of extremism).

    32401/10 and 19 others, §§ 158-59, 7 June 2022 (excessively broad definition of extremism).

    32401/10 and 19 others, §§ 158-59, 7 June 2022 (excessively broad definition of extremism).

    32401/10 and 19 others, §§ 158-59, 7 June 2022 (excessively broad definition of extremism).

    32401/10 and 19 others, §§ 158-59, 7 June 2022 (excessively broad definition of extremism).

    32401/10 and 19 others, §§ 158-59, 7 June 2022 (excessively broad definition of extremism).

    32401/10 and 19 others, §§ 158-59, 7 June 2022 (excessively broad definition of extremism).

    32401/10 and 19 others, §§ 158-59, 7 June 2022 (excessively broad definition of extremism).

    32401/10 and 19 others, §§ 158-59, 7 June 2022 (excessively broad definition of extremism).

  • EGMR - 25302/19 (anhängig)

    COGITA PUBLISHING HOUSE v. RUSSIA and 19 other applications

    32401/10 and 19 others, §§ 158-59, 7 June 2022 (excessively broad definition of extremism).

    32401/10 and 19 others, §§ 158-59, 7 June 2022 (excessively broad definition of extremism).

    32401/10 and 19 others, §§ 158-59, 7 June 2022 (excessively broad definition of extremism).

    32401/10 and 19 others, §§ 158-59, 7 June 2022 (excessively broad definition of extremism).

    32401/10 and 19 others, §§ 158-59, 7 June 2022 (excessively broad definition of extremism).

    32401/10 and 19 others, §§ 158-59, 7 June 2022 (excessively broad definition of extremism).

    32401/10 and 19 others, §§ 158-59, 7 June 2022 (excessively broad definition of extremism).

    32401/10 and 19 others, §§ 158-59, 7 June 2022 (excessively broad definition of extremism).

    32401/10 and 19 others, §§ 158-59, 7 June 2022 (excessively broad definition of extremism).

  • EGMR, 06.02.2025 - 16041/19

    LOBACHEVA v. RUSSIA and 6 other applications

    Rn. 8 In an earlier case concerning overly broad definition of "extremism" in Russian law (see Taganrog LRO and Others v. Russia, nos. 32401/10 and 19 others, §§ 152-59, 7 June 2022), the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.

    32401/10 and 19 others, §§ 158-59, 7 June 2022 (excessively broad definition of extremism).

    32401/10 and 19 others, §§ 158-59, 7 June 2022 (excessively broad definition of extremism).

    32401/10 and 19 others, §§ 158-59, 7 June 2022 (excessively broad definition of extremism).

    32401/10 and 19 others, §§ 158-59, 7 June 2022 (excessively broad definition of extremism).

    32401/10 and 19 others, §§ 158-59, 7 June 2022 (excessively broad definition of extremism), Olga Kudrina v. Russia, no. 34313/06, 6 April 2021 (excessive prison sentence for peaceful expressive conduct).

    32401/10 and 19 others, §§ 158-59, 7 June 2022 (excessively broad definition of extremism).

    32401/10 and 19 others, §§ 158-59, 7 June 2022 (excessively broad definition of extremism).

  • EGMR, 17.09.2024 - 15541/20

    Pindo Mulla ./. Spanien - Recht auf Selbstbestimmung: Zeugin Jehovas durfte keine …

    Rn. 2 Il s'agit de principes: a) que la Cour a exposés en détail en 2010 (Les témoins de Jéhovah de Moscou et autres c. Russie, no 302/02, §§ 135-136, 10 juin 2010) et plus récemment en 2022 (Taganrog LRO et autres c. Russie, nos 32401/10 et 19 autres, § 162, 7 juin 2022), b) qui ressortent clairement de la Convention sur les droits de l'homme et la biomédecine (la Convention d'Oviedo, plus précisément de ses articles 5 et 9 - paragraphes 71-72 de l'arrêt), c) qui ressortent également du Pacte international relatif aux droits économiques, sociaux et culturels (Observation générale no 14 sur le droit à la santé - paragraphe 79 de l'arrêt) et de la Convention relative aux droits des personnes handicapées (Observation générale no 1 sur l'article 12, relatif à la reconnaissance de la personnalité juridique dans des conditions d'égalité, § 42), d) qui sont reconnus (explicitement ou implicitement) par 24 (des 39) États parties à la Convention étudiés, y compris l'État défendeur (paragraphes 81-86 de l'arrêt), et, surtout, e) dont le respect a été recommandé par l'Assemblée parlementaire du Conseil de l'Europe, au paragraphe 1 de sa Résolution 1859 (2012), dans les termes suivants:.
  • EGMR, 06.02.2025 - 26410/10

    NOVAYA GAZETA AND NIKITINSKIY v. RUSSIA

    Rn. 12 Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law, and to the claims of just satisfaction lodged by the applicants (see, in particular, Taganrog LRO and Others v. Russia, nos. 32401/10 and 19 others, § 300, 7 June 2022), the Court considers it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table and dismisses the remainder of the applicants' claims for just satisfaction.

    32401/10 and 19 others, §§ 158-59, 7 June 2022 (excessively broad definition of extremism).

    32401/10 and 19 others, §§ 158-59, 7 June 2022 (excessively broad definition of extremism), RID Novaya Gazeta and ZAO Novaya Gazeta v. Russia, no. 44561/11, §§ 111-12, 11 May 2021 (failure by the domestic authorities to apply standards in conformity with principles embodied in Article 10, or to base their decisions on an acceptable assessment of the relevant facts).

    32401/10 and 19 others, §§ 158-59, 7 June 2022 (excessively broad definition of extremism), RID Novaya Gazeta and ZAO Novaya Gazeta v. Russia, no. 44561/11, §§ 111-12, 11 May 2021 (failure by the domestic authorities to apply standards in conformity with principles embodied in Article 10, or to base their decisions on an acceptable assessment of the relevant facts).

    32401/10 and 19 others, §§ 158-59, 7 June 2022 (excessively broad definition of extremism), RID Novaya Gazeta and ZAO Novaya Gazeta v. Russia, no. 44561/11, §§ 111-12, 11 May 2021 (failure by the domestic authorities to apply standards in conformity with principles embodied in Article 10, or to base their decisions on an acceptable assessment of the relevant facts).

  • EGMR, 06.03.2025 - 39776/15

    KOLYASNIKOV v. RUSSIA

    32401/10 and 19 others, §§ 199-207 and 252, 7 June 2022 (failure to ensure the participation of followers in the proceedings leading to the banning of their religious organisation and consider the impact of the ban on their rights).

    32401/10 and 19 others, §§ 199-207, 7 June 2022.

    32401/10 and 19 others, §§ 199-207, 7 June 2022.

    32401/10 and 19 others, §§ 157-59, 7 June 2022.

  • EGMR, 25.06.2024 - 20958/14

    EGMR zur Lage auf der Krim: Russland begeht schwere Menschenrechtsverletzungen

    Rn. 1070 In these circumstances, on the available evidence, the reliability of which it accepts, the Court finds that during the period under consideration there were sufficiently numerous and interconnected incidents amounting to an "administrative practice" of interference with Article 9 rights under the Convention, such as the denial of access of priests to places of worship (see, mutatis mutandis, Cyprus v. Turkey (merits), cited above, §§ 243-246); questioning by police, searches of homes and seizures of books, recordings and other items (see Boychev and Others v. Bulgaria, no. 77185/01, § 46, 27 January 2011, and Dimitrova v. Bulgaria, no. 15452/07, § 28, 10 February 2015); the non-extension or cancellation of residence permits for foreign ministers (see Perry v. Latvia, no. 30273/03, § 53, 8 November 2007; Nolan and K. v. Russia, no. 2512/04, § 62, 12 February 2009; and Lotter v. Bulgaria (dec.), no. 39015/97, 6 February 2003); and the confiscation of religious publications (see Taganrog LRO and Others v. Russia, nos. 32401/10 and 19 others, §§ 197-98, 7 June 2022; and Moroz v. Ukraine, no. 5187/07, § 104, 2 March 2017).
  • EGMR, 22.01.2026 - 3198/20

    KUDRYAVTSEV v. RUSSIA and 13 other applications

    32401/10 and 19 others, §§ 158-59, 7 June 2022 (excessively broad definition of extremism).

    32401/10 and 19 others, §§ 158-59, 7 June 2022 (excessively broad definition of extremism).

    32401/10 and 19 others, §§ 158-59, 7 June 2022 (excessively broad definition of extremism).

  • EGMR, 18.09.2025 - 1488/16

    SOKOLOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA and 7 other applications

  • EGMR - 4513/18 (anhängig)

    TUGUZHEKOV v. RUSSIA and 8 other applications

  • EGMR, 12.06.2025 - 22646/07

    DMITRIYEVSKIY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 15.05.2025 - 13002/10

    MAGLEVANNAYA v. RUSSIA and 1 other application

  • EGMR, 26.03.2026 - 32118/21

    KUTSENKO v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 11.06.2026 - 49687/16

    CONGREGAZIONE CRISTIANA DEI TESTIMONI DI GEOVA c. ITALIE

  • EGMR, 22.06.2023 - 10794/12

    GERMANO v. ITALY

  • EGMR, 16.07.2026 - 45588/16

    RELIGIOUS CULT "BISERICA UNIFICARII" AND AKHUNZYANOV v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA

  • EGMR, 05.09.2024 - 30342/19

    LEVCHENKO v. RUSSIA and 10 other applications

  • EGMR, 04.06.2024 - 618/18

    SOKOLOVSKIY v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 26.02.2026 - 14662/21

    SMIRNOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 27.06.2024 - 24098/21

    VOSKRESENSKIY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 26.02.2026 - 2171/18

    KOCHKIN v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 06.02.2024 - 43082/14

    HAMZAYAN v. ARMENIA

  • EGMR, 26.03.2026 - 29779/18

    SUVOROV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 26.03.2026 - 36930/21

    CHAYKOVSKIY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 26.02.2026 - 23571/22

    SHCHERBAKOV AND ZHMUTSKAYA v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 16.10.2025 - 20519/18

    MARKIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 08.07.2025 - 81028/17

    RAFIYEV v. AZERBAIJAN

  • EGMR, 15.05.2025 - 40768/18

    KLIMOV v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 06.02.2025 - 4128/18

    MATVEYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 10.07.2025 - 5804/15

    STOMAKHIN v. RUSSIA and 5 other applications

  • EGMR, 06.03.2025 - 10618/19

    LOGINOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 06.03.2025 - 17908/20

    SHALINA v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 11.06.2026 - 15224/19
  • EGMR, 26.02.2026 - 21290/18

    ALIYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 10.07.2025 - 9096/13

    ZLOBIN v. RUSSIA and 9 other applications

  • EGMR, 10.07.2025 - 29296/18

    KIROV LRO AND DMITRIYEVYKH v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 18.07.2024 - 32532/18

    POLYAKOVY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 26.03.2026 - 53075/18

    JEHOVAS ZEUGEN IN DEUTSCHLAND AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR, 06.03.2025 - 39476/21

    LUBIN AND ISAKOV v. RUSSIA

  • EGMR - 55654/21 (anhängig)

    CZERSKI v. POLAND

Haben Sie eine Ergänzung? Oder haben Sie einen Fehler gefunden? Schreiben Sie uns.
dejure.org Übersicht EGMR
dejure.org nutzen ohne Ablenkung
Werbung abschalten. Jetzt buchen! Keine automatische Verlängerung.
Info zum PUR-Angebot
Sie können auswählen (Maus oder Pfeiltasten):
(Liste aufgrund Ihrer bisherigen Eingabe)
Komplette Übersicht